Відео

My y12's loved this!thanks!

Very interested I have enjoyed listening to this

Great video!!

Pre-1941 relationships USA- Roosevelt. Saw C as a stinker, isolationist so didn't want to join war until attack of Pearl Harbour. USSR- stalin- communism disliked it. R did the Nazi soviet pact Moscow 1942- c visits stalin, not productive. Mediterranean strategy discussed and C doesn't want to open 2nd front. S thinks it wld end the war faster. 1943 Casablanca- R agrees on some of M strategy invasion on Cicily and Italy shld go ahead. They also met in Quebec- R wanted a French invasion and Churchill wanted to start a balkhan war. Tehran- R disillusioned w C's decisions.

Abdication crisis- Admirer of Nazi Germany applauded them for their economic recovery after WW1. But no concrete evidence. Churchie shouted him down in parliament. He was friends w the King for 25 years. Isolated him from the party. Independent and unofficial- had to use every lawful means possible 2 keep him on throne.

Notes Round table talks- talks abt independence Gov of India Act. Also talks abt more independence. Boundaries created in India. 35 Mill ppl added to the electorate who cld get involved in laws. Some progression. Churchie- believed in Anglo-Saxon superiority, suggested that India couldn't govern herself. Saw India as key for the B Empire. Also scared for Indian Muslims who were a minority and could be persecuted.

cheers stephen

great outlook on postmodernism

Legend

Just like to say a quick nice one for your OCR History videos. Got an A* in my Britain paper, your videos on Churchill were immensely useful. Hope you’re doing well.

Cheers pal

Still using these videos a year later Mate obviously done something right

Are the further videos still coming up? I found this very helpful for my y12 finals ! Thank you for your effort❤

Thank you so much for this series, has helped me understand everything!

Great video

Three things that I think about when it comes to the UK elections of 1945: 1. If 1945 had a Presidential-style Election, for the Prime Minister's job, I think Churchill would have beaten Attlee, due to their personal popularity. But personal popularity does not mean, which one would be the better PM for the next 5 year cycle.. 2. The last time a Parliamentary Election occurred was in 1935, where the Conservatives won the majority. The public wanted change and the Conservatives were the status quo. It didn't help, that the biggest thing the party used Churchill as the main reason to elect Conservatives. The personal approval/disapproval of a leader should not be the main reason to support a legislator of the leader's party, rather the ability of the legislator to do the job, reguardless of the person who holds the office of Prime Minister. 3. The Labor Party Leadership already gave a "preview" of what they can do, if they were in power, through their participation in the coalition government. For example, Attlee served as Deputy PM in the coalition government. His main concern was handling domestic policy, while Churchill handled matters of National Security. Attlee also served as Acting PM when Churchill was away from the UK. The Labor Party had a clear agenda of what they wanted to do, if they gain the majority.

These lessons are amazing, using them for a 3rd year university paper. Thank you!

Please carry on with the rest of the course please 🙏

To me , as conservative , Churchill was the best , like UK conservatorism and monarchy too .

To me who love UK as italian I like Churchill and actual conservatorism of UK is very very different from fascism , very different to me .

Thank you so much for this, I am studying to resit my papers after a traumatic experience that affected my summer exams. I have to wait until next year to sit them and not having a teacher has been so stressful. Videos like this with questions and exercises at the end help me stay on track. Thank you.

Luvoo

Wait it’s not the 20 marker thought it was ?

Great channel some more uploads would be great

thank you so much for the informative, yet concise video!

Weird how the provisional government is so often presented in terms like Shirer used when presenting the Weimar Republic, as though it was a noble, noteworthy thing whose failure needs explanation. (Incidentally, a look at Bertrand Russell will strike a discordant note in the "Western View" perspective.

Class video cheers for the help!

Great video, all straight to the point with your facts and without the annoying flashy graphics that every UA-camr feels they need to add in to get views 🤣 wish more were like this

Bit of a random question. But would you guys say a percentage for a B grade would be for AQA sociology? :)

have some good stuff here, but man the volume on this video is so low

Up to 1960 most of the work available was in Factories or buildings...the work that men did was heavy manual work..typing jobs were middle-class jobs for women...most men in the 1901 or 1911 census are down as labourers...pulling, pushing and lifting...that is in Ireland..unless a man set up a shop of some kind..So physical strength was also required for farming..which is not the case today...most jobs can be done by either sex..The problem with sociology is that it takes the 21st century on a 20th or 19th century world..pre the Pill and modern machinery and technology

thank you for providing these you deserve much more views

The irony is that although he had nothing to do with it, Chamberlain was fired because of the fiasco at Narvik... it was Churchill's operation! There were powerful forces at work behind the scenes at that moment, powerful enough to have their man named PM without any consultation. They also had the US ambassador replaced, he was also against a war so FDR recalled him, his name? Joe Kennedy. Germany had kicked international finance out of Europe, they didn't like that. Fortunately Churchill was broke, very broke and they had money, a lot of money, a perfect master/slave relationship.

you explained this better than my 2 hour lecture thanks so much

This has helped clear my thoughts for my assignment. Thank you so much.

THANK YOU!!!!!! THIS IS FANTASTIC

Thank you for this information. It has helped me in my university assignment.

Thank you so much for this lecture. It has really cleared my mind and prepared me for my university assignment.

ua-cam.com/video/4wBVprLojEQ/v-deo.html ua-cam.com/video/17m8OnHC7dQ/v-deo.html

Another fantastic video by Craig (The Sociology Guy) on Global Crime here: @NxiM

Great video. There are lots more revision videos for A-Level Sociology on the Crime and Deviance topic on this UA-cam playlist: ua-cam.com/video/vEESezcc86Y/v-deo.html

Bcp online class?

6:30 for postmodernists slide

Love it Stephen

The statistics and trends on slides starting at around 7.55 are a few years old. You may want to research more up to date figures.

You are a diamond! <3 :)

Gerrin Stephen lad, quality content

Youve got yourself a new subscriber Stephen! Genuinely great to hear your class :)

If the liberationist view apply’s to society today , why isn’t the numbers of both gender commitment of crime the same ? #sociology4ever #sociologyrules

Why would men attempt to try and demonstrate there masculinity through violence. And what sort of crimes would they commit to support this theory.