Відео

I never knew that this has a specific term. I thought that it was just because of the consequence of A type personalities always trying to grade and compare their own self-worth with others. I think it could be structural. The idea of academics is to pursue interesting topics in a field of study. However, systems like grading and curves artificially "grade" people in an artificial hierarchy, even when artificial hierarchies isn't needed for functioning modern society. When can the academic environment be structured around cooperation instead of competition? If academics could join forces and cooperate instead of tiptoe around avoiding plagiarism and competing with their peers, I'm betting more academics will have much more satisfaction out of their efforts and contribution to society.

This is extremely helpful. I learnt lots of new tips. Thanks Dr. Silvestri

Let me know if an elevator pitch was useful for your career!

At the end of the day, your application will be evaluated compared to the other applicants. For example, I have a master's GPA of 3.87 in a related major, an IELTS of 7, two publications, and worked on the structure of my SOP and CV for several months, but in the end, I got rejected from several universities such as UK.

Thanks a lot ❤

Let me know if this method was useful and how you use Generative AI for scientific Writing!

Thanks a lot sir.

Nice! I was fortunate enough to win the Career in my first attempt. It did very positively change the trajectory of my career. These are all great tips that I agree on, especially: Don't neglect the the educational plan or assign it five lines as a afterthought. Do read funded proposals, if possible with their panel reviews. Finally, some people feel that a career proposal win is both necessary and sufficient for tenure. Neither is the case. Many successful profs did not win it, but went on to have amazing careers. Don't stress too much ;-)

Let me know your experience with your CAREER proposal!

Let me know where you applied and if these suggestions have been useful!

Let me know how you approach a paper rejection!

Let me know your experience with Impostor Syndrome!

much needed and much underrated video for prospective students. I wonder why this video has no comments yet. except 'having a good mentorship' most of the part we all know commonly. but irony is that we human tend to forget those and tend pull down ourselves whenever such 'imposter syndrome' attacks..Thank you for sharing your valueable and experienced thoughts with us.

'you should not see this as end of the world' this is the true gist of this video.

Shortly, no.

Hi there, I visited your UA-cam channel and I saw that SEO is not done in your videos because of which your UA-cam channel is not growing. The way to solve this problem is UA-cam SEO. Doing SEO on UA-cam will increase your video views, likes and shares very quickly. Your channel will grow very fast and your channel will rank in UA-cam search results. Do you want to discuss this with me?

Thank you so much for your detailed explanations. I have a question regarding peer review. Recently, one of my papers got accepted, but! one of the referees left comments on using some specific words by saying these types of words should not be used but me and my team don't feel like making changes. So, what is your opinion regarding this? Should, we follow the referee or stand by my decision?

Many thanks, your channel had been very helpful for doing research writing I am just wondering what do you mean by venue?

Sir, Your videos are very helpful for research. Could you make a video on how to write a project and its pre requisites?

Thanks for this video. I am going to take ur advice into consideration

The second point which reduce the text will help yourself not to read the content which is the problem of first point

Thank you for taking your time to educate us.

Thank you very much. You channel is very informative. I'm going to recommend it to my friends

Thank you so much. I believe it will be helpful for many people

Besides IEEE, Google Scholar, and ACM, how can I insert or use references that come from online sites, like TechTarget, IBM, Salesforce, Code42, CISA, etc.....?

Thanks

Awesome video. Very useful advice.

"promo sm" 😣

Simone: Excellent presentation. I have two comments: 1) Yet one more possible research-oriented career path (in addition to postdoc and researcher in academia) is researcher in a research lab (e.g., national lab or research lab of a company such as IBM, etc.). In that case, perhaps the teaching aspect is less important; teaching will not be part of the job on a daily basis. 2) Regarding the teaching-oriented career path: In this case, increasingly, scholarly work on science/engineering education is important. So, in addition to the usual research papers, a PhD student may want to look into research on education approaches.

Many thanks for the insightful videos, i found your channel engaging and fastinating. I love the contents you upload.

Very nice. Ten years ago, I interviewed many of the top authors in data mining, and asked "why do you reject papers". I placed the top ten at the end of this tutorial, starting with slide 162. www.cs.ucr.edu/~eamonn/public/SDM_How_to_do_Research_Keogh.pdf

There is a lot of truth about this video

Thanks

Really enjoy this video

thank you, your videos help me a lot☺

Any genera tips for writing? How does one ensure good flow, sentence structure, and so on?

You are making very useful videos, many thanks!

Thanks! I shared this video with my students.

GREAT!👌

Simone, you won't believe me, but I'm still using your template you gave me many years ago! 😅

You are using it in a wrong way, and expected a right outcome!

well described, i agree based on my experience

IMHO best usage for cases like this, is to ask for suggestions / criticisms / proofreading, then filter it through your own brain. The thing isn’t reliable enough to replace your brain. The text is absolutely distinguishable, because it’s riddled with errors and filler words and clichés

Thank you for the video. I hope it is an eye opener for many of us. I also used it to obtain some references / citations for a topic that I was not very familiar with and I just wanted to read some relevant papers. In fact none of the 5 citation that ChatGPT gave me actually existed.

Please let me know your opinion and experience in using AI assisted technology to write scientific papers. Thank you for watching!

Very interesting, thanks for sharing it! Just to double check then, writing a paragraph or a section, for example, and asking the chatgpt to rewrite it on more academic standards will not cause any issues as far as I mention that we used chatgpt for this at the end right? I am pretty sure this is fine since it is only improving language instead of writing any "new" actual information.

Perhaps the onus of preserving blindness for their part is on reviewers: I cannot believe that reviewers cannot find a published paper that shares 70% of the content with the paper they are reviewing. This also leads to the question on how/whether reviewers should check against double submissions or already published results (possibly by others) in a double blind process...

You spoke my thoughts. Was waiting for this. This is very useful. Thank you ❤

Thanks! If you provide to ChatGPT the Introduction of the paper and not just the title and the topic, the quality of the abstract provided by ChatGPT is much better.