Відео

NIce video! The almost unlimited possibilities of plugins decreases the creativity. It is recommended to work with few gear that you know well, than with an extended amount of gear. The line that draws the musician to a collectionist is very thin. Pretty much what you explained.

I love the Apple Magic Mouse just because THAT one feature --> vertical scrolling. I checked many other mice but not even one mouse can offer that feautre. There are some like the Logitech MX Master Series but I love that natural feeling of the vertical scrolling for the Magic Mouse. I'm using Logic Pro X, FInal Cut Pro X and many other applications such as Affinity Designer and Publisher. The vertical srolling is a masterpice! btw. I don't like trackballs or scrolling wheels

I started with my portico II.

2:53 DO NOT REDEEEM

The SSL Six is the best thing I ever bought so far. No plug-in can recreate this sound and feeling

All plugins are emulations similar to the original hardware, but still uncomparable to the original units in sound quality.

There willl be all for subscription plan and YOU WILL OWN NOTHING AND YOU WILL BE HAPPY... Is this Agenda familiar to you?

If I could start over I would buy two FATSOs and the Wes NG Bus.

Check out the MOTU 16A it's 2 grand.

I think it can be a great video to see Cubase interacting with the mouse!

2 words.....track ball

Just got it for $19.99 now I'm using this instead of Ozone 11 and getting better resluts. And I don't have to switch between multiple setting screens within Ozone 11.

analog hardware is for everyone, the only reason it is not for everyone is because $$

thank you. appreciate the insights.

Great info -- thanks. Subbed. In my tracking room everything passes through analog preamps, comps and eqs before hitting my Apollo x16 and x8. So I get color at the input stage. The only piece of hardware I use for mixing at this point is a Stam Audio SA4000 mk3 bus comp w/the Fairchild mod. That said, I'm looking to add some pieces. Let me ask -- how do you deal with the latency introduced by the analog chain for mixing back into the Apollos? Does Cubase have functions within it to compensate?

What do you recommend regarding stageboxes to bring mic lines back to studio from booths?

❤sounds good . Helpful and powerful plugin

Which Mic and Pre are using for your Voice ? Sounds really natural and smooth and non distracting .

Very helpful, thank you so much

This is a good begginers guide. Saying that 'most' of the tracks the bigger producers receive were of higher quality means nothing. Higher in what? bit rate?... frequency range? ...Talent? And sayng 'mostly' using analog hardware means even less. How 'mostly'? And how 'analog'? Then you say their arrangements were meticulously thought out... Are you saying the rest of ours aren't??!! Obviously they were meticulously thoughtout... everyone's are these days. And then, of course, mastering. All production companies have gotten their best artists work mastered by legends before releasing the final product. But before that maybe watch Anthony Marinelli explore why digital 'IS' analog. And gain a higher grasp of the entirety of what digital actually encompasses. You are 2 years in and it shows. 'That Pro Mix' title is therefore very misleading. You'll get there, though, I bet.

My beginnings were similar to yours. Started off plugins only, and eventually moved onto a hybrid recording and mixing setup. The biggest advantage to hardware is with compression specifically. After using dozens of plugins, it becomes apparent that hardware compression reacts more naturally with the signal than their digital counterparts. Especially on the mixbus.

My only analogue device is an Avalon 737 vst pre amp but it is awesome! So Awesome lil Wayne borrowed it when he came to Buffalo….but I enjoy plug ins for the most part…..I don’t think they’ll ever get you the exact sound you want just with plug ins.

What is the variable "pluginStatus"?

10:12 Why are you talking about others? You look like an analog fanboy.

Wait! The weight?!?!

Genius Thank You !!!

thanks for the tip!

I don't share this opinion that mix bus should be your first approach. The fact is that in the box offers plenty of what we need for every stage of the audio processing tasks we know and love, with one glaring hole that nobody talks about. Headroom. Everything in the PC is subject to the headroom of whatever audio converter you chose. Since all those things are designed to do is create inputs and outputs to your computer, that leaves no extra headroom for true analogies recording. Ever wonder why the gain know gives so much on those older preamps? Because the larger the picture we take with our camera, the more detail it captures. The preamps of am audio IO are not sufficient to the task and they never will be. You can get a better than average recording if you have all the other pieces in place, but that one huge problem in the chain can never be undone. Once the choice was made to record with only this much headroom to begin with, that's all you'll ever have to work with. Turning it up later will still be in the domain of what was captured with that smaller threshold. Front end should be the starting point. And Vintage flavor should only be chosen if going out and buying several to choose from. Several styles will be needed to create that analog separation of tone that adds so much that we like, but with one good modern external pre, plugins can add the character to each individual track afterward.

i have gone through almost the same, but I ended up using a drawing tablet. I think that for me it is a lot more precise than any mouse or trackpad, and also very ergonomic. it`s like holding a pen

I am researching a good setup for myself and it looks something like this: -Black Lion Audio Seventeen -Art pro VLA II -Behringer Exciter -IGS audio 825EQ -Tegeler Varitube compressor VTC -SPL vitalizer -Erica Synths Zen Delay -Herritage Audia LANG PEQ-2 Equalizer -Black Lion Audio PG-2 Type-F (for power) -the t.racks Power 8 IEC VA (also for power) I own a Presonus Quantum HD8 interface and I already have a SSL Fusion.

Sure thing!

I followed everything, then reached the Keyboard Maestro part and you lost me completely

Interesting!!

Tracking = analog Effects and mixing = itb hybrid Mastering = otb hybrid

Great video. I am the target audience for this. You make me think differently. I started with an apollo twin. Great unit, but i didnt like it because i became aware that it wasn't a great AD/DA converter. I considered the purchasing order in the opposite direction. I started with and rme card for the computer to get into AES and avoid usb or thunderbolt. Then I got a high quality 8 channel AD/DA converter. Then on to getting a stereo analog preamp pair. Then good mics. As soon as I had that my ability to record well exploded. I then got an Avocet and a pair of focal monitors...again awesome. Except the preamps, I don't consider that I have made any investments in analog gear so here I am watching your video. Do I get compressors and EQs for my preamp so I can print the best possible tracks, or do I invest in mastering gear for the mix bus? Does this change your opinion? What do the input outputs look like for mastering gear? Basically I don't understand how to efficiently go from computer to gear to computer to my Avocet. Too many options.. paralysis by analysis...

apollo x 16? wtf, with an apollo x6 you has 16 x 22 simultaneous inputs/outputs !

Hey Thanks for the video, can this mouse do pinch zoom to zoom in and out in Ableton or cubase sessions? I think the mx3 can do that? im currently using apple track pad but im looking for a mouse that can pinch zoom within the Ableton session. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated :)

Hardware a bit more open but actually all sounds good even dry on my bose quiet comforts through UA-cam. Please supply file links to get around UA-cam audio mangling.

9:16 hardware not only affects sound (in good/bad ways), but also workflow. There's something to be said for not having to tab between windows, and use the mouse for every interaction. 😄

Could you revist this and demonstrate how you would open/close plugins independently with a midi controller that has several available buttons?

That would be awesome 🙂. I also aksed the support for UAD native support. Hopefully they did it and possibly other plugins also. Fingers crossed 🙂.

Anal gear more useful that analog gear.

Audioscape Engineering analog gear seems like good bang for the buck. I own their Buss Comp.

I love NEOLD 2A I will buy it asap

Faster doesn't matter. Funner, more satisfying, tactile and ear dependency is more like it.

Does this mean I must have to buy a Keyboard Maestro to use this method?

i started with plugins now im hybrid which is the way to go keep in mind having high quality converters will speed up mixing as it removes that dull sqaushy sound its like lefting the blanket away you can heat the plugins like reverbs work better translation works better cheap interfaces will make you work harder and longer you want to make fast decisions my current gear is a neve summing board a maag eq4m dangerous compressor im also building my own compressor using high quality parts my music now sound amd hold up like major releases it takes lots of work and training

Thank you, my thoughts on this issue simply coincide word for word with the opinion you voiced. There is no doubt anymore, I plan to purchase a Warm Audio Bus-Compressor as my first rack-mount and analog device!

They did an incredible job with this one. A much better job than they did with the CL1B Mk2. I am so tempted to buy this although I already have Titanium... hmmmmmm

No sound examples? Isn't that what's important I tested and Plugin Alliance sounded better with most and they do updates and upgrades.. UA is the Protools of younger generation.. Overpriced hype with no real quality benefits.. Don't get hooked on their marketing Use your ears..