Відео

You lack taste and sense

I like that you've sought it out on You Tube and found my modest offering which presumably cemented your view. I didn't know the composer or the work but I have great respect for the musical taste of the conductor, and when I saw it was a 30 minute performance of a contemporary (new?) work I thought it would be worth seeing/hearing. I was very happy I went to the concert, although the noise of the audience in the first work threatened to turn it into a 'concerto for unmuffled coughers', and the applause between movements which felt obligatory rather than inspired in the Tchaikovsky, the third to fourth movement notwithstanding, tested my concentration. The recording engineers really do a splendid job in that great hall, despite the efforts of the great unwashed.

"This channel is dedicated to writing and analysing music based upon the method outlined in the book The Modal Method of Music. By using a simple mathematical process, even the most complex music can be understood at a level unsurpassed in music theory. From J. S. Bach to Jazz, the Modal Method of Music reveals both the thought processes of the composer and the hidden world within the music itself." You, Sir, are off your rocker. As Dan Reynolds used to say "... all methods lead to the eventual recognition of the failure of our methods." I suggest an afternoon with Helmholtz before wading into these waters again kind sir.

?! Which channel are we talking about? @@jacklunetti8850

@@MrKurtank Naturally the channel run by the pos(t)er of the comment I am replying to. I, for one, am glad you posted this curious work for orchestra, which to my ears is a rather clean exploration of rational intonation - which is mathematics at the simplest level . Why I was quoting @TheModalMethodofMusic-fu1qr channel page description is that they seem to claim some authority on the mathematical analyses of music. Clearly, this isn't the case and I think Helmholtz is good place to start if one wishes to analyze work in the 21st Century that deals in pure number ratios. Also, I stopped analyzing compositions from my car stereo in the early 80s, so it is just hard to take comments like @TheModalMethodofMusic-fu1qr seriously. I do hope they improve their knowledge of contemporary music before taking the time to denigrate younger composers. To quote Dan Reynolds again - "Once your reputation is done, its time for a life of fun."

Saw this comment just now in the studio. Had to find out who the commenter is because the comment is just so pointless and deliberately deceitful. Reads like anonymous online hate speech. Commenter should have his/her channel taken away.

By "sensitivity" do you mean 'sensitivity' or ""sensitivity""?

Alas, yeah...I debated about whether to keep it in but I didn't want to "doctor" the document, so-to-speak. I excuse the announcer for feeling even more overwhelmed that many of the commentators here because he heard it live -- something I could have done by buying the ticket that was available when I had the chance. Again alas, I did not, but I'm always grateful for the incredible musical resource that is BBC Radio 3.

In the Finale movement's the Absolutely factures fragment of Future's Rachmaninov's 3-th Piano Concerto!

Daniil makes --playing with that Form like a composer--simple & very cleare! It's UNIQUE,I finally understood everything in this Sonata!...In this Sonata's giving special Russian's "znamenni raspev",like in Rachmaninov's 3-th Concerto,its Rachmaninov special technique ! BRAVISSIMO, DANIIL!❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

It always depends of the Musician's 😅

Wowowowowow

@@yechanjung5925 ❤️

우연히? 댓글 만나니 반갑네요~ ❤

yet this sonata is the only one out of those 6 that ends in minor

it looks even worse now...

Je ressens la même chose, même si je ne considère jamais les tempi trop larges. C'est un examen approfondi de l'émotion et de la psychologie fait par un jeune homme ; J'espère sincèrement entendre son interprétation de cette œuvre lorsqu'il sera dans sa cinquième décennie.

@@MrKurtank ...de là à ne jamais considérer les tempi qui demeurent la vie de la musique et la base de tout phrasé... mais je disais bien que le suivi de sa pensée aide à la comprendre. Et puis (syndrome du Grand Erg) à trop approfondir on s'enlise comme mon idole Richter dans la D 960. Heureusement qu'ici on n'a pas de barre de reprise ! Dans 20 ans il l'aura refaite 5 ou 10 fois et donc essayé d'autre visions; celle-ci pour l'instant n'en fait pas, de loin, ma version N° 1.

@@MrKurtank Cela dit, quelles que soient nos préférences personnelles pour tel ou tel tempo ou même l'importance qu'on lui attache, il reste pour moi fondamental de respecter les intentions de l'auteur; surtout lorsqu'elles sont aussi foisonnantes et précises dans tous les domaines (phrasé-dynamique-style et notamment tempi (11 différents dans le seul 3° mv); lorsque SR attaque ce 3° à d=100, je n'admets pas que Trifo l'attaque à 63 pour jouer ensuite entre 72 et 84. Dommage, car la suite vaut le détour !

@@jehanbaze8367 Jehan, ta connaissance de la musique dépasse largement la mienne ; J'écoute sans comprendre. Parfois, il semble qu'un artiste jouera de la même manière... qui suis-je pour juger ?

@@MrKurtank Pourquoi dis-tu ça ?; il se trouve que j'ai la partition (et que je m'en sers hélas mais c'est un autre problème) SR y transcrit sa conception avec précision ce que je voulais simplement souligner. Après, nous ne sommes que des juges subjectuvistes de par nos ressentis, et sommes tous qualifiés pour les exprimer y compris les déplorables instrumentistes comme moi !.

Un commento degno del pezzo, dell'interprete e dell'interpretazione.

Complimenti per il straordinario commento !!!!! Behh c’è poco da dire ,in questo mondo ci sono pianisti estremamente bravi !! ma per me TRIFANOV in questo momento è il miglior pianista dell’universo e 1000 anni avanti a tutti .. quando suona lui è come se il tempo è il mondo intero si fermasse ……🙌🏼🙌🏼🙌🏼🙌🏼🙌🏼🙌🏼

I do not know if there is an extant recording of Horowitz playing this piece, I could not find one (but I did not look very hard)

my absolute pleasure.

Ah ouah

@@lampadairevisqueux5247 ok.

@@happycreeper6923 Bah c'est une œuvre styléique, mais faut peut-être pas pousser Pierre Ménès dans la salle de sport

@@lampadairevisqueux5247 faut pas pousser non plus tes analyses dans leurs retranchements je pense.

@@happycreeper6923 Ah poto, c'est plutôt à toi de démontrer qu'il s'agit du truc le plus styléique qui se soit jamais introduit dans l'appareil auditif du tout-venant, plutôt qu'à moi de démontrer le contraire. Je ne peux pas prendre un bouquin au hasard, dire : "c'est le meilleur livre jamais écrit", et répondre à qui trouve cette considération excessive : "j'espère que tes géniteurs te déshériteront pour cette non-argumentation". Je dis ça bien que trouvant cette œuvre d'un styléisme immodéré (je la travaille en ce moment, figure-tézigue, poto). J'espère que tu es néanmoins réjoui de demeurer mon pote.

Luckily, the music is quite entertaining.

A pic of Rachmaninoff is never boring my man

The picture is marvelous.

Hearing Christian Gerhaher at this performance was special too; I couldn't record it but I'm happy you enjoyed the alternative.

Did you hear her 'live'? There's no recording that I can find... I have Šárka and Libuše, and some recital material, but that's it.

I think it is Sara Mohr-Pietsch.

@@MrKurtank Oh that makes sense. Her mother is Polish.