- 1 057
- 202 806
faturechi
United States
Приєднався 21 лип 2006
I mostly make videos about the Hebrew Bible. I recommend beginners start with my Jonah playlist.
There should be a link to the Jacob's Ladder Discord server in the latest video. You can also comment asking for one and I will reply with a link.
There should be a link to the Jacob's Ladder Discord server in the latest video. You can also comment asking for one and I will reply with a link.
Відео
Father Stephen De Young joins Hebrew Bible Study
Переглядів 3,7 тис.Рік тому
Father Stephen De Young joins Hebrew Bible Study
Shacharit Part 3: Shema and its blessing and Amida (Nusach Chabad - Siddur Tehilas Hashem)
Переглядів 3173 роки тому
Shacharit Part 3: Shema and its blessing and Amida (Nusach Chabad - Siddur Tehilas Hashem)
Shacharit Part 2: Pisukei D'Zimra (Nusach Chabad - Siddur Tehilas Hashem)
Переглядів 4083 роки тому
Shacharit Part 2: Pisukei D'Zimra (Nusach Chabad - Siddur Tehilas Hashem)
Maariv (Nusach Chabad - Siddur Tehilas Hashem)
Переглядів 2,2 тис.3 роки тому
Maariv (Nusach Chabad - Siddur Tehilas Hashem)
Alcoholic DESTROYED with FACTS and LOGIC
Переглядів 2733 роки тому
Alcoholic DESTROYED with FACTS and LOGIC
Protestant DESTROYED with FACTS and LOGIC
Переглядів 3033 роки тому
Protestant DESTROYED with FACTS and LOGIC
Feminist DESTROYED with FACTS and LOGIC
Переглядів 7503 роки тому
Feminist DESTROYED with FACTS and LOGIC
Trinitarian DESTROYED with FACTS and LOGIC
Переглядів 4513 роки тому
Trinitarian DESTROYED with FACTS and LOGIC
Theodicy, Gnosticism, Neoplatonism and GrimGriz
Переглядів 3043 роки тому
Theodicy, Gnosticism, Neoplatonism and GrimGriz
Hebrew Bible in English - II Samuel 7:1-17
Переглядів 504 роки тому
Hebrew Bible in English - II Samuel 7:1-17
Hebrew Bible in English - Revised Common Lectionary and Isaiah 61
Переглядів 524 роки тому
Hebrew Bible in English - Revised Common Lectionary and Isaiah 61
Hebrew Bible in English - Isaiah 53 the "forbidden chapter"
Переглядів 1504 роки тому
Hebrew Bible in English - Isaiah 53 the "forbidden chapter"
I think: “this mystical shi too high for me” then immediately conk asleep
Might’ve been “I’m too high for this mystical shi”. Sorry
1:00:00 I think going into the book of Hosea and St. Paul's understanding and uses of it in Romans would be helpful in this discussion about marriage.
27:45 know who else likes Lacan and Zizek? Peter Rollins. He also has a good podcast on “what is Marxism?” And “what is fascism?”
Search for “The Fundamentalists” if you wanna find them.
Sorry I missed this when it was live, but I got all the way through it! Was especially happy to hear Chezi's announcement at the end about all the upcoming stuff with Yosef, etc. Looking forward to it.
52:00 totally agree about your observation, there is a spirit on the top of herearchy & saying there isn't seems a bit like a cultish.
I have no idea what this stream was about
53:00 A lot of street cred to whoever actually makes this happen. Contributions to the community in physical structural reality matter
We disagree little. This is litmus for me ;-)
This is the catch phrase: "Bro, do you even do old testament?"
GOD BLESS YA!! I said the same thing. Hari wha?? I would point out though that ANYBODY is not WILLING??? Is NOT qualified. Feed the sheep. 💞
The monarchical trinity appears in the article for the trinity on new advent under a section about the greek view of the trinity
Can I listen to this without violating jewish laws?
Of course Lynn. I hope all is well
@chezispero3533 I enjoy this & will watch, I learn so much. Thank you
@@lynnlavoy6778my pleasure it's here for this purpose. You are welcome to join this week
Sam speaks well
I was baffled by the fact the universalists could find a way to get confrontational with you, but it just validated my belief that they are captured by Satan.
Really great conversation
That's a cute baby. God bless
I am very glad that you are advocating for judgement. Thank you for that. And you are right, without it, then it is just nihilism. Where I am undecided on my view of "universalism", is around the idea of free will, and how much we are allowed to choose. Can we choose non existence if we don't even know what that means? Is it possible to usurp God's creation? Does God allow it? Can God forget? Does God forget the Amalekites?
Maybe to help make this question make more sense: Does God allow us to usurp His creation in the fact that he created me? Can I tell God to unmake me? ("Annihilate me'?) If God does not grant me this choice, does he trespass my free will? Does God trespass His own creation, if he made me such a way that I could choose my eternal state? And then, is God ultimately just trespassing against Himself? It feels like it would resolve in some weird paradox or tangled knot. So that probably didn't help it make sense lol, sorry.
Much of this gets resolved in Judaism by transmigration of souls.
@@faturechi i don’t think I understand this well enough.
So ive heard this a couple times that universalism pops up in people that haven't suffered enough (1:25:00 ish? And PVK said this too, which was surprising). Aaannnd...I'm not a card carrying universalist but know enough of the figures involved that this is really super not true.
Sorry, but I simply do not believe you. Despite having met many people in the United States who imagine they understand suffering, there is a primal level of deprivation that almost nobody in the West ever actually experiences which goes to the heart of this in ways Western people simply fail to understand. I forget who exactly it was who said that he was starving so much in a concentration camp that he caught himself wishing his father would die so he could eat his portion. Unless you are talking about that level of deprivation, you aren't even scratching the surface.
@@faturechi No need to be sorry in disagreeing. Reading my own comment, I didn't explain myself well. But I was not thinking about modern people at all but the historical writers who seriously mulled the possibility of what we are now speaking of as 'Universalism'. It is simply this position that "you haven't suffered enough to believe in eternal hell" that I think is clearly weird, wrong, counterproductive and unnecessary and I'll pop my head up for it, since it's occurred more than once now.
@ As I tried to make clear in the video, I don't believe there is much of a difference between "eternal conscious torment" and "a really long time in purgatory". I find most universalists motte and bailey themselves into the latter, which is a cheap trick.
1:39:30 Again, I don't know what universalists you are talking to who don't believe this. Although I can't really speak for JDW or Grail Country...nor twitter....but I hope that they don't throw away the judgement. It is for the fact that I believe in reaping what you sow which makes me a "universalist". God is a consuming fire, and I don't think creation or judgement is arbitrary, and I also think it is eternal.
What universalists are you talking to that don't affirm correction or judgement? Are they mostly on twitter? I haven't kept up with the convo enough lately. 1:23:00
2:08:23 “ why are we even bothering? If you do good things, good things will come. If you do bad things, bad things will come.” First, Job. Second: this is good and will work for many, but not for all. There is no universal prescription for what every human person needs for transformation. Outside of the generic: love G-d. Some people will need the doctrine of hell flushed out in more nuance terms because they will have more nuance questions
2:03:30 the sin is not “forgotten”. It’s transformed. Forgiveness doesn’t change the facts. It changes the meaning.
1:56:06 so…we agree ❤ Edit: why would finite sins be punished for an unending duration/quantity of time? Only God exists forever, no?
Why would an infinite God give two shits about a finite world like 🤣🤣🤣
@ cause he loves.
@@WhiteStoneName lmao alr, God hates sin simple as
1:47:00 Edward fudge is an annihilationist (conditional immortality). He’s not a universalist. And I own that book.
"But what in the world's as rare and nourishing as a life's work? As I see it, God gave me a gift. And by way of recompense... He's given me another." - Penance, The Nevers Reward and punishment
1:21:30 Sam: “the clearest teachings about Hell are from Jesus” vs St. Paul and the rest of the NT. “Jesus is not hard to understand at all.” It’s obviously debatable, Sam. ❤
1:15:15 why is it only universalists who shouldn’t talk about their understanding and vision of Hell? The other perspectives have their own pragmatic problems.
I think everyone who speaks with great specificity about the World to Come is a fool.
@ probably right.
1:12:40 punishment as (mere?) retribution or vengeance. Is G-d like a father? To whom? Some? On what criteria? Are we deists? How do people exist?
1:05:45 Sam Tideman (transfigured3673)
52:07 “the unholy Trinity of evil is: universalism, anarchism, and egalitarianism” Two for three.
46:30 would you be open to talking to Jordan Daniel wood? I’d set it up if you were both willing?
Wow. That would be great.
I’m not a fan of JDW at all after that stream on grail country. Wouldn’t JDW just get mad if Jacob disagrees with him?
@ maybe. Idk, if it’s a good Matchup. Probably not. Just figured I’d ask.
@@WhiteStoneName oh, i thought you meant Sam and JDW - my bad. I tuned into Grail Country on that convo thinking sure that Sam would be there for a countervailing opinion.
@ oh, I’m sure Sam would be up to talking to JDW.
Fr Stephen joins 4:57 Mr Footwear, please add the pre-game and introduction to the playlist 🙏
Jacob, if you can see I download all these videos now because I have no internet in temporary accommodation. Please don’t think I’m a stalker archiving everything haha 😅 it’s only a semi stalker behaviour I assure you .. I often wonder now if channels can see I download everything to watch ..😊😊 peace , and stay safe
I can't see, but I certainly appreciate someone having a copy of my videos, because I don't.
Are we sure that the verb used for "sold" in the Greek is in the passive voice and not the middle voice? It's in the imperfect which has the same syntax for passive and the middle voice, but the middle voice would give the "sold onself" that Yosef was pointing out as lacking since the Hebrew has reflexive verbs.
This is was such an excellent discussion! I hope Fr. Stephen, Yosef and Jacob continue the conversation on these topics and go down some of the roads that were touched on but left for another time.
I'll preface this with, I know he's of American Calvinist stock and the Lutheran tradition isn't very strong at the moment. Still it's funny to me that around 1:45 Father Stephen gives the Lutheran principal principle regarding the Baptised Life (daily dying to sin, daily rising with Him), with Baptism as Luther's chief picture of Justification, ( Luther's perfect tense of, "I am Baptised" both referring to God's work and man's changed life) then says protestants reject that.
Are you saved bro?
@andrewternet8370 I'm not as high as this comment sounds, but yes; by God's work in the beginning, 2000yrs ago, 30yrs ago, last week, and by His grace tomorrow in the Absolution and Holy Communion, looking forward to being saved in the Judgement in grace upon grace.
@@j.g.4942 But have you accepted Jesus into your heart bro?
@andrewternet8370 I offer it to Him to be recreated every Sunday, if not everyday; and lift it up to Him every Eucharist. It's not like it's my decision dictates His will. I'm more concerned with if He's accepted me into Himself, as God promises in Holy Baptism and Holy Communion.
Great discourse. I really appreciate everyone here. I was wondering if the book Yosef was a referenceing was the Jewish Annotated New Testament by Amy-Jill Levine? There is the Complete Jewish Bible and a commentary by Stern that I've been thinking about. A Hebrew Roots congregation near me use them. One interesting note is they don't have the Trinity in their statement of Faith posted on their wall. They are affiliated with One for Israel and a few other Messianic groups, so they keep a version of Shabbat and few other Jewish festivals and Holy Days (of course it is their version but we've slapped our Library onto yours so why not have more reverence) . I plan to start worshipping there regularly despite the hate for HRM (Side note my family and I sporadically attend the Black Pentecostal gathering currently a house away from us). Also, I recently received Learning Biblical Hebrew and accompanying workbook by Karl V. Kutz and Rebekah L. Josberger. I'm excited to start The Study and meditation.
Yes I did mean the one that Amy Jill Levine edited
@@yosefrazin6455I appreciate it, Yosef.
Many messianic congregations don't overtly speak of the Trinity because they realize it is a non-starter. They generally will speak out of both sides of their mouths. They tend to be incredibly deceptive and dishonest, which is why they end up with so many clergy scandals. Obviously, there are actually faithful people who are sometimes involved. But I would be very careful. You might want to talk with David. He was very involved with them.
1:27:00 I’d very much like to know the title of the book Yosef mentions
I asked Yosef.
Holy Russia, Sacred Israel by Dominic Rubin
@@faturechi many thanks
@@yosefrazin6455 Thanks!
1:43:40 I think everyone will fully keep Torah in the end
What about John the Baptist?
@ him too.
@@WhiteStoneName are there Nazerites in heaven?
@ can you just say explicitly what you’re getting at? Cause I’m not following.
Romans 8 does not strike me as pessimistic though. Nor Romans 11.
1:35:45 I think this is the same thing as my other point. A baby doesn't know what "do not covet" is. You have to teach a child not to steal another child's toy. Its not implicit that it is a "law" until it is revealed or taught.
So I listened to Father Stephens answer and I think I would disagree. I think it is about your conscience. If someone tells me "we have a law that you should not murder", I don't then get a desire to murder. I think that it is saying that there was a point (when I was a child) where all things were permissible, and I could live without conviction of sin. But when the law (do not covet) is revealed, then I have the awareness that I do sometimes desire to covet, or have coveted in the past, then I must repent (die to my old patterns) and turn back to God (or the father, if I am still using child as example), and seek forgiveness and his aid to do better and learn more.
@@almondtree What about Yosef's response, which is, you don't specficially need the Torah in order to know the law of "do not covent", weren't there Greeks who came to this conclusion apart from the Torah?
@@olubunmiolumuyiwa Yeah, thats a good point, but I don't know hebrew or greek, so a lot of this just feels like semantics to me. The way someone might use torah would be the same way they would use law. But to Jewish people that might be irresponsible. But I thought that Paul was getting more at genesis stuff in general, maybe even more metaphysical type of stuff...or essences. like light and law and torah are one.
@@almondtree I mean, I've definitely sucked my own cuts after learning about the Noahide Laws to see what God would do. Hopefully He has mercy on me.
1:19:30 But does EO elevate the Torah over the Gospels? "looking through the glass backwards" type of stuff.
but I really don't know if one way should be held over the other. I think they are all supposed to reflect back on one another and almost speak to and help interpret each other...at least in theory.
@almondtree Fr. De Young has made the point at various times that while “law” can be a sometimes valid translation for Torah, it’s a bit of a juridical rendering that casts a legalistic hue over the Scriptures. On average, a more accurate translation might be “teachings”. I don’t know if this casts any of the passages you’re looking at in a different light, but a lot of Romans takes on a different meaning when switching out “law” for “teachings”.
@nathandaniels4823 Thats probably helpful to me as well. I think I often translate it in my head as something like order or light. Possibly even knowledge of good an evil. So I think teachings would fit nicely as well. "That is that and this is this."
1:16:10 "He was alive once without the law/torah" I think he simply means that he was a baby once, childlike innocence. Babies have no law/torah, and no condemnation. When you give your child a new rule, then the accountability and standards for growth come, and also the temptation comes to break the rules. And we incorporate those laws (no matter how minor) into who we are as people, and who we should be. Something like when you learn a law/truth or say "i see", then you die. Its genesis stuff I believe.
Except babies DO have Torah. Circumcision at eight days at the very least... We are born into Torah. But if you believe Torah= condemnation I could see your reading. A baby doesn't have yetzers
@@yosefrazin6455 Touche hmmmm..... I was thinking Torah=law....but the nkjv says law instead of torah... So I would not be familiar with the way that you are using torah in the sense of a circumcision...could it still be used as law? Like law in terms of tradition? which is interesting... What is yetzers.
1:01:00 I should preface that I am LOVING this convo so far, but I would agree with Yosef that this is a hard sell for me.
Ah, the clip function is missing. 1:00:27 - 1:00:33 has branding material potential. “We love crying babies here. That’s what this channel is for.”
I was once in a synagogue and the Rabbi complained about the crying baby. I decided never to go to one of his services again.
I was entertained. Jacob should now be able to put aside his besmirching of Paul of Tarsus.
Really enjoyed this stream. And hey, if this stream doesn't fulfill Jacob's goals, we can always have Romans Stream 2: Electric Boogaloo, or maybe Galatians Stream.
2:20:55 Is that a reference to Dave Rubin commenting on the conversation with Eric and Brett Weinstein?
Father Stephen's pop culture references always throw me for a loop.