Відео

If the company has 2 directors,do I capture both of them on cipc?

Good Sir

Schamberger Port

Founder of Bidsstack here, thank you for what you do, you find a way to make that which is rather dry, interesting. I'm slowly working my way through the act, focusing heavily on Chapter 5.

Wow I'm glad I found this channel have learnt so much on procurement in our country from these conversations thank you all for your input in assisting all business with information I so wish more youth would engage 😔

Thank you Arno. This was very helpful.

I wold like to know if I was awarded a tended receiving the award letter April 2023 and he MoU in December 2023 attend numerous meeting and requesting how many candidates will be on the program and I was kept been told its demand driven. We had a dry run in February in 2024 and a huge presentation in the from of the students the DDG and DG etc. During the presentation the students told us the training was done internally in 2022 when we were supposed to do the training. After been told its to start about 288 students as a SMME coming out of COVID we needed bridging finance which we we trying to get with various institutions.They indicated our Company registration number was incorrect with a number swapped and that we needed a PO number upon raising this we received a letter of the our tender was in the process of cancellation and this without and consultation/mediation. Please can you advise on my rights.

This was a very informative session. Thanks MmeNkwe

There is another case, this time between Fidelity and ACSA.

😑 Promo SM

Hi. Thank you so much for the information. Where are the values for Pt and Pmin from?

Anyone with the court case regarding the contingencies?

Good day, I do not see a mention of "schedule of rates" as the pricing strategy in the presentation. Does this mean JBCC 6.2 is not suitable for this pricing stratergy

thank you very much!!! I almost got scammed, they had ordered almost 50 items for 10k each, very promising, with sbd forms with letterheads but after watching the video I realized that it was a scam as they had provided a specific code and had meticulously specified what they wanted which was only available at one supplier in SA who was also very professional and provided a prompt quotation with free delivery too. Its sad that businesses are scammed everyday, Its really said and one doesnt know where this ends

Continue to rest in perfect peace Uncle V❤

Thank you for honouring my father so fondly! It means a lot to me!

must not have been a republican to get in the way.

'Promo SM'

The information leak issue is a very compromising factor for SMME

I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW IF THE RFQ IS SENT THROUGH EMAIL. DONT THEY REFLECT AT CSD (MY RFQ INVITATION)

Thank you I been looking for someone to help me differentiate between the real RFQ and the fake one

Promo sm

Current legislation PFMA 16A.4 states: Establishment of supply chain management unit: “The accounting officer or accounting authority must establish a separate supply chain management unit within the office of that institution’s chief financial officer, to implement the institution’s supply chain management system”. This may change under the new Public Procurement Bill.

wow, Adv Ntsaluba nailed it, the alignment of organisational strategy to this process that SCM is undertaking. So listening to colleagues now, it is clear that SCM is making decisions around what is the transformation agenda of organisations without the core functions of the organisations taking part. it is going to be interesting. lets hope that whatever is developed will infact be in line with the APP's and the pronouncements that the political principals make out in the public.

Section 217 (2) and (3) of the Constitution states: “2. Subsection (1) does not prevent the organs of state or institutions referred to in that subsection from implementing a procurement policy providing for: a. categories of preference in the allocation of contracts; and b. the protection or advancement of persons, or categories of persons, disadvantaged by unfair discrimination. 3. National legislation must prescribe a framework within which the policy referred to in subsection (2) must be implemented.” In terms of section 9(2) of the Constitution, it is stated that “Legislative and other measures designed to protect or advance persons, or categories of persons, disadvantaged by unfair discrimination may be taken”, but it does not advise as to whether one category of persons will receive a more preferential status than the other when such legislation is enacted. The Constitution in Section (9) provides an all-inclusive list of categories of persons and that the Act only chose to include three of those categories and that each one carries an equal status. (“race”, “gender” and “disability”) Section 2(1) (d) of the Procurement Act clearly state that 'specific goals'' include two things. The first is the promotion of previously disadvantaged persons (which is B-BBEE), and the second is implementing RDP programmes. The reference to protection or advancement of persons, or categories of persons disadvantaged by unfair discrimination refers to B-BBEEE and the primary purpose of the BBBEE Act and the Codes is to address the legacy of apartheid and promote the economic participation of Black People in the South African economy. Section 10(1) (b) of the BBBEE Act, stated in peremptory terms, obliges every organ of the state to apply any relevant BBBEE code in the development and implementation of its preferential procurement policy. Section 2(1)(d) does not make a distinction as to whether one category of persons should be afforded a higher consideration or preference status within the allocation of points for “Specific Goals”. With the organs of state now charged with the responsibility to implement their own procurement policies, the biggest challenge will be the correct interpretation and application of preference points for each “Specific Goal” as listed in section 2(1)(d) of the Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act of 2000. Giving more points for an HDI, based on the person’s race and award fewer points for a person being a woman or disabled constitute discrimination. The presiding then begs the following question, is the discrimination fair or unfair? The answer to the above will determine if the policy is in line with S9(3) of the Constitution which states that “S9(3) The state may not unfairly discriminate directly or indirectly against anyone on one or more grounds, including race, gender, sex, pregnancy, marital status, ethnic or social origin, colour, sexual orientation, age, disability, religion, conscience, belief, culture, language and birth.” By: Vuyo Ninzi Date: 20 November 2022 NB* these are my personal views on the current raging debate in the country and should not be attributed to any organisation. The attempt is to enrich debate and also to try and assist in finding a solution to this uncertainty going to 16 January 2023.

That will assist

These collaboration sessions are informative.Thank you.

Thank you Shaun for the recording, I was writing an exam at 10am and couldn't join in on this session.

1) The background to the Regulations are of interest described by Richard Raphiri (CIDB) from 23:50 a. Shaun asked on the issue concerning “set-asides” - Richard's response was interesting (from 30:00). 2) Sanale Khomo’s points (KZN Provincial Treasury) from 44:30 are of interest, particularly the simple approach to the points system (and 47:00) 3) The supplier’s perspective (48:10) who was on the bad end of a sub-contracting arrangement demonstrates one of multiple iunitended consequences of the regulation. 4) Advocate Ntsaluba’s perspectives (1:00:00) take a strategic view. She raises important points

Good morning, I am very much interested in the other contracts and this has broadened my understanding of contracts. please do share the other form of contracts as well. I have Subscribed and clicked to be notified if you ever upload anything new. I am a Pr. Technician (Civil) with ECSA

This is very informative. You are really appreciated. Thank you.

Great session. I like how Walter set the scene and context of a tender validity period in the procurement process. It is not just a thumb-shucked number of days but linked to planning the whole tender process (pretender process). If procurement professionals took planning seriously as it should and use historic intelligece, we could minimise challenges, such as in this case.

Good Day, I would like to ask if it is necessary to furnish the names of directors on table 2.1.1 even if the answer to 2.1 is NO? Your response will be highly appreciated.

On 30 May 2022, The Constitution Court confirmed that the suspension period initiated by the Supreme Court of Appeal continued from 16 February 2022. The 2017 Preferential Procurement Regulations therefore are valid and must be complied with until 25 January 2023.

How to join in the telegram group?

Thank you panel members. This was informative. Kind regards Yvonne

I'm glad you've created this account sir. This is appreciated.

How can I get connected with this group and in particular Shaun.

Without functionality even big business doesn't have leverage,

Prof, is it not now "necessary or expedient" for the minister to draft and issue preliminary regulations to cure the position from the time of the judgment till the lapsing of the invalidity period prescribed by the judgment?

Thanks Shaun. You always save me from needing to investigate these matters myself.

Based on a number of points of view, it seems that the suspension period instituted by the SCA kicked in last week when the CC handed down its judgement. Informally I have heard that the minister is considering asking the CC for clarity on this. It may be that the status quo therefore remains.

Thanks for the video. Great to catch up Thanks to you all and hello to colleagues :)

I will monitor how long people spend on the video. Let me know if you believe a 10 or 15 minute summary will still do justice the Commissions recommendations ?

At the start I refer to a "summary". My apologies, it is an extract of the Public Procurement Chapter from Part 1 of the Inquiry into State Capture.