Відео

I noticed you might be facing some challenges with fundraising. I’d love to share an idea I believe could help you not only reach but possibly exceed your goal. Would you be open to a quick conversation?

Yet H20 is possible ... Blah blah blah.... AI horse shit ...

Amen

Amen 🙏

amen

Soure? Where has this been peer-reviewed and published?

How to get scammed:

I think you make too much of it. Sure String Theory bred a lot of crud, but that's always the case in science. The crud is a good thing, if not taken to extremes. No one knows ahead of time what the best models will be. It is a bit childish to expect a revolution every 40 years. The period 1905 - 1980 was extraordinary. I mean "extra ordinary", which is to say "not ordinary"! Don't fall prey to the Hossenfelder-Weinstein circle jerk of anti-establishmentarianism. There has to be an establishment for anyone to be anti-establishment. What matters is not what side of that artificial divide you fall upon, but your honesty and integrity regardless of where you have a role.

@21:0 nah, the heart of the problem is not extra dimensions - the experiments to probe that hypothesis do not exist, but they might one day. The core problem is "capitalism" writ large, and neoliberalism (gutting of public good funding) in particular and long standing false paradigms concerning macroeconomics. Hint: public science and services are _not_ "tax payer funded". No one can get the state currency to pay a dime in tax until the government first lends or spends. Governments do not spend using "tax payer dollars" - there is no such thing, all currency since antiquity is the IOU of the authority (church, state, temple, palace, etc). So public funding is the exact opposite of what the "tax payer" rhetoric suggests. All good science begins with a wisdom motive, and the ongoing need of worker-scientists to eat to survive, the profit motive then takes over and then enshittification ensues, unless the idea has a competitor. So the core problem is String/M theory has few credible competitors. That is saying something, because String Theory itself is rubbish, as you say. It is the least bad rubbish. If we want serious competitors we need to give other thinkers a salary to do the work. But science is not in the "let's fund the right project" business. By definition you cannot know which ideas are going to pan out. So inherently good science is not a capitalist enterprise, it can never be pure capitalist, except by sheer good luck. So funding agencies need to have waaaay more open minds.The key is public finance. The government cannot run out of its own IOU (aka. tax credit, aka. "dollars"), so can always pay the wage for any science nerd, in perpetuity. The cost to the private sector is the real cost of real resources, mainly the labour of that science nerd is no longer available in the private sector, otherwise her wage is bid up. But the currency issuer (government) can always outbid the private sector, whether they should or not is the question (the out-bidding is defined as a price pressure, it can become inflationary if it occurs across a wide spectrum of economic sectors without an increase in currency withdrawal = saving or tax returns) The State wishes to claim real resources, not its own I.O.U. (aka. "the money"). Thus, the State needs us to need their otherwise worthless currency. How do they force us to need it? They impose tax liabilities. (And most people running governments have no clue this is what they are doing. How does that compare to the brain rot of extra space dimensions?!!!) The tax return is a redemption operation, not a funding operation. Once you understand this, you realize leaving good scientists unemployed is a simple (tragic) policy mistake. The government is the source of _all_ unemployment (defined as people seeking to exchange their goods or labour for the tax credit). Why do governments needlessly leave massive numbers of people unemployed, typically 6% to 10% of the able workforce, and 20% to 40% (in some countries) drastically _underemployed?_ It is a banal evil - the governments do not understand the purpose of their own monetary system. It is a massive waste of human lives, and the *_real_* cost of lost output from unemployment in a decade _today_ exceeds the real costs of all wars in all human history. That is how much human productivity has advanced. Think about that! It is a huge f-ing problem that makes String Theory cliques and groupthink dwarf into insignificance by comparison.

What braindead idiotic nonsense! This will definitely appeal to ignorant uneducated people. These crooks and swindlers know how stupid and gullible their audience is... They have cotton candy for brains...

I completely agree with your opinion of String Theory. However, I really didn't want to be lectured to about another untested unproved theory.

That’s makes sense! Sheesh that’s why we say they don’t exist until they are being observed! Because the cloud version of it self is there but the nodes, charged energy don’t show up until it is being observed…the dual nature of it…who wrote this paper?!

wow imagine just looking at the fucking road and not at some lights on your dashboard which you know distract you?! Star dropshipping skibidi sigma ligma toilet mr. entrepreneur

I think this product is cool. Where can I invest into your product. Do you have any shares i can buy.

50 bucks in a few weeks its ilegal or you get some kind of legal touble. I hope not because that device is just freaking awesome 🤩

Cockamamie.

No knowledge of the topic Just conspiracy theories

Bro, let the AI rest.

Where did you get information from??

I think we need to build upon the work of both Newton and Einstein with a little help from Faraday's concept of fields!

The following is a related model. However, this model reveals the "thread" is made up of twisted solitons, which can be "chiral" (Right-Hand or Left-Hand twist) and is "Quantized" with each twist cycle being equivalent to Planck's Constant. If Physicists describe electrons as point particles with no volume, where is the mass of the particle? Can one extra spatial dimension produce a geometric explanation of the 1/2 spin of electrons? The following is an extension of the old Kaluza-Klein theory. Can a twisted 3D <---> 4D soliton containing one extra spatial dimension help solve some of the current problems in Particle Physics? What do the Twistors of Roger Penrose and the Geometric Unity of Eric Weinstein and the exploration of one extra spatial dimension by Lisa Randall and the "Belt Trick" of Paul Dirac have in common? Is the following idea a “Quantized” model related to the “Vortex Theory” proposed by Maxwell and others during the 19th century? Has the concept of the “Aether” been resurrected from the dead and relabeled as the “Higgs Field”? In Spinors it takes two complete turns to get down the "rabbit hole" (Alpha Funnel 3D--->4D) to produce one twist cycle (1 Quantum unit). Can both Matter and Energy be described as "Quanta" of Spatial Curvature? (A string is revealed to be a twisted cord when viewed up close.) Mass= 1/Length, with each twist cycle of the 4D Hypertube proportional to Planck’s Constant. In this model Alpha equals the compactification ratio within the twistor cone, which is approximately 1/137. 1= Hypertubule diameter at 4D interface 137= Cone’s larger end diameter at 3D interface where the photons are absorbed or emitted. The 4D twisted Hypertubule gets longer or shorter as twisting or untwisting occurs. (720 degrees per twist cycle.) If quarks have not been isolated and gluons have not been isolated, how do we know they are not parts of the same thing? The tentacles of an octopus and the body of an octopus are parts of the same creature. Is there an alternative interpretation of "Asymptotic Freedom"? What if Quarks are actually made up of twisted tubes which become physically entangled with two other twisted tubes to produce a proton? Instead of the Strong Force being mediated by the constant exchange of gluons, it would be mediated by the physical entanglement of these twisted tubes. When only two twisted tubules are entangled, a meson is produced which is unstable and rapidly unwinds (decays) into something else. A proton would be analogous to three twisted rubber bands becoming entangled and the "Quarks" would be the places where the tubes are tangled together. The behavior would be the same as rubber balls (representing the Quarks) connected with twisted rubber bands being separated from each other or placed closer together producing the exact same phenomenon as "Asymptotic Freedom" in protons and neutrons. The force would become greater as the balls are separated, but the force would become less if the balls were placed closer together. Therefore, the gluon is a synthetic particle (zero mass, zero charge) invented to explain the Strong Force. The "Color Force" is a consequence of the XYZ orientation entanglement of the twisted tubules. The two twisted tubule entanglement of Mesons is not stable and unwinds. It takes the entanglement of three twisted tubules to produce the stable proton. The term “entanglement” in this case is analogous to three twisted ropes being wrapped around each other in a way which causes all of the ropes to move if someone pulls one of the ropes. Does the phenomenon of “Asymptotic Freedom” provide evidence that this concept is the correct interpretation of the experimental data now available?

You're taking a piss...

Gravity is simple Galilean relative motion. The earth is approaching- expanding at 16 feet per second per second constant acceleration- the released object (apple). “The Final Theory: Rethinking Our Scientific Legacy “, Mark McCutcheon for proper physics including the CAUSE of gravity, electricity, magnetism, light and well...... everything.

"Are universities nurturing the next generation of great physicists, or are they suppressing creativity and innovation?" Is a great example of false-choice logical fallacy. I couldn't find any date or author tied to the slides the narrator is reading verbatim. Unattributed conjecture is gross.

Relativity Crisis: Einstein has taken us down a wrong path, and 100 years later, physics has not recovered from the consequences. We need to look at the clear evidence and go back to working on real physics instead of science fiction! Theory and experiments show Special Relativity and General Relativity are optical illusions. Space and time are absolute as denoted by Galilean Relativity. Hi my name is Dr William Walker and I am a PhD physicist and have been investigating this topic for 30 years. It has been known since the late 1700s by Simone Laplace that nearfield Gravity is instantaneous by analyzing the stability of the orbits of the planets about the sun. This is actually predicted by General Relativity by analyzing the propagating fields generated by an oscillating mass. In addition, General Relativity predicts that in the farfield Gravity propagates at the speed of light. The farfield speed of gravity was recently confirmed by LIGO. Recently it has been shown that light behaves in the same way by using Maxwell's equations to analyze the propagating fields generated by an oscillating charge. For more information search: William Walker Superluminal. This was experimentally confirmed by measuring radio waves propagating between 2 antennas and separating the antennas from the nearfield to the farfield, which occurs about 1 wavelength from the source. This behavior of gravity and light occurs not only for the phase and group speed, but also the information speed. In another recent experiment an EM pulse was observed to propagate in the nearfield with no propagation delay, proving that the front speed, or the speed of information is instantaneous in the nearfield. This instantaneous nature of light and gravity near the source and been kept from the public and is not commonly known. The reason is that it shows that both Special Relativity and General Relativity are wrong! It can be easily shown that Instantaneous nearfield light yields Galilean Relativity and farfield light yields Einstein Relativity. This is because in the nearfield, gamma=1since c= infinity, and in the farfield, gamma= the Relativistic gamma since c= farfield speed of light. Since time and space are real, they can not depend on the frequency of light used. This is because c=wavelength x frequency, and 1 wavelength = c/frequency defines the nearfield from the farfield. Consequently Relativity is an optical illusion. Objects moving near the speed of light appear to contract in length and time appears to slow down, but it is just what you see using farfield light. Using nearfield light you will see that the object has not contracted and time has not changed. For more information: Search William Walker Relativity. Since General Relativity is based on Special Relativity, General Relativity must also be an optical illusion. Spacetime is flat and gravity must be a propagating field. Researchers have shown that in the weak field limit, which is what we only observe, General Relativity reduces to Gravitoelectromagnetism, which shows gravity can be modeled as 4 Maxwell equations similar in form to those for electromagnetic fields, yielding Electric and Magnetic components of gravity. This theory explains all gravitational effects as well as the instantaneous nearfield and speed of light farfield propagating fields. So gravity is a propagating field that can finally be quantized enabling the unification of gravity and quantum mechanics. The current interpretation of quantum mechanics makes no sense, involving particles that are not real until measured, and in a fuzzy superposition of states. On the other hand, the Pilot Wave interpretation of Quantum Mechanics makes makes much more sense, which says particles are always real with real positions and velocities. The particles also interact with an energetic quantum field that permeates all of space, forming a pilot wave that guides the particle. This simpler deterministic explanation explains all known quantum phenomena. The only problem is that the Pilot Wave is known to interact instantaneously with all other particles, and this is completely incompatible with Relativity, but is compatible with Galilean Relativity. But because of the evidence presented here, this is no longer a problem, and elevates the Pilot Interpretation to our best explanation of Quantum Mechanics. Below is a link to a short Video with a lot more details, and in the description of the video you will find many links to papers by other researchers confirming the ideas presented here. UA-cam presentation of above argument: ua-cam.com/video/sePdJ7vSQvQ/v-deo.html More extensive paper for the above argument: William D. Walker and Dag Stranneby, A New Interpretation of Relativity, 2023: vixra.org/abs/2309.0145 EM pulse experiment proving no time delay in the nearfield: Emmanouil N Markoulakis, William Walker, Emmanuel Antonidakis "Superluminal Maxwell Displacement Current measured in the near-field of a spherical capacitor", 2024 www.techrxiv.org/doi/full/10.36227/techrxiv.170862178.82175798/v1

Our earth IS a 3 dimensional space-time continuum with: 1) EAST - WEST axis = Singapur (S) - Galapsgos (G) (perpendicular to Greenwich circle that join SZ, A , ME, M) 2) NORTH -SOUTH axis = Seewirnaya Zimlya (SZ )- Mt. Erebus (ME) (perpendicular to Equator circle that join A, G, M, S) and 3) MIDDAY - MIDNIGHT axis = Accra (A) - Makwa (M) (perpendicular to the Day Night circle that join SZ, G, ME, S) What PHYSICAL MEANING can any sensible person associate with calling 3 of the rays (S, SZ and A ) as positive and the corresponding other 3 (G, ME and M) as negative, if one applies the Cartesian System of Coordinates to the Center of The Earth? The earth as a whole experiences a single day for a second every day, when the sun passes the Greenwich meridian with 12 noon at A and 12 midnight at M. Note: If the ECLIPTIC is only an optical illusion [view the link below], then one side of the earth always has DAY (faces the fixed in space SUN) and the other always NIGHT. facebook.com/myk.rahmaan/videos/1022828304902329/?app=fbl

Is this a new theory of everything? Could you provide some references?

The end result of this video is we need to think outside the box (like Einstein did for his time) but you give nothing here but buzz words and snake oil. We already know Einstein and Quantum don't play well together. There is no Redefining in this article. Waste of time here.

Cult of Mathmatics? Dude keep your opinions out of science ulgh!

Is there a reason to explore this further? I'm not sure but I also feel that our current physics is missing the mark. In other words, it doesn't work out in all cases. We've been stuck in a rut for long enough, we need to move forward again and maybe this is a way?

Jeez why do you even bring up relativity with all the bs you mentioned? Einstein theory was tested. What about your theory? The irony

What is SEU? Why is the total energy integral taken from zero? What is actually being measured?

Thx, your avoiding the singularity is a great job. I assume that you take the first condition to model all other conditions, means that all matter we find will emerge from this ground state like a vacuum entity that gives rise to it. If energy/mass is caused by spinner thread interaction what is the substance or medium of the entities them self? This would help me to understand, not to judge your work. Thx

Thx, glad to hear your theory. I also work on something new, it's not so far from yours. But please don't blame c² as trash, you also don't want to hear that yours is "a waste of time" like a comment say. It makes you grateful, because you are with respect to others. Like your free thinking, stay put to it.

the em2 equation was derived directly. it wasn't arbitrary. i'd look up the derivation before spinning off somewere hehe.

Beauty will save ☮️ if a cleverly beautiful lie does not destroy it. 🆘! More than $13 billion in environmental losses could be avoided. We are looking for help and hope for your courage to protect the nature of our planet. Construction of gravitational wave detectors is underway in China and India. There is also the launch of heavy rockets with interplanetary satellites, such as LISA and so on, not counting other resources. We need physicists who understand the difference between direct physical experience and indirect one. In the past, the Light Ether Theory had many indirect confirmations and even greater recognition from elite physicists, well, as is fashionable now; Einstein's theory of relativity. And as soon as Michelson conducted a direct experiment, the popularity of physics changed. Now a question for you: can you refer to direct experience in determining the constant speed of light? New hollow optical fiber technology allows even schoolchildren to do this. Using the Michelson-Morley Hybrid Gyro device... We will see this “Light is the ordered vibration of gravitational quanta, and the dominant gravitational fields adjust the speed of light in a vacuum.” If the device is in zero gravity and at rest relative to the dominant gravitational field, the difference in the path of light is zero. When registering gravitational waves, the noise is 99.99%, and the useful signal is 0.01% - correct. Large corporations benefit from such devices. When registering gravitational quanta, the possibility of receiving a useful signal is 75%; the noise will be 25% - the device needs improvement, Einstein dreamed of such a device.

Total bogus!! SEU’s (Single Event Upsets) not understood. This is a SETUM (Single Event That Upsets Me)

your view Seems right, just try to explain what exactly these threads and spins are

Bulk AI generation waste of time!

I'm already sick of the morons that created and believe in the Electric Universe, Saphire, and Hydrinoes, this seems like another one

A microwave oven magnetron also seems to give the electron beam a greater spin-frequency.

See the elementary particle nature in O Universo em Retro Expansão

Interesting concept. But what is their anchor. When viewed from the front, counter clockwise rotation becomes clockwise rotation from the back. Nature is simple and frugal.

Thanks for your great video. Your subscribers might find this quantum-like analog interesting and useful. Who’s credited with saying “All models are wrong, but some are useful”? ua-cam.com/video/wrBsqiE0vG4/v-deo.htmlsi=J5jCMxq3pRe_P-gG I have been trying to describe the “U” shape wave that is produced in my amateur science mechanical model in the video link. I hear if you over-lap all the waves together using Fournier Transforms, it may make a “U” shape or square wave. Is this like Feynman Path Integrals using wave functions? In the model, “U” shape waves are produced as the loading increases and just before the wave-like function shifts to the next higher energy level. Viewers might be interested in seeing the load verse deflection graph in white paper. Actually replicating it with a sheet of clear folder plastic and with the ends taped down. Seeing it first hand is worth the effort.

- Who created the whole universe? = Allah. - Can we know how it is done? = No, only Allah knows that. The big question is why. Why should this complex universe behave as someone imagines in their imagination only without being able to measure the visible universe. Can we determine a theory without measuring anything? This seems ridiculous. Why should we assume that the whole universe behaves uniformly, and why should all the laws of physics work the same way everywhere as measured from the Earth, and why should the Uniformitarian Principle work. My advice to anyone is to search for the real purpose of life, which is to be a servant of Allah instead of doing a lot of mental imaginations without useful results or confirmation. In fact, the real purpose of life is not to search for how the universe behaves, but to carry out Allah's commands and to be a good human being, because in the hereafter there is either heaven or hell. Islam does not prevent us from thinking about Allah's creation, but not by spending huge amounts of money for no benefit. Look at how much money was spent searching for those grand ideas about creation and the universe, and look at the dead in Palestine and Syria. Humans are no longer human.

A fabric (spacetime) can only be made with many threads. Threads in a Hilbert space universe could form infinite dimensions. In a dynamic hypersphere universe of a Hilbert space, with an indeterminate quantum logic entangled probable edge, beginning and end all in a dynamic holographic superposition.

Threads may have formed in the primordial universe by random fluctuations of alternating positive and negative characteristics of quantum foam, that accidentally lined up into strings of great potential energy difference, with a positive end and negative end which would naturally have attracted one another forming loops of superstrings, and the possibility of a huge discharge of energy (big bang) forming matter. An analogy a long string of magnets formed a loop, or the positive and negative molecules in a stream of falling water forming a liquid string. Such strings of quantum foam charge may form loops of quantum virtual particles, un looped superstrings of quantum foam strings with virtual positive and negative ends may be affected by interdimensional polarization, by magnets which seems evident by magnetic attraction and repulsion. And affect electromagnetic waves.

Threads in Hilbert space could transform into an infinite number of parallel dimensions of spacetime. Including our own three-dimensional universe. Which is the only universe that we are able to perceive and are tuned into.

Interesting (out of the box thinking) theories.

Blackholes and white holes might be linked by long one-dimensional spinons threads by the threads formed in their event horizons. The white hole may produce negative matter and expel it from its event horizon in a fourth dimensional parallel Dirac Sea of negative antimatter with counterrotating galaxies that centrifugally expel matter created from the engulfed and disassembled matter in the black holes and reconstituted in white holes. Also a reversed arrow of time outside of the white holes, as well as reversed entropy all in a rotational hyperspace hypersphere (e.g. rotating four dimensional hypercube tesseract) or even of infinite number of threads and spinons translated into our three-dimensional world, being a three and simultaneously rotating four-dimensional universe, separated by quantum Pauli exclusion, the dimensional rotations are evidenced by the twisting propagation of electromagnetic waves, which are driven forth by the expansion of spacetime, but simultaneously a collapsing arrow of time in the fourth dimensional Dirac sea, in a big crunch, big bounce. This without matter and antimatter annihilating one another, due to a high frequency stroboscopic quantum Pauli exclusion waveform crossover of the negative and positive universe, in a continuous process, so that we may alternately be living in both universes without ever being aware of this being the case (e.g. visual persistence, as in motion pictures), because of the high frequency of these alternating, oscillating universes, which are both in a superposition which is collapsed by our conscience perception that our minds are to slow to notice the transition, but have seemingly evolved to predominately comprehend a seeming preference for an apparent asymmetry for matter in our positive realm of spacetime.