Відео

Civ V. Honestly though, i don't like how they make it harder and harder to make your own civilization each game, making it more difficult to name your cities and civilization.

He didn't talk about the economy lmao. Cause EU4 has no redeeming qualities to it at all.

From my experience so far, CIV 6 forces you to rely a lot on city states to win a war quickly. Otherwise your wars devolve into stalemate unless you're several steps ahead technologically.

I don't like the districts in Civ 6 and Humankind basically did the same. I don't like a city to appear to take up a whole territory as it sprawl is insane due to the districts. Where Civ V looks like the city is in one spot, but you do have farms and forest just outside the city walls.

It’s a downgrade from 2

One big change with Civ 6 was that it was the first main line game that was available on consoles, which meant that they needed to make certain changes to the game style. But at the same time I personally wouldn't of played the game if it wasn't available on consoles, and the next game will be for the ps5 and series Xbox. In Civ 6 cities without walls are near defenceless but they get a big boost with the first of 4 wall improvements. In Civilization Revolution the AI would stack every city it controlled with 2-3 armies of usually the best troops if can create, so personally I feel that the combat without armies from the start of the game is much better.

Jesus, my biggest turn off for Civ 6 is the graphic, looks like dog-shit.

I haven't clicked play yet. But it's an easy answer. CIV V is the goat. No questions asked. For many reasons. Childish animations, natural disasters everywhere all the time, luxuries and tile development is lost. The VI got infected by the woke syndrome.

data mining?

My first Civilization game was Civilization IV. I played it for hundreds of hours. When I tried the beta (or was it a demo? It was before release date at least) of Civ V, I loved it pretty much right away. It lacked some things, but I ended up really enjoying it and switching to Civ V. Going from Civ V to Civ VI however... I didn't like it right away and still don't. I have played it for about 15 hours (one full game) and it just annoyed and bored me with all the districts. Workers (called builders in that game) having a finite number of uses also was a frustration. It did some good things, but VI is far inferior to Civ V in my opinion.

I play all three plus Stellaris.

The attirbutes I care about are all won by Civ 5. Civ 6 points are things I don't care about.

The Civ V soundtrack is also 100x better than that of VI.

No stellaris ?

before watching the video, i can quickly answer this: whichever your friends play is the better game

Honestly districts are what put me off civ 6, I hate it. I felt like it limited your cities way more than in civ5.

Very cool video, thank you.

I want to like Civ 6 a lot, the hexagonally tiled map is such a big improvement. But the art direction leaning so heavily into the cartoonish, mobile game-esque style just spoils so much about this game for me. I also really dislike how diplomacy is still braindead simple.

The highlight of all Civ for me is hearing the narrator for V reading excerpts from great works of literature. Chayka, The Raven, Alice in Wonderland. I kid you not when I say Civ V introduced me to some of the greatest pieces of art the human mind has ever conceived. That alone makes it better than all the others for me.

5 is far better

The districts of Civ 6 utterly boggles the AIs. Civ 6 might be more fun playing against fellow humans, but for a solo game 5 has the AIs play better

A change that bothers me more than it should is the change they made to workers. Workers only having a limited amount of uses is really annoying. It also doesn't make sense that roads are no longer able to be made using workers. It really takes the control of your infrastructure out of your hands. Civ 5 makes more sense.

I just got civ 5 cuz civ 6 is like $60 8 years after coming out.

I personally prefer 6 over 5. 5 is good and got me into Civilization, but I don't much like building tall just for some Russian or Indian to nuke my city back to the stone age. Civ 6 nukes are far more powerful and numerous than 5, but at least I can spread out my empire so my capital being nuked isn't an auto rage quit.

civ v with vox populiu is the best 4x game I've ever played, bar none. 6 isn't even in the discussion

I like playing at the Canadians in Civ 6. I like playing a cold map as Canada

Tˇwas a great childhood...

Civ 5 has a way better UI too. and Civ 6 has NO STATS. whats your gdp? what are the populations of the civilizations? Who knows, who cares? I DO

i think its kinda stupid to give narration the same weight of a point as some core gameplay features. I often skip the voicelines and I play while listening to music. Felt very biased to me.

I've never played 5, there is a better version?! 5 sounds like what I want 7 to be like.

Civ 5 is my go-to for modern CIV. Call me old fashioned but I still prefer Civ 3. It was great.

Civ 5 by a landslide,tsunami and earthquake.Civ 6 is cartoonish garbage.There can be debate about Civ 4 vs 5 but i would not call Civ 6 a civ game at all.

Fantástico video! Like and subscribe.

I've recently been playing Civ V again, mostly due to the music for Elizabeth 😁but your review of both games has me going back to Civ VI (with the Civ V graphics mod) as it does more of the core elements better, in my opinion, and forces you to think and plan city placement and growth. Good content chap.

Civ 4 best civ, civ 6 is better than 5, hated that policy system in civ5, felt like an EA game.

CIV 5

There are 2 main reasons why Civ V is the better and more rewarding game: 1. The district system is tedious and inflexible 2. You literally have to play wide in Civ VI and hammers are by far the most important resource at every point in the game, for any civ. The game-to-game variance in play is extremely small. Even the civ variety is toned down. Oh, and all aspects of the presentation are outright insulting. And the AI doesn't protect its interests in diplomacy. And the turn pacing is way off as a result of turns being super long cuz everyone has 20 cities that each have districts. And the combat is substantially worse. And the leader screen looks like a work in progress. And the diplo victory is stupid. And the culture victory is arcane. And the science victory is a hammers victory in disguise which requires next to no specialisation. I could go on

My first time playing Civ 6 was with my friends when Epic gave it out for free. I had like hundreds of hours of experience and they had none, so we agreed on playing in a team against AI. Ofc my friends were complete noobs, so I just told them to produce units and give them to me. I was trying to figure out where the happiness counter was.. Guess what.. I just conquered three ai civs in a row without consequences. It felt like nothing. No challenge at all. So I just sticked to 5.

Civ 6 feels like a mobile game. Why are all the characters ugly and fat? Or super skinny? Overdramatized proportions where everybody looks like bigfoot or a rake. Why did they cut out the backgrounds form the previous game? Why did they make it so the characters all have one single line of dialogue? It just boggles the mind.

I actually liked the scaling better in Civ V more since it alowed to play super tall. Keeping to a single city was at least a semi-viable strategy, which is simply not the case in VI.

Civ 6, if it is any good was too difficult for me to get into. I still play Civ 5. It looks to me like they have taken the worst of Civ 6 and brought that forwards into Civ 7. I suppose I will have to wait for Civ 8.

CIVII

I really don't like the agendas of the leaders in 6. Some make sense, some are irrelevant, and some are just stupid.

I feel most people are saying Civ 5 just cause its older (more nostalgic). Which is fine, but personally I find Civ 6 more fun in general. But not by all that much. Theyre both great.

I like humankind more

Civ 5 myself, I just don't like some of the changes in civ 6. Mainly: limited usage workers Districts/wonders taking whole tiles the art style

Civ 5 cause it's realistic

as a person who got to know the civ series from civ vi, i can't really compare... i've never played civ v. so i kinda got used to the ui, graphics and mechanics. now that civ vii is going to be released i think there's going to be another generation shock

i love both , but civ 5 is my first civ game so there is a bit of nostalgy there

I never got far in civ6. The thing I hated the most was having to manually instruct my workers on everything and having them gone after 3 turns. With civ 4 and 5, I always just automated my workers and continued with my other stuff. Not having that option really annoyed me.