Відео

Human rights outside of negative constitutional rights is the most grotesque distortion of the notion of law since Hammurabi.

Professor Davis is a treasure and should advise our military leaders!

Is this on Spotify I couldn't find it?

It is morally virtuous to mock Islam and it's prophet

All well and good, but it would be interesting to see how Mr. Biggar would think and feel if he were the one dying of thirst. Great talk. Subbed.

I wonder if this video will be watched by the British people?

Lawyers defensive ? Well, turkeys aren't going to vote for Christmas 😅

Dark shit is coming. Moon taking over. Cry to Yeshua the Jew Sun of God and call Indians for support.

An excellent book on how the idea of "human rights" has been stretched way too far to have any reasonable meaning: "The Debasement of Human Rights: How Politics Sabotage the Ideal of Freedom" by Aaron Rhodes (Encounter, 2018).

A leisurely stroll and a brisk conversation at a cracking intellectual pace. I wish I could follow them but they left me far behind. Actually, I nipped into the village pub two miles ago.

This series is a beacon of light in the darkness of the internet....

Great stuff MMC!

Human Rights are a social construct, people treat them like religion. The idea of Universal Human Rights rests upon idea of Universal Humans and this doesn't work out in a globalised world, it prevents nativist priority meaning that Global Minorities can be swept away by the tsunami of demographic shifts.

This needs to be listened to more than once. Good discussion.

I don't believe in rules. Because they don't work in the real world. You can't define human beings in a couple of sentences. Rules end up doing more harm than good. Nature is perfect. People are smart. They know what's good for them. Government should back off.

Important to have this discussion, thank you both. We need to understand that rights sit within a legal framework at a practical level, and that upholding the UK legal system (or national) is the greatest way in which a country is held together. Where this is challenged either by something like Sharia internally or the ECHR externally then we undermine our culture as a whole. Any rights need to be balanced against the whole, at least. On a second point a simple way of looking at right is more functionally. One way of doing this is to distinguish between rights as a shield and as a sword. In the hands of activists rights are their weapon of choice and inflict enormous harm on society as a whole. Equal rights to protection such as in the US function to strengthen their culture, more like a shield. Where individual rights are the same for everyone, or equal, then the fabric of society benefits. Where rights are group based then rights create conflict between groups and undermine the fabric of society. We must at least start to think about the effect of granting the wrong sort of rights looked at from a societal point of view. Rights are not 'individual' rights that can be considered out of the wider context, as in the resource point which is excellent also.

😂good stuff Charles &co.

Very interesting stuff

great interview

I really appreciate your efforts! Could you help me with something unrelated: I have a SafePal wallet with USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). How should I go about transferring them to Binance?

Farah❤❤❤❤

This is real quality brain food, and equally needed in the public realm. Reading of Burke recently, it occurred to me that he was pointing to a social substrate - a kind of social soil out of which ideas and impulses will grow - which preceded rights talk and in which it was entirely possible to carry on rights talk but in which it was equally obvious that something was always prior to rights talk, and that was the agreements which people achieved tacitly through behaving reasonably towards each other. This was a real social substrate for everything which Burke urged in favour of. This quickly moves away from analysis of the relations between ideas to consideration of how people actually are, what comprises their sense of all that is reasonable and wanted by them over a course of life. Burke's keen acknowledgment of rights - Indians, Irish, colonists - grew out of something which was not a rational elaboration of abstractions. It arose almost anthropologically - from recognising that this is how people are. Perhaps there is some calculus whereby all of his observations can be abstracted and worked out rationally, but I doubt it. The overall "calculation" was, for him, a human judgment informed by a wide ranging awareness of certain things and an acceptance of them. This simply amounts to something close to a kind of approach which is conservative of social goods in a way similar to environmentalists who seek conservation of natural goods. Listing all of these would be the next thing to do, in what I am writing here. But it is all in books already. Perhaps one of the inbuilt deterrents of a kind of conservatism which refers heavily to Burke is that it is not attractive to crusaders, to cathartic displacement for hot headed social missionaries, and it is resistant to being reduced to intellectual slogans and formal patterns of explanation, so beloved of people who are intellectual but not intelligent.

Volume issues, music =loud, converation=too quiet, Great rap though!

, these men are dressed alike, well... almost matches their outlook in life.

Woh. Brilliant discourse. Thanks - interviewer's erudition draws out the best from Nigel. Well done young man, Some times your comments are too long, but still a tour de force.

Great discussion. I'm no legal or philosophical expert, but I've always instinctively been suspicious of the concept of human rights. Responsibilities & duties make sense - as they're down to me to fulfil, a demand on myself, to live up to a sense of right and wrong. Whereas rights imply a demand on someone else to do something for me & how is that supposed to come about? Nigel Biggar is excellent at explaining abstract ideas clearly & providing concrete examples to illustrate them. Also a nice understated sense of humour. And very good questions from Harrison. Thanks.

God bless you Iranian’s Mum . Majesty Farah Pahlavi ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

At a round 3o min he doesn’t get it. There are well established theories that ‘immigration’ of conquered people, the slow integration of these conquered people inevitably changes and even conquers the conquerer. This is part of the natural history of humanity and civilization.

Get it through your heads - you are not conservatives. You are extreme radicals and comfortable in meeting your objectives through lawlessness and violence. All this is part of the recent historical record. I’m for (very) strong borders and selective immigration. And realize, most of US debt is a product of ‘republican’ (radical right) policies designed to burn down the social compact.

I love Hirsi Ali and her newfound faith in Christiany, but among "our enemies," she forgets the most sinister - those within. I worry more about them than other nations. I think we should have constructive dynamics with China, Russia, Iran, Islam, etc. Be adults and behave responsibly. Our context is the Nuclear Age. Those countries and religions have as much to lose as we do.

Looking forward to this one.

God bless you my crown majesty my homelands Mother ✨👑

Long life #شهبانو 👑🌹

you know, you know , you know, you know. ffs please remove that from your speech Yarvin, its intolerable

Such a great interview!! The Empress of Iran is so lovely…Thank you for sharing!!

❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

Interesting. I've been told that the concept of zero was a dangerous idea that changed the West and that it didn't become widespread until not much earlier than Galileo's day. I don't think that Descartes was fully onboard with it, but Pascal was.

Her Majesty, beautiful and graceful as always. Long live Her Majesty! Empress of Iran!❤

brilliant. elevating interviewing to another level completely

Falsification of government statistics, that is lying in a government document is a crime. I am not vindictive, but mercy serious damage has been done and punishment for falsification, lying and prejury punishment is a deterrent for future crimes.

This is how one refers to a monarch: Introduced as YOUR IMPERIAL MAJESTY thereafter Ma'am. Ending the interview one then again refers to the Queen as Your Imperial Majesty thank you for your time to discuss......! Good interview but was destracting with references to the Queens title, almost sycophantically.

think of the dumbing down of the education system,in it's entirety,regardless of each individual's potential,smaller&smaller %age of those qualified,in the most basic way,to to build,operate,repair&improve"tech". ya mentioned automated farming,yet there'sa shortage of setup people,operators&repair people,hell maintenance on dumb stuff es going"undone". G.Davis sr 20Nov'24

good host,great guest. i think a few points are incorrect,tho i think"we"would be fast friends. G.Davis sr 20Nov'24

This man facts are spot on

I was taking them really seriously and then they just started laughing like little kids about chavs and the labor party being best described as "its complicated relationship", i mean come on, you cant go from serious greek/roman political analysis to that in a couple seconds

A bìg part of why the next generation of possible soldiers is not joining is because it is becoming more apparant that the US military is not about national security and protecting Freedom. It is now a proxy for large corporate interests and imposing views of our own government on people who do not want it.

34:30 🔥

TLM❤

Very good interview. Appreciate it!

Curtis Yarvin is what really became of Donnie darko.