![Storyograph](/img/default-banner.jpg)
- 37
- 499 133
Storyograph
United States
Приєднався 24 тра 2019
Storyograph video essays explore the hidden meaning of popular and obscure media by reverse-engineering the story: tracking thematic elements through the use of character arc and story structure.
And if you just fell asleep half-way through that last sentence, there’s also a bunch of dumb sound effects, shoddy animation and cheap jokes to keep you entertained through to the end.
Let's find out why we like the stuff we like, and just what those writers were thinking up when they wrote this stuff!
And if you just fell asleep half-way through that last sentence, there’s also a bunch of dumb sound effects, shoddy animation and cheap jokes to keep you entertained through to the end.
Let's find out why we like the stuff we like, and just what those writers were thinking up when they wrote this stuff!
What to do when your BIGGEST video gets copyright claimed?
After over three years of being the most viewed, most commented film analysis on this channel, on August 12 2024, Mulholland Drive Explained with Story Structure was hit with a copyright claim, and has been blocked everywhere.
▼Support This Channel on Ko-Fi▼
Click here to guilt me into making more content: ko-fi.com/storyograph
While this video is responsible for over one third of this channel’s monthly income, has brought in 20% of my total subscribers, and has consistently ranked on the top 10 search results for Mulholland Drive Explained, what’s worst for me is that I don’t get to share it with you anymore. They could have just demonetized it, but no. It’s gone.
See, long-time viewers will know, I went through hell to make this video. I actually had to make it twice because my computer died right as I was finishing the first draft. This is a small channel. I’m just one guy. and I don’t have the hours to pump out video after video, so everything I put up is meant to be of the highest quality. And when the main pillar of my channel get removed, its devastating to the entire channel’s foundation.
And it’s not just me, you guys loved this video. It seems like nearly every day I would get your sudden epiphanies, personal fan theories, and discussions about what nature of cinema was supposed to be.
So what is to be done now? Is Mulholland Drive Explained with Story Structure gone for good? No. The next step is to get out my old project file, re-edit this video a third time, and someday put this video back into the world, hopefully even better than it was before.
Now if your with me so far and would like to help me out, there are a few things you can do:
1) If you’re not already subscribed, clicking that button would help mitigate some of loss to my subscription rate
2) Sharing your favorite Storyograph videos on social media, Reddit has helped me out a lot in the past
3) When the video eventually comes back, rewatching and sharing it soon after its posted will help it reach more people, and don’t worry I’ll let you know when its coming. I know this new video will likely never grow a big as the old one. I got very lucky with that. But with your help I can still get it out to the people who want to see it.
4) And finally, if you are in a position to donate to my ko-fi account, any amount would be greatly appreciated. It would help make up for the revenue I’m losing every month from now on.
UA-cam is the Wild West when it comes to copyright. There are a lot of creators like me using movie clips under fair-use for educational purposes, but if your video is claimed and you refute it, you put yourself in danger of losing your channel if your appeal is rejected. And I can’t risk that. I’m just getting warmed up. I have a lot more to cover on this channel, and I hope you’ll be there with me even when times get tough.
Thank you all so much for watching my videos. It’s a funny paradox that I’m only in a position to lose this much because all of you have given me so much, and this bump in the road has helped me appreciate that. I hope to be back with you real soon with something great… that doesn’t get immediately flagged.
It’s time to get back to work.
MUSIC:
"Past Sadness" "Zazie" by Kevin MacLeod
▼Support This Channel on Ko-Fi▼
Click here to guilt me into making more content: ko-fi.com/storyograph
While this video is responsible for over one third of this channel’s monthly income, has brought in 20% of my total subscribers, and has consistently ranked on the top 10 search results for Mulholland Drive Explained, what’s worst for me is that I don’t get to share it with you anymore. They could have just demonetized it, but no. It’s gone.
See, long-time viewers will know, I went through hell to make this video. I actually had to make it twice because my computer died right as I was finishing the first draft. This is a small channel. I’m just one guy. and I don’t have the hours to pump out video after video, so everything I put up is meant to be of the highest quality. And when the main pillar of my channel get removed, its devastating to the entire channel’s foundation.
And it’s not just me, you guys loved this video. It seems like nearly every day I would get your sudden epiphanies, personal fan theories, and discussions about what nature of cinema was supposed to be.
So what is to be done now? Is Mulholland Drive Explained with Story Structure gone for good? No. The next step is to get out my old project file, re-edit this video a third time, and someday put this video back into the world, hopefully even better than it was before.
Now if your with me so far and would like to help me out, there are a few things you can do:
1) If you’re not already subscribed, clicking that button would help mitigate some of loss to my subscription rate
2) Sharing your favorite Storyograph videos on social media, Reddit has helped me out a lot in the past
3) When the video eventually comes back, rewatching and sharing it soon after its posted will help it reach more people, and don’t worry I’ll let you know when its coming. I know this new video will likely never grow a big as the old one. I got very lucky with that. But with your help I can still get it out to the people who want to see it.
4) And finally, if you are in a position to donate to my ko-fi account, any amount would be greatly appreciated. It would help make up for the revenue I’m losing every month from now on.
UA-cam is the Wild West when it comes to copyright. There are a lot of creators like me using movie clips under fair-use for educational purposes, but if your video is claimed and you refute it, you put yourself in danger of losing your channel if your appeal is rejected. And I can’t risk that. I’m just getting warmed up. I have a lot more to cover on this channel, and I hope you’ll be there with me even when times get tough.
Thank you all so much for watching my videos. It’s a funny paradox that I’m only in a position to lose this much because all of you have given me so much, and this bump in the road has helped me appreciate that. I hope to be back with you real soon with something great… that doesn’t get immediately flagged.
It’s time to get back to work.
MUSIC:
"Past Sadness" "Zazie" by Kevin MacLeod
Переглядів: 236
Відео
That Time Garfield Ripped Off Toy Story
Переглядів 11 тис.3 місяці тому
Garfield the Movie (2004) is a beat-for-beat rip-off of Toy Story and Toy Story 2! Whether or not you like Garfield as a guy, chances are you’re not a fan of his 2004 movie. But it's not the lack of humor or deviations from the source material that are the film's worst offense, so lets take a deep dive into how its entire plot, and I mean all of it, was blatantly lifted straight from the advent...
Ghostbusters: A Movie About Reaganomics | [Patrick (H) Willems Rebuttal]
Переглядів 1,6 тис.5 місяців тому
Is Ghostbusters just a fun movie with nothing to say? Well that’s what UA-camr Patrick (H) Willems concluded in his video “Ghostbusters: A Movie About Nothing”. But what do we find when we really examine all the common threads over all of Ghostbusters’ key moments? - A love letter Regan-era free market capitalism! And since we’re not a political or financial channel, we’re just going to deal wi...
Why isn't there "conflict" in Past Lives? | Oscars 2023-2024
Переглядів 2725 місяців тому
"Past Lives" is a film written in the Asian story structure of "Kishoutenketsu", which means it doesn't have to have a conflict, it only has to explore themes and how people react to life as it comes to them. But in that scene when the American writer husband sees the situation they're all in, it reminds him of the classic three act structure where he would be considered the villian of the stor...
Is Robot Dreams about 9/11? | Oscars 2023-2024
Переглядів 2,2 тис.5 місяців тому
Is Robot Dreams about 9/11? Robot Dreams has several prominent shots where the camera lingers on the twin towers And of course there’s repeated use of the song September by Earth Wind and Fire So is this cute animated film about a dog and his robot friend secretly about 9/11? Well no. But also kinda yes. See Robot Dreams isn’t about 9/11 directly, but it is about remembering a past that’s gone ...
Why Does Greg Turn into a Tree? - “The Loveliest Lies of All” Explained | Over the Garden Wall
Переглядів 29 тис.9 місяців тому
Why does greg turn into a tree in Over the Garden Wall? What are the “Loveliest Lies of All”? Could this story be about the loss of innocence? If we follow the candy trail of story structure all the way to the end, we’ll see a pretty satisfying explanation to all of these questions and more... ▼Support This Channel▼ Click here to guilt me into making more content: ko-fi.com/storyograph 0:00 - I...
Over the Garden Wall Explained with Story Structure
Переглядів 17 тис.9 місяців тому
There are 9 Types of Love in Over the Garden Wall, and we’ll see Over the Garden Wall explained with story structure in “Love of the Garden Wall”, Storyograph's popular series finally compiled into one video! And with each chapter of Over the Garden Wall, a different form of love is represented in the show's themes. Brotherly love, the love between friends, romantic love... in fact pretty much ...
Steamed Hams but it's a WAY TOO SERIOUS Film Essay
Переглядів 180 тис.Рік тому
Steamed Hams but it's a WAY TOO SERIOUS Film Essay
How do you LEAVE the UNKNOWN? | Love of the Garden Wall - Part 10
Переглядів 2,1 тис.Рік тому
How do you LEAVE the UNKNOWN? | Love of the Garden Wall - Part 10
The REAL VILLAIN of Over the Garden Wall | Love of the Garden Wall - Part 9
Переглядів 3,1 тис.Рік тому
The REAL VILLAIN of Over the Garden Wall | Love of the Garden Wall - Part 9
What is GREG'S WISH? | Love of the Garden Wall - Part 8
Переглядів 1,9 тис.Рік тому
What is GREG'S WISH? | Love of the Garden Wall - Part 8
Like Ships Upon a Winding River | Love of the Garden Wall - Part 7
Переглядів 2,2 тис.Рік тому
Like Ships Upon a Winding River | Love of the Garden Wall - Part 7
Why is it Called Over the Garden Wall? | Love of the Garden Wall - Part 6
Переглядів 2,8 тис.Рік тому
Why is it Called Over the Garden Wall? | Love of the Garden Wall - Part 6
Over the Garden Wall's GHOST STORY | Love of the Garden Wall - Part 5
Переглядів 2,6 тис.Рік тому
Over the Garden Wall's GHOST STORY | Love of the Garden Wall - Part 5
HIDDEN CHARACTER ARC in "Songs of the Dark Lantern" | Love of the Garden Wall - Part 4
Переглядів 2,1 тис.Рік тому
HIDDEN CHARACTER ARC in "Songs of the Dark Lantern" | Love of the Garden Wall - Part 4
Who is Active in the Unknown? | Love of the Garden Wall - Part 3
Переглядів 3,4 тис.Рік тому
Who is Active in the Unknown? | Love of the Garden Wall - Part 3
Who is the Black Cat in Over the Garden Wall? | Love of the Garden Wall - Part 2
Переглядів 6 тис.Рік тому
Who is the Black Cat in Over the Garden Wall? | Love of the Garden Wall - Part 2
What is Over the Garden Wall About? | Love of the Garden Wall - Part 1
Переглядів 4,1 тис.Рік тому
What is Over the Garden Wall About? | Love of the Garden Wall - Part 1
"To Love is to be Vulnerable" - C.S. Lewis | Over the Garden Wall Teaser Trailer
Переглядів 2,8 тис.Рік тому
"To Love is to be Vulnerable" - C.S. Lewis | Over the Garden Wall Teaser Trailer
Why the Live Action Garfield 1988 Sitcom Failed | Storyograph April Fools Day Special 2022
Переглядів 2,4 тис.2 роки тому
Why the Live Action Garfield 1988 Sitcom Failed | Storyograph April Fools Day Special 2022
Mulholland Drive | 5 Stages of Grief (as shown through its characters)
Переглядів 7032 роки тому
Mulholland Drive | 5 Stages of Grief (as shown through its characters)
How to Write Like John Wilson (feat. Jingle Berry) | How to with John Wilson
Переглядів 4,6 тис.2 роки тому
How to Write Like John Wilson (feat. Jingle Berry) | How to with John Wilson
Mulholland Drive Summary in 60 Seconds but it's told exclusively in words that rhyme with "blue"
Переглядів 1,9 тис.3 роки тому
Mulholland Drive Summary in 60 Seconds but it's told exclusively in words that rhyme with "blue"
When Your Computer Repair Takes Way Too Long
Переглядів 5693 роки тому
When Your Computer Repair Takes Way Too Long
5 Reasons Why Harry and Marv are Secretly Vampires | Home Alone (1990)
Переглядів 3,7 тис.4 роки тому
5 Reasons Why Harry and Marv are Secretly Vampires | Home Alone (1990)
1:23 "desipe your directions" (sorry)
No need to apologize! That typo has gotten me so much engagement on this video. I regret nothing!
Masterpiece of Seventh Art
Flim Springfield!
Also, Free Palestinel
Thank you for this. genuinely. legit cried over some parts. and still doing so as I type.
0:34 this is burger king footage
Oh-ho, no! Patented Skinner footage! Old family video!
This is a really well made video with great analysis! Thank you! ❤
well, my english teacher told me it isn’t possible to read into anything too much, the author wrote it that way for a reason
It's a goof, which is fine, but you miss important aspects. First of all, Skinner gets a point by showing off his knowledge of regional expressions in upstate New York. It may be based on a lie, but he is able to display awareness of of the distinctions between Albany and Utica dialects. Chalmers is personally familiar with Utica and reasonably aware of how they talk there, but Seymour presents himself as having superior knowledge of the greater world outside his small experiences. Chalmers can still be suspicious of Skinner's lies, and is quite right to do so, but he cannot keep pushing this line of argument. Chalmers is a guest in this man's house and he is there to enjoy a luncheon. Regardless of the Superintendent/Principal relationship, it would be inappropriate for him to pursue this line of argument. If he was wrong, and Seymour is right about "steamed ham" being an Albany reference to grilled hamburgers, then he would be disrespectful and potentially charged with abuse of his subordinate. It would be far better to drop the argument now and continue to dine on this fine ham Seymour has steamed. Second, why has Agnes not joined this meal her son has cooked for his supervisor? This seems very contradictory knowing how close she and Seymour are. The need for food is a universal requirement for life so she requires nutrients on a regular basis. As is romance, and she had recently been on a date with Gary. Was it just a fun night out that never needs to happen again? Was there an argument? Was her son worried about some new man coming in between his relationship with Mother? We can't see all the details, all we can do is speculate, but then why did Gary come to house he already knew about for a meal with someone whose relationship should stay professional? He was carrying a bottle of wine when he entered the house, is that appropriate for a luncheon? This is entirely a guess, but that may be how they do things in Utica. Regardless, this is a large part of the story that the audience is completely blissful of. Thankfully it does not negatively interfere with what we see on screen. As rich with potential as the respective relationships, real or potential, with Agnes might be, we don't need to know any more. But Seymour knows, and Gary might like to know, that Agnes is always there, keeping a close eye on them. Third, Chalmers is still trying to work through the lies Skinner is telling. The principal is clearly experienced at this and, whatever his weaknesses, has provided a successful defense through this luncheon. But there comes a point where Chalmers really needs to challenge them again, having been informed that he had just seen a brief glimpse of aurora borealis. The effect on Chalmers is twofold and contradictory. On the one hand, it would be truly glorious to get a full view of such a majestic event. It's a moment where you can't waste time with ridiculous questions, you must rush to enjoy it for what it is before it's too late. You may never have this chance again and should thank God that you received this one. However, the superintendent is still a rational man and cannot forget that he has caught his subordinate lying before to hide incompetence. He cannot just unquestioningly believe this. No matter how beautiful the sight, there's a least a slight chance that such a thing might not be happening at this time of year, at this time of day, in this part of the country, and localized entirely entirely within Skinner's kitchen. The superintendent's mind must be bursting all over the place. Yes, he has Skinner caught in a lie. No, Seymour is clearly knowledgeable of things Chalmers doesn't know and should certainly be familiar with what's happening in his own kitchen. Gary has to argue with himself that the odds are of him being right or wrong whichever way he goes, and every second that goes by is less of a chance for seeing such an amazing sight. It's even deeper when you realize that we the audience know the truth, that Skinner is indeed lying and risks getting in a lot of trouble if he gets caught. This is really where good drama comes from, it's not that we care which side wins, so much as we want to follow these characters to the end of their current story and see what happens to them. Seymour is a major character in this ongoing series, so that's also relevant, although he often loses in conflicts with his supervisor. We could be rooting for Seymour, will he win this time? We could be looking for comedy as the superintendent yells at him again. Because we see the characters from our view, we can have internal conflicts that they would be unaware of. How many times have I passed by the aurora borealis and didn't even realize it? I'm not sure it's deliberate, or even conscious, but that's clearly the situation Chalmers is in right now. With no time left, he realizes that argument is not the appropriate decision to make. Do not demand, but ask permission from the rightful man in charge of this luncheon. You could say he's being a coward, or that he's showing his wisdom and peace. You could also say that Seymour is being bitter and revengeful by not allowing him to see it, or defensive of being caught in his lie. Seymour is morally in the wrong for these lies, and for burning his house down, but it's understandable. Not just his personality weaknesses, but that he tried to overcome them at the very least to provide his boss an unforgettable luncheon. I'm not sure that either man really learned anything about themselves from this story, but they're fictional characters, that wasn't the point. The audience learned something and were nourished the way great art should.
The Kevin Macleod music is a brilliant touch
Grrrrr I hate giant corpos who ignore fair use grrrrrr
I'm so sorry, thanks for all your work.
Thank you
Found your channel from that video a month ago. Just realized I wasn’t subbed on this account.
My dumb ass saw the thumbnail and thought “oh no, my fav video about funny games.” Nope, It was my other fav video about a Naomi watts movie where she’s absolutely miserable. Looking forward to seeing the third draft of the video. I showed a few of your videos to one of my film professors when he was teaching a class all about character development. I used your Mulholland Drive video as a great way of explaining development through the inner mind of a character, and he loved it. I don’t know if he ever subscribed, but he said he looked through the rest of your stuff :)
Ah thank you! I love hearing stuff like that! And Yeah, Funny Games is safe for now. Hopefully I won’t have to change my video too much. I was pretty satisfied with it. But it’s an opportunity to improve it I suppose!
It happens to all the big UA-camrs. Wishing you luck.
Yeah, I guess I've "made it" ... 😆😂😭
Fair use is always tricky when there are bots involved
It really is a tough problem. It's a weird legal compromise we have here on UA-cam. "Fair use" is somewhat vaguely defined by the law, so instead of having a whole court case every time someone uploads a video, we have these robots.
Nooo! I really liked this one!
Same. But it will be back one day!
Slight re-edit and re-post. One day it will be the youtube meta to delete old video, slightly retool them and repost them. Because people have not been using the chronological views for a very long time, not re-posting your stuff is just leaving youtube money on the table !
Yeah, that would be great! The editor they have is getting better all the time, but it wasn't enough to save this one. I'd have to cut too many important scenes, completely devaluing the video. But maybe a re-upload will help it find another audience!
Has anyone had any experience with this? Did you appeal? Did it work? I kind of don't want to risk it. I'd love to hear your thoughts!
I noticed it disappeared :(
Yeah, it's the worst thing about being a "film analysis" UA-camr. It's happened to me before, but never on a video this old. I thought it was safe.
The growing flames quickly devouring Skinner's house are symbolic of his burning passion for steamed hams.
oh my god, wirt is literally me
There was ONE THING WRONG- Woody did not in fact leave Buzz outside. That was an accident that just happened to be resolved by itself later. The Woody that did leave Buzz outside is part of the famous Black Friday cut of Toy Story where Woody doesn't act like a jealous friend but a cruel dictator who wants to keep his power. Other than that, the rip-off is to a T and I am convinced
You know, you're right! I didn't actually intend to say that Woody left Buzz outside, but it looks like I accidentally implied it. I was really just narrating the plot of Garfield and using similar clips from Toy Story. But I stayed pretty close the whole way through this video and this part might have been just a bit too different. (I suppose if I remake this video a 4th time I'll have to tweak that!)
@@Storyograph It's still pretty interesting that both plots were still very similar and I didn't notice! Also, both this and the video essay about Steamed Hams made me subscribe, and I would love to see more of these kinds of videos 😁😁😁
Close. The robot took down the towers actually
Spoilers btw
jason thunderberger. thats my favorite one since all greg wanted was his brother to help come up with a name aswell. and its a silly name
this was THE video i had searched for far and wide across an seemingly endless sea of youtube videos. you explained his character arc, his flaws and how he overcame them, alongside clips of the show to show it, so so well. i tend to be media illiterate in certain cases, ill admit, and thats why these videos mean so much to me. i saw myself taking a liking to wirt and relating, but i couldnt quite point down why exactly. his cynicism and quick tendency to give up and lose hope, his defensiveness in fear of getting hurt by daring to be vulnerable, believing the lie so many do that by not opening yourself up to others, you'll be protected against any type of pain. though it is that loneliness and feeling of being lost, not having anything going for you, wandering without any aim, is what brings the most painful hurt of all. a slow walk to your death, never having made a chance to the world or the persons around you, just like being a ghost. passing through life. I thank you greatly for this absolute masterpiece of a video, i also like the theory of each episode conveying a type of love. till know ive heard mostly only about the purgatory refrences from dante, which i absolutely adore, though it is nice seeing a different take on this exquisite show. alright that is a lot of text ill go watch the 11 remaining minutes now.
Thank you! For me, I really liked "Over the Garden Wall", and I just wanted to make a video about it. Then the more I watched it and the more I wrote about it, the video almost became like a therapy session for me. I was able to kinda put Wirt's problems in context, and started to find I was giving myself advice while writing about him. I'm really glad other people are getting a lot out of this video too!
Glad you’re doing another video on Mulholland Drive. Such a magical powerful film.
Next up: The idiot sandwich scene from Hell’s Kitchen but it’s a WAY TO SERIOUS film essay. Coming to a theater near you
"because in the end, what Gordon Ramsay did when he held up that bread, was aim the camera back at us, for we are the true idiot sandwich."
@@Storyograph “as you can see in the scene, mr. Ramsy is holding up two pieces of bread. You can see the confusion in the woman’s eyes as she proceeds to see these beautiful wheat squares. What could she be thinking? Thousands upon thousands of thoughts enter her mind. Seconds pass as this rotary motion has been achieved until mr. Ramsy begins a pre-meditated second wave of his comedic act. He slaps the glorious wheat squares onto the woman’s ears as a sign of dominance in the situation. But for the true climax, in the middle of this moment of tyranny he asks. What are you?!? With no non-embarrassing answer in a moment of panic, suprise and utter humiliation she speaks out the words, The words we’ve been waiting for, the true punchline that was planned out just moments in advance by the cooking mastermind: An idiot sandwich…” CHAPTER 2: THE AFTERMATH
Can you please make sense of Videodrome for me because that film is one that I have struggled to gather any meaning whatsoever from and likely the most fundamentally confusing film I'd ever seen and have no idea what it was trying to say. This was another one and you'd likely put some sense into this for me and even if I had a fraction of the understanding I now have of this, of Videodrome then I'd be a far less confused person who commits too much time attempting to make sense of that movie. Just been thinking about that film again lately and had to express how perplexed I'd been ever since I'd watched it and nothing read or watched about such had ever helped make any shape of what was attempting to be said with that film. I may never understand that film but I think this suggests that maybe you could piece it together in a coherent and digestable narrative which the film itself clearly was not. Perhaps this was covered already but didn't want that to slip my mind because that's been a film I just want to understand on some level and it's bothered me for years attempting to put that puzzle together even slightly.
Videodrome is a tough one. I think I'd have to watch that several more times to be able to make a coherent video out of it. If I figure something out, maybe you'll see it here someday!
@@Storyograph glad it's not just me then!
I come back to this every once in a while, this is such an amazing essay. 10/10, Keep making quality content Storygraph.
Thank you! That's so great to hear!
David Lynch really sucks. And so does this movie.
genius
somehow it's both a legitimate analysands and kind of a goof though i feel like the points you bring up about how the whole thing falls together in the way you portrayed for this video says a lot about how the writing of the early simpsons even without meaning to had deep and complex layers
Sorry but you didn't start the video by recounting the entire history of the Simpsons and hyper-specific context under which '22 Short Films About Springfield' was made, thus totally deviating from your intended topic and tripling the runtime. I'm gonna have to take points off.
One of these days I'm going to have to make a feature-length version of this where I really get into the details.
I thought the old people was her aunt and uncle or her aunts boyfreind
could be 🤷
Strange seeing ppl not noticing how dangerous Greg was meanwhile i noticed it from the beginning and i was thinking that it was because i might be grumpy it something but it was just my senses
Love it. One could say this isn’t even a video essay, but a parody of one. It’s still just steamed hams but thinly veiled as a video essay my God. My God. Oh my dear GOOOOOOOOODDD
This movie fucking sucks
It is, kinda.. Except the fact this series happened in the 1980s.
0:13
The most interesting film I've seen...
Annoying fucking video, editing, and channel
people who say the series 'DARK' is so mysterious ain't got no idea how fu=kd up this movie is . God bless those poor souls!
You're analyse is very much on the money, this sketch was actively still trying to build up the Dynamic of the Super Intendent and Skinner, and affirm pervious episodes. It fulfils the same plot line of every one of their episode. Chalmers arrives, Skinner tries to impress, an understandable incident occurs which could cause Chalmers to look down on Skinner, Skinner is too anxious to let it be known, and tries to cover it up with lies, subterfuge, or otherwise distract the super intendent with attempted excellence, though his attempts to achieve excellence and his promises to the Super Intendent only serve to worsen a situation that would have been better if he just let it play out. But in the end, whether due to the Super Intendents pity, gullibility,m or the skill of an accomplice he does recover or get the smallest amount of gratitude, and things return to as they once were. The house may be burning, but the Fire Engine is on its way. As with most episodes of the Simpson's, it ends as it beings nothing having changed.
honestly, this completely changed my outlook on the bit
I keep realizing what im watching every few seconds and just lwugh at the absurdity Edit: no firetruck at the end :(
Firetruck at the beginning though?
This video changed my life.
I think that superintendent Chalmers figured out at some point that principal Skinner was lying to him. Chalmers points out that the burgers were grilled and not steamed so he probably thought if the burgers weren't steamed why was steam coming out of the oven. however despite figuring out that Skinner was lying to him Chalmers doesn't call out Skinner for his lies. I think that the reason is because despite everything going wrong Chalmers recognizes the effort the Skinner is putting in to make this luncheon unforgettable.
#lolsuperman
Kamila is an mk ultra victim, so is the guy that passes out from dumpster guy..
I saw this version of the Finland one too