Відео

@@TennisReaperCinema-vp7bw I'm good sir, how you feeling? It held my attention but it definitely could've used some more action in the film.

@@TheSeezMonroeShow Well, it snowed here so just relaxing since I have the day off. As far as the action part, the first movie had a bit more although it started slow too but it ended well. This one was a slow burn for me.

@TennisReaperCinema-vp7bw The overall premise was just better.

@@TheSeezMonroeShow Well, I guess I will check out Wolf Man next week. January usually don't have much movies to offer. Night Swim was the beginning of last year and that was pretty trash.

@TennisReaperCinema-vp7bw Don't remind me. We need a random marvel film to drop in January to change the trajectory.

@@Aspencoldfr Appreciate you 💪🏿

@@Aus10-1 Hey, the video is attached to the short. If you're watching the short there should be a link to click on for the full review.

@@AtcMello my man 💪🏿

@@dwayneandreincorporated498 It could be tough coming off the first film. But I feel the first film set them up for a simple sequel. They just waited too long.

@@TennisReaperCinema-vp7bw What about Dune part 2 and Godzilla X Kong?

@@TheSeezMonroeShow Never seen Dune 2. Actually I havent seen either of the Dune movies. Godzilla X Kong movie was alright. I am more of a Godzilla fan and they did not have him doing too much. They have him sleeping and waking destroying stuff that gets in his way. Storyline was more of Kong which was fine. The movie could have get rid of the 4 characters of the movie and still would been the same.

@TennisReaperCinema-vp7bw That's typically what those films are. Just nonsense on the big screen. You need that from time to time. The Dune films aren't great, but they keep you engaged. I wouldn't go out of your way to watch it.

@@TheSeezMonroeShow I passed on Dune. I have seen a few people movie reviews on it and I was not impressed enough to watch it. I know both of us are movie reviewers and we are not just going to go out and watch any movies unless they are so bad that they are worth trashing them. I hope this year bring some good movies from the start. Bad Boys 4 started it off las a great blockbuster last year.

@TennisReaperCinema-vp7bw I really enjoyed Bad Boys as well. Are you checking out Den Of Thieves 2 this week?

@@dever197041 Yikes, hate is a strong word.

@@antberrios75 that's a fact

@@TennisReaperCinema-vp7bw Blade is Marvel's Jesus???

@@TheSeezMonroeShow There is only one Blade and there will ever be only one Blade.

@TennisReaperCinema-vp7bw 🤣🤣🤣

@@TheSeezMonroeShow So far Wesley is right

@TennisReaperCinema-vp7bw I love Wesley but we need a new blade.

@@manuelreyes3589 Naw, AB is good. Just let the money and the fame cloud him. His work ethic was no longer there.

@@HavanaJoe-u4l Why? What AB do?

@@jrrico88 idk about that now. You gotta send me the footage

No he didn't..only a Mayweather hater would say that

@ and only a crybaby lover would say he didn’t 😂😂😂

50-0 my 🫏

He can't beat Mayweather I'll bet that

@@TennisReaperCinema-vp7bw I'm doing great sir. How about yourself? I've never played the game but I feel we didn't even try to give this film a fair shot.

@@TheSeezMonroeShow What are some of your video games based movie you like. I wish they would remake Spawn the one with MJW was in.

@TennisReaperCinema-vp7bw I literally talk about spawn on my next video. But as far as movies based on games, I believe they did a phenomenal job with Resident Evil. Who knew that would become a franchise. I'm from Chicago so Mortal Kombat films. Sonic 3 was amazing, Super Mario Bros was amazing as well. How about you?

@@TheSeezMonroeShow Really. Spawn next video. Well i get a chance to check that out. Sonic by far was amazing. Mario Bros was amazing too. Not the first Mario brothers in the 80s with Bob Hopkins and that was freaking garbage. Resident Evil was alright, Street Fighter was decent and MK, well I like the soundtrack and that about it. From New Orleans.

@TennisReaperCinema-vp7bw The Mario from the 80's lol. If it comes on, I'll let it play. Nothing I would look for though. I haven't seen one Street Fighter film that was good.

@@TennisReaperCinema-vp7bw Happy New Year my good friend. May 2025 be all you want and more. 🙌🏿

@@nomadicgamer9466 I thought the music was great as well. I think people wanted to hear hakuna matata for the thousandth time 😂

@@TheSeezMonroeShow Honestly, I was happily surprised by the music! It felt like Lion King! It felt like an extension of Rhythm of the Pridelands CD and that is incredibly high praise, indeed! So yeah, I think people are crazy and just hating on this movie because it gives them attention.

i agree

but I see where you’re coming from, and I appreciate your perspective. The Superman trailer does a great job of portraying him as a figure of hope and strength, which is central to his character. The color grading, designed to make him stand out, is a clever idea, and it’s clear you resonate with that visual choice. However, for me, it felt a bit overdone, making the overall look feel more artificial than inspiring. As for including lesser-known characters, I completely agree that it’s important to bring them into the spotlight to make them more familiar to audiences. Marvel’s early success with characters like Iron Man worked because they were given depth and compelling arcs, which allowed them to connect with viewers on a deeper level. If a film introduces lesser-known characters without meaningful development, they risk being forgettable instead of leaving a lasting impression.

Continuing that thought, the challenge lies in how these lesser-known characters are integrated into the story. A film like a Superman project already carries massive expectations, so these characters need to serve a meaningful purpose in the narrative. Marvel succeeded with characters like Iron Man not just because they were less familiar, but because the stories crafted around them were compelling, fresh, and emotionally resonant. For a character like Absorbing Man to truly stand out in a Superman movie, he would need to have clear motivations, a solid backstory, and a meaningful role in the plot. Without those elements, there’s a risk of them feeling like background noise rather than significant additions. In big superhero films, every character should contribute something memorable to the story; otherwise, they might not achieve the impact they’re intended to have.

When lesser-known characters are introduced effectively, they can elevate the story by bringing new perspectives or challenges for the hero to face. In Superman’s case, characters like Absorbing Man could introduce moral dilemmas or unique threats that push Superman’s limits, both physically and philosophically. However, if these characters are underdeveloped or their arcs are rushed, they risk being overshadowed by the main narrative. Marvel avoided this by grounding their lesser-known characters in relatable struggles-Tony Stark’s flaws, for example, made him human despite his larger-than-life persona. For Superman, a similar approach would mean ensuring the story allows him to interact with and react to these characters in meaningful ways. Audiences can then connect with them, not just as plot devices but as individuals who add richness to the world. When done well, this approach doesn’t just expand the universe-it enhances the core story, making Superman’s journey feel more layered and impactful. That’s where the opportunity lies for lesser-known characters in major films: not just to exist but to contribute something essential to the hero’s narrative.

yo booty is speakin to me baby

@@yappatron-d2i 🤣🤣🤣 That's definitely a stretch

It’s an interesting comparison to make, and I can understand why you might feel that way about the upcoming Mufasa: The Lion King. A prequel like Mufasa inherently carries a tough challenge: it has to build on the legacy of one of the most beloved animated films of all time while also standing on its own. For many fans, the original Lion King is near-perfect, and revisiting that world through a prequel may feel unnecessary or uninspired if it doesn't offer a compelling new perspective or story. If the narrative feels predictable or fails to add meaningful depth to Mufasa’s character, it could come across as "filler," diminishing its emotional impact. The live-action/CGI style doesn’t help either. While the visuals in these Disney remakes are technically impressive, many viewers criticize them for lacking the emotional expressiveness and charm of the original animation. This issue could make Mufasa: The Lion King feel cold or disengaging, which is a major problem for a story meant to explore themes of leadership, sacrifice, and destiny. Without those emotional highs and lows, audiences might walk away feeling that the film is unnecessary or, worse, boring. The stakes for a prequel like this aren’t as high as they were in the original, where Simba's journey was about reclaiming his throne and avenging his father. If Mufasa doesn’t bring that same level of intensity or emotional weight, it risks being forgettable. On the other hand, a movie like Sonic the Hedgehog 3 has a completely different kind of appeal. Sonic movies don’t carry the same burden of nostalgia that Mufasa does, even though they lean into fan service for longtime fans of the franchise. Instead, they focus on high-energy action, humor, and a sense of fun that’s inherently engaging. Sonic 3 has the advantage of being part of an established trilogy, where audiences are already invested in the characters and their dynamics. Bringing in Shadow the Hedgehog, a fan-favorite character, adds an extra layer of excitement and anticipation for fans of the games. That kind of hype, combined with Sonic’s fast-paced storytelling and lighthearted tone, gives it an edge in terms of broader entertainment value. While Mufasa may aim to evoke deeper themes and emotional resonance, it also risks feeling too self-serious or weighed down by the expectations of living up to its predecessor. Meanwhile, Sonic 3 knows exactly what it is: a fun, action-packed adventure that appeals to both longtime fans and casual viewers. It doesn’t need to reinvent the wheel; it just needs to deliver on the high-energy, family-friendly entertainment that made the first two movies successful. In that sense, Sonic 3 might indeed come out as the more engaging and enjoyable movie for a wider audience, even if it doesn’t aim to achieve the same level of emotional storytelling as Mufasa. Ultimately, it comes down to what people are looking for in a movie-depth and nostalgia or pure, unfiltered fun.It’s an interesting comparison to make, and I can understand why you might feel that way about the upcoming Mufasa: The Lion King. A prequel like Mufasa inherently carries a tough challenge: it has to build on the legacy of one of the most beloved animated films of all time while also standing on its own. For many fans, the original Lion King is near-perfect, and revisiting that world through a prequel may feel unnecessary or uninspired if it doesn't offer a compelling new perspective or story. If the narrative feels predictable or fails to add meaningful depth to Mufasa’s character, it could come across as "filler," diminishing its emotional impact. The live-action/CGI style doesn’t help either. While the visuals in these Disney remakes are technically impressive, many viewers criticize them for lacking the emotional expressiveness and charm of the original animation. This issue could make Mufasa: The Lion King feel cold or disengaging, which is a major problem for a story meant to explore themes of leadership, sacrifice, and destiny. Without those emotional highs and lows, audiences might walk away feeling that the film is unnecessary or, worse, boring. The stakes for a prequel like this aren’t as high as they were in the original, where Simba's journey was about reclaiming his throne and avenging his father. If Mufasa doesn’t bring that same level of intensity or emotional weight, it risks being forgettable. On the other hand, a movie like Sonic the Hedgehog 3 has a completely different kind of appeal. Sonic movies don’t carry the same burden of nostalgia that Mufasa does, even though they lean into fan service for longtime fans of the franchise. Instead, they focus on high-energy action, humor, and a sense of fun that’s inherently engaging. Sonic 3 has the advantage of being part of an established trilogy, where audiences are already invested in the characters and their dynamics. Bringing in Shadow the Hedgehog, a fan-favorite character, adds an extra layer of excitement and anticipation for fans of the games. That kind of hype, combined with Sonic’s fast-paced storytelling and lighthearted tone, gives it an edge in terms of broader entertainment value. While Mufasa may aim to evoke deeper themes and emotional resonance, it also risks feeling too self-serious or weighed down by the expectations of living up to its predecessor. Meanwhile, Sonic 3 knows exactly what it is: a fun, action-packed adventure that appeals to both longtime fans and casual viewers. It doesn’t need to reinvent the wheel; it just needs to deliver on the high-energy, family-friendly entertainment that made the first two movies successful. In that sense, Sonic 3 might indeed come out as the more engaging and enjoyable movie for a wider audience, even if it doesn’t aim to achieve the same level of emotional storytelling as Mufasa. Ultimately, it comes down to what people are looking for in a movie-depth and nostalgia or pure, unfiltered fun.

@@hades9900 In a trailer for a CW show type of way? Maybe. Other than that, get ready for another bomb at the box office.

@@TheSeezMonroeShow ah the way you said that the superman tralier is bad makes me want to hit the jamacain thugshaker it is a good trailer ok, and how is it too much? it is so perfect it shows superman as a figure of strength and hope the color grading is supposed to repersent that thats why its like that to make superman stick out among the crowd and also less known charecters should be in big projects like absorbing man to make them more familiar with audinces because normal viewers wont be able to know these lesser know characters the reason that marvel was such a hit was because there was no other movies at the time like iron man and thats why it was so populer so idk i dont see where you are coming from.

I understand where you’re coming from, and comparing the trailer to a CW show promo touches on a real issue. The CW is known for producing superhero content that’s often fun and engaging but operates on a smaller scale with limited budgets, overdramatic tones, and familiar tropes. If the Superman trailer evokes that same vibe, it risks being perceived as low-stakes or overly polished in a way that feels more like TV than a cinematic blockbuster. That’s a significant problem when audiences are expecting something grand, inspiring, and worthy of Superman’s status as a cultural icon. A Superman film isn’t just another superhero movie-it’s supposed to represent the pinnacle of hope, heroism, and spectacle. If the trailer doesn’t communicate that scale and weight, it could fail to generate the excitement necessary to drive box office success. The problem lies in the current state of the superhero genre. With so many films and shows being churned out, audiences have become more discerning. They’re not just looking for another CGI-laden action fest; they want stories with heart, characters they can invest in, and visuals that don’t feel like they belong in a high-end TV production. Marvel’s dominance in the early days of the genre worked because it offered something new and exciting. Now, with the market oversaturated and superhero fatigue setting in, films like Superman must do more to justify their existence. Simply showing Superman as a beacon of hope and strength isn’t enough anymore; audiences need to see how this story sets itself apart from what they’ve already seen countless times. If the trailer fails to deliver on that front, it could alienate both casual viewers and diehard fans. Casual audiences might see it as another generic superhero flick, while longtime fans of Superman might feel let down if the tone and execution don’t live up to the character’s legacy. A comparison to a CW show, whether fair or not, suggests the trailer lacks the polish and depth expected from a major theatrical release. When people are already skeptical about whether Superman can resonate with modern audiences, a lackluster trailer only reinforces doubts about the character’s relevance in today’s cinematic landscape. For the film to succeed, it needs to show why this Superman story matters now. What’s unique about this version of the character? What emotional beats will the audience connect with? And most importantly, how does it elevate Superman beyond just being an iconic figure to someone audiences care about deeply? If the trailer can’t answer those questions, it might indeed set the stage for another underwhelming box office performance. That said, trailers don’t always tell the full story, so there’s still hope that the final film will deliver something memorable and worthy of the Man of Steel’s legacy. @TheSeezMonroeShow

@@TheSeezMonroeShow ah the way you said that the superman tralier is bad makes me want to hit the jamacain thugshaker it is a good trailer ok, and how is it too much? it is so perfect it shows superman as a figure of strength and hope the color grading is supposed to repersent that thats why its like that to make superman stick out among the crowd and also less known charecters should be in big projects like absorbing man to make them more familiar with audinces because normal viewers wont be able to know these lesser know characters the reason that marvel was such a hit was because there was no other movies at the time like iron man and thats why it was so populer so idk i dont see where you are coming from.

@hades9900 I agree and I'm hoping for the best for this film but with this being released in July, Matt Reeves removing Batman 2 from October 2025 all the way to 2027 let's me know that he's Trying to stir clear of this upcoming shipwreck. James Gunn did an okay job with Suicide Squad but this isn't Suicide Squad. You can't give us the wacky colors for Superman and expect us not to think it's a joke. Man Of Steel missed a lot of marks. The tone of the film was not one of them. This reminds me of the Tobey McGuire's first Spider-Man film.

I feel that, that was different. Yes he was OP but they story was incredible. This last two episodes which yesterday's episode was a continuation into this one. It wasn't good. The writing seemed lazy and there's no back story for any of these characters that would justify them being able to harness this type of power. Correct me if I'm wrong.

@@LarryHayward-v7p Sonic 3 is a better film. What did you not like about Mufasa?

@ Bad Story and Boring and I hate Live action Remakes from Disney

@LarryHayward-v7p Wait, so you knew this was a Mufasa back story when you went to see it. Knew it was a live action Lion King film ( technically not a remake) and you were surprised how?

It’s an interesting comparison to make, and I can understand why you might feel that way about the upcoming Mufasa: The Lion King. A prequel like Mufasa inherently carries a tough challenge: it has to build on the legacy of one of the most beloved animated films of all time while also standing on its own. For many fans, the original Lion King is near-perfect, and revisiting that world through a prequel may feel unnecessary or uninspired if it doesn't offer a compelling new perspective or story. If the narrative feels predictable or fails to add meaningful depth to Mufasa’s character, it could come across as "filler," diminishing its emotional impact. The live-action/CGI style doesn’t help either. While the visuals in these Disney remakes are technically impressive, many viewers criticize them for lacking the emotional expressiveness and charm of the original animation. This issue could make Mufasa: The Lion King feel cold or disengaging, which is a major problem for a story meant to explore themes of leadership, sacrifice, and destiny. Without those emotional highs and lows, audiences might walk away feeling that the film is unnecessary or, worse, boring. The stakes for a prequel like this aren’t as high as they were in the original, where Simba's journey was about reclaiming his throne and avenging his father. If Mufasa doesn’t bring that same level of intensity or emotional weight, it risks being forgettable. On the other hand, a movie like Sonic the Hedgehog 3 has a completely different kind of appeal. Sonic movies don’t carry the same burden of nostalgia that Mufasa does, even though they lean into fan service for longtime fans of the franchise. Instead, they focus on high-energy action, humor, and a sense of fun that’s inherently engaging. Sonic 3 has the advantage of being part of an established trilogy, where audiences are already invested in the characters and their dynamics. Bringing in Shadow the Hedgehog, a fan-favorite character, adds an extra layer of excitement and anticipation for fans of the games. That kind of hype, combined with Sonic’s fast-paced storytelling and lighthearted tone, gives it an edge in terms of broader entertainment value. While Mufasa may aim to evoke deeper themes and emotional resonance, it also risks feeling too self-serious or weighed down by the expectations of living up to its predecessor. Meanwhile, Sonic 3 knows exactly what it is: a fun, action-packed adventure that appeals to both longtime fans and casual viewers. It doesn’t need to reinvent the wheel; it just needs to deliver on the high-energy, family-friendly entertainment that made the first two movies successful. In that sense, Sonic 3 might indeed come out as the more engaging and enjoyable movie for a wider audience, even if it doesn’t aim to achieve the same level of emotional storytelling as Mufasa. Ultimately, it comes down to what people are looking for in a movie-depth and nostalgia or pure, unfiltered fun.

@@TheSeezMonroeShow It’s an interesting comparison to make, and I can understand why you might feel that way about the upcoming Mufasa: The Lion King. A prequel like Mufasa inherently carries a tough challenge: it has to build on the legacy of one of the most beloved animated films of all time while also standing on its own. For many fans, the original Lion King is near-perfect, and revisiting that world through a prequel may feel unnecessary or uninspired if it doesn't offer a compelling new perspective or story. If the narrative feels predictable or fails to add meaningful depth to Mufasa’s character, it could come across as "filler," diminishing its emotional impact. The live-action/CGI style doesn’t help either. While the visuals in these Disney remakes are technically impressive, many viewers criticize them for lacking the emotional expressiveness and charm of the original animation. This issue could make Mufasa: The Lion King feel cold or disengaging, which is a major problem for a story meant to explore themes of leadership, sacrifice, and destiny. Without those emotional highs and lows, audiences might walk away feeling that the film is unnecessary or, worse, boring. The stakes for a prequel like this aren’t as high as they were in the original, where Simba's journey was about reclaiming his throne and avenging his father. If Mufasa doesn’t bring that same level of intensity or emotional weight, it risks being forgettable. On the other hand, a movie like Sonic the Hedgehog 3 has a completely different kind of appeal. Sonic movies don’t carry the same burden of nostalgia that Mufasa does, even though they lean into fan service for longtime fans of the franchise. Instead, they focus on high-energy action, humor, and a sense of fun that’s inherently engaging. Sonic 3 has the advantage of being part of an established trilogy, where audiences are already invested in the characters and their dynamics. Bringing in Shadow the Hedgehog, a fan-favorite character, adds an extra layer of excitement and anticipation for fans of the games. That kind of hype, combined with Sonic’s fast-paced storytelling and lighthearted tone, gives it an edge in terms of broader entertainment value. While Mufasa may aim to evoke deeper themes and emotional resonance, it also risks feeling too self-serious or weighed down by the expectations of living up to its predecessor. Meanwhile, Sonic 3 knows exactly what it is: a fun, action-packed adventure that appeals to both longtime fans and casual viewers. It doesn’t need to reinvent the wheel; it just needs to deliver on the high-energy, family-friendly entertainment that made the first two movies successful. In that sense, Sonic 3 might indeed come out as the more engaging and enjoyable movie for a wider audience, even if it doesn’t aim to achieve the same level of emotional storytelling as Mufasa. Ultimately, it comes down to what people are looking for in a movie-depth and nostalgia or pure, unfiltered fun.

@@TennisReaperCinema-vp7bw I was really good. Bad Boys 2 will always be my number 1. Rate your top Bad Boys films

@@TheSeezMonroeShow 4,3,2,1 in that order. Which is rare these days. It gotten better at least to me.

@TennisReaperCinema-vp7bw 😬 I cannot believe what I am reading right now

@@TheSeezMonroeShow I raise you one even better. I was looking at someone top 10 worst movies this year and he had Bad Boys 4 in his top 5 worst movies.

@@TheSeezMonroeShow Yep. I know it painful to hear 😣. Its kind of like being tied down to a chair watching Moribus. Well maybe not that extreme. I raise you one better. I was looking at someone top 10 worst movies this year and he had Bad Boys 4 as one of them. Im pretty shocked at that.

@@Reinathegoat ???

@@TennisReaperCinema-vp7bw I'm good sir, how about yourself? I appreciate the kind words, I really love Cinema and I love to talk about it so it's a lot easier for me than it is for a lot of other channels. So I figured if this is going to be something that I discuss with my friends for hours, why not record it and put it out. What channel is amazing as well my friend and I'm happy to share this platform with others like yourself. We make these platforms amazing.

@@TheSeezMonroeShow yes sir. Are you going to see anymore movies for 2024 or you done.

@@TennisReaperCinema-vp7bw I just came from Watching Nasferatu? You interested in the title?

@@TheSeezMonroeShow Meh. I see too many horror movies this year. Most of them pretty bad. If I do see that movie, I wont do a review on it. What did you think of the movie?

@TennisReaperCinema-vp7bw It wasn't bad. I'm intrigued by the lore so that'll probably make or break a lot of individuals from wanting to see it.

@@TennisReaperCinema-vp7bw I don't think WB will allow that. That was the issue behind Batman V Superman

@@TheSeezMonroeShow did you see the extended version of the Justice League. It was like 6 hours or some crap like that.

@TennisReaperCinema-vp7bw Absolutely, I couldn't have spent 4hrs of my life in a better way. If they could've condensed the film to 3hrs, cut out some BS. I believe it would've been highly regarded. I would put it over infinity war.

@@TheSeezMonroeShow I lost sleep that day watching that garbage. It was more of a fast money grab than anything.

@@TennisReaperCinema-vp7bw What???? Blasphemy! I cleared a schedule to watch that film uninterrupted.

@@TennisReaperCinema-vp7bw That's an everyday classic ahk. I can't put that on this list. That deserves to be in the best films of all time.

@@TheSeezMonroeShow You said all time. You got high praise for that movie.

@@TennisReaperCinema-vp7bw Have you ever ran across someone who did not like that movie?

You think Madame Web was worst than Kraven???

@@unclegreenskatesoda9570 Thank you! It's something comforting about a bad film that you enjoy. You don't have to think. What you see is what you get lol.

@@CBGMovement I don't think Major Payne RT rating was that low. I could be wrong.

@@CBGMovement Problem Child definitely was a surprise to me as a shorty. I never heard of it and my brother in law put the film on and I been on it ever since.

@@CBGMovement I literally just watched that the other day. That definitely has to go on my top 20 list. 😂

@@CBGMovement Shouts out to Hot Sauce