Відео

Thanks for your comment. Would you care to give some examples "of the Freudian/Jungian Subtle Nuances" in the film. Also, if you want to elaborate more on the other two points you stated. Just want to allow you put your points out for others to read, I would gladly pin your comment so others can read it.

I meant the film benefited from the soundtrack vs other films that have the soundtrack but doesn't compliment it. Sorry could have explained it a bit more i guess

Yes, it does, i've seen the cases on television. I just felt that they didn't approach the subject in the film with sensitivity like they should have. The comment i said was meant to sound like it was coming from the studio making the film

@@salandpalsgotothemovies8052 I haven’t seen the movie yet, I’d rather wait till it comes out on streaming services. I have been reading the screenplay which is available online. It’s interesting.

See i would have liked if they touched upon his background then it would have shown where he started and then went to win gold. The fact that i mentioned stuff that didn't happen was cause just like in the movie George Clooney for the last race he made it a photo finish which never happened at all. So as you can see movies don't hesitate to bend things for the "benefit" of the movie. Which I said i rather see their beginning to get more of a feel of their journey. But thanks for sharing your connection to Joe

Yes it was a very close finish, “instead of a photo to reveal the winner, the judges had to deliberate for a few minutes to determine the placements of each team. Brown said, "It was an extremely close finish, and no one knew who had won. There were photos taken (by spectators) of that finish, but I don't have any reason to think they took a photo to determine who won.” That worked for the film. They truly did get the worst lane and started late because they didn’t hear the starting gun go off from that lane. Still they won gold !

@@donnad1204 exactly

So if it was a great movie. Could you tell me if it was a comedy, a serious movie, a retelling, or a reimagining? Because i felt the movie didn't know what it was either.

@@salandpalsgotothemovies8052 it’s all in one the silly stuff in book one represents the nonchalant unproductive life of a person who doesn’t have their shit together. Sitting around getting high scheming, goofing off. Book 2 shows a man trying to find his purpose. Book 3 is the awakening so to speak he knows the truth and has found his purpose. It’s a great journey to redemption

@merrickbeaufort8048 Sorry, but i didn't see it that way. It's a bit too clustered from my POV. But hey, I am glad you made it work from your POV

No, thats not the deeper meaning since we see Clarence use the money to free the slaves vs keep it to pay his debt, also we see him refuse to give up Jesus when he says he rather die then give him up to rome. If anything the redemption part is on the surface, but the beggar didn't turn cocky cause the money he went around sharing his riches which religion teaches on to do ao how is that cocky. When i asked about a deeper meaning is cause even in the trailer if you see it again it raises a question "How far would you go to prove you're not a nobody" it doesn't ask how to reach redemption.

It really is! Happy Belated Xmas

Well you can see it two ways 1. Thats the humor in the film they have different accents even if they lived/grew up in the same house. Or 2. Due to the experiment, the baby (Bella) retained the mothers accent

Could be the compression on this video sorry about that

Yes, its a great movie and some will see that but also say its too long. I agree with everything you said. Also glad you enjoyed the review

Yea DJ did seem to understand what movie he was in and he did make me laugh as well, but I just wished the Octopus battle would have lasted a bit longer and we could have seen more Megalodon vs Giant Octopus fight

Will added it to the list, thanks

Thanks

But you also asked for the "The Italian Job (1969)" didn't you?

We covered it already check it out its in the throwback thurs playlist

@@salandpalsgotothemovies8052 ok, I will.

we shall try

@@salandpalsgotothemovies8052 cool, I'm looking forward to it.

Ahh yes for the old Atari Jaguar it was one of those games that you have to say why was it made. Thanks for that trip down old memory lane

Nice catch

Lol thanks for watching hope you enjoyed

This is the point we talked about during the gunfight they should have gunned him down when they had the chance and not leave it to interpretation. This is what the movie keeps doing leaving everything opened ended. When it should have given it to us in a nice package

But Guys they show Jacks funeral and theirs two lines in the film “You killed my mother and my little brother” and “I just buried my mother and my brother”

@@peterquinones2169 Yes he does dies after the gun fight, what we are saying is they should have finished him during the gun fight. This would have made it so the viewer has a bigger reaction then to him dying off screen. Just try to imagine Bobby and his brothers watching as the bad guys kill jack point blank. So again our point is that the movie takes shortcuts when they could have used some scenes to build on the brothers driving force to go after the bad guy. In the review it sounds like we say Jack doesn't die but what we are saying was he doesn't die on screen, in movies either you see it happen on screen or it happens off screen but they carry different weight depending on which way it happens.

I will check it out

same here. I just feel it was a cash grab or a way to keep the rights to the franchise

@@salandpalsgotothemovies8052 DH2 is an always truly will feel like the biggest cash grab towards anything I’ve ever experienced. Just feels like they put no effort into it at all what the whole movie having this “let’s just get this over and done with“ attitude from everyone and everything involved from the acting to the simmer photography to just how they overall went about the movie, which is also completely true when you hear about the behind the scenes in David Yates wanting to keep The deleted scene Of Tonks and lupin, But was forced to cut it all so they could convert it into the most pointless use of 3-D ever imaginable in film, Which only resulted in having Me feel completely nothing towards their deaths let alone any other deaths in the whole movie except for Snape‘s. He also has some of the worst music that I’ve ever heard for any movie not only because it sounds generic and mediocre, way more than this movie which actually had me feel Way more emotional towards the creatures let alone characters in the movie and actually felt and sounded like a Harry Potter/Wizarding World movie as they actually reused a lot of themes from the previous movies and even without those themes the new/original fantastic beasts theme still felt way more like we were in the Wizarding world as opposed to the generic sounding garbage that was most of DH2‘s soundtrack. And above all regardless of whether you like the movie or not, if you can’t acknowledge that DH2 Has probably the most abysmal colouring and lighting of the movie where you literally cannot see a thing for most of it then there’s something wrong with you as well this movie was certainly darker than the previous two fantastic beasts at least you could still see what was going on even when it was really dark

@@SuperMoviemaster21 if we did a review on DH2 then i would point those things out but good thing the series ended as to not degrade the series overall. The feel of DH2 vs the previous films did feel way off.

My point is the story fell really short and it didn't have a strong plot to merit another film and as a fan even if it continues I won't go see it, not due to the actor Johnny or her comments but due to the script doesn't feel as strong as the other franchise films. Same as Star Wars ep 1-3 vs the original trilogy. But I respect you point of view and wish you the best of luck keeping this franchise alive

@@salandpalsgotothemovies8052 That’s truly selling yourself short and only hurting yourself by not giving another movie a chance for those reasons you said. Like how people have even felt about the later Harry Potter is compared to the earlier ones and many other movie franchises just because you feel like there’s no need for another movie or even for the disappointment of the previous one it doesn’t mean that you won’t like the next one For it very well could be The best one especially if they potentially drop J. K. Rowling altogether as a screenwriter which is quite possible, And again even Ralph Fiennes of all people actually says he hates the earlier Harry Potter movies but loves the newer ones hence why he signed on to play Voldemort in the first place

@@SuperMoviemaster21 I gave Fantastic Beast 3 chances and in my personal opinion the first one was fine but then it kept declining. So I gave it plenty of chances. But once again everyone has their own view if they want to keep hoping they get better then by all means support it but it doesn't get better then what then.

@@salandpalsgotothemovies8052 But that’s the thing; how do you know if and when will get better especially at the very least if you are a Harry Potter fan? Considering the reasons I just gave? :-)

@@SuperMoviemaster21 I don't know that is why i gave them 3 chances to prove me wrong and if not then its time for me to move on to other movies. They are doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different results

I wouldn't say that I think its what all fans want a character that has a real reason for being who he is and a story that makes sense. I feel cheated when a movie makes up stuff and if you ask how they just say don't worry about it. And thank you for watching and commenting

According to what I read Mel Brooks said the drug abuse and arrest let to insurance companies not wanting to insure him for movies later on he got better or better at hiding it and was able to get into movies

If the story was developed the characters along with the bad guy then it would be better, let's just say it had potential to be a TV series

Oh and another point. Japan woke up a sleeping nation for sure but in 1941/42 the US was not a Giant. Due to the war in the Atlantic the US was severely limited. Even with all the vessels moved from the Atlantic to Pacific the IJN still had the edge. The US battleships were very old and slow and guzzlers. The US didn’t even have enough fleet oilers to fuel all the vessels. That’s why the battleships were not even patrolling. The US also had junk torpedos and lacked armor piercing bombs. Inexperienced captains and sailors and pilots. The US worked on Intelligence and were very resourceful. It’s too bad so many US historians cover up the US weaknesses at this time but they do it at a sacrifice of showing the resourceful and bravery of many. In 1942 the IJN was the Giant Bully at Midway. They blew it. The Midway movie of 1976 doesn’t do a good job of showing the vessel strength differences.

Most of these points you mentioned are in the history books that are taught in school, and the others have can be seen in documentaries or mini series such as 'The Pacific' and such. Like you state soldiers just follow orders from higher up that have motives that civilians might not be aware of. Thank you for your comment

@@salandpalsgotothemovies8052 but the contradiction on your part is stating you’re glad to see the Japanese wasn’t necessarily portrayed as the “villain”. Let’s step back and think about why you would even make such a comment. It’s obvious many see Japan as the “villain” which is why you made the comment to begin with. Why is the Pearl Harbor bombing always referred by many as a “sneak” attack. Some say it was a “total surprise”. Come on. Japan bombing Pearl Harbor today would be a total surprise. China? No total surprise but more of a surprise than what it was in 1941. I don’t believe there is anything within the last transcript that was delivered late which states officially and literally that there is a declaration of war. It was more like further negotiations are pointless. Who knows what was said before pertaining to negotiations. The overt acts were clearly on the US side. Flying Tigers and supplying China and already presence in Asia. Cutting off oil. You also know that the US allowed Japan to annex Korea. Yes? Japan had Taiwan since 1895. You never hear about any atrocities here. Japan gave Taiwan and Korea the education system which still exists today. Same with infrastructure. Taiwan to this day doesn’t even want to be a part of China. Japan and Taiwan are Allies to this day. Japanese soldiers stayed in Indonesia after the war and helped drive the Dutch out for their own Independence. Over time every Asian country was freed from European colonization. Over time we can see what the power of the media can do. All sides have rights and wrongs. It’s not so clear cut. Pay attention closely to Ukraine and Russia. It’s not so clear cut. If Russia was supplying Cuba with biological or nuclear weapons what would we do? Ideally not attack Cuba like how Russia attacked Ukraine but we are often fed certain biased info to establish an agenda.

Thank you. Hope you enjoy our reviews and please feel free to give your take and recommend throwback movies for us to review

@@salandpalsgotothemovies8052 Have you reviewed "Backdraft 2"?

@Jerome Wade no, I am aware of it but there is no need for me to review it lol

Thank you for the nice words I will check out your review

very true

But even the detective tries to tell us who they are, but then the movie doesn't continue to develop each character. Heck they don't even focus more then a few minutes developing the bad guy