Відео

Did Shaq ever win a defensive player of the year or a block champion in a year ?

Hakeem had 200 steals in a year did Shaq do that no

Hakeem in a playoff series he had 30 blocks did Shaq do that no

In college Hakeem took his Cougers to 2 Final 4 did Shaq do that no

Shaq was a great center but the reason Hakeem was better than Shaq cause on the defense side of the game Hakeem was more superior

[FULL] Shaq and Ryan Hollins debate: Will LeBron James be on the Lakers' Mt. Rushmore? | First Take ESPN Throwback ua-cam.com/video/CHJZL3B2VR8/v-deo.html

BU TV CONTEXT WILT STRENGTH VERSUS ANY OTHER PLAYERS STRENGTHS START WITH THE CENTERS SINCE THEY ARE LIKELY THE STRONGER OF ALL THE POSITONS. WILT SPEED WILT INDURANCE NOW A SIDE QUEST FOR YOU CONSIDER THE CONDITIONS OF THE GAME AND CONDITIOINS OF THE ERA/ THE POLITICAL/ RACIAL CLIMATE PER CITY FOR BLACKS. LASTLY CONSIDER THE RULES AND THE LEVEL OF PHYSICALITY THAT IS ALLOWED. THIS GOES FOR HOW PLAYERS WERE TREATED DRIVING TO THE HOOP BACK THEN VERSUS HOW EASY IT IS THE DRIVE TO THE HOOP TODAY AND ANYTIME AFTER KOBE RETIRED. SO SPEED, STRENGTH, JUMPING, ENDURANCE FORGET ABOUT BASKETBALL. JUST A PLAYER ABILITY AND ALTHOUGH THIS DOES NOT ALWAYS EQUATE TO HIGH I.Q. THEY HAVE A BETTER CHANCE AT BEING BETTER THAN LESS ATHELETIC ABILITY. EX. JOKER, BIRD, DETLEF SCHREMF, DIRK NOWITSKI, YET HIGH I.Q. AND GAMEMANSHIP. FASTER, STRONGER, HIGH I.Q. WILT IS THE GOAT AS BARRY AND BILL RUSSELL

kobe would puke luka in one one acion

Great reaction

You Know Who Said That Remark, "Bird Is Going To Have A Good One Tonight" ? That Was Bob Cousy. You Can Find This FULL Game On YT Here Too.

ua-cam.com/video/3g2z1dLzTcM/v-deo.htmlsi=cnVhIAf7Y2Ql8y2- MJ's famous "the shot", but with alternate angle + Jordan interview. Enjoy! :)

Does LeBron realize that he's the laughing stock of the NBA? If you take away all the media who have been paid off by Klutch influence, he would have zero NBA supporters

Bird makes every defender look bad bro, black or white, don't make.

Bird Said In A Interview With Reggie & Isaia Thomas, That "Wow, Meaning Jokic. I Would Have Loved To Play With OR Against Him". I Think Larry Meant Who Could Have Shown Who Really Has The Better IQ. I Believe Larry Would Still Have Beat Jokic IQ Playing Against Him, But Larry Would Have Loved The Hard Competitive Part To Be Able To That. And Larry Would Have Loved Having Him On His Team, Almost Like Having 2-Minds Thinking A Like. Kinda Like He Had With DJ.

Appreciate the love yall! 💯💯

Nice review.

These can be two or three separate questions, and highlights the difference between ‘quantitative’ aspects of a player - things we can count- and ‘qualitative’ aspects that we cannot count and are more opinion-based. The “championships” part of this question is quantitative and easy to answer: 6 < 4. Michael Jordan won 6 championships, while LeBron won 4, so obviously MJ won more. Now.. who had a better career? That’s something that’s debatable and not easily summed up with a single statistic (qualitative). You can look at things like career statistics from an average perspective - who scored/assisted/rebounded/blocked/stole more per-game across a career. You can also look at cumulative statistics - who collected more points, assists, rebounds, blocks, steals, etc over the course of their career. Then are are the advanced stats, where you take the numbers above and do some extra math on them and come up with things like PER, VORP, Win Shares, and so on. While you can ‘count’ the type of qualitative measures above, it’s hard to collect them all into one grand picture to say which player had the ‘better’ career because that’s again, an opinion. What weight do we give colleting more points over averaging more points., for example? Then comes the qualitative measures. Accolades, awards, championships. Winning championships counts, but basketball is a team game, so it’s not just one player who wins a title. However, when superstars lead a team and make it their goal to win as many chips as possible, it’s not unfair to log championships as a measure of their success. MVPs are voted upon, as are all-NBA team selections, all-star appearances, defensive player of the year, so they are qualitative, and opinion-based. Scoring titles, assist tiles, rebounding and steals titles - they are based on recordable metrics, so are quantitative achievements.. BUT, we also have changed how these awards are won. Some years it was the player who accumulated the most points, then we shifted to averages, and then we needed to introduce a minimum number of games played..

It all about me basketball.

These can be two or three separate questions, and highlights the difference between ‘quantitative’ aspects of a player - things we can count- and ‘qualitative’ aspects that we cannot count and are more opinion-based. The “championships” part of this question is quantitative and easy to answer: 6 < 4. Michael Jordan won 6 championships, while LeBron won 4, so obviously MJ won more. Now.. who had a better career? That’s something that’s debatable and not easily summed up with a single statistic (qualitative). You can look at things like career statistics from an average perspective - who scored/assisted/rebounded/blocked/stole more per-game across a career. You can also look at cumulative statistics - who collected more points, assists, rebounds, blocks, steals, etc over the course of their career. Then are are the advanced stats, where you take the numbers above and do some extra math on them and come up with things like PER, VORP, Win Shares, and so on. While you can ‘count’ the type of qualitative measures above, it’s hard to collect them all into one grand picture to say which player had the ‘better’ career because that’s again, an opinion. What weight do we give colleting more points over averaging more points., for example? Then comes the qualitative measures. Accolades, awards, championships. Winning championships counts, but basketball is a team game, so it’s not just one player who wins a title. However, when superstars lead a team and make it their goal to win as many chips as possible, it’s not unfair to log championships as a measure of their success. MVPs are voted upon, as are all-NBA team selections, all-star appearances, defensive player of the year, so they are qualitative, and opinion-based. Scoring titles, assist tiles, rebounding and steals titles - they are based on recordable metrics, so are quantitative achievements.. BUT, we also have changed how these awards are won. Some years it was the player who accumulated the most points, then we shifted to averages, and then we needed to introduce a minimum number of games played..

This is all redundant now. Canada is now chopped liver to many Americans. They call us a communist nation and their exalted leader talks of destroying our economy to benefit America’s. “Come From Away”. has a new and threatening meaning.

MJ non factor vs pistons? Isaiah is stoned. regular season (6.6 rebounds 5.3 assists 2.2 steals 29.6 points) Playoffs (6.7rebounds 6.1 assists 2.1steals 30.0 points) plus something called "the Jordan Rules."

Man-child that's a good one.

Big time. As Chuck calls him, Mr Sensitive. He was cool with Bill Walton until Walton offered constructive criticism. Shaq never got over that. Petty is a good word to describe him.

The Celtics traded the number one pick in the draft to Golden State for Robert Parrish, and the number three pick, which was McHale. Golden State drafted Joe Barry Carroll. And you couldn't stop McHale even with a double team. The NBA no longer care about post play.

More Larry bro

LARRY LEGEND

Same thing happened to Larry, but it was BOTH of his akilease

As the years pass , the rules did, every ten years, the game changed.

That man Larry Legend has a way with words don't he? AWESOME

This is painful to hear.