ExecutiveEd
ExecutiveEd
  • 19
  • 161 209
thirteen days clip2
thirteen days clip2
Переглядів: 102 622

Відео

mobsters
Переглядів 47 тис.12 років тому
mobsters
intolerablecruelty
Переглядів 10712 років тому
intolerablecruelty
fiveeasypieces
Переглядів 13712 років тому
fiveeasypieces
theoffice
Переглядів 412 років тому
theoffice
30rock
Переглядів 412 років тому
30rock
Lipscomb Executive Education
Переглядів 15813 років тому
Lipscomb Executive Education
The New Normal: Business Lending In Turbulent Times
Переглядів 4213 років тому
The New Normal: Business Lending In Turbulent Times
Don Williamson on The New Normal: Business Lending In Turbulent Times
Переглядів 4213 років тому
Don Williamson on The New Normal: Business Lending In Turbulent Times
The New Normal: Business Lending In Turbulent Times
Переглядів 5613 років тому
The New Normal: Business Lending In Turbulent Times
Lipscomb_Titans_Nick.mpg
Переглядів 1014 років тому
Lipscomb_Titans_Nick.mpg
Lipscomb MBA Fellowship Program
Переглядів 37414 років тому
Its the best of both worlds: academic excellence in an MBA education that runs simultaneously with a job in your desired field. The combination is a highly engaging, highly successful and highly marketable educational experience. Lipscomb Fellows will have the advantage of a one-year working experience in one of the following three areas: * Health Care * Entertainment * Sports Management For mo...
Negotiation - Power of the Opening Offer
Переглядів 1,2 тис.14 років тому
Negotiation - Power of the Opening Offer
Negotiation - The Dance
Переглядів 75614 років тому
Negotiation - The Dance
Negotiation - Mixed Motive Process
Переглядів 3,5 тис.14 років тому
Negotiation - Mixed Motive Process
Negotiation - Go Below the Line
Переглядів 15714 років тому
Negotiation - Go Below the Line
Negotiation definition
Переглядів 3,5 тис.14 років тому
Negotiation definition
Lipscomb Certificate in Accountancy 2010
Переглядів 1,2 тис.14 років тому
Lipscomb Certificate in Accountancy 2010
Business Negotiation/Dr. Randy Lowry
Переглядів 53115 років тому
Business Negotiation/Dr. Randy Lowry

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @gruntforever7437
    @gruntforever7437 2 місяці тому

    The only quibble I have with showing the destroyer going to battle stations is that they loaded a blue drill rd instead of a live rd

  • @4HBirtcher
    @4HBirtcher 6 місяців тому

    1:01 If it’s like Star Trek then it’s “Red Alert, Red Alert! All hands man your battle stations!”!

  • @123456RaulMorales
    @123456RaulMorales Рік тому

    0:45 "Grozny, Grozny, this is the Destroyer Pierce of the United States of America. Do you read[🇷🇺]?" 0:50 "Grozny, Grozny, this is the Destroyer Pierce of the United States of America. Do you read[🇷🇺]?"

  • @ChrisGWGreen
    @ChrisGWGreen Рік тому

    I would have liked more from this scene... "this is language" is such a brilliant line.

  • @toyotaandlexussupercharged6699

    Democrats so stupid

  • @davidpickens8800
    @davidpickens8800 Рік тому

    They loaded blue shells into the breech.

  • @sethpotter9592
    @sethpotter9592 Рік тому

    Macnamara was an idiot. He was the architect of Vietnam and it blew up in his face leaving LBJ holding the bag.

  • @brianzybura8633
    @brianzybura8633 Рік тому

    Get out of my way Mr. Secretary. Man , how I love that. Today that is what American farmers should be saying to the Secretary of Agriculture, because he wants to eventually rule and regulate farmers to the bone using the excuse that it is all good for the climate. The climate change initiative baloney.

  • @wolfman-nz6or
    @wolfman-nz6or Рік тому

    kennedy was the man and smarter than his war hungry generals.jfk would have been great and served 2, terms if it wasnt for lbj and his texas connection....they killed kennedy.

  • @mauriciolacruz
    @mauriciolacruz Рік тому

    What's the watch JFK (Bruce Greenwood) wears in this movie?

  • @GEZ-KNUTSCHI
    @GEZ-KNUTSCHI 2 роки тому

    Eine der besten Szenen im ganzen Film.

  • @w.cooksy421
    @w.cooksy421 2 роки тому

    What's the translation for the warning they're giving the Soviets at 0:44? Is it along the lines of "stop or heave to, we intend to board you" like it is in another navy show I've seen called Sea Patrol?

    • @marcostisanifrancadanese3076
      @marcostisanifrancadanese3076 Рік тому

      He seems to just be stating who they are, something along the lines of “Grozny, Grozny, this the Destroyer Pierce, of the United States of America, over”

  • @andrewwerner2061
    @andrewwerner2061 2 роки тому

    I think in order to be defense secretary you have to be in military longer than what Robert McNamara was in

  • @andrewwerner2061
    @andrewwerner2061 2 роки тому

    We are kidding ourselves what did he mean by that ? Was he for this or against it ?

  • @MisterMac4321
    @MisterMac4321 2 роки тому

    The scene is a good portrayal of ADM Anderson and SecDef McNamara's rather tense relationship. Anderson deeply resented what he saw as "civilian interference" in a strictly naval operation. However, the scene fails to fully represent the reality of the situation then on-going at sea. First off, only the day before, there were multiple reports of Soviet submarines shadowing the various USN warships in the vicinity of the quarantine line - this was the first report of such submarine activity in the area since the beginning of the crisis, so tensions were already high and nerves strained that evening. Secondly, the actual intelligence picture of where the Soviet merchant ships were at the time was far less precise than the film suggests, and McNamara's little tantrum (as shown here) was actually in a fairly private setting with just him and ADM Anderson and their immediate staffs present, and the tirade was more theoretical (about what the Admiral expected would occur the following morning when the Soviet ships actually reached the quarantine line) than about a specifically "disobedient" firing of starshells at the time of the event. The scene makes for good theater and accurately conveys the tense atmosphere and frayed nerves of the time, but it's inaccurate in a number of important details.

    • @StephenKershaw1
      @StephenKershaw1 Рік тому

      the admiral should have been relieved of duty immediately... ego, incompetence, arrogance...

    • @davidrendall7195
      @davidrendall7195 Рік тому

      @@StephenKershaw1 No that's what you think based on this overly dramatic representation of an actor's portrayal of a screen writers story and a director's perspective of an incident which was wholly different in reality. McNamara openly questioned the accepted procedures and methods of identification for dealing with Soviet submarines. He did this in front of junior ranks and civilians without clearance, in the operations room as tensions were at their highest. Anderson asked for a private meeting in a side room to discuss the issue and McNamara took offense. Incidentally after Anderson explained the situation, McNamara made no suggestions or alterations to the RoE or chain of command procedures. No starshell was fired, no row in front of the men was made. Admiral Anderson was later commended for his handling of the blockade and was slated to become the next Chairman of the Joint Staffs. He featured on the front cover of Time as man of the hour, and I think that's where McNamara's ego, incompetence and arrogance went into top gear. He forced him out of contention for Chairman and into early retirement and then trashed the Admiral in his memoirs - like a coward. It's possible that with Admiral Anderson as the next Chairman, someone prepared to stand up to authority, the escalation of the Vietnam War may have been averted. As the Diem regime was falling apart, McNamara had taken General Maxwell D Taylor out of retirement to advise the President directly. He had good relations with the Kennedy family. This caused huge disruption to the decision making process of the Joint Chiefs, Security Council, State, DoD and Cabinet - right when the way ahead needed clear thinking. The US Army CoS Gen. Johnson, US Navy COps McDonald, CIA Director McCone were all for a limited engagement policy and against Kennedy's Saigon coup - but McNamara went around the joint chiefs and Army and put his protege Westmorland in direct command of MACV. He then advised President Kennedy and Johnson he could keep the war under control with Westmorland, fighting it like a Detroit CEO with micromanagement OCD. And we know how that went, don't we. Costner can portray all the Generals and Admirals however he wants in his films, if it helps him with his JFK halo fixation - fine - but Cuba and Vietnam were their mistakes, not the Command Staff.

    • @StephenKershaw1
      @StephenKershaw1 Рік тому

      @@davidrendall7195 no, it's based on several books Ive read on the topic. Your presumptuous disposition is noted and also exposes you as naive and inexperienced.

    • @davidrendall7195
      @davidrendall7195 Рік тому

      @@StephenKershaw1 Which books? I've read McNamara's book 'In Retrospect' and that doesn't mention a shouting match in the ops room. From memory its not even mentioned like this in Robert Kennedy's Thirteen days - and that has to be taken with a piece of political salt. From Admiral Anderson's own papers "The Reminiscenses of Admiral George W. Anderson Jr, U.S. Navy (Retired)," He explained the Ops room story thus: "One incident occurred. We knew where one of these particular submarines was located. We had that information from the most highly classified intelligence that the navy had at the time. We were very anxious to preserve that intelligence, and very few people know about this type of intelligence. We had a destroyer sitting on top of this submarine. One evening, McNamara, [Roswell] Gilpatric, and an entourage of his press people came down to flag plot and, in the course of their interrogations, they asked why that destroyer was out of line. I sort of tried to pass it off because not only were there some of McNamara’s people there who were not cleared for this information, but some of my own watch officers were not cleared for it in the general area of the flag plot. After some discussion, I said to McNamara-he kept pressing me, ‘Come inside,’ and I took him into a littler inner sanctuary where only the people who had clearance for that particular type of classified information were permitted and I explained the whole thing to him and to his satisfaction, as well. He left, and we walked down the corridor, and I said: ‘Well, Mr. Secretary, you go back to your office and I’ll go to mine and we’ll take care of things,’ or words to that effect, which apparently was the wrong thing to say to somebody of McNamara’s personality." So from the memoirs of the two people involved in the incident, neither say it was as portrayed in the movie.

    • @StephenKershaw1
      @StephenKershaw1 Рік тому

      @@davidrendall7195 McNamar's The Fog of War absolutely covered this.... The Fourteenth Day by David G Coleman more than testified witness to the on-going feud. I get it. you didn't like someone responding to your presumptuous post and being dressed down publicly and you're looking for a feud. Grow a pair and act like a man for god's sake; Anderson was a weak man which was proven numerous times.

  • @savethedeveloper
    @savethedeveloper 2 роки тому

    Hollywood shows McNamara to be the smart one here, in reality his career is defined by Vietnam which killed over 50,000 US personnel

  • @HockeyFan1972
    @HockeyFan1972 2 роки тому

    Damn Democrats! They can fuck up a wet dream!

  • @bicyclist2
    @bicyclist2 2 роки тому

    Thankfully I have this movie on DVD. I've seen it many times. It never gets old. This is one of the greatest scenes. Thank you.

  • @joe6096
    @joe6096 2 роки тому

    John Paul Jones? Great bass line on The Lemon Song.

  • @anthonybanchero3072
    @anthonybanchero3072 2 роки тому

    The Pearce was played by the USS Joseph P. Kennedy Jr.

  • @Democratic_Industrialism
    @Democratic_Industrialism 2 роки тому

    Motherfucker almost started WW3

  • @michaelcodelmar9547
    @michaelcodelmar9547 2 роки тому

    If the soviets retaliated...WW III!

  • @tommyenglish5104
    @tommyenglish5104 2 роки тому

    Amazing movie, watched it the other day. One thing I have noticed and maybe you people out there can clarify, 4-5 seconds into this clip, do you hear what sounds like a laser blast from Star Wars?

  • @rikkogeluz8214
    @rikkogeluz8214 2 роки тому

    The oceanic system putatively pat because semicolon nationally annoy in a rhetorical timpani. outrageous, future futuristic octagon

  • @williambolden6437
    @williambolden6437 2 роки тому

    He ran up on admiral and said “STOP THAT FIRING!” 😂😂

  • @01Mary02
    @01Mary02 2 роки тому

    This movie never got half of the accolades it deserved.

  • @ianmangham4570
    @ianmangham4570 2 роки тому

    Mcnamara was a major league WANKER

  • @Tyler-qg2sj
    @Tyler-qg2sj 2 роки тому

    US would've won

  • @RiverFunsies
    @RiverFunsies 2 роки тому

    Highly likely this conversation never happened.

  • @frankhoffman3566
    @frankhoffman3566 2 роки тому

    I'm sure people had nightmares then. A single miscalculation would have been all it would have taken to plunge the world back into the stone age. We are in a similar situation today, perhaps worse. War in Europe, A major nuclear power run by one man who may be ill. Three nuclear powers and 30+ countries supplying weapons to the underdog nation. Disinformation rampant. With so many moving parts and with so much death hanging on every decision, the situation is primed for miscalculation. We can only hope that there will one day be a movie about this time, and not pictures of it scratched into the wall of a cave.

    • @cooperdefrenne5790
      @cooperdefrenne5790 Рік тому

      Well said

    • @frankhoffman3566
      @frankhoffman3566 Рік тому

      @@cooperdefrenne5790 ...Thanks, but it's been a year now for this war . I've had a few vivid nightmares filled with fire and radiation. Still, I can't say that we should stop arming Ukraine. It's hard to say no to people who have tasted democracy and who fight to keep it. But the deadliness of the weapons escalates. Main battle tanks are going, maybe soon fighter jets. Nuclear threats have been heard. Both sides see an absolute necessity of winning. I don't take the Bible as literally true. Still, this all has a feeling of biblical Armageddon. I'm not a praying man, but I have been praying. There must be a creative way out of this war, but I don't see anything in the world that looks like a fresh road to peace. I don't see it, but it's what I pray for.

  • @gregfawcett5152
    @gregfawcett5152 2 роки тому

    Come on...what Admiral back in the 60's wouldn't be all in favor of a war...boys with toys...

  • @grahamgallick2928
    @grahamgallick2928 2 роки тому

    He is such a good actor. "What if they made the same mistake I did" although that doesn't sound like McNamara

    • @patrickwolff2727
      @patrickwolff2727 2 роки тому

      ua-cam.com/video/dbgOACJpZg0/v-deo.html 0:30 That actor is great!

    • @lowtdave
      @lowtdave 2 роки тому

      Damn. It's been forever since I've seen this movie. I always love good actors who you watch and just believe. Guess I need to go and watch this movie again.

    • @patricksmith5282
      @patricksmith5282 Рік тому

      @@lowtdave everyone except Costner, he was horrible especially the bad attempt at a Boston accent.

  • @jamesdenofantiquity
    @jamesdenofantiquity 2 роки тому

    I am not sure of the historical accuracy of the confrontation, however, both men were right in their points, but both would have been wrong for doing this in front of the personnel. The severe disrespect and disparaging language used against the Admiral would have been severally bad for morale and would have undermined the chain of command in the room and beyond. The Admiral, by disagreeing so vehemently in public with the SecDef would have been seen as being too overly aggressive. But, bottom line, both men should have held the disagreement out of sight and ear range. I have heard of hellatious fights between officers and their civilian counter parts but, out in front of the troops you are shoulder to shoulder.

    • @jt7638
      @jt7638 2 роки тому

      That f*cking admiral should have faced a severe reprimand for disrespecting civilian command of the military. This must be for dramatic effect because he was WAY OUT OF LINE.

    • @joestueckrath5275
      @joestueckrath5275 2 роки тому

      This confrontation did happen and Anderson got removed

    • @hanscumyeah4216
      @hanscumyeah4216 2 роки тому

      They were using their gun in urgency, those disparaging language toward the Admiral was needed. Chain of command be damned if miscommunication resulted in 3rd WW.

    • @joestueckrath5275
      @joestueckrath5275 2 роки тому

      @@hanscumyeah4216 admiral Anderson got appointed after the crisis ended to be ambassador to Portugal until June 1st 1966 then in 1970 he got appointment to the intelligence advisory board that post lasted until 1976 when he retired

    • @ironsideeve2955
      @ironsideeve2955 2 роки тому

      You try dealing with incompetent civilian govt officials… This was a movie not a documentary

  • @speedracer6294
    @speedracer6294 2 роки тому

    I bet this nonsensical exchange never happened But portraying actually being on the edge on Armageddon isn't dramatic enough for Hollywood types......

  • @bravephiladelphia6300
    @bravephiladelphia6300 2 роки тому

    “In a nuclear world true enemy cannot be destroyed… In a nuclear world true enemy is war itself”. - Denzel Washington-Crimson Tide

  • @spartanrh83
    @spartanrh83 2 роки тому

    Kennedy sucked at the Cold War, really screwed things up at the Bay of Pigs, and screwed things up even more during the Cuban Missle Crises. JFKs idiotic mistakes and arrogant blunders put him at direct odds with the Pentagon and Intel community, so much so that Kennedy was going to strike first and gut the CIA and clip the wings of the Pentagon. That's why they killed him. That being said, if JFK was successful in his efforts, the world would be a much better place right now.

  • @jebbroham1776
    @jebbroham1776 2 роки тому

    This is what happens when civilians who have never served a day in the military think they can command a military situation. Fortunately for us, JFK HAD served in the military during WW2, and had a clear mind as to the Naval implications of what was going on in the waters around Cuba. This why I firmly believe that the only qualification that should matter for a presidential nomination is a military background.

    • @jonathanj.7344
      @jonathanj.7344 2 роки тому

      But the film also illustrates what would happen if the military men themselves had the final say.

    • @thelargefart
      @thelargefart 2 роки тому

      What are you talking about. McNamara served in the Air Force in WW2

    • @mickywanderer8276
      @mickywanderer8276 2 роки тому

      @@thelargefart Not in command of anything. He was a numbers cruncher.

    • @benrae6337
      @benrae6337 2 роки тому

      Why exactly is a military background more essential for effectively leading a country during military situations, than an economics one in leading during peace times?

    • @jebbroham1776
      @jebbroham1776 2 роки тому

      @@benrae6337 You can learn economics from advisers and books, but you cant learn how to think militarily from a command perspective unless you've actually done it. JFK may not have exactly been well rounded in terms of grasping the domestic side of things, but he certainly knew how to approach a tense situation involving the use of military force, which ultimately proved most fortunate for us and the world.

  • @Johnston212
    @Johnston212 2 роки тому

    I watch these clips and I keep thinking about what Carl Sagan described MAD as: two guys standing hip deep in gasoline flicking matches at each other. We came pretty close to igniting the whole thing, didn't we?

    • @RideAcrossTheRiver
      @RideAcrossTheRiver 2 роки тому

      "Came"? Putin's made active threats to use nuclear weapons unilaterally over a regional conventional war.

    • @checkmate778
      @checkmate778 2 роки тому

      We're still pretty close, though not as close as this

  • @stevesmith8484
    @stevesmith8484 2 роки тому

    McNamara was a war crimmal, plain and simple.

  • @BubblegumCrash332
    @BubblegumCrash332 2 роки тому

    "John Paul Jones!!" makes me laugh everytime

    • @williambolden6437
      @williambolden6437 2 роки тому

      I laugh at that too!!! 😂😂😂😂 I even laughed when he ran up on Admiral saying “STOP THAT FIRING!”

    • @chilitoday
      @chilitoday 2 роки тому

      John Paul Jones is the bass player for Led Zeppelin.

  • @chrispile3878
    @chrispile3878 2 роки тому

    Hey, McNamara - calm yo tits!

  • @BenRice1974
    @BenRice1974 2 роки тому

    McNamara was an idiot

  • @whereisthehook
    @whereisthehook 2 роки тому

    Arogant idiot in a tie.

  • @marknan5352
    @marknan5352 2 роки тому

    Dear mr. Secretary , go back to the auto industry from whence you came and get out of our way. 😋🤪

    • @starguy2718
      @starguy2718 Рік тому

      When he was at Ford, McNamara gave the world the Edsel. Let that sink in.

  • @lynnmckallen4011
    @lynnmckallen4011 2 роки тому

    The squeamish kangaroo cephalometrically concern because scent morphometrically nod off a laughable millennium. coordinated, calm pants

    • @terrybates6271
      @terrybates6271 Рік тому

      Mc Namara was a somewhat hawk/dove in the cold war. Especially during the Cuban missile Crisis. he had been a subordinate to Gen Curtis LeMay towards the end of WW 2. He instituted the 'Firebombing" of Japan to help end the war in the Pacific. Unfortunately, the US had exhausted the amount of incendiaries then. Which probably saved Japan from a total antihalation.

  • @joeysausage3437
    @joeysausage3437 2 роки тому

    The movie should be called how Kennedy almost ended the world.

  • @JoefromNJ1
    @JoefromNJ1 2 роки тому

    be happy nixon wasnt in the whitehouse.

    • @farid1406
      @farid1406 2 роки тому

      Nixon was a great diplomat actually.

  • @williamphillips6049
    @williamphillips6049 2 роки тому

    There was no excuse for WWIII then, there sure as Hell isn't now and there never will be.

  • @iamgabrielf
    @iamgabrielf 2 роки тому

    3:30 "This is language. A new vocabulary. The likes of which the world has never seen. This is president Kennedy communicating with secretary Kruschev." Translation: We are going around the deep state's attempts to start a war. Seems Biden was no Kennedy.

  • @Jrhoney
    @Jrhoney 2 роки тому

    I sincerely doubt McNamara's assertion that President Kennedy wasn't clear with his intentions in his signed orders and ROE. As a naval officer, with combat experience, he would've well understand what "firing on" another vessel actually means. McNamara was out of his depth in this scene and acted like a complete clown.

    • @yhp99
      @yhp99 2 роки тому

      I dont think combat experience has anything to do with the significance of this scene... as already expressed by the admiral's lack of understanding in this situation. The point is that every action, regardless of ROE, must be taken with the highest of intention in mind. Preventing a nuclear holocaust is of the highest importance and mistakenly agitating the enemy with ROE approved flares is something an admiral should be able to discern

    • @JoefromNJ1
      @JoefromNJ1 2 роки тому

      your statement demonstrates why the military should always ultimately be under the authority of civilians.

    • @CrniWuk
      @CrniWuk 2 роки тому

      Yeah, now imagine if, as Namara said, the enemy so to speak was not aware about that "difference" and it would have actually started a nuclear war because as we now know today there have been soviet submarines in that area of which some had nuclear torpedoes which the captains had access to and the order to use if they saw them self threatened. In fact we also know today, that it almost happend. A captain of a soviet submarine, the B-59 was ready to lunch a torpedo. However it required the agreement of the three most senior officers and one of them, Vasily Arkhipov, opposed the lunch. So maybe sometimes having a "clown" with you isn't such a bad thing.

    • @farid1406
      @farid1406 2 роки тому

      President Kennedy directly and explicitly told the Admiral there would be no firing at all without his explicit orders, and the Admiral chose to go around it by taking a lawyerly approach to the written order. He was lucky not to be fired and court marshaled for this breach of command.

    • @Heckleburger
      @Heckleburger 2 роки тому

      The admiral tried to argue semantics in a time where the mere intent of an act could have wildly altered the course of events. The admiral was wrong and knew it but he chose that hill to die on anyway.