Відео

Here take no problem! Here is also my soul and all belongings if you need it 👉👈 🎁

Of course. In godot you can use a anim player node and key frame the shader preperties like how he changed the dept, you can make a realtime animation with the shader. Also if you want there are also tutorials on yt about how to animate in gd script rather then anim player node.

I wish publish it, but this not completed as I want, so not yet(

@@JewelByte Nice. Then I'm looking forward to it! :)

Not 3 months actualy, just a few hours per week

Yes, but not 100% POM, because it's badly stacks near each other for my case

Yea, because for voxels i use a tricky technique, one quad for one layer

Well, it's simpler than you think. Mostly this effect completed by erasing edges based on camera direction and mesh normal, but i need it more complex.

Actualy i thinking what i need to do after, but now i just try to complete my idea with this type of voxels. And i use GLSL in compute shaders, and gdscript, i feel i need to use c# but for prototype gd feels fine)

Ah yes, prototype in GDScript, remake it in C#. Cool stuff.

Hah)

Thanks you!)

??

Hey, thanks for the question! I doesn't use my own physics engine, just little extends of physics rigid body and character body with additional checking for collision with voxels, so physics body collides with godot physics objects and with voxels.

@@JewelByte Of course, I expressed myself a little incorrectly, I meant that the voxels are already physical or there is a separate part of the code responsible for colliding with them. Thank you for your reply!

a short video done

I think the whole point of the method (which, I think is called 'global lattice'), is to avoid meshing altogether. So no greedy meshing, no binary meshing, no meshing, period. This does make things like collision detection more difficult. As far as the game engine is concerned your world is some very weird cube-like structure with many intersecting planes in it. You will have to do some work to get per voxel collissions.

@@StijnDeWitt Yeah, that's why you need meshing anyway, to create proper collision data. But I was talking about the visuals of smooth voxels libraries such as VoxelFarm (not sure if it's still being developed) or games like Blockscape (very good) have.

Huh, i do this nice voxels a little accidentally, so no, propably i have some idea what project i want to do

@JewelByte @JewelByte hmmm, interesting, try to recreate the CS2 smoke, I saw that it works by voxels

Thanks!

The 3d software looks like Godot or something similar

its Godot. free and open-source game engine

it's godot

Godot 4.3

Lol

hes showing a high-performance voxels in godot 4 normals test

what are you trying to show with this comment?

@@firstlast6796 my curiosity about the meaning of the video, what are you trying to do by not answering my question?

@@Augustman22 thanks!

@@pwhv not my video, but I'd assume its to show high-performance voxels in godot 4 with normals.

Thank for your tutorial really helpt me

Why nt?

No, i used some huge quads and some shaders to do it. Wait a little bit, and I make video about this technique

Feels like it had quads spanning entire section for each layers(so 128 + 1), used grid uv shader and selectively draw the section and did it for 3 axis so actually (129 * 3 = 387) quads if it was made this way. Even drawing inside of the closed area is honestly not much of perf loss since it's single quad with fragment shader fun anyway, by leaving out that optimization code could get real simple and even allow cut section views. That sounds quite doable and fun so I'm gonna try making one now! Not sure how physic would work in that case tho.. might try just filling it with collision boxes per blocks for now

@@jupiterbjy Exactly, you'r right!)

@@JewelByte yay! still couldn't figure out how to do the collision though, m curious how you solved it and wonder if more optimization steps are possible - like idk, bake each layer texture on CPU and hol in memory so it updates section only whenever block update happens, and GPU just draws it? Still not sure having complex shader with tons of branching on thousands of cores are better or mere few cores with baked image is better, wish I had time to test those out!

@@jupiterbjy Not 128 + 1 right? I mean you only need to draw the front face for each voxel in each direction so simply 128 faces on each axis should do the trick?

play minecraft?

@@super_normaI Wow that's so clever, and well thought out! Thank you for sharing! In your favor, I should have clarified my question. I have been playing with different Github submissions and have tried coding my own voxel engine in Godot, but had not seen anything or anyone create something that allowed you to use a slider and different noise techniques to change the way chunks populate. I'm fairly new to Godot, and thought this was very impressive.

I don't think you can expect smth from a person who deliberately hides his hierarchy. As if we could get anything from it, lmao

@@upSIDEdnMedia I would give it a try using a GridMap. You can then use a noisemap (integrated into Godot 4) to generate a map. I've done so to create a sidescroller in 3D. But I'm sure there must be a way of doing this in 3D, too. Try with a single noisemap and if that doesn't suffice, just add another. :D Just play around a bit.

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm, i can show it just a little bit later

Im doing fluid simulation now, and implementing some things. After that I can make guide for this terrain and fluids. I recommend try to use Godot 4.x, it's very powerfull engine :)

Don't worry, just have fun :)