Відео

She doesn't understand the Bible, God is the one who will let you understand it.

Is the term "New Atheism" a thing or is it something that theists came up with, and only they use it?

Ayan Hirsi Ali claims that people who leave Christianity adopt other beliefs because atheism leads to nihilism. This by itself is debatable but let's say it is true. What's wrong with it? What is wrong in abandoning Christianity for some other faith?

Really enjoyed this. Your commentary is excellent and unbiased. Much appreciated.

There are no facts concerning religion. It's all fake.

Saying that atheists see theists as not rational is another straw man fallacy. Of course most religious people are rational when they deal with things other than their religion. Religious people think differently when their religion is concerned and differently for other matters. As for whether religions themselves are rational, Christianity in particular is not rational. You can't have a religion with a central concept like the holy trinity and claim that it is rational.

Atheists put all religions under the same umbrella in the sense that they are all unsubstantiated. Otherwise they have similarities and differences. For example the problem of evil, which is a common atheist argument works only with the Abrahamic religions where you have an omnipotent, omnibenevolent creator of the world and his shitty creation. In other religions gods are not the creators of the world or they are not omnipotent and omnibenevolent or there are counterbalancing forces of evil. Still I don't think that atheists consider all religions as the same in every respect.

The world needs to treat God like North Koreans treat their leader, fear him

It’s a bit weird to say he ‘confronts’ her, especially in full caps. I feel if he’d confronted her he would have challenged her rather than inviting her to talk and letting her speak. Was the confrontation bit edited out of this video perhaps despite the title?

If you believe in fairy tales, you're in the same bin. You are irrational on THAT topic, period. Don't let this guy disingenuously lead you down the path of irrationality. Care about what's real!

Ooohhh, this is a fake intellectual page. I thought it was going to be serious content. I could tell the framing was weird when the said "new atheism" did something wrong and implied it "faded" because of it. The faces of it got old and no one took up the mantle. Atheism is growing because anything else is illogical. With education, religion will be placed in the dust bin of history.

There is no contradiction in the Bible, scripture is not open private interpretation. The word of God is The Truth, the only real Truth this fallen wicked world has in it. There are only two ways of seeing anything, one is through The Truth of the word of God, the scriptures, the other is through the lens of this fallen wicked world and the prince of this world, Satan himself. I encourage you to reach out if you are sincere about what the Bible is and who it is for. God bless you and keep you all the days of your life may your eyes be opened, may your heart and mind seek The Truth of the word in Jesus name.

How is "wokeism" a religion? Who they believe in? What are their rituals? Do they have clergy? Do they have places for worship?

You used many logical fallacies throughout this video. One example is when talking about the many great scientists who also believed in a God. Just because these scientists used rational thought in their scientific discoveries does not mean that believing in God is also rational. Therefore, many of your arguments are not reasonable.

SHROUD OF TURIN = ONLY PHOTOGRAPHIC NEGATIVE IMAGE ON A HISTORICAL ARTIFACT IN THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD. CARBON DATING REFUTED BY OXFORD UNIVERSITY. XRAY DATING TAKES IT 2000 YEARS.

Now Rogan needs to believe the new evidence "the Mosaic found this year".

Thank you for sharing!

Shabbat Shalom Trust in real science, the fabric of space and time, with our very own DNA points to GOD! Prophesy + Eye witness Accounts, both prior and right now, point to YESHUA as the Head of the Church! If you don't believe me, read prophesy... Read Isaiah 53! Shalom

Shabbat Shalom DNA: The Mind of GOD, mind over matter! Faith so small, can surely move metaphoric mountains and in the case of our CREATOR, created life to evolve. Matthew 17:20 'And YESHUA said unto them, because of your unbelief: for verily I say unto you, If ye have faith as a grain of mustard seed, ye shall say unto this mountain, remove hence to yonder place; and it shall remove; and nothing shall be impossible unto you.' A cosmic realm of our internal DNA structure, our electrical circuits and internal plumbing point to the gateway beyond the stars. The Great Information Highway System, a vast system of networking nodes all communicating with one another. An intelligent design has an Super Intelligent Entity, the GREAT I AM! Our very own DNA points to GOD! Shalom

Such stories spread mass hysteria. Luckly, more is known about sleep paralysis.

The David story is a great story as many modern Americans can really relate to the moral shortcomings evidenced in the Bible.

As Former Atheist lm so grateful l turned to JESUS ❤

Those in the bible were not without fault neither did God say it was ok to the do the wrong things . They were regular people , some who loved God but sometimes went astray . As it is today . God forgives, and there is non that is without fault ! None. You can’t really understand the bible in-depth without receiving the Holy Spirit . He is the one who helps you to get a revelation of the meaning of Gods word. It is not just a story book .. it is and contains life and spirit . Now what I’ve just said is a typical example of having understanding . What is life? , what is spirit ?. How can they be in words? .God intentional hid these in the form of revelations, in parables and kept it for those who really desire by faith to know him . Not for those who feel they already know it all. For those the bible has nothing to offer. Hebrews 11:6 KJVS -  But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him. John 6:63 TPT - “The Holy Spirit is the one who gives life, that which is of the natural realm is of no help. The words I speak to you are Spirit and life. But there are still some of you who won’t believe.”

7:09 an atheist isn’t committed to the view of naturalism. Are some atheist naturalists, sure. But not all and hence not necessarily. I’m an agnostic atheist, which is a reference to my state of confidence with respect to the belief that a supernatural entity exists or has previously existed in history. I don’t think you can prove 100% that god doesn’t exists, in that proving a universal negative is quite an undertaking to review every argument ever written on what god means and refute each. But the positive belief is given from the theist, and my reaction as an atheist is engage sincerely on the fact that I lack belief in said supernatural occurrences. But since atheism isn’t a positive philosophy I can see why a theist might think we doomed to a void and nihilism, however this is only because they think we can’t find a way to get our moral system to graduate with objectivity enough to be worthy of debate consideration. But be warned, a fantastic set of positive philosophical principles, arguments, beliefs and distinct forms have been put forward to date. My most highly revered is the positive philosophy like that given from Alan Watts and Jiddu Krishnamuriti which reflect an eastern approach and wisdom about how god is not an out-there phenomenon. He’s more of an in-here phenomenon of realizing your inseparability with the world around you and how there ultimately is just one.

Rogan will be an out spoken believer. He will guide many to Christ through His public public process. His heart softening and the scales Falling from his eyes. Thank you Father.

Atheism is not in a decline, just the opposite. An easy google search away. That's just an attempt at creating a more convincing narrative built from the additions of a few pro Christian messages from the likes of Jp and Ayaan Hirsi.

Even though God called & considered King 👑 David a man after his on heart ❤️ He was still a human born with the curse of sin like all of us sinners… King 👑 David was no different than each of us, God held him accountable for his sins & he & his family suffered the curse of King 👑 David’s fall from grace & sin…

Ayaan Hirsi grew up in the faith and spent only a few years as an atheist. She only changed from Islam to Christianity via an atheist interlude. It's not very shocking to me. She was suffering from withdrawal symptoms. Not everybody can stare into the abyss of nothingness that awaits us after death.

Got to remember god created evil.

Sleep paralysis feels very real

I want to point out also, that Mircales alone by themselves do not produce faith. Many stood before Jesus and witnessed mircales and yet denied him. Honestly, it takes more faith in science to believe your cells talk to each other, then it does to disbelieve 500 people were wrong about what they saw, a lot of which were the enemies of Christ who has an agenda to disprove his divinity. Drop your best objections to Christianity, and I'll do my best to answer them below.

How is your personal experience and observations a standard for what is possible? You have faith in science that protons exist, because there's technical writing on the subject, well... there's also technical writing on the life of Christ in much the same way. You are the standard of what's possible.

She thinks Christianity and Islam are *completely different* ... because?

I believe the Council of Nikea was primarily an exercise in temporal power, so I dispute the argument that we edit books in the same manner today as was done in Elden times. Actually this is correct. Ulterior motives still govern the actions of man all too often. However, your comparison I find not a little disingenuous, and it would take a great deal of convincing to persuade me that the creation of the Apocrypha, and finalization of The Holy Bible, was not influenced by politics and a cynical view of how to maintain the power of The Holy See down through the ages. These men had visionary foresight aplenty, but my personal take is that it was to their own security and biases that they clung, rather than a wish to make it more palatable to the masses. Doubtless, there was some consideration as to this, but it seems to me in my studies, and admittedly it is my own biases that color what I see in the subtext, that it was calculation that ultimately influenced the choices made on what would make the cut. I realize I am exhibiting no small amount of cynicism in my brief argument here, but is in the belief that if people sit down and are honest about things that might otherwise be willfully overlooked in order to maintain a status quo, a deeper understanding of The Bible, God, and the human condition can be reached together. One key point I would cite is what I consider a thinly veiled misogyny throughout the text that starts all the way back at the beginning, when Eve offered the apple to Adam. I'll attempt to soothe ruffled feathers here by saying that my politics are liberal (a belief in the aims of Humanism, arising from the idea that good and evil exist by intention, so Man may know free will) with the moderate to conservative understanding that Christianity is the bedrock of America the Ideal, which I do posit is something that can be realized again with a great deal of work, faith, perseverance and the free and honest exchange of ideas found in classical debate. I would welcome your refutation with a heart full of love for the inherent goodness in man, and a healthy dose of scepticism for the darkness in each man's heart which I posit comes from the experience of the human condition and evolution, rather than the concept of original sin. Let me make clear that while I espouse this denial of the idea of an Original Sin, I do however believe that, paradoxically, that Jesus Christ was able to and in fact lovingly did shoulder all of the darkness in the human spirit that arises from our contemplation of the world in which we live our lives, ever seeking an oh so elusive, yet worthwhile, Grace. I humbly accept that Christ did this noble thing no more the son or daughter of God, than you or me. Thank You for the opportunity to engage in this, An imperfect human being who strives daily to improve and in any given situation to simply do the right thing, Dabney Frazier Bowen P.S. Again, if you wish to take up the debate, you find me welcome you most readily. I shall keep a weather eye on the comments herein God Bless You

It's painful watching Joe try and twist, at any cost the truth into a myth, a lie, a legend. So all the apostles died, horrible deaths save John, never going back on their claims...so we're all 12 mentally ill Joe? You will not have an excuse on the day you stand judgment Joe. The plethora of evidence for the truth of Christ has been spoon feed to you and your kind, an amount and quality of evidence that in any other topic or area of life would persuade you 1000%. Yet in this topic it's not enough. You are a sinful hypocrite, who is a lover of self and pleasure in sin, more than a lover of truth and God. So, in order to protect your comfort in the filth that is your life, you pretend to be arguing from some legitimate position against the evidence, as if the evidence is not enough😅😅😅😅. Sorry Joe but any truly unbiased, critically thinking person understands there is no argument as far as quality or quantity of evidence, rather a sinful being wanting to hang on to sin instead of dying to self to accept the evidence backed claims of Christ Jesus. I watch you sit there making your pathetic, spiteful, downright child like comments with a pride filled face. I want to smack the bull shit out of your nasty face, but I can't think this way and be Christ-like, so I will pity you, your child, who you pridfully lead to eternal destruction. On that day before you and your child whom you have groomed to deny and hate Christ are before the edge of that awful pit, I hope the child looks into your eyes and ask why you did this to them. All to keep your reputation, you comfort in sin, your pride. You should think very hard on this. Stop the childish pride, accept the truth, and secure an eternity in real bodies with your child. The other option is to lead yourself and those who love and depend on you to eternal death, eternal separation from the very source of life itself. So sad, so pathetic, so needless.

I am an atheist because I grew up with the Abrahamic religion and find it incredulous I simply don't believe.

A demon only has 3 fingers, like TMNT......

First want 2 visit REALLY HUANTED PLACES

LIVE LIFE TO THE FULLEST

just believe in what you believe DEATH COMES 2 US IS ALL

Hidden things in the Bible... Why do you not see the book of Enoch? It was written for a reason, right?

Who was on this Joe Rogan podcast so I don’t have to listen to you interrupt it?

Hello. I am an atheist. I define atheism as suspending any acknowledgment as to the reality of any particular god until sufficient credible evidence is presented. My position is that *_I currently have no good reason to acknowledge the reality of any god._* And here is why I currently hold to such a position. Below are 11 facts I must consider when evaluating the claim made by certain theists that a particular god exists in reality. To be clear, these are not premises for any argument which _concludes_ there to be no gods. These are simply facts I must take into account when evaluating the verity of such a claim. If any of the following facts were to be contravened at a later time by evidence, experience, or sound argument, I would THEN have good reason to acknowledge such a reality. 1. I have never been presented with a functional definition of a god. 2. I personally have never observed a god. 3. I have never encountered any person who has claimed to have observed a god. 4. I know of no accounts of persons claiming to have observed a god that were willing or able to demonstrate or verify their observation for authenticity, accuracy, or validity. 5. I have never been presented with any _valid_ logical argument, which also introduced demonstrably true premises that lead deductively to an inevitable conclusion that a god(s) exists in reality. 6. Of the many logical syllogisms I have examined arguing for the reality of a god(s), I have found all to contain a formal or informal logical fallacy or a premise that can not be demonstrated to be true. 7. I have never observed a phenomenon in which the existence of a god was a necessary antecedent for the known or probable explanation for the causation of that phenomenon. 8. Several proposed (and generally accepted) explanations for observable phenomena that were previously based on the agency of a god(s), have subsequently been replaced with rational, natural explanations, each substantiated with evidence that excluded the agency of a god(s). I have never encountered _vice versa._ 9. I have never knowingly experienced the presence of a god through intercession of angels, divine revelation, the miraculous act of divinity, or any occurrence of a supernatural event. 10. Every phenomenon that I have ever observed appears to have *_emerged_* from necessary and sufficient antecedents over time without exception. In other words, I have never observed a phenomenon (entity, process, object, event, process, substance, system, or being) that was created _ex nihilo_ - that is instantaneously came into existence by the solitary volition of a deity. 11. All claims of a supernatural or divine nature that I have been presented have either been refuted to my satisfaction or do not present as _falsifiable._ ALL of these facts lead me to the only rational conclusion that concurs with the realities I have been presented - and that is the fact that there is *_no good reason_* for me to acknowledge the reality of any particular god. I have heard often that atheism is the denial of the Abrahamic god. But denial is the active rejection of a substantiated fact once credible evidence has been presented. Atheism is simply withholding such acknowledgment until sufficient credible evidence is introduced. *_It is natural, rational, and prudent to be skeptical of unsubstantiated claims, especially extraordinary ones._* I welcome any cordial response. Peace.

The child was named Solomon and became King.

If David didn’t have a fall then we wouldn’t need Jesus. He falls like us all.

The bible is about two different gods, the god of David is not the creator. The bible was edited at the time of the translation of the Septuagint , Jewish translators of the dead sea scrolls are still doing the edits, what those edits are , only they know .I have some clues .

One thing I don't think she is correct about is the fact that the Bible in the form it is in as we have it now is not in chronological order. So reading the Bible while is very important you have to really understand that you aren't following it in the correct timeline. That does not change the meaning of the Bible it just makes it easier to parse.

Nope.

David a great example for all of us 😅

Apologists trying to explain how this myth book isnt the white guys magic myth book😂😂😂