Відео

TY Basil - love your content, sharing far & wide!!!

Doesn't it stand to reason, the titanic forces necessary to push quadrillions of tons of rock miles into the sky came from an impact collision? Or, more accurately, a series of impact collisions, Earth doesn't compress and expand in some weird routine way that pushes, or pulls, outward, so the motive force had to be external.

How good is NRELs OpenFAST for Time Domain coupled assessment?

Very good video. You are way ahead of the curve. Does the part at time stamp 42:29 about high PO4 in olivine that crystalizes fast have anything to do with the origin of carbonatites?

Thank you all for your time and for sharing this presentation.

Makes sense that Austin has the bat caves. It’s interesting how it’s farm land east of the escarpment. We always noticed it in a simpler way, that it’s flatter and more green east of I-35. Thanks for the insight, really cool video.

Lacking scientific explanation

First heard of that model 2 days ago from a lecture from Nick Zentner. Fascinating how new (or in this case: partly old) evidence can overturn what was thought to be common wisdom. Lets hope that more evidence can be collected and the issue can finally be laid to rest.

Thank you for sharing

This is by far the most enlightening and rational lecture and approach I have ever heard on the subject. How can we help getting this information into the hands of policy makers?

There are entirely too many people being paid to do nothing except analyze nonsense. Until environmental science can account for EVERY SINGLE VARIABLE which contributes to the climate, we have no idea EXACTLY what problems we MAY BE CREATING for the future by interferring in the earth's cycle. I beleive that the sudden cessation of chlorinated hydro carbons had the effect of causing a temp spike.. WHY WOULD IT NOT HAVE CAUSED THIS? The earth had been slowly changing cycling to compensate for the chloro floro carbons AND THEN all of a sudden they are gone... the earth now has to change to mitigate a different alteration, do you think that such a large complex system can account for a sudden CHANGE, from what had been steadily increasing for the prior 60-80 years to suddenly completely devoid of it? BTW any carbon released from digging materials out of the earth is CARBON which has always been in the EARTH's CARBON CYCLE, and had been naturally sequestered. Natural sequestration occured in the past and there is no reason to beleive it will not happen again... why? because raised C02 levels produce a GREENING of the planet, which will in turn will absorb more PLANT FOOD/C02. PLUS higher C02 levels actually makes plants more resistant to DROUGHT!

which company do you send them out to for chemical analysis

How can we collect data?

ICE MELTING DOES NOT RAISE SEA LEVELS.

WE HAD HIGHER CONCENTRATIONS IN THE PAST AND COOLER TEMPS, ANOTHER COLD MORNING IN MID SUMMER, HOW MANY PERSONAL JETS ARE FLYING AROUND GOING TO CLIMATE CHANGE CONFERENCES.

It's all a big money spinner. Isn't it Myles?

The Tom Nelson YT channel contains talks from experts who disagree with the anthropogenic global warming agenda. It should be obvious to anybody not captured by the alarmist agenda that net zero is a scam.

Man made CO2 causing climate change is the biggest hoax/scam/shakedown of all time.

Or you could accept the mountain of evidence from real science that prove that CO2 can not be a driver of climate...

The IPCC has been a scientific fraud from the beginning. When their first draft report went out the data set used in their models did not support any climatological catastrophes. Instead of accepting the normal scientific discipline of changing or discarding one's theory, in order to keep the institution alive, the "scientists" chose to change the data. The 'little ice age " data from the i300-1400's in the original data set magically disappeared. Look up "The Truth About Greenhouse Gasses" written by Dr. Will Happer, a real scientist.

This climate agenda is bout human population control we have very little control of the climate changes 😂😂😂

Fantastic factcheck presentation. Since 2000, China almost eliminated energy poverty to the tune of of supplying hundreds of millions of people with electrons from coal and hydro. That's a bad thing apparently. Anti-coal narratives will be the most obvious and largest form of net zero failure and maintaining fuel poverty, while decarbonising coal is easy, the will power is lacking.

Why is nobody asking if those advisors and experts had ever been right before with their climate doomsday predictions? In the Lincoln Sunday Journal and Star from April 13 1931? “Will melting ICEBERGS Engulf WORLD?”. So called experts and scientist warned the public of a pending catastrophe where by the year 1950 Manhattan would be flooded. And if all the ice one the planet is going to melt see level would rise by 150 feet. When climate science has failed for the last century in predicting future events, why do we believe them now.

This is BS science

Net zero is gross ignorance!!

If you look at the actual data, which you are never presented, you see three things very clearly. 1) the data shows that the Earth isn't warming. 2) The data that is manipulated by people shows the Earth is warming rapidly, 3) the process used to manipulate the data is fraudulent.

How will we stop this scam, as so much is invested in it. The word bandwagon springs to mind. Co2 at 0.04% of the Atmosphere is supposed to be in control of the temperature. Clouds determine the temperature, and the sea controls the amount of them. I'm hoping it gets as warm as the Romans had it, or maybe the Medieval warm period.

Real tittle: How we lie, so the tyrannical elite can keep their power. You should be ashamed of yourselves.

well, good news: all climate models projected temperatures too high, which becomes clear now that real measurement data is coming in after over 30years of satelite data. The real measurement data shows 0.1C per decade, while all models projected 0.2 up to 1C per decade. The models where ALL wrong. The talk begins with claiming that we reach 2C in 3 decades, which in reality (as the data now shows) is 0.3C. And that amount isn't unusual, as it happened many times in the past (both cooling and warming). A shame that Oxford employs such swindlers - it used to be a place of real science.

A nutter who believes he can stop the earth from warming should be in an asylum, not a university... A pig in the money trough of alarmism.

What it takes to net zero is a permanent COVID trajectory. Therefore, the answer is bio-terrorism.

Great talk and great questions.

Go Shukuru nd friends 👍

Thanks

Thank you ❤

According to this, what exactly was responsible for the building of the Southern Rockies in Colorado?

This is totally awesome. It cleans up confusion about the Salinian block being in between the Franciscan and Nacimiento blocks. Some thought there could have been over a hundred miles of sinistral motion along the Sur-Nacimiento fault on top of SAF dexteal motion. That seemed like a ridiculous explanation to me. Another explanation was that the Salinian block squeezed into the Franciscan/Nacimiento accretionary wedge, from a southern california/mexico origin point where the granite batholith fit to the southern end of the sierras. That was also clunky. The hit and run model basically claims there was a much broader accretionary wedge and the northward shearing of the insular subcontinent slid the Salinian block and Nacimiento block up along the central coast of california *prior* to SAF displacement

fascinating!

Hi, am interested in analysing sample, how do I go about it?

The West Coast Baha-BC story is becoming established science. But the story of the Colorado Rockies still seems hand wavy to me. Then East of there we have an ocean. All are different parts of the same story. Who is going to tie it all together?

Leva's voice has not changed at all! :) The same as it was 30 years ago.

The Stuart Batholith and Swakane Gneiss are both in central Washington state, not northwest WA.

These dates are quite fascinating as they relate to the Ontong Java Nui hypothesis ("New evidence for the Ontong Java Nui hypothesis" Tejada et al. 2023 paper for example). Ontong Java Plateau is proposed to have formed as a single unit with Manihiki and Hikurangi Plateaus at 125-120Ma, and to have broken up 118-86Ma, with the plateaus moving apart from one another from 86-40Ma. It is further worth noting that the Pinon Formation in Ecuador is considered to be a piece of the Manhiki Plateau that is proposed by Reynaud et al. in their 1999 paper "Oceanic plateau and island arcs of southwestern Ecuador: their place in the geodynamic evolution of northwestern South America" to have "not been transported passively by the oceanic plate during the whole 123-80Ma tie-span. Therefore, the hotspot responsible for the generation of the Pinon Formation may have been located closer to the Ecuadorian margin." In other words, there is evidence to suggest that a component of the Ontong Java Nui plateau complex was in the region of Ecuador, and thus the Ontong Java Nui complex also has evidence that it formed nearer to the western margin of South America than present models indicate. This would put the OJN complex much nearer also to the area where all these terranes in Baja-BC proposals are generally originating from. There is thus a high probability that there is a very important relationship between the OJN formation, its breakup, and its spreading apart, to the "hit-and-run" motions of terranes in western North America. This connection really strains the plausibility of plate tectonics, however. It, instead, is far more readily explained as part of an earth expansion model. In fact, it is possible to interpret the entire magnetic anomaly map of the Earth as being the result of undercurrents below the crust that flowed in all directions (from the area of Eastern Pakistan as a location where they erupted from the mantle itself) and this brings to light a highly anomalous but revealing structure in the area of Fiji--between the OJP, MP, and HP's. Namely, a high magnetic intensity anomaly in an oval shape that is surrounded by a "Figure-8" structure to the east and west. Below it and above it are additional peculiarities, but most significantly coming out of its northern section is a "fracture zone" like structure that goes in a straight line upward and then branches off like a trident shape. To the left of this is the OJP while to the right is the MP and the main conduit--if positioned along the western margin of North America at an earlier time in Earth's expansion history--that goes upward would provide a mechanism for why these terranes were caused to "hit-and-run" North America. In addition, the flow seemingly caught at the bend from BC to Alaska, which would help explain the clockwise rotation of North America as well. There is much more evidence to these concepts than can be put into a quick comment on a UA-cam video, but, regardless of the model being incorporated, the relationship of the formation and breakup and separation of the Ontong Java Nui complex is unequivocally related to the accretion of terranes onto northwestern North America's margin.

Thanks for the video. Why is ideal depth between 500 and 2000m? Why not deeper? What is determining the ideal depth?

Great conversation y’all, very informative!

He is deliberately and intentionally lying. He is deluding himself if he thinks he comes off as believable.

Excellent research

Excellent presentation, Dr. Gray. And a shout out to what's now SOU!

These are fantastic, keep it up!

LET'S GOOOOOOOOOOO