Відео

1HP unit, 1 attack, 1/1 armor, 1.0 speed, trained in 1 seconds and cost 1 gold.

The Demo Cart gets added along with the Taliban Civilization.

Not as much of a meme as the content of this awesome video, but it could be if properly implemented. Imagine if the Byzantine knight line was also given trample damage from their imperial age civilization tech. Considering that they have one of the worst knight lines, missing out on bloodlines as well as the last attack upgrade, this could be a game changer. Giving them the same trample damage as the cataphract would probably be a bit too much, but I could see 1/4 damage to adjacent units as a solid buff without pushing into overkill range. This would also encourage players to get both blacksmith attack upgrades and knight line upgrades, as well as logistica, keeping in line with the expensive upgrade costs that are required to utilize logistica in the first place. Either way, I thought it was an interesting idea twenty+ years ago when I was a kid playing the conquerors expansion and trying to figure out how the trample damage worked on what was once one of my favorite units and civilizations. I hope whoever reads this gets as much entertainment out of this thought as I did.

That wololo caught me off guard 😂😂😂

A trebuchet that uses enemy villagers as projectiles and they die upon their fall. Of course it deals a little damage, but what matters the most is the damage to the enemy's moral

Wololo

Hmm, looks like my previous comment was deleted (guessing it was for including a link to the Steam workshop). Anyways, I was stating that I had actually created a collision free mod for villagers, trade carts, fishing ships, and trade cogs back in 2014 for AoE2HD. It was a bit janky in the first version but in the second version I added a very small collision radius that helped improve things. Also inspired by SC2 :)

Maybe eagles who can carry relics? Or does that step onto the warrior monk's turf to much?

this would be the best forest nothing civ

Please less unfunny memes blocking the entire screen

"micro" is a bad excuse for terrible game design

onagers are absolute garbage in pve

"You think you want that, but you don't." resounds in my head with a twist: "You think you want that, but you just want a Spanish ally."

The villager liking and subscribing joke was top tier Admiral. Great content, thanks. Always good to get more AoE in my UA-cam feed

Saw you got a shout out from der Viper, GL podcast when? 👀

Awesome video

It should be a thing for scorpions, or at least for the heavy scorpions. Rams could have this mechanic but targeting building armor.

This needs to be featured in T90's smallest maps ever series.

Came from Viper's video on your other upload and now subscribed. It's nice to have another investigating aspects of AOE II. Perhaps SOTL will give you a shoutout at some point as your viewership would almost 100% overlap.

What about the dismounted Konnik?

Decreasing collision size like that would break blocking vills with scouts and stacking would introduce problems when attacked by mangos. Maybe if the collision size decrease wouldn't be that significant? 🤔 The first problem could be ameliorated with two classes of collision sizes: one for villager-villager interactions (smaller hit box) and one for villager-other units interactions (the normal hit box).

Viper reacted to this on his channel. Efficient villagers would be sooooo nice. Great video

Thank you for video. So, i can train to speak correctly.

The closest sound european languages have to nahuatl's “tl“ is the welsh “ll“ which is afaik a bit softer, like a nahuatl “dl“ would be

The video I've always needed

1:20 dude this is lit! How'd you do that? Btw congratulations! You have earned a new subscriber

Arguably, a smaller farm would run out of food faster. How does it look if you have the same food (and wood cost) per area, just more farmers?

Is return of rome worth it now?

How odd, in the Iron Age they knew how to predict fire stones ;--))

Something I would love to see would be a version of the hussite wagon that would transform into a stationary "tower" but couldn't shoot in the mobile form (or at least had a lot less firepower). And in the stationary form it would be resistant to cavalry.

This could be quite a strong unique tech.

Who says 'prisin', just use gaol instead. :) We can always do better... it's good enough for me when someone tries even just here & there!

A disadvantage of the walkable camps is that the villagers would become more vulnerable to raids, since they would need more walls to close themselves.

As soon as I saw the title of the video I remembered a video from either Spirit of the Law or T-west, I don't remember which one, about villagers not keeping their bonuses after conversion and I predicted this would be the hidden ability.

There should be a bonus or tech that makes your mangonels deal less damage to your own units, kinda like siege tanks in Wings of Liberty campaign for SC 2

Til bardaga!!!

What if monks didn't have ballistics?

30 seconds into the video you see a wolf tech logo, anybody know what that does?

What another Age of empires Spirit of the Law type Channel! hell yea I'm in!

For the Algorithm!

How about mangonel line along with getting affected by ballistics, also dont do any friendly fire damage?

Catapults in the ROR dlc benefit from ballistics and tbh I absolutely hate it. They're extremely oppressive especially to infantry (and they have a huge blast radius) and it's the #1 thing that kinda ruined it for me

I think the reason they chose to not give ballistics in the original game is due to the fact that mangonel line unit attacks have a massive return for the resource invested already in potential. This potential will not always realize but will definitely increase drastically if they get ballistics.

game desperately needs petard civs and bonuses

But, what about ballistics trebuchet?

AoE I dramatic vibes

I'm also curious on how this would effect A.I players like in campaigns, where their units would always automatically try to dodge the shot as soon as it's fired, which makes using Onagers there quite different compared to multiplayer. If the Onager with Ballistics were to just shoot in the direction of where the enemy unit was headed before the shot was fired then it could potentially be even worse since they'd be even further away from the target area by going in the opposite area when the shot is fired. Of course they could also continue moving in the same direction to "dodge" the shot, making it actually hit them. So it would be kinda hit or miss (haha) in A.I situations. One solution to this would be for the Ballistics Onager to predict where the enemy unit would go after the shot is fired, so it would for example shoot behind the enemy unit since that's where they would go if the Onager fired its shot and didn't have Ballistics. I think that would remove a lot of the frustrations I have with them in campaigns at least

What if Supplies swap places with Gambesons in the tech tree and reworked to "reduce infantry population space to ½"?

remove the wood discount from koreans and give them this one!

What if the civ gets the Ballistic Onagers but not the Siege Onagers upgrade? I think it would be an interesting twist on late game siege.