Відео

Thank you… needed this today

Thank you Clive❤

Hes not referring to himself... Jesus never believed he was god. Sorry, this is trash

Just finished my first day on the freedom in Christ course this is such a God send, God bless you my friend. Jesus loves you.

Amen

Welcome toi new fachiste Christian Amerika sems licke thé Others with sunnite Islam. you dont want to go pray on mars with your body Elon

Thank you so much Clive for breaking this down. It is a perplexing parable.

Obrigado

He’s not the God of confusion. He was making things clearly. To clarify since the people where misinterpreting while adding and subtracting from scripture back then. Just like what is happening today. People put God in their own little box and not how he truly is.

Clive keep posting ❤

Alex, like many selfish-minded people, will try to find blame against an unrighteous god so that he can keep his sin and be safe from condemnation. Let me give an example: He asks if God could still be recognised as a merciful, gracious god after commanding the annihilation of the peoples such as the Amalekites. But if he read the Bible for what it says instead of for what he wants it to say he would see that: 1) The people had become so irreversibly evil in their evolution of depravity that they would offer their own children into the red hot iron arms of Moluk their god, to be burned to death as a living sacrifice for such things as rain for crops, victory over enemies etc. Their depravity had no bounds. 2) He waited 400 years for them to repent and yet they did not. However, Jonah went all the way to Nineveh and preached and the whole city came to repentance. These horrific people just chose to be evil in heart without repentance. Now if God were to be found unreasonable in His thinking by not wanting to contaminate His people with the likes of these people, (for He was lovingly jealous over His people Israel for His own names' sake), then the same must apply to one as being unreasonable for not allowing a sex rapist and murder who was riddled with a deadly disease to play with his children. God commanded the annihilation of the depraved to save His own people. And even though He granted grace for 4 centuries they just became more evil. How then can God be deemed unjust?

I'm sure you are aware that there is much more to this story than simply a kind work. Wine is a symbol of joy, turning ordinary life to joy was the whole purpose of Jesus ministry. What we have before salvation once we accept the Father's offer has become completely full of joy with sin forgiven and new life given by our resurrected Lord. Many parallels can be drawn with our celebration of communion. I apologise for adding into your simple message! bless you for sharing.

God blesses me so much. I see when his blessings unfold. I have been arrogant with the grace the lord extends me.

❤thank you Clive

What a great explanation 🙏🙏

Amen 🙏

The problem with Atheists is not disbelieve it's Rebelling against God like a cult which they are. Jesus could literally appear in front of them and they would find every excuse there is to not believe.

I don't understand this. The shrewd manager didn't make friends, he lied to gain favours. Those people were not his friends, they didn't look upon him and said, he has lied to his master, he will be honest to us. He gave them a break, granted, but not out of the goodness of his heart. 1 Corinthians 13:3 NIrV [3] Suppose I give everything I have to poor people. And suppose I give myself over to a difficult life so I can brag. If I don’t have love, I get nothing at all. Matthew 19:21 NIrV [21] Jesus answered, “If you want to be perfect, go and sell everything you have. Give the money to those who are poor. You will have treasure in heaven. Then come and follow me.” How is this compatible with lying for your own benefit?

💯🙏 Nothing in this life is Eternal, it is all vanity only God is Eternal.

The parable is about sowing earthly treasures to build on eternal treasure. The shrewd manger was only concerned with the here & now.

This was helpful. Thank you

Thanks! GOD bless you brother!

Yikes 😬 nice try I guess

This helps, thanks

Simple answer. Yes. If atheists disagree, let them justify their moral code. Hint: The particles are amoral.

Didn't God create ALL human beings? So why pick the Israelites who constantly complained even rebelled against him, favor them?Think of it.Today we have no supernatural evidence for God thus the scepticism of many. THE Israelites however had supernatural events happen nearly all the time! The 10 plagues in Egypt, A pillar of cloud by day and fire by night guiding them to the red sea, parting of the red sea etc...and thats just the start! Now place yourself there.If you witnessed those supernatural events wouldn't you be super stupid to complain and start worshipping inanimate objects like a golden calf?

Human raid?Genocide more like it And definitely the invasion of the Canaanites was over land( which ironically seems to be going on today) Abraham came from the land of Ur (modern day Iraq) God promised the Israelites, who were the ancestors of Abraham a land flowing with milk and honey guess where? Canaan

Amen :)

Blah blah blah

There gona bé Always good people and Bad people but if do you want good people doing atroceties you Need a religion

Thanks for telling us about all those evil children, disabled and sick people, and animals who were slaughtered. An all powerfull God could have clicked his fingers, and sorted it out without massive suffering. But no, as in the Flood, it had to be an unpleasant death. Do you think that it is possible for every individual in a Tribe, to be evil? I suspect that you have a different view about more recent atrocities, done by men, in the name of other Gods.

The men king Saul spared, ended up killing Saul! The nations God commanded to be wiped out had become genetically corrupt. They represented an existential threat to mankind, which is why God flooded the earth and saved 8 people, including Noah. Once again we are in the days of Noah - get on the Ark that is Jesus Christ, believe on Him, and you will be saved.

That was right before god drowned the whole world but saved the devil, right?

On point.

More deep shit brother 👍

Using common sense listen to yourself giving this analogy; does it sound right for other prophecies about the messiah .

Unfortunately, the great evil is amongst us, in the form of muhammadans.

I want to ask. My questions... 1. The reality that we can see right now is that in this universe there are trillions of trillions of planets and galaxies. If there are countless trillions of trillions of planets... maybe not only planet Earth has living creatures inhabiting it...? For example, if there are a trillion other planets that have living creatures like Earth and its inhabitants are various types of non-human creatures, would Jesus also be God on those one trillion inhabited planets...? 2. The real facts that we can know right now... the earth is approximately 10 million km, the sun is 1.3 million times as big as the earth, and there is a star called U Scuty that is tens of billions of times as big as the sun . If the celestial bodies were super massive in size like that, the number in the trillions would be uncountable. How big do you think God the Creator is, bro...? Maybe God is only as big as the man Jesus...? 3. According to scientists, the universe is more than 13 billion years old, whereas according to historians, Adam and Eve only existed about 7 thousand years ago. Based on this science... maybe the universe has been empty without any living creatures inhabiting it for more than 13 billion years...? So what was Jesus doing for 13 billion years before there were humans, Adam and Eve...? Please answer me!!!!?!!!

It's true. Satan's temptation is always God's test. So, I would still say that there is no such thing as coincidence because coincidences mean there is no rhyme or reason for it. Events just happen haphazardly which we know is not true based on Scripture such as Romans 8:28. Everything happens for a reason and every temptation from Satan is a test from God, to test our faith and/ or discernment.

That's some deep shit brother 👍

This is wisdom! I love this channel

"Thou shalt not kill"

I don't think this guy believes a word he is saying. Either that or he is certfiably insane

It just seems like you used your subjective mind to decide that this particular god's moral will is accurately described in the writings of men. And you subjectively chose that god based on those men's writings. And when your moral intuition screams that something is not moral when your book written by men says that you are wrong and that god is right, you make a subjective choice to override your moral intuition. Lots of subjectivity going on with your objective moral system. And the book contradicts moral good all over the place. Even Jesus said: “You have heard that it was said, ‘Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.’ But 'I' tell you, do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other cheek also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well." Is it objectively right to take an eye for an eye, as the Bible objectively teaches in Exodus 21:23-25, or the opposite: to turn the other cheek, as the Bible objectively teaches in Matthew 5:38? To say it changed means it is NOT objective. Examples like this abound in the Bible. You can follow the Bible for your moral guidance, but don't try to trick outsiders into believing the moral life expected from its god is objective. Everyone, regardless of whether we like the responsibility, has subjective morals. It just depends on if they offload their personal (subjective) moral decisions to someone or something else or decide to do the mature work of deciding for themselves.

None of these answers satisfies anyone who does not presuppose that the bible and the christian god are true. This is just more ridiculous excuseoly masquerading as a wise response to these questions. For the majority of people, who don't believe any of your Magic Sky Daddy nonsense, this is just more childish and dangerous gish-galloping verbal glop.

Loving your enemy does not have a good track record of success.

The responses you get have become beyond tiresome

The fact that God didn’t know how this was all going to play out, doesn’t that mean He’s not omnipotent?

This is truly a remarkable show of raw fundamentalism and general lack of empathy, how strange that a human mind would rather cope with so many contradictions rather than accept reality

@soreeze8483 : "Boy, what are you high on?" was my first thought! But let’s take a closer look at what you’re saying. Your argument is all over the place, so let’s untangle it step by step: "The AI car company exists within a world independent of it, but the world wouldn’t exist independent of God": This is simply asserting a point without proving it. You’re making a massive assumption that the world wouldn’t exist without God, but you haven’t demonstrated why that’s true. The AI car analogy doesn’t fail because of this-it’s pointing out that if a creator (be it a company or a god) designs something flawed, the blame ultimately rests on the creator. You don’t get to absolve God of responsibility for creating a flawed world by just declaring him exempt. "In every possible world, the worst thing would hold the same essence": I’m not sure what you’re trying to argue here. Are you saying that suffering is inevitable in every conceivable world? If so, that’s a huge assumption, and it contradicts the idea of an omnipotent God who could create a world without suffering if he wanted to. Are you saying God has to allow suffering? That makes him less omnipotent. "If you remove bad, you remove free will": This argument assumes that free will inherently requires bad options. But why? Couldn’t God create a world where people still have meaningful choices without those choices resulting in suffering? For example, I can choose between helping my neighbor or reading a book-both are "good" choices. Free will doesn’t collapse just because evil is removed. "If you remove all worst things, eventually you remove the essence of a person": This is nonsense. A person’s essence isn’t defined by the presence of evil. Compassion, creativity, curiosity, love-these are all qualities that thrive in the absence of suffering. A world without suffering wouldn’t erase who we are; it would enhance it. "100 years is a blink in the eye of eternity": This is a classic cop-out. It’s like saying, "Your pain doesn’t matter because it’ll be over eventually." That’s not comfort; it’s dismissal. A loving, omnipotent God wouldn’t let his creations suffer horrifically, even for a blink, if he had the power to prevent it. "To cast judgment on God ignores salvation": Here’s the kicker: salvation is only "necessary" because of the mess God supposedly created in the first place. If God didn’t allow suffering or sin to exist, there’d be no need for salvation. It’s like setting a building on fire and then demanding praise for rescuing people from the flames. In summary: your argument boils down to excuses for why God has to allow suffering while ignoring that he supposedly created the entire system that enables it. The idea that we "need" suffering for free will, or that salvation somehow justifies pain, doesn’t hold up under scrutiny. A truly omnipotent, loving God wouldn’t need such convoluted logic to justify the existence of suffering in the first place. If this is how you "look at it," maybe try looking a little harder. 😉