Відео

Glad I could help!

No problem!

Glad to hear it!

Hmmm. I thought I identified the Soldier as Australian.

@@rueschhoffteachesur right. The graphic on the screen says “Australian” but as the picture is shown you’re saying “working with the US…” that’s why I was confused. N

Ummm. According to records and dna evidence, they come fromSpain and Portugal. The Portuguese had brought them to the Canary Islands-which for transparency is off the coast of Africa but not Africa continent-and it is believed that Columbus picked up a few to bring to the Americas in 1493.

@@rueschhoffteaches Do a deep dive. You will see the Iberian cattle largely originate from African breeds

Yap yu are correct it also helped me

Interesting. I am planning to eventually get around to updating these videos and I will certainly look to correct as necessary. Thanks for watching and for the comments.

@@rueschhoffteaches Hello Sir, I also have done my research i may repeat myself several times but I will try my best. Do not worry because the video is for the most part correct, you are a person that speaks with respect and knowledge. My point is that, in india, there have been migrations from all over parts of the country, from the west, from central asia, from de east and from the south. This kinds of migrations happen in every country, it is basically new material getting adeed into the already diverse genetic pool of india. For example it is obvious that there are migrations within neighboring countries/regions and india is no exception to that. I am not trying to negate the fact that there were migrations in india, i am saying that the cultures that migrations brought were assimilated in the already existing one that started when the region was first population, also that assimilation did ofcourse influence the inhabitants of the region but not to a greater scale. In other words: the region of india was populated 65.000 ago by the people(those also settled on regions befor reaching india) that left the african continent, once they settled, other populations that did not "stop" in india reached other regions of the world like south east asia, central asia, middle east, europe, those people also returned to india because the migration moviments have happened as a natural thing in our planet, also populations from india left an intermingled with other populations. So the two populations original to india ASI and ANI were not only native to india but also recived external genetic material, the first ones were the ASI and went they went south of india some of the population stayed in the north, and during the years both cores of population recived different genetics inpouts that made them distinct to each other but ASI and ANI also intermingled with each other thats is why the population is so diverse but is more or less the same. The problem lies in separating culture and genetics. The vedas and Sanskrit were created by the inhabitants of the subcontinent regarding the genetics and cultures of the grups that migrated. Meaning that the languages and cultures and genetics that came with the migrations, did influence but did not brought or created any vedas or sanskrit or hinduism, they integrated into the already existing society were all the traditions of india were already beeing practiced. The problem lies with white supremacist saying that white people brought that and conservatives indian people claiming that there were no migrations. Both are wrong, because in india, the culture already existed and the migrations happened always. If I may say so, the genetic population of india is composed by the first settlers(that already created a culture similar to the current one, but we need to decipher languages and discover more archeological sites), the iranians, the steppes peoples from central asia the south est asian sailors and the people from east asia, but at the same time this migrations happen, people from india left the region and went to the oposits directions of this groups that came to india, meaning that they all intermixed with each other but in every region a certain ancestral grup is the founder of that population in a given territoriy. That does not mean that they imposed their culture on india or their language, only that contribuited to the genetic pool and cultural aspect but they became indians as far as genetics and culture goes beacuse there were already an existing ones. So all the ethnicities of india have same ancestors, the ones that first inhabitates the region, the diferent ethnic groups of india are not people that did not mix with the already population but a mix of migrants related to the first settlers. Our ancestors created sanskrit and vedas(migrations and first settlers) and not anyone from outside that did not mix. For example: we all came from africa but that does not make us africans and that does not make africans the inventors of everything, our ancestors were(from african descend) but the populations that we belong now are made by our respective regional first settlers and the diferents migration waves, and from that we have the cultures of our respective countries. The only time that this can be broken is with an invasion and further colonization, were culture, genetics and languages are exterminated or hindered by outsiders that do not mix completely and have nothing to do with the existant culture or genetics of the place that is beeing destroyed. For example there was no aryan invasion so the vedas were not brought from outside to india, they were created in the subcontinent by the population at that given time or prior to that migration. Aryan in sanskrit means something along the lines of pure so anyone anyone worth of it can be aryan, it should not be used to define an ethnicity or a language group because it leads to misunderstandings. Sir, I encourage you to do another video adding more information. There is a lot of people in india that still believes in that theory because they have a complex of inferiority because of the mughal and british colonisation and also people that becomes corrupt politicians and lie to people. Thanks for everything!

Thanks!

Thanks for the very kind words

I'm so glad to hear this. Keep working. You got this!

No. The Sahara is the largest “hot” desert

You're very welcome!

I believe I note on a graphic Jainism although I do not cover the religion. This is largely as these lessons are designed to support our state’s standards which do not require it. Additionally, one of the drawbacks of making these types of videos is not being able to cover everything in 15 or so minutes.