Відео

I learned this trick from Aeioialleipe, if you take just the Tomcat (or any other plane, but only one at once) into Air Arcade, it drops your BR by one level (so the Tomcat is 12.3 on its own in arcade) and then it’s just sealclubbing

Not only is this a dogshit take (others have already explained exactly why), you can't even figure out how to make a proper widescreen video, so its 21:9 being displayed in a 16:9 window. I also run ultrawide, its not that hard to do, just render in the proper resolution. Skill issue in more than one area here. Please fix.

Truly a skill issue US main moment, The Persian tomcat is perfectly capable at 13.7 because of the “fuckyour” 90 missiles outranging and outspeeding every other fox3 in game. The only limitation is the countermeasure count and slightly lackluster flight performance

It was literally the most overpowered aircraft at its br 💀💀 typical US main complaining

First off, I get your frustration, but 1. The F-14 no matter version could always see 120s because of the AV-8B+. 2, all F-14s were moved up slightly because the 12.3 (A versions especially) constantly got with the 12.0 bracket as there are very few planes that is 13.3 except for the MiG-29SMT on the top off my head and the (previous) Su-27. And at 12.0 the F-14s have no counterpart, EXTREME long range missiles (no matter how "easy" it is to dogde for you, your knowlegde of dodging missiles doesn't help the enemy), insane dogfighting performance, ESPECIALLY at low fuel levels. 3. RWRs do not matter as much as I think you think, I fly USSR and until you get the top-top tier, meaning SMT and SM you won't get a better RWR than a SPO-15/10, which is either 12 directional (SPO-15) or 4 directional (SPO-10) it won't show you the plane nor missile, but SPO-15 has launch and track warnings and that is all you need, you just need to know someone is tracking or launching at you, the missile doesn't matter mostly (usually every fox 3 is defeated by notch+chaff and fox 1 is defeated by hugging the ground)

skill issue detected, opinion rejected

WAAAAAAAH THE F14 SEALCLUBBER GOT NERFED, RUZZIAN BIAS, RUZZIAN BIAS, WAHHH WAHHH, HOW AM I GONNA COMPLETELY RUIN 11.3-13.3 BRS WITH INSUFFERABLE MISSILE SPAM NOW??? literally us mains are the only ones sad about it, every other nation is celebrating because those things finally got nerfed, y'all are not opressed yet you think you are oh so hated by gaijin when you get the same treatment for once as every other nation and actually have to play the game rather than takeoff, spam, land, rearm, repeat its always the oh the rwr sucks so it shouldn't go up in br exchuse but like? there are planes with worse rwrs and lesser missiles that have to deal with the f14

truly a US main moment

Finally, no f14s should meet my mig21 and make a whole br bracket unplayable. If you cant handle this its honestly a skill issue.

Bruh, that was one of the most OP aircraft Br for Br plane

The game itself has become pointless since a while . Unless you have money to inject in it every month/week/day. I have taken a break from it since a while . You can't fly any bombers ( not a single one in any nation ). If you are not a cash payer , you end up in the losing team 15 times out of 10 games . Good luck with that game . I am very sad , I was really fond of WT .😪

The point in raising the cap is 9.0-9.7 were getting screwed hard by uptiers.

For my is the best tank

the su27sm only has 2 datalink whereas f15 has 8

And tws kind of sucks it works but not as reliable as a hard lock

I tend to stay low enough to not make con trails everyone shoots at the cons so if you stay around 5-5500 meters you can hold the lock longer

It’s probably the best fox 3 for close range

It works great for me I just don’t use it over 20km I use r27er for long range

Short, straigth to the point thats how I like videos about how to.

Yay, about time.

One of the biggest problems facing RU players as we continue to get newer aircraft is that NATO outstrips you in this era and beyond. Aside from artificially making them better you're going to be at a disadvantage. Small side effect of a military budget twice that of any other nation and several combined to include RU.

Gaijin add the AIM-174B

Maybe play DCS 😂 If you want a game with accuracy and not economy

No way the r77 will hit anything at 40+ km shot from mach1.1 also u would benefit from being higher up, 15k aint nearly enough, launch from 30k

It is kinda big. It pulls like a sparrow now

I've seen enough after 2 min of video that u launch mid range missile from 40km ok bro😂

Its fine just add the AIM-120C-7

My style of play is highflying. I don’t come below 20,000ft or 6000 meters unless I’m forced to. I play the game like it DCS. They 100% nerfed its range. I was shooting 30 mile shots before the nerf, now it’s gotta be within 24.

On an f-15 going mach 1.2 at 9km altitude the NEZ is around 35km, even after a nerf it's absolutely cracked

They keep the uptier bs going because that feeds frustration and causes people to spend money and skip long researches and stock grinds. That is how they make that $$$$

bg3 class and sub class?

I watched your video . While you hit the 7th plane , I ask a question to GOD " Lord , can you beat him in W.T ? " The reply was " Yes , but I need a hack "

Here are the changes made to Aim-120A/B CxK 1.4 --> 1.425 (1.8% drag increase) WingAreaMult 1.3 --> 1.275 (2% reduction in wing area modifier) Fin AOA 33.25 --> 24.2 degrees FinsLatAcclel 40.19 --> 42.26 deg/s (+2 deg/s to the speed the fins can move) Booster Thrust 21.8kN --> 22.3kN Sustainer Thrust 13.2kN --> 13.485kN Max Loft Angle 7.5 --> 20 degrees In practice, what this means is that Aim-120 doesn't pull as hard off the rail as it did before due to fin angle, but still ends up hitting ~30-33G after 2-3 seconds of flight, while maintaining (Or even extending) its range. In every shot you would have taken that isn't at super close range and high-off-boresight, the missile will still hit. It is NOT "Just like a Sparrow" like I've seen some say, and using it for just a bit makes that very apparent. The missile accelerates to peak agility much quicker. The missile itself is much more responsive (Aim-120 takes 1.14 seconds to fully reverse its fins while Aim-7F/M takes 1.86 seconds). The missile actually has a high enough G-Limit to take full advantage of its fin angle at higher speeds (Sparrow pulls tighter initially even if it's less responsive, but will grow wider at high speeds as the missile quickly hits its G-Limit against hard targets. This does NOT mean Aim-7 isn't agile. But it's less capable overall).

AMRAAM got buffed this was not a nerf. It now have more effective range and more energy to kill targets, no matter what kind of maneuver you do instead of nocthing, hovering or hide on terrain, the missile will kill you.

LMAO THE F5E AT 11.0.......... FUCKING PATHETIC.

How come you got 74km range on your TWS, but i only get 37

It’s meh

It is still pretty good.

US mains will screech no matter how deserved or minor a nerf is, nothing new

i subed to help u

its hard to get content in those type of games man, most watched are gtarp and shooter games but whatever makes you happy

Having the British phantom at 12.0 feels bad man. Also I'm confused why the British gripen c is a full BR higher than the swedish gripen c

still the best missile

ofcourse america got nerfed

The R27ER dominated for 1,5 years. Time for something not russian to shine too….

:)

You really have to use the HDN mode to go past 50 km with the Russian Radars. Then it just randomly stops detecting people if they fly a little bit offset. I've had nothing but bad luck trying to get the HMS to radar lock people as well. The ACM "ladder" mode is really hit or miss. This is the first patch where I really feel like the Russians suffer in the electronics department.

Take it into a sim match if you want fight fox 3 planes..

This game Is Total garbage fantasy Hollywood propaganda. Unreal NATO uberalles propaganda and full Russia Nerf bug..

You were using the plane wrong, but at the end of the day the Su27SM doesn't do ANYTHING better than its NATO counterparts. Nothing at all. Right now NATO went from having the advantage in every metric except BVR missile (in a meta where it didn't matter because of strong multipathing), to them doing literally everything better. Your mistake was trying to climb to altitude and employ BVR tactics. It is unwise for the Su-27SM to do that for a number of reasons. The first is that you're simply outranged by a tremendous degree. Everyone who isn't using spamraams is outranged to the point where it isn't even fair. The second problem is target acquisition capability. You struggled to find the words to articulate the issue but noticed that you had trouble locking targets. The reason why is because the Su-27SM's radar is atrociously subpar for the tier. It is a challenge to acquire locks in TWS when the radar's refresh rate is so subpar and you can't even narrow the search pattern. The third problem that you didn't even touch on is datalink bandwidth. While NATO can babysit six to eight missiles in the air with TWS, you can guide two. You can't even boast a superior supply of Fox-3s since the F-15 can carry eight to your six. So basically it is foolish to even attempt BVR since they're better at you in BVR in every conceivable metric that matters. Instead you need to hug the deck and try to terrain mask your into WVR combat. Then fling R-77's at targets within pitbull range while always doing your best to be prepared to retreat back behind a mountain or into a canyon. You don't even really have the advantage here because NATO enjoys 20km ACM mode while Russia is handicapped by 10km ACM, but at least the playing field is more level. My advice for trying to acquire locks within that ~10-20km window is to either use PD SRC mode because it refreshes faster than TWS, or to try to first acquire the target via HMD IRST before swapping back over to radar for the missile launch. This levels the playing field a lot, but it's still an uphill fight since the Su-27's flight model is generally inferior to NATO opposition in a close range dogfight. But it's the difference between fighting with one hand tied behind your back vs just being tied to a post in front of a firing squad. I suppose the ONE field where you can do something that NATO can't is that you have the R-27ET. It's still useful in its niche but it is far from a meta defining missile. As for what can make things better: For one I can see BRs shifting, but believe it or not thunderskill suggests that the average american main is managing to faceplant with worse win rates than any other nation (bomber F-15s I bet). Introduction of the R-77-1 seems like an obvious addition in the near future to extend the range of the 77. Newer flanker variants will eventually help close the performance gap with the radar's shortcomings. MAAAAYBE the R-37 might be introduced as a higher BR version of the phoenix as an ultra-long range bomber killer than any fighter worth his salt should have no difficulty evading, but I'm not holding my breath on that one. I think they'd need to give us the Su-25 or Mig-31 for that.