Відео

❤

"show your work"

Thanks for the video, very nice - short but with all the detail necessary. I think your description should read "... with a trick, and a second trick"! Both methods required a level of divine inspiration that I wouldn't spot, possibly even when left in a room with the standard answer. 🙂

I use an even odd contradiction to prove this result. ua-cam.com/video/QkLc8oYFVdE/v-deo.html

No, 1+1=1!!! And I am RIGHT!!!

Uh, 1+1 =11

thanks

Now prove 1 x 1 = 2

Please do a proof that zero actually exists- I’m convinced we made it up so our math can make sense; but I don’t think it actually exists.

Trolling.

how did dx/d(theta) equal that then. i haven't heard of integrals so try to explain using high school knowledge please

Great video!

Where is the negative on 1/2 coming from

When you are proving 1+1=2 then how can you imagine that 1+0=1 or a+0=a ?

just wondering but for 1+1 to equal 2 isn't it also about perspective ?? for example if every decimal point leading up to 1 is infinite the how does 1+1 = 2 ?? Would you first need to distinguish what 1 is ??

I like your gaslighting.

🎉

Just a waste of time !!! Proving 1+1 =2 means we don't have common sense . We can't prove a single thing , without considering some assumptions . If you are proving 1+1= 2 assuming 1 is a natural number , then prove that 1 is natural number first . To proof of 1 is a natural number, prove that natural number exists . Yes you got it . This whole process is a bullshit or nothing . Just use your common sense and stop doing phd in proving 1+2 =3

Why do you feel the need to add music to a video tutorial? How can anyone concentrate on what you are saying when all you hear is background music.

1 + 1 is 2, *OR IS IT?*

You forgot to write QED at the end.

Thank u

When asking why 1+1=2, you might be taken as an idiot or a mastermind.

Math creator: Me have one rock, me have one rock, me have TWO rock The future:

Can i just ask why and how they came up with this ? Like can i just write random stuff and say yes indeed this is a pen not a horse

one question... how do you re-define S(0) into 2 and S(S(0)) into 1 if its already a pre-defined number from the mathematical law the video just stated? this was quite interesting tho

I had a deep thought about the assumption of 1+1=2 and this logic only applies if we don’t involve frame of reference(time). Ex: 🍎 + 🍎 = 🍎🍎, that is logical it makes sense, however, it tells us nothing about the state of the two apples. Let us think, I have 1 🍎today and 1 🍎 tomorrow, thus by tomorrow I should have 2 🍎🍎. However, I either ate or lost the 1st apple thus, tomorrow I only have 1 🍎 ONLY. In such case, without involving time in this logical assumption we cannot confirm 100% that 1+1=2 as from frame reference of tomorrow, I only hold 1 🍎? In conclusion, is Time=Logic in maths or does it break assumptions?

You pronounced his name wrong. "Eu" is not "Oi"

0 is a Natural Number, what?

F***YOU GREEN SCREEN KIDS

Thank you ❤

If there is an infinite number of decimal places between 1 and 2. That infinite number MUST at some point equal a whole number. 1+1=3.

What a lemma

its like if u accept 1+1+2, u join the game of math, if u don't, just don't join. one can always come up with their own rule like1*1+2 as long as it could explain things better

Reminds me first day of uni lol.

So... we define each part of the equation and then we realise: "Oh, the definition of what we defined is actually what we defined it to be... huh"

bro just get an apple and then take another apple,so you now have two of apples,see it`s easy

Clicked off because background music is distracting.

2+2=1, best plot twist ever

I thik thia prove has no value because we cant ordenate natural number if we dont know that s(a) = a +1

Interesting.

Oh boy, talk about wasting time with triviality. Just use sticks like my teacher did many years ago. Mathematics is based on conventions, so we define symbols to make life easier, and operators are just tools to simplify counting. Why prove that a tool does what a tool does? Just use the tool.

You lost me at #2 is false for 0. Sincr 0 exists in the set N, then for every number, there is a successor, this means that the number -1 does not have a successor, this means that #2 is false since there isnt a successor for every number in the set N.

It is based upon some definitions. In the proof how can be say that a+S(a)=S(a+b) If its just a definition of addition then why can't we just say 1+1=2 and move on.

it's 2 because i said so. you don't have to beat around the bush.

Se a pessoa não sabe que um mais um é igual a dois, então a pessoa não sabe nada.

1 means single , two ones means, there are doubles of singles , so agsin both singles added together makes a double, and double is symbolised as 2 😂

Sound recorder BB)

But if you define numbers in such a way that 2+2=1, then you have just changed names, not concepts. In this case, 2 will have all the properties of 1, and 1 all the properties of 2. You have just written a "squiggly 1" and a "straight 2". It's just bad calligraphy, not arbittrariness of concepts.

a+s(b) = s(a+b) property need to be proven. Until then don’t claim u proven 1+1=2 because it’s like delegating the prove to another claim I am not a mathematician, but I am not stupid to fell down to your trick