Відео

Mi dispiace,ma in questo modo suona spesso....per nulla.

using tracking is risky . it dosent calculate when the best time to refresh so it might do so on a target , and this screws up everything , so i would only use it if at all on very clean ground

The filters are there for a reason knocking every filter off to gain depth would not always be the best choice 👍

I made one of these programs we will see how it goes. I don’t use park program in parks I use a custom sensitive program.

Heck great information are you intending putting out some later date video info cheers

My glass eye fell asleep

Great explanation

Cant hear you talking!

Can we see some real world finds with your superJ program.

But how about misshaped iron and old nails? They will ring up in non ferrous scale.

Thanks for the video. I really enjoyed that. Do you Relic hunt or mainly just park hunt? I’m still trying to figure out the absolute deepest program for Civil War relics, and I keep jumping back and forth between Beach Sensitive and Deep HC. I’ll have to give the Park program a shot.

Interesting, I would suggest to put audio response on 4 for the confirm program, because the X Y screen is relevant for more shallow targets. that way if you hear the item is deep, you can know the X Y screen is not reliable in that case.

more please...

Minelab is Russian owned company that wouldn't buy jack shit from those swines ..

what happens if you set the discrimination to 0? Does this do away with tone 1 (iron) and everything will come in at tones 2/3 if you are using a 3 tone program. Does discrimination actually affect depth. I heard that only reactivity affects depth. Thanks, Teche Ridge Digger

Great stuff

I liked that idea and tried gold all day with mono at 13khz and 17khz for my switch over program. I'm wondering why you chose general and not the "deeper" sensitive. Thanks

Give me the Original TESORO LOBO (20 khz) with the NAUTILUS DMC power (44 volts) That's all folks

Sorry but you should not be advising settings like this because these are non usable settings in the field!

I don't understand, why do you need to turn most things off to detect, and then use a program with things turned on to check it, why not just use the things turned on programme if it does the same?

Awesome thank you very informative

The programs Relic and Goldfield are near to your program, just reduce the reactivity...

The other solution is not to buy a machine with $500.00 coils and buy a smaller coil. 😆

Having done some technical writing, I can tell you engineering is close minded about a manual written for the end user. Traditionally these products have been viewed as complete technical descriptions of the product, and they’ll view anything else as incomplete or “dumbed down.” Some companies are doing it right, but they’re the exception to the rule. And to say that every tech writer is completely uninformed about the product is inaccurate as they are usually involved in the writing of specs, internal communications, etc. during the product development cycle.

Heck yeah where you at? Waiting for any new vids. Take care bro 😎

Just have the XY screen up and you don’t need to keep swapping programs because it literally shows you that your over big iron from the direction of the line. Unless you’re over such big iron that it overloads it and gives a positive signal but that’s easy enough to hear from the way it sounds.

I understand your concept and somewhat agree with it. I do think you may have a few of the settings reversed. I would think you would want the iron volume as high as it could go. Just thinking logically by setting it to 0 you are making the processor distinguish between ferrous and non ferrous and calculating which to quiet and which to not quiet. Setting it as high as it can go would mean that the detector wouldnt care what it was, every signal would be the same volume. I don't know if that would matter with the discrimination set to -6.4 though as you have removed any iron discrimination anyway. Also I would think you would set the audio response to its highest value, this would mean that every target no matter how deep would have the same audio response. Anything lower would cause the detector to have to figure out which signals need to be higher than others due to size and or depth.

Thanks for the informative video! Keep ‘em coming 😁

I have now had some time to try it out! I really like the ideas. I also use general with xy-screen as confirmation prgr! I find it deep and loud and sensitive. Use it for pinpointing. Hit it very often spot on! Tried to use the Goldfield, and like it. BUT it is almost everytime very noisy😔. Dont know how to come around that. Tried frequ-scan and Groundgrab, but no effekt.... Is it the ground disturbing? Or EMI? When I compare some default prgrs like Sens or Park or Gen, with Hecksyeahs setup, I find that he has a point! Switch between his setups and some default prgrs on the same target out there! 🇸🇪👍

I gave it a go. It’s very unstable and no use to me like that here in England unfortunately.

Can you show how reactivity 0 does in heavy iron with your settings in Gold Field? My testing has confirmed that Reactivity 2.5 or greater does much better where non ferrous is next to ferrous. But maybe it is better with 0???

Low Recovery Slower Swing deepest targets?

I’ve never used park but I see why you’ve based this deep program on it. I have a Tudor coin Spill site. 3 silver coins from the 1500s they were between 8 and 10 inches. The uneven patina on the first one up suggested it had been stuck to others. Found two more 30 centimetres away. We’ve matched the uneven patina on two suggesting they were touching. The third coin has that patina too but doesn’t match the other coins. Suggesting it may have been stuck to a fourth. I’ll go back in park with all fillers off and see how I get on. Thanks 😊

Do you really want your 10" targets sound the same as your 2" targets?

Thanks for the heal tip- I have the 11 inch coil and I have been wanting to go smaller - now I don’t have to. I’m looking forward to trying the super J program as well. I appreciate the information you are giving me. It’s helping me to understand this incredible machine better.

Great idea...

Thank you buddy I appreciate that it opened my mind up to a lot of things Looking forward for more information thanks

I was just thinking about this today.

Turn on and go, See all your setting without scrolling thru a menu. Great detector...

Intresting, can you please make a video with using your setting vs other XpD2 setting to show the difference on both test deep targets and also live digs, really interested to see the results 😀😀😀

Good afternoon. I have not downloaded the v.7 version yet. Do you plan to and test? Thanks and still liking your program

ALSO, you never cut completely around on your plug!! Always leave an attached plug. I think that's more important than your compression theory!!

Thank u , it was helpful for me, since I am just starting to detect.

Nice I prefer the 9” over the 11”

But the amount of falsing with a reactivity that is too low for conditions would slow you down so much that you wouldn't gain anything....no?

I’ll try it..

In an iron patch you’re going to lose more targets to iron masking than you find with the extra depth you’re getting by setting your reactivity to 0

Sad…same way in the California gold fields.

cool dude, thanks

If it works it works… let haters hate 😎