Відео

s21 of the Human Rights Act 2019 (QLD) ss(1)Every person has the right to hold an opinion without interference. ss(2)Every person has the right to freedom of expression which includes the freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, whether within or outside Queensland and whether- (a)orally; or (b)in writing; or (c)in print; or (d)by way of art; or (e)in another medium chosen by the person.

Australian constitution OR Commonwealth constitution? We have NEVER had a referendum that got rid of the Commonwealth Constitution SO the Australian constitution is illegal, null and void

This guy isn't even Australian and he's educating us on our Political System. Nah, I'll be alright

can you explain what is commonwealth powers

Obrigado, Renato!

When it come to international treaties and Australia, one of the most famous ones is the “International Rights Of The Child Convention”. Came into effect in mid 1990 under less than honorable conditions but became loved by all when the Republic Referendum failed in 1999. This treaty has a very interesting back story from being hated to being loved in just 9 years and is well worth researching. And if you do, you will be amazed how it was linked the the republic referendum in so many ways but the ‘yes’ case failed to see it.

It is us people who make laws and it is us who need to stand up for what is right

Where is the referendum that changed us from the Commonwealth constitution to the Australian constitution?

When was the successful referendum when we left the Commonwealth constitution? If we haven't (which we have not) then we are bond by the older Commonwealth constitution which does have an even older bill of rights.

When did we have a successful referendum that got rid of the Commonwealth constitution? If there is no referendum then the Australian constitution is not legal and was brought in illegally

2009-2016! Tonny abbot Kevin rud malcom julia gillard , your names are called out along with uk tonny blair david cameroon and bush obama clintons. So welcome to justice land. 🔥

Hi Dr Renato, Estou assistindo os seus vídeo, congrats Sir. I’ve started to follow you on LD. Thanks for share your wisdom.

You have saved my life for my AUS Const law exam, thank you very very much sir

Whitlam wanted to renegotiate the Pine Gap arrangements with the US. The truth was revealed by CIA man, Christopher John Boyce. - who was then ‘stitched up’ by the CIA, who claimed he was selling secrets to Russia (just like Donal Trump). Boyce spent 15 YEARS in solitary confinement- as an example to other CIA operatives, and to ensure he would never be heard from again. After his release, Boyce formed close relationships with falcons, and eschewed human company. Please learn the *real* history - however dangerous it may be to even know, let alone discuss. I’m old. I don’t care anymore.

Hey Renato, absolutely love your videos!! I have told my whole cohort to watch you! Just a request for more content - it would be really great if you touched on an overview of judicial power and ChIII separation rules including integrity principles and off court roles for judges and statutory interpretation. (these are the other topics we are doing at Sydney Uni which i noticed you haven't made videos about...as of yet!!) Thanks so much!!

i love u thank u

How does a PM change the constitution without the opposition knowing or preventing it? 2. How would the PM get the high court would allow it? 3. How would a pm make the changes not obvious in plain sight?

Out of curiosity how would a pm change the constitution 1. without the opposition knowing or preventing it? 2. Make the high court allow it 3. Make it not as noticable to hide it in plan sight? Have you ever seen a UA-cam conspiracy sov CIT show any evidence? Do they apply talk about it with none?

🇦🇺🇦🇺 A thousand word's or none. THE MONEY OR THE GUN? "Well I'M going to sit in the sun"

thank you bro youre saving my atar rn

Sir Harry Gibbs, former Chief Justice of the High Court, in collaboration with Australia's most formidable legal minds, and those of UK, had a different view... that Australia has been a colony of the British Empire since 1931. It was a sovereign nation only between the Versailles Treaty of 1919 and the Statute of Westminster. Bestowing the Governor General and state governors with the authority of the Queen of England and the Queen of Australia left the governors with no authority to pass legislation, thus government has been unlawful since 1931. As a vacant Colony of the British Empire, I invaded this and occupied it since April 12 1971 and claimed complete dominion over this continent. A half century has passed and according to international law, because the British Empire has failed to expel me, or even to challenge my declaration of sovereignty, such opportunity has lapsed. Moreover, the true Kind of England has been discovered living in a southern state (Victoria?) and I have invited him to re-establish his Empire which, evidently, he is not interested in doing. Thus, it appears I have the opportunity to claim the British Empire as mine. Thinking the British Navy might be useful in expelling the US occupiers of the NT, I examined this asset only to discover the Brits own only two aircraft carriers and need to sell one in order to repair the second. Moreover, their principle commander admitted those enlisted are not fit for purpose and it would take several years to remedy this, if they had the money, and was I prepared to loan them some? Well, I was loathe to admit I have none, so I bookmarked a conference with the City of London , with no real intention to deal with the BIS. They had already tried Wall Street but already owing $34 trillion this was kinda pointless. It appears that the only solvent nation is Russia so I have arranged for Putin to recapitalise the City of London and its alter ego, the British Empire, who have agreed to recognise my sovereignty of Australia. Previously, I was stumped over the problem of US military, corporate, mining, and media presence but now it transpires that America has been bluffing about its military prowess and is essentially 20 years obsolete having blown its $2.1 trillion R&D budget on Afghanistan, a war that it then lost. This means its purported War of Annihilation of Russia, China, and Iran may not go so well. Specifically, the missiles known affectionately as Zircon, Vangard, Iskander, S-300, S-400, DF-17, DF-41 and KN-25, are all superior to anything the US possesses so this will all go very messy for the White House and I suppose, the military in north Australia. I imagine it will be China thet does the strikes, and so Pine Gap, Tindal B52 base, Five Eyes, the spy satellite thingies at Middle Point and Darwin harbour, will be flattened. Unfortunately, believing themselves to be omnipotent, the Yanks also built ten giant INPEX gas tanks only one K across the water from Darwin CBD, backed by two giant military fuel tanks. So there goes my fave city, probably, if one believes pundits and gurus like Scott Ritter, Col Doug McGregor, Larry Johnston, Col Larry Wilkerson, Judge Napolitano, Jeffrey Sachs, and so on, in December 2024. Darwin. All gone. This means the rules of war apply and so I will use these to remove what is left of the US military. I am hoping I can commandeer one of their Osprey MV22Bs in order to survey my kingdom while I await the arrest of hack lawyers like Twomey, and all politicians. Arise, dear readers.

Grab any Law Dictionary pick one of your choosing and look up the law dictionary definition of 👉humans ... All these mentions of human rights ect ect are resoundingly inept and somewhat of a waste of oxygen verbalising it as humans have no rights human beings have no rights none , Nada not a one , zip zero , zilch ... the same as a citizen or a person these are bad deals and a blatant misuse of the English language ... wo/man = manKIND Chocked full of unalienable rights .... avalanche and tidal wave of them apparently just doing whatever the hell they want has got a lot to do with the majority of experiment acceptors and Entrance pertaining intellectual properties of said Patent holder ... something the forward thinking bribed by doughnut recipients seemingly overlooked

So can they go to international and eu

💫Use the same protections that protects the Bar Association... seek PRIVATE info MEMBERS in ASSOCIATION. There are many that Australians can join via community meetings so step out into your community ❤

Law or Legislation?

Renato é fera

when you calling it albo

im dropping some information to the public before the next election lets call it a referendom on who controls a persons thoughts let the public decide if thee offends

are our plans transparant enough

time for aussies to rewrite our constitution

Man your so clear and explain it so well

This is incorrect information - the Statute of Westminster at no point said the UK could not legislate for Australia even at the Federal sphere - it merely agreed not with our consent and request - but as a UK Act of Parliament - it could be ignored or repealed at will . Request and consent were merely ' manner and form provisions ' that would apply BEFORE it did legislate. It was not until the Australia Acts 1986 that the Sovereignty of the UK was extinguished . The UK Parliament DID enact legislation on 3rd March 1986 and that applied to BOTH the Federal and State levels ( see wording of the Acts ).

I don't read anything about their law. I just do the right thing based on my morals.

Why don't you start with ! 1919 Treaty Of Versailles when Australia became an independent Nation. Because this happened it meant we could (according to International Law) no longer use another countries document as law. But those in power, Politicians, Judges ETC, instead of writing a new Australian Constitution , kept the , now illegal English Constitution. Which means all Politicians judges etc that swear an Oath too, from the English constitution are in fact sitting illegally

Using your argument, the Australia Act is NOT Constitutional...

Not without a Referendum..... but if you compare the new print green copy next to the original red copy, they have made changes without referendum.....Our Constitution 1900 does have a preamble...therefore Your opinion doesn't matter....

This section came from the historical aspect of Britain having a State Church and discrimination against Catholics in colonial times. This section would assured Catholics that the new country would not be like the UK. Remember that the constitution was voted upon in all the colonies. If this section was omitted the vote may have not have passed due to a Catholic backlash.

What happened to this section during covid ? The law only applies when it suits politicians and the judiciary ! During covid you could not travel between states !

Yeh, cause relying on responsible government has never failed right!

How can we the people have a say to amend the bill so we have a fair hearing and be heard.

Well the Australian government shits all over the human rights of kiwis living in Australia and nothing is ever done about it!

You are talking about the corrupt UN

Renato. Only someone from a dictatorship could find any comfort in Australia’s lack of expressed rights, namely a bill of rights, for its citizens. Forgive me, but were you in Australia over the last 4 years. Please, be real and go to cases whereby medical autonomy doesn’t even exist anymore. Nuremberg codes were being violated in nearly every aspect with regard to mandating of the experimental gene therapies for those simply not wanting to be sacked from their jobs. This was carried out on different levels at the State levels and those States then stopped the freedom of trade and travel as supposedly protected in your pitch of implied right or whatever nonsense legislators or Govt’s will ignore when they have a plan to protect. There is a great way you could have taken this channel but being so far from where Australia once behaved to where it finds itself now requires the scrutinising of the absence of a Bill of Rights and why Menzies would be rolling in his grave after your citing his words in what was a very much freer country with the scars of WW2 still very much upon the psyches of Australians. There is a politically protected in this country and that is it. The rest are treated like the prisoners of we are (with probably as many or less rights than a prisoner) of this Penal Colony. I have a mate who escaped Argentina and he has the same (inauthentic feeling) - happy about everything in Australia disposition because it probably a notch above having guns pointed at your head by officials. I remind everyone, the Victorian police opened fire with plastic bullets on civil and calm protestors at an ANZAC memorial. If that’s not enough, what a bi it the grandmother knocked to the ground slamming her head then only to sprayed in the face with mace from another tyrant Victorian policeman. Nothing has happened to change this from happening again. We have no rights. There is always another way for Govt to exert their control over you. Legally and illegally. It doesn’t matter to them - we probably don’t even exist in any meaningful capacity or capability, on the books. Just Serfs would be most accurate.

Australia had it's Constitution introduced into place and power on the 1st of January, 1901, after being signed by Queen Victoria Herself about 6 months before. AND it cannot be changed, added to or subtracted from except by referendum. All it embraces is part of it, otherwise it was a useless order of the Queen, our Monarch. It covers what is written, and everything else is part of our freedoms. This cannot be taken away by some negligent politicians signing a foreign treaty without referendum approval. The United Nations and it's laws are not part of Australia'sobligations under Constitutional Law. They are just legal fiction put together by corporatized entities that want to control the whole world...the One World Government/New World Order which has not been approved by any Australian referendum. So most of your utterances will be based on the lie that the UN has some sort of power over us...which it does not. Our freedoms are from God and his law and order processes that became Common Law. That is the only law system we are obliged to follow as a Westminster Country.

Australia does not have a legitimate government, just Corporations...

You're a dangerous little man aren't you?

when i finish this degree, i'm giving you a special tribute. thank u for making this channel

The United nations need's to be disbanded. It has become a tyrannical institution.

Purpose yes Ahaha

Forde was only PM for 7 days while the Labor caucus could convene to elect a new leader after Curtin died. Also Chifley only won one election. Not sure why you skipped Menzies after Paige