Відео

"They don't represent us" umm yes they do

Can get the full video. It was so helpful and the best debate I ever saw.

Father and son does not equal a treenity, disobedient children say God is 3 because they rather belive in the theology ( vain thinking ) of vain men..

And they couldn't defend Islam😂

If Jesus is considered the Son of God simply because he made that claim, then by the same reasoning, Isaiah could also be seen as God based on the verse, 'I am the first and I am the last; besides me, there is no god' (Isaiah 44:6). Yet Isaiah was a man born of a woman and did not even perform miracles. This raises a fundamental question: how can we be sure which 'God' Isaiah or Jesus was referring to? The truth is, we can’t know with certainty. The term “God” is used frequently across different contexts, but the meaning varies depending on the speaker’s beliefs. Even among those who claim similar concepts, like unitarianism, there are often significant variations in interpretation. This diversity in understanding highlights the complexity of interpreting ancient texts and the meanings of divine titles.

The Bible (Old Testament) doesn’t refer to a singular 'God' as often assumed; instead, it speaks of Elohim, with Yahweh being one among them. Many Elohim are mentioned, which has no relation to the concept of the Trinity. There are around 20 Elohim in the Bible. The term Elohim generally refers to powerful ones. The gods of the Old Testament are all men.

Avery your channel is amazing, you actually teach in a calm dialogue and understandable way , your knowledge of scriptures is top. I love the team you have, David, Sam, it was heartwarming to hear Sam referring a young man man to you❤, you are doing a great work in the kingdom of God the father, may God bless you more abaudantly above what you ask...🙏🏻

What 'powerful" defense of God? She just utters the same unprovable utterances and fantasys. That is fine; but it is not proof of a 'God'. Proof of a 'belief', yeah. But not of a "God."

@32:35 I almost feel bad for this upper right corner dude. He is making the WINNING Case for brother Avery and Rabbi Eduardo and doesn’t even realize it…Glory be to God

@27:32 WOW. That cat in the upper right square looks so demonized as he chomps down his food like he is starving and manifests a demon. That’s just wild.

Cooked! He accused Avery of strawman fallacies, then he goes on to commit them himself, without even recognising it. Not only that, but he agrees to a premise, then he changes his mind and argues as if he didn’t agree with the premise because it no longer serves his dishonest claims. Unbelievably!

How come you can see God ( Jesus as you claim) but you cannot see paradise yet? You're saying Paradise is greater than God??

oh em gee . David knows the Quran better than the dakwah guy.

38:44 so I guess Mr Barter would rather interpret Judaism's Scriptures his way rather than simply comprehended the Sacred Prose through the overall context.

The problem I have is that it seems to me that people are searching for purpose. I will never be swayed to religion because I don't need one. I am very comfortable being the results of my decision and actions. I don't believe in objective morals, because they have never been demonstrated. I am fine with subjective morals as they have been demonstrated. I don't care about the origins of the universe as that is no more relevant to be than needing to know the origin of the toolls thst I use in my everyday life. I am indifferent to continued existence beyond this one. I don't need the threat of punishment in another life to do my best to be good in this life. Essentially, religion neither offers anything I care about nor answer any questions I deem relevant to me. If there is a god or gods/ goddeses they are either indifferent the vast majority of the world or impersonal interventionist at best. History demonstrates this.

36:12 - Good going Avery; caught him. Now's he sounding like a Mus1im with that heresy statement of the "Greatest Commandment." Guess he never read: "‘37 Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’[a] 38 This is the first and greatest commandment."

31:27 Mr Barter is now cherry-picking, lol.

5:12 David wook is the GOAT... thank you Brother, you did it well

32:20 - Yes, "One God The "Father" - John Barter's argument is a strawman fallacy given as leading question (also a fallacy), as he's assuming an understanding of Judaism's Deity ("Echad"/"Oneness") is agreed upon by all in the debate group; thus, trying to trap his opponents by word-smithing, because it isn't agreed upon by all; rather, it's something which the Messianic Jews/Hebrews (other millions of other Ekklesia) don't ascribe when it is defined as literal sort of numerical unity by outsiders (Unitarians or other Oneness cults); the same misrepresenting the meaning of the Hebrew Texts regarding the overall nature of Hayah's (Exodus 3:14) Being (YHWH) and Echad. Furthermore, the Oneness folks attempt to explain their view as a "Mystery of God" (earlier in the video) to justify having it, as if the SAME rational can't be applied to "Trinity" using Isaiah 55:9; as "Trinity" technically involves temporal paradox associated with relative Human perceptions (thus incomplete) of the Infinitely Eternal Being. All languages attempting to "explain" the absolute transcendent Being of YHWH (LORD) are always an approximation since language MUST anthropomorphize (for Human communication) what is impossible to fully explain in any human language (as they're all inferior for explaining the Transcendent Infinite Nature of YHWH). It's what we see on the book of Job. It's one of the reasons Yeshua spoke using parables. "Trinity" is a rational doctrine for what we see the whole of Scripture revealing, whereas Oneness Doctrines fall short, but Trinity STILL remains a decent approximation given Isaiah 55:9.

Why does James looks like AI?😂

Amen

simple question like this also cant answered😅

Every word in the Bible and Quran was spoken by men. Claiming divinity doesn’t make a person anything more than human. We might call such individuals holy, but scientifically, they are still Homo sapiens. This classification would also apply to figures like Jesus and the God of the Old Testament. When a human claims to be 'Lord,' 'Elohim,' or 'Yahweh,' it’s easy to assume they’re referring to a singular God, particularly the Father Jesus spoke of. However, a closer look at the context in the Old Testament shows this is not necessarily the case. Thus, we cannot conclude that there are three gods-or three-in-one-as in Christian doctrine. Additionally, the Holy Ghost, whom Jesus supposedly sent in the first century, doesn’t even claim to be God. Terms like 'Lord,' 'Elohim,' and 'Yahweh' each carry distinct meanings and do not refer to the God of the universe.

The Christian argument about the Trinity is like debating whether there is one moon or three moons. What you fail to understand is that, whether there is one moon or three moons, they are both finite. When we count something as one or three, we’re dealing with finite entities in space and time, within the universe as taught by science. Therefore, they cannot represent God. For God to be God, God must be omnipresent-existing everywhere-so nothing can exist outside of God. It is in this sense, God is one. Everything physical, including Jesus or any holy figure, exists within God. Thus, the concept of God in both Islam and Christianity is flawed.

Dawahh😢😂😂 what a 0 logic dude

The problem in discussions with Muslims is that their bases of evidence is relying on totally different approach that the mainstream and actual evidence. They rely on Trust me Bro’ thing. He said and she said and they trust hearsay narratives even if they are not witnessed. While people I. The west rely on the actual realistic evidence the make judgments. So no outcome out of these discussions other than it is obvious that the Muslims bases of truth is baseless according to reality but all true according to their imaginary unwitnessed narrative manner.

That's right , continue cooking , sweeping floor, clean toilets please.. Help your mother Avery! rather than blaspheming

Is Hawkins devoid of the Holy Spirit, because what stops the understanding of the theology of Jesus Christ for him. Has he ever studied Catholicism or that it dangerous until he accepts God exists? 😔 because without the acknowledgment (refusing God) how can a person describe faith? A person cannot act morally if they have no knowledge of understanding the importance of why to act morally. I think of the book of Genesis, the false belief and understanding that man without God can each to their own reasoning (without knowledge) make a decision

2:07 Then where were we, before we were born, may I ask? Saying that because you don't believe the 2:07 existence of a god , that there is nothing, what are we chop liver. And there are more than a thousand gods around the world, then which one are we referring to, why only the Christian god

Great work

Any verse from your bible ill expose?? And then he exposes how hes book says nothing..

So this GodLogic guy still believes in Supernatural Fairytales like his imaginary sky fairy wizard friend ‘God’ making the whole Universe and everything in it in SIX! Literal days and this ‘God’ had a real live ‘Son’ called ‘Jesus’ that ‘he’ created by magic from ‘Jesus’s’ mother who got pregnant by this ‘Gods’ power to create a life by magically getting her pregnant without her having sexual intercourse to do that. An actual virgin birth. 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣 GodLogic actually believes these things happened 100% 😂🤣😂🤣😂 There is no hope for people this deluded they are too far gone. It’s deeply ingrained in them, whatever is said to them falls on deaf ears and they refuse to think any other way but what has been brainwashed into them.

Are those Muslim children going to heaven getting their share of virgins and wine?

Osama is a liar. So, now, 10;94 should read, if you have doubts about yourself 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣,, according to Osama,,, these guys,,, may God forgive them

God bless this man. Big hang from Angola 🇦🇴

ARGUING with MUSLIM SHEIKHS or IMAMS is like ARGUING with a WOMEN,,,You'll never get ANYWHERE😂😂😂😂😂😂

Seems Dawkins is desperately seeking to be persuaded God existe.Either he makes good money out of mocking God and Christianity or he really wants to believe in God and tríes to get different scientists to provide evidence of his existence It' s absolutely absurd if he is really persuaded Christ is a myrhical digure, if he"s got evidence Christianity is a preposterpus lie and superstición, why doesn't he produce scientific evidence of such assertions We might as wellbelieve the soy is green and the sun is blue

I'll tell ypu that Jesus was a Muslim and Islam is the truth and God means Allah Mathew 26:39 Jesus Prayed in the ground just like the Muslims Luke 24 Jesus said to all People peace be on to you wich means Assalamaleykum means Peace be on to you and we all saw that the Bibel Changed alot Mathew 8:20 Jesus called himself Son of a Men that means Jesus isnt son of God. JESUS WAS NOT A F**ING CHRISTIAN.HE WAS A MUSLIM AND CALLED THE PEOPLE TO WORSHIP ALLAH In the day of Judgemend you will find Out that Jesus was a Muslim and a Messenger Off Allah (SWT) Allahu Akbar Proud to be a Muslim ☪️ Jesus was a Messenger Off Allah Just like Mose, Abraham and Muhammad and Quran revieled at last one Islam is the Truth Allahmdulliah👆☪️ he better Challenge Dr.Zakir Naik or Islam Schoolars and he better Challenges WAYOFLIGHTSQ Real name of Jesus was Isa

I said it almost under all Avery debates with a muslims: Without Lie and Twist Islam not exist No other Way LIE of muslims it is their the Straight Path to their wicked Allah to the Hell Oh boys oh boys Condemnation of Just God on all of you who doing this

Avery probably won’t see this. But this truly blessed me

The funny part is that, only the paster is herd clearly😂 u guys are trying to hard

How are u so proud seeing a paster having a debate with a muslim who hasn't really learn islam to the fullest. The muslim brother doesn't even know when was Adam born or when he past away

Dudes like “it’s Muhammad’s own doubts of his inner self” so now we have Allah giving to Jibril a revelation of Muhammad to Muhammad. Bruh

Getting in the ring with David Woods is like getting in the ring with the son of a lion. Oh, wait a minute… he *is* the son of a lion.

You CANNOT defend islam without lies and dishonesty

I have already ignored her why is she on this panel. She doesn't know the subject. Moses myth King David myth rubbish. Her "know" comments are fallacious and prove her lack of knowledge

Amen pastor tell them the truth 🙏

I can see both Godlogic and the muslim in the thumbnail

Hirsi Ali who became a Dutch citizen by asylum fraud, was the black face who the multicultural social engineers put in the spotlight to call Pim Fortuyn a racist and danger to minorities and climbed her way to the top on the death back of Theo van Gogh who was beheaded on the streets of Amsterdam because he followed his underbelly feeling and followed this opportunist.

Arguing with someone who can't actually see your line of logic is actually very frustrating.