Відео

You are going to have to find it online. Direct from AXon, you need an account…

Keep in mind USCCA normally doesn’t cover Armed Security ie on the job only concealed carry incidents.

Honest opinion, it was edible. I wouldn't classify it as a good, but it wasn't garbage either. It's institutional food.

@@UniversitySecurity yes they just need to be more thankful for having a full meal

He could be named in a law suit. It's unlikely he would every be able to pay for the resources lost...Both time it took to develop the cultures and the potential they held. This went to mediation between his employer and the research center I believe. It's hard to put a value on potential....Research is one of those things that could lead to nothing or be a major breakthrough. The reality is sometimes a debt can't be repaid. We need to be aware of our mistakes and never repeat them. This goes beyond the janitorial staff member that made the mistake. How do we protect ourselves from the lowest denominator? Preventing this leads to questions relating to training and access. Most notably, the Research Assistants and Scientist were not the only ones with access to this sensitive space....I have to wonder how hard it would be to limit access to research spaces to cleaners unless supervises by lab staff....Also removing garbage and placing the bag outside the space.

Bs

I have heard much worse. On the scale of bad or great customer service....This is about average. A business employee can tell you to leave the property, it's the right of the property owner. Refusing to do so, is trespass.

Ton's of POS systems are IPAD or Smart Phone based. Paypal has a reader....As do most other services. It's not unusual.

Not sure if I was able to articulate it as well you but I agree. I will pin the comment. Appreciate your contribution.

It was for one day. Store specific incident not company policy. According to the comments in the viral video, it had to do with the inability to access the safe and the POS system was not functioning correctly. Which to me creates a reasonable set of circumstances for refusal without much fuss.

Correction, the government doesn’t print or issue paper currency and coins. A private company called the Federal Reserve does that. It is not a government entity in any way.

Correct but those that do require are in the minority...Most have provided no guidance.

It's likely to occur in our life time. It's happening in developing countries faster than it is here. Basing a currency on the value of bitcoin ext. There are clear issues going down this road.

Legal tender of offer of payment. Key is to what is says under the US Code not how people interpret what is on the bill which is not a guarantee it will be accepted nor is it law. US Code and how it defines US money is. It basically only saying this can be accepted and it's money backed by the US government.

There is no debt when you go into a business to buy something. The good or service they're selling is nothing more than an offer. You either accept the offer on the price and terms stated or you don't. There is nothing in federal law which even remotely requires anyone to accept cash.

Because a business has a legal right to refuse service for any reason. You don’t get a say, assuming it’s a lawful refusal of service and not based on a protected class. He is welcome to complain but we are talking about the law. The cashier is within their rights as an agent of the business to refuse. You naturally have a right to a different opinion, or say you would do things differently. That doesn’t take away the cashiers legal rights. The reason why they refused? It was explained in the comments of the longer version…There point of sale system was broken and they didn’t have access to the safe to make change. It was just for the day.

@@UniversitySecurity I saw that, I was perplexed wondering why he would refuse cash at that point, lol I definitely agree wit you on the right t refuse service and would have understood and agreed with you more b4 hand had I known there was a system failure, but didn't learn that till watching other vid about it! Still being familiar with their pos system it still seems strange their system was working fine to accept cards and not accept cash that was my main issue with the situation cause if it went wrong at jjs I dealt with and fixed it and never had there been a reason where system was down where cards were accepted and not cash it would have been opposite like a card processing failure... honestly that guy probably was trying to close early and had already counted down the drawers and only wanted to take card so he wouldn't have to recount the till.... just based on how I've seen things transpire working there for 3 years

Actually with further thoughts I'm almost positive that's exactly what it was they counted down the drawers before they were supposed to and made up an excuse to not have to accept the cash. Obviously I wasn't there😂 but I'd almost guarantee that is exactly what was going on there based on how the store looks it was a late customer and they counted down the till too early... I'd almost bet money that's what the actual story is

It's plausible. Legal right to refuse ...Can be based on being lazy. I have certainly seen it before. We won't know. I doubt the customer is interested in finding out more. There is no civil suit, nothing to be gained besides bad PR for the business. The employee....He will find another job if he gets fired. Food service is critically short staffed as it is.

It’s because of all the armed robbery.

@@AceRasputin That's a real consideration. With cash, there is a risk not only of robbery but of employee skimming. You have to hire armored truck services to collect and deliver the cash. Electronic payment systems make financial management and record keeping more efficient.

Banks charge businesses a cash deposit fee depending on how much cash they deposit each month. Labor and risk of handling cash for a small business is more than many people realize.

Visa, which has extensive control on fees, charges a processing fee....3% is typical. It doesn't go to the business. I believe using debit would avoid this.

well it WAS Sting so did you really miss that much? heh

Why should it be mandatory? If a company wants to deal with credit or debit cards only, that's their prerogative. How is that rendering someone's money "inert?" (Do you know what inert means? How can money be inert?)

Businesses must accept the legal tender. This is the law.

www.federalreserve.gov/faqs/currency_12772.htm#:~:text=There%20is%20no%20federal%20statute,payment%20for%20goods%20or%20services.

@@UniversitySecurity I said the law should be changed. What good does it do me to show me the law has yet to be changed?

@@christinef7739 So back in the day there were situations in which corporations would have geographical control of an area and as such would have the power to be, in essence, a little fiefdom. The company would own the entire town, literally. They'd own the general store, they'd own the clinic where the doctor would work, etc. Not only that, but since they had so much control, they wouldn't pay their workers in cash, they'd pay them in what was known as "scrip." You could liken it to Chuck E. Cheese tokens on steroids. And the reason why the corporation in question would do this is because while an employee would be paid in enough scrip to have a "savings" in it... that scrip was only worth something to the company. So if a worker got too uppity or tried to leave? All their scrip savings would be worthless, and of course it was at the complete discretion of the company as to whether the corporate owned stores would even accept an individual employee's scrip in the first place. Like there's a rich history in which workers fought to be paid in a currency that could be used for ALL legal goods and services. I could go on, but I think most peoples' eyes have already glazed over just seeing two paragraphs as it is. Maybe that brief history alone is enough to give you an inkling on how money can be rendered inert.

I will say most businesses are not open. While unsure of the current situation on the ground, price gouging is incredibly common as well in disaster zones. I heard they went to 10 dollars a gallon, about triple their normal rate. Short term market manipulation is very easy, basically it's take it or leave it. Mobile start link would make cashless processing possible as nearly all modern points of sales are connected to the internet.....Like ATM's. While I keep currency on hand, I advise others to look in fractional silver pieces....1/10 1/4 1/2 1oz to batter with. It's in my emergency kit and has been since I lived in the hurricane zone in Texas.

@@UniversitySecurity In Texas the gas stayed at normal prices. There is a STRICT law against price gouging in Texas. Silver is not a good emergency barter. You don't want to get rid of your SHTF barter for a few hamburgers. The cell phones were dead during the aftermath of the hurricane. No way to connect to the net. Not a viable option.

Starlink is satellite based. It does not connect to cell towers. I travel to the Philippines every year....This is a common piece of equipment for Expats. Due to the hurricanes most expats have and Starlink...It's very common for an Expat to the be the first back up and running...Well before the grid is restored. The conditions in the Philippines may not be worse in some parts but the recovery times can be post disaster. Odet was like 3 months for power in rural Leyte. Most people don't know the value to silver and gold. Often, 1Oz of silver is seen as more valuable than 30 dollars. I am of the firm belief it's not what it's worth now but what a potential value will be in a grid down scenario. People don't know what melt / scrap value is, they can't look it up. There is historical value, whether perceived or not, it's tangible. keep gold in the safe as well. I would rather spend the silver first....Gold doesn't come out unless I really need to trade for something. I am a HAM Radio Operator as well. I keep a go box radio and solar panel. I use a AllPowers 100w foldable.

@@UniversitySecurity Starlink where I live costs about $150 a month after all fees and taxes. Beyond my budget.

It's not cheap. With fiber coming into my area I will likely go to it. The Starlink has been highly reliable and convenient. I am hoping the price of the service will go down. I think the equipment is around $500 which is a added burden. Living in Montana...The options are not great up here.

I can tell you did not watch the video. It is legal at the federal level to refuse cash. Feel free to look it up. USC Code confirms this.

2025.10-No-Cash or No-Check Guidance Federal entities may decide not to accept payments made in cash or by check. Before adopting a no-cash or a no-check policy, a federal entity should decide that the policy will be more beneficial than not to the operation of the program generating the payments. Factors that a federal entity must consider when making its determination include: Federal entity’s statutory and regulatory authorities, Costs and benefits associated with implementing the policy, Programmatic or economic reasons for adopting the policy, Efficiencies to be gained by adopting the policy, and Anticipated impact of the policy on the federal entity’s constituents. If, after examining these factors, a federal entity determines that it is more beneficial than not to adopt a no-cash or no-check policy, Fiscal Service considers such a decision to be consistent with Treasury’s move to an all-electronic Treasury, as well as the purposes of federal cash-management statutes. 2025.20-Funds Received for Another Federal Entity If a federal entity receives funds that must be deposited under another ALC, it must: Deposit the funds under its own ALC, Classify the transaction to its budget clearing account F3875, and Intra-Governmental Payment and Collection funds to the ALC for which the funds were deposited. tfx.treasury.gov/cash-and-check-deposits

Same here. It surprises me how few are willing to do so:

We actually don't know if the Security provider had an agreement with Lowes or not. The contracted Security provider had a contract with the landlord to patrol the common spaces of the property. This may have included the exterior of Lowes and the parking lot. Which is a common setup with leaseholders and security. Lowes had no formal agreement with the Nelsons. He was not employed with Lowes, wither as an independent contractor or as a regular employee. He asked to take the pallets and employee said yes. That does not absolve trespass on other parts of the property if they existed. Due to the number of previous incidents, to include at other businesses, he likely was trespassed from the property. The issue is there is no proof, no documentation which means he would have to be told to leave every single time he entered the property and was not criminally trespassing upon entering. Also some internal communication indicated that the Nelsons were permitted in common spaces, this would have included parking lots. If Security and landlord management didn't know what was allowed for the Nelson's on the property, how did they? The pepper spray into the vehicle was illegal and served no purpose. He should have called Law Enforcement when they were sitting in their vehicle. Gimbel escalated the force. He assaulted the Nelson's when he deployed pepper spray into the vehicle.

@@UniversitySecurity I’m confused but still the gun guy is a psycho and broke so many laws

He killed a guy and will serve a minimum of 25 years. I can't imagine sitting in the jail house and telling another inmate that you a beef over a guy over a used pallet and lost your cool...killing him. It's unreal that he couldn't disengage or that law enforcement was NEVER previously called. This was brewing for a long time...Months apparently. We have more information now than we did when I first made this video. We still have questions obviously. It's unlikely they will ever be answered. What is clear, this was murder.

@@UniversitySecurity yeh this is is why I’m very very careful not making anybody mad at me

I can't believe I missed your comment! Absolutely agree. I don't generally have a soft approach, there is an age where you have to take a different approach. You can't treat an elementary school kid like a senior in high school. This kid made some mistakes but how many failures around him led to this? This kid still has the opportunity to turn things around. While I don't know, I suspect the thought process involved was not well developed in this case. I have a strong feeling this was for shock value, playing on what was in the news without much thought about consequences. Rarely do 11-year-olds formulate detailed plans. Can they do wrong? Absolutely but let's get real. A 5th/6th grader isn't a criminal mastermind. This needed intervention, assessment, monitoring and restitution...Not a public hanging.

Presumed innocent until proven guilty in the court of law. Whether the 11 year old is guilty or not, people have already presumed his guilt on social media. We don't have the evidence. We don't have a trial. He has a right to a defense and due process. Social media has already decided which calls into question a bias. We are outsiders. Yes, there are reports he admitted to making the threats, at least he is willing to take personal accountability and attempt to right a wrong it seems if true. We don't get to tar and feather someone especially a 11 year old. We still have a process to follow, and that process must be followed for each and every person. That is not left or right opinion, it's about the faith in our judicial system. Other countries, our peers, do not release even the name of pre-detention inmates because of this. Germany being one of them.... Even if a DA has a 98% Conviction rate, the 2% who are found innocent...There is a reason why pre-trial detention has differences being post-conviction.

@@chrisbates2443 bravo. Same school of thought.

So where do you draw the line? 5 years old? 7? 10?

@@UniversitySecurity There is no line. If nothing else these parents are accountable. If your little shit pulls the fire alarm, the authorities are on your door step. Like these school shooters mommy and daddy you fucked up. Along with your little cherub you're going to jail. FOR LIFE. Hope that answers your question.

He wasn’t a school shooter. That’s the issue. People are confusing this kid and putting him on the same list as the Georgia shooter who killed 4 people. This kid screwed up but he’s not a murderer. Did you watch my video or any others?

@@UniversitySecurity I know he wasn't the shooter. I take it your security. Any disruption by any snot nosed kid affects daily life. Whether he's a 10 year old or any one that pulls that crap disrupts life. Shuts down businesses, locks down hospitals, government buildings etc. Why are you making excuses? Are you ok with anything that causes fear or disruptions. This is not kids being kids, this is an assault. This is parents sitting little Johnny or Betty in front of what ever and letting them go "stupid". What would happen if there was a bomb threat at a "Trump Rally" would you go sideways? Sorry but this conversation feels like you accept this behavior. So a little tap on the ass is punishment enough.

This is way outside the norm for juvenile offenders at 11 years old. I think you know that. This is not making excuses or degrading the seriousness threats, it’s the recognition it’s a child, not even a teenager. I addressed placing him in victim impact and setting up restitution, along with monitoring and removing all weapons from his possession. I also discussed possible placing him in a correctional facility…I think that depends on how advanced his plans were….Thats reasonable for this age group. No where did I say a sorry was enough, but there is a clear difference between adult, teen, and child offenders…there always has been in the US system. You don’t get to take that away. Because you are annoyed. This is not a soft approach, it’s a measured one with understanding that we have a legal responsibility to protect due process and juveniles are different especially this young. You want to parade a 17 year old shooter, arsonist, child predator…you’re going to see a completely different opinion from me. 11 and the bias that is being shown for digital threats…it’s way too young.

Yes, it’s pre conviction. I highlighted this as well.

I disagree. There absolutely MUST be evidence of a crime. No policeman is stupid enough to accuse an 11-year-old without evidence!

An arrest does not decide guilt or innocence. Nor does evidence that has not been reviewed by a jury. We only use the probable cause that a crime has committed to hold someone in jail, even then a judge as to read the probable cause affidavit…Get it wrong, even for a serious case and you walk out. Anything more than that is decided by the judicial process. It does not define their guilt or innocence. Due process and Constitutional rights and the presumption of innocence are still protections provided to the accused.

@@messrsandersonco5985 Are you aware that there is a Supreme Court decision that says you can legally be ruled out as a cop if you are too smart, but does not address a lower limit?

Do you lock up your kitchen knives from your kids? The access is the same. He was also provided access to those by a parent. You can't buy them under 18. Under the law, juveniles have always been treated differently than legal adults. They will be seen by a juvenile court, only transferring if charged with absolutely heinous crimes and of a certain age. This about finding the appropriate punishment and understanding they do not have the same rational thinking as an adult. They don't, there is no debate there. There is developmental differences between a adult, teen, and child. Holding them to the same standards is not okay. We have to accept we administer sentencing appropriately. He is also not convicted, this is pre-trial detention.

It's NOT Illegal for people under 18 to have those items, they just have to purchased by the Parent. Hell when I was growing up were allowed to bring Rifles to our Middle School when Hunting Season began. People have become too soft and more concerned with 'Feelings" over actions..

'Due Process' 'Presumption of Innocence'..

Exactly. Sheriff's saying pay attention to what your kid is doing.

Similar to the way they do things in other countries. I don't know what the best option is. I know kids are being exposed to things they truly don't have a full grasp of at younger ages these days. So much of this is drawing likes, drawing social media followings...It's addicting to young children. From birth these days kids are given gadgets in the United States....The addiction is very real, kids have melt down when they get their phones taken way...On a nuclear level.....Also kids will freak out if no one likes their shorts. This likely played a role in this kids decision.

@emmitt1515 Loss Prevention, agent is a term in business to refer to someone acting under the authority of the property owner IE Designated Agent of the business. It's appropriate.