Відео

@@MailCache3000 EU citizens unfortunately get treated harshly on the VAT/customs front :( we are working on finding an EU distributor to reduce the cost. VAT and tariffs vary across the world, we do have a big, fat warning on the checkout page for EU citizens regarding the cost to at least try and give people a heads up...

@@GhostNoteAudio Oh yeah no worries, I was totally aware that there were gonna be fees - You made that information very accessible which I appreciated a lot. I just didn't expect the fees to be that high, so I thought I'd give other fellow germans a heads up

Sweet, thank you for the purchase!

@@HOBBITSODYSSEY I think you can find all the answer on the product page: ghostnoteaudio.uk/products/conductor In short: editor works online, in Chrome, Edge or Firefox. It's hosted on GitHub and is open source. Second, the button on the front panel toggles between three different settings/banks for the faders, which can be reprogrammed using the editor. And as for setting it up - no drivers or installation needed, and we have video tutorials on the site for getting it added in Reaper, Live and Studio One (see "Setting up your DAW" on the product page). Hope that helps.

@@HOBBITSODYSSEY it ships with a 1 meter (3ft) USB-C cable and a C-to-A adapter. But it will work with any USB-C cable if you need a longer one.

@@GhostNoteAudio thank you for the reply, so its not usb c mini anymore?

@@HOBBITSODYSSEY The Mark I version had a Micro-USB port, the Mark II has a standard USB-C port (as found on Apple devices or most newer PCs)

@@GhostNoteAudio so I will need a usb c to c or usb c to a (2.0), really sorry just trying to be prepared for it when I purchase it.

@@HOBBITSODYSSEY It depends on what USB port your computer has. The unit itself has a USB-C connector. If you need to buy a longer cable I'd recommend buying a USB-C to USB-C cable, and using the supplied USB-C to USB-A adapter if necessary. That should have you covered for all scenarios.

This was recorded into my audio interface, and then processed with our Forged in Code impulse responses for cabinet simulation.

@@GhostNoteAudiooh wow

Hi Marco. We don't currently have a video for Logic Pro, but here are two great videos to show you how to set up a midi controller in Logic. there is no special setup necessary, just plug in, enable the device in Logic, and start using it. ua-cam.com/video/wrH1U2oTy0I/v-deo.html ua-cam.com/video/1gOoBT3Q9ls/v-deo.html

@@GhostNoteAudio 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 thank you

Excellent to hear, very happy you like it! :)

@@TheoreticalLimit I'm not sure why you got that impression. Even with the gain set to half, these pedals are already in "rip your head off" territory :) They are extremely high gain, just like the original amp (exact circuit replica)

@@GhostNoteAudio It's from what we hear and see on your video. With the gain button full wide open, we only hear a moderate distortion. With the gain at noon, we only hear an overdriven sound. It sounds like it's the clean channel of the ampeg (the green one). Maybe your pedal has the second channel. I don't know. Please let us know. Unless your guitar pickups are extremely and outrageously weak. That's the only point that actually stops me to buy it; I'm not convinced by its gain capacity, according to what we see and hear from this demo.

@@TheoreticalLimit There are some parts where I played and the volume knob on the guitar was rolled down, and some where I was using split coils. Also, playing technique has a lot to do with it, I vary from playing very soft on some bits and hard on others. But if you want to get a sense of the maximum gain, have a look at 5:59 - 6:29. And no, it is based on the Red Channel A, the higher gain channel.

@@GhostNoteAudio I looked at the entire video and the gain is still really moderate comparing to all the head demos, and the one I played many years ago. That's really strange if it's based on the channel B. The preamp sounds good here, except this apparent lack of gain. I see two possibilities : - the guitar output is weak, then it's need a proper demo (the other one, with the schecter, is not convincing too). - the gain staging has an issue, which can be surely fixed. I assure that my goal is not to be negative. Your preamp seems to sound good, except, that one thing, but absolutely essential, that make hesitates to buy. From what we see and hear, there's an improvement that can be done. Or, you can also show us in a demo how far the gain can really go.

​@@TheoreticalLimit I'm sorry the video isn't portraying it well, but all I can do is tell you; there is no issue with the gain staging, the pedal has an exceptional amount of gain, and matches exactly with the high gain channel of the VH140c.

The original Marshall Lead 100 MOSFET is so named because it uses MOSFET transistors in the power amplifier. The preamp is entirely op-amp based. Our pedal only emulates the preamp section of the amp, so no mosfets used or emulated. The power amp in the original Marshall is actually quite clean and uninteresting, they only really slapped MOSFET in the name for marketing purposes, as back in the 80s, many manufacturers tried to associate them with loudness and power... - but all the character that makes the amp unique comes from the preamp :)

@@emulgatorx yes it's unfortunate that shipping lower value products is difficult (unless you're shipping from China), the cost of the unit gets drowned out by the cost of shipping. I'm mainly targeting this at the domestic market here in the UK, where shipping is cheaper, or as an add-on sell for people buying my pedals. I've started looking for EU distributors though, so maybe you'll find my products stocked locally in Germany before the end of the year :)

You're right. That would be a great update for the future - right now the firmware has a fixed set of 3 pages (red, green and blue), but a future firmware update might allow for variable number of pages.

Oh, I wish 19" rack gear would make a comeback!! :) By the way - we do actually use soft-touch momentary footswitches with relays on all our pedals - no stiff, clicky switches for us!

It does. Although it was 169, and now price is reduced to 149. However, the Monogram is more tailored towards video editing, and several features set these two units apart. But the features I wanted our design to have, that the Monogram does not: * Single unit, no "master module" required. * Plug and play, no proprietary software required. * Long-throw, 100mm faders (Monogram is 60mm). * Class compliant Midi-over-USB, making it work with non PC/Mac host devices (like hardware sequencers). * Grippy and doesn't slide around on your desk. Will stay put if you place it on your master keyboard. If any of these features appeal to you, then consider our product. If the modularity of the Monogram is a desireable feature, and you want to combine more modules to make your own custom interface, go with the Monogram. Their design is very sleek! A lot of people are liking the 100mm faders, that's probably the main selling point of the unit, but I've also had people complain that it's too long to be comfortable for them. If you have small hands, shorter faders might be more suitable. We're just here to offer options, but people seem to like what we offer 😀

You sure you watched the whole video, mate? :) Sure, I wanted to make the point that this is not a one-trick pony and played some mid-gain riffs. It's actually a very versatile preamp. 6:01 - 6:55 is what you're looking for. Also, further demos: ua-cam.com/users/shortshv5QDSIB29E ua-cam.com/video/PipKkw_MRfw/v-deo.html

Good question. I've unfortunately never tried the Martyr myself, but am aware of it. I don't know what solution they used to replace the triode clipping stage, but I suspect it's something similar to what I did, although maybe with JFETs instead of diodes? Only way to be sure would be to crack one open a take a look :)

The early reflections section was split up and better labeled, it consisted of the tapped delay and the diffusion section. So no change there, really, just a re-labeling of things in the UI.

Nice :) - If the old version works well for you, that's great. But I also want to make it clear; you *can* install and use the new version without a license. There is a dialog that shows up for 5 seconds when you first open the UI (similar to what Reaper does), but you can dismiss it and use the plugin without limitation. It's just there to remind you that, if you have a chance to buy a license and support us, that would be awesome. ☺ - but the old version is still totally free and continues to be so, of course!

Might've been a temporary glitch - back up now :)

yes, absolutely! 😵 It's an old bug that somehow managed to sneak back into my codebase just before the latest release! It was reported to me yesterday by a helpful customer, I've already made the fix, just wrapping up a new release right now, you should find version 2.2.1 with correct labels on our download pager tomorrow :)

@@GhostNoteAudio Great, thank you. Looking forward to demoing!

It's in the works :) I've got a couple other projects to wrap up but I've been working on a new plugin which takes the majority of what IR Workshop does, and adds a bunch of the methods that I developed for this project. I'm hoping to get it released before the end of the year.

@@GhostNoteAudio Good to hear. I'll probably exclusively use that for cabinet simulation when it comes out 😆. What's weird to me is that IRWorkshop is a pretty powerful and creative tool. And you/you guys released it 7 years ago apparently, and the first time I hear about it is in this video. That too as an offhand mention.

The personal license is 39 pounds. I don't know what the minimum wage is in the Netherlands but your argument doesn't quite seem right :) - but indeed, you can use the plugin without limitations until you're ready and able to buy a license. I'd much rather offer a good free option than for people to resort to piracy.