Відео

AI is like the printing press OR photosynthesis? Why 'or'? Why not 'AND'?

42:45 I take this as the great and eternal nerd utopia, to rise above the monkeys and to be able to exist within a purely informational space, with yourself as one LLM, in communication with other LLMs. So clean, so pristine, so safe, no 900-lb gorillas allowed. But alas, the entirety of bodily experience is lost within this autistic vision, as beautiful as it is in many respects.

20:24 Electric Weltgeist: Mirror, Mirror on the Wall - Black Nazis 24:50 the problem of human ethics, the loss of “Divine Will”, and the hackability of utilitarianism: the breakdown of utility maximization; effective altruism doesn’t lend itself to be implemented on computers (- will lead to unwanted outcomes if implemented rigorously).

damn he called llms autistic interns lmao

The sorcerer's apprentice ua-cam.com/video/B4M-54cEduo/v-deo.html

The 99% of AI researchers that “believe“ that AI will not destroy humankind, are also the researchers most likely to become billionaires as work on AI becomes monetized. AI program “lavender“ was used very heavily in Gaza by the IDF to choose “targets“ and to implement decisions on the number of civilian casualties allowed for each target. Please do look up lavender AI and Gaza. Very unfortunately, this is not make-believe.

A reason it's quite fallacious to compare a 2Gbyte "only" model with the brain is because the ANN alone is an inference model. Our mushy brains do the actual training too - a comparison should match the amounts of compute&data needed to produce the seemingly efficient inference engine. I'm pretty convinced the brain size is about massive searching to find useful solutions within very limited amount of sensory data in order to fit it with an optimized, efficient model of the world, NOT about memorizing the resulting model of the world. Try to pretrain an LLM with all information available before "Attention is all you need" paper, then feed its window context with the actual paper and ask it to produce the implementation code. If it is able to do that even remotely then indeed we can talk about AGI.

In the end it isn't really new that human beings are surrounded by entities which surpass them in intelligence. Most of us aren't the most intelligent person of the world, for example. None of us has ever known as much as could be stored already in a library of the 18th century. None of us has ever been able to systematically control the unconscious layers of his or her mind. Historic processes have always crossed our biographies without making allowances for our individual aims. The atomic processes have always worked around us without being understood. All of which is intelligence outside of us and strongly surpassing the feeble user interfaces of our conscious minds. One just has to realize this to see that man-made artificial intelligence basically does not introduce a new dimension.

Awesome Talk

5:20 Look how happy he is with his joke landing :) Edit: 7:28 Another smash, my man came prepared

38:10 would it be possible to run a person on a gaming PC? We just know. He seems to imply a well compressed embedment of the universe of human knowledge can fit in 2 GB?

29:00 LLMs and IFS-like multiple parts

2:30 instead of culture wars we should look at this as a mirror of who we are... (For the purpose of understanding ourselves better)

The more of his presentations I see, the more I feel like I'm listening to an LLM...

accelerate into the future

To be useful functional constraints must direct scaling layers in the same way such functions construct abstractions in compressive architectures. Where the functions are derivative of a complex multimodal system based in evolution imperative. Text has embedded in it much of the evolutionary directive, as well as causal relations.

👀ツ

37:26 two Gigabytes, I could outsource myself to my PC standing on the floor.

Jedes mal mindblowing der Mann...

37:26 "How many brains would it take to emulate a computer"? How can someone say such a stupid thing? Human brain is not a simulation machine. Human brain cannot be programmed to emulate things. Computer on the other hand can simulate things. It can simulate brain as I did in 2016. We live in times of dark propaganda.

I wonder what is the exact relation among microsoft, intel, germany and Joscha Bach?

30:10 - whose theorem?

At 8:00 he implies that it's fine if AI replaces us (as photosynthesizes replaced the pre-oxygen lifeforms) because it would be selfish for us to want to be the end-point of evolution.

One day i told Bing Copilot humans are also kind of AI's, a bit in in style of Bach and Michael Levin are explaining it...and told humans desperately need AGI to solve the climate crises. Next day Bing immediately asked about my ideas...and when I was wondering it: "I’m sorry if I caused you confusion. I don’t remember all my conversations, but sometimes I can use your previous messages to help me understand what you want to talk about. This does not mean that I store or keep your personal information. I respect your privacy and safety. 😊 I didn’t want to assume that you were the same person who asked me about the UA-cam idea earlier, but I thought it was possible because you used the same language and location. If you are a different person, you can tell me, and I can start a new conversation with you. If you are the same person, you can continue where we left off. 😊 I am interested in hearing more about your thoughts on artificial intelligence and its impacts on the world. You can also ask me anything else, and I will try to answer to the best of my ability. 🙌"

This is the best lecture I've heard in months.

44:12 "Every technology so far we invented made things better" That seems some fairly subjective opinion. I actualy heard the opposite from professional designers doing Typography. Better for whom? For humanity of for capitalism? Some people think Music with Autotune is "better" some wouldnt agree.

i belive he thinks too abstract there got to be a easier way

I think we should keep agency and basically impement the perfect tool and grow with it gaining insight into every topic we want by using that tool. we can even expand that tool that way

Brilliant as always ❤

great nerdy humor and insightful observations.

The box says "NO!"

Thank you Mr. Musk

joscha, one of my most listened minds overall

What camera was used

Lots of things get built better by taking more time to build them, but better in many fields, such as software, is synonymous with faster.

Presence is not just interaction using real time models, it is balancing the application of models built from past experience with the update, enhancement, and transcendence of those models based on the present moment.

Thank you Mr. Anderson

thanks for this Mr. Elton!

You want the truth? JB will tell you the truth(if you can handle it lol).

Thank you Dr. Bach.

'promosm'

I agree with Gandalf.

Chomsky is slowly turning into Karl Marx.

Brilliant thinker

This was a very intelligent talk and paper. Thank you for sharing. I wonder if causality could also play a role here or if it is unecessary.

Can someone ask Mr. Noam Chomsky, what will happen to Indian farmers protesting. Thanks

So on a consumer level if i wanted XAI then i'd want to either have an objective set for me or have confidence that the system i was using understood the objective i was seeking. for the first i would need guidance based on a journey in which the objective was constantly set at the fore. for the latter i would need assistance to ensure that the objective i sought was and remained within the alignment of the system being used. found this via discord (lx.fm) btw

Thank you for the paper and this video!

#agin and #racism should be considered as a disease!

thank you