MrRR0001
MrRR0001
  • 1
  • 19 377
uspa vs ralph lauren polo
ralph lauren polo(1967) just popular brand , because all the stars and rappers buy it, so you think it's cool.
USPA still first . (1890)
Переглядів: 19 377

Відео

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @effectosis742
    @effectosis742 Рік тому

    There are now at least few more brands like that connected to a polo club and suing each other for stealing the pony idea... That said I like other polo logos more than RL . RL will always remind me these rich and dumb kids who were always wearing RL ;)

  • @drewstevenson4393
    @drewstevenson4393 Рік тому

    The only thing that USPA sells that is half way decent is their mens colognes . Their clothes and especially their underwear is cheap junk .

  • @KatrinaDancer
    @KatrinaDancer 2 роки тому

    I'm more impressed if you can play polo than if you have a specific brand of shirt! That being said my horse was much better at polo than I was 😝

  • @FaridGangBang57
    @FaridGangBang57 5 років тому

    HAHAHA

  • @otherworlds7171
    @otherworlds7171 6 років тому

    come on there is a big difference between uspa and Ralph Lauren Ralph Lauren is the original polo and it has a good items than polo assn I'm a sales person in uspa

  • @mmikethemack
    @mmikethemack 6 років тому

    yeah someone who knows

  • @DanielValdez_monsieur_jonas
    @DanielValdez_monsieur_jonas 9 років тому

    although uspa is the official brand for united states polo since 1890, polo ralph lauren's clasic designs and style paved the way for the otherwise unknown exclusive uspa brand, so yes most of the designs and branding style are very much similar to the ralph lauren look, in otherwords mr ralph lauren has invested millions to promote his brand and style and yet uspa wich was then unknown is now benefiting from polo ralph lauren's fame and success

  • @robbrady3086
    @robbrady3086 10 років тому

    Ever notice that all the Polo vs USPA video are black folk? Still worried about how you look rather than obtaining a good education. How much money have you waste over the years over materialistic garbage?

    • @robbrady3086
      @robbrady3086 10 років тому

      Stereotypes? First, I didn't say anything about being poor. I wrote, "How much money have you waste over the years over materialistic garbage?" Maybe you need to go back to school to learn more about READING COMPREHENSION! Fact is that I am BLACK and PROUD which is why I don't support Ralph Lauren. Brothers be killing and stealing over a stupid brand. You're living in a different form of slavery and too ignorant to know it. Fact is that you're of this world and I am NOTW. You're welcome moron!

    • @robbrady3086
      @robbrady3086 10 років тому

      Yet, most dont make a choice, they assume that expensive clothes will make up for their lack of education. Face it, the chains of slavery is fashion for those like you. Yet the world still judges us by our skin tone whether we're wearing Ralph Lauren or not. The issue is....that you fail to realize this....For others welfare and EBT is their form of slavery. Like I said fashion is yours! I'd rather have education on my side, nobody can take that away from me. Life ain't no fashion show!

    • @sfknns
      @sfknns 9 років тому

      Rob Brady LOL

  • @oFlashoPoetryo
    @oFlashoPoetryo 11 років тому

    No you're a bum. USPA was branded in 1981. Ralph Lauren originated making ties and did not start a Polo line until 1993: over a decade AFTER USPA was already established and branded.

  • @oFlashoPoetryo
    @oFlashoPoetryo 11 років тому

    I couldn't agree more lol

  • @oFlashoPoetryo
    @oFlashoPoetryo 11 років тому

    NO people wear Ralph Lauren because they see celebrities wear it and the price, do not lie. IF you saw USPA first your story would be backwards. I just watched 8 videos back to back on USPA and the common factor was "look USPA is $15, that's cheap, real polo is $85"

  • @cheeseburgerofdeath
    @cheeseburgerofdeath 12 років тому

    Is Ralph Lauren racist ?

  • @houshidar558
    @houshidar558 12 років тому

    @waitandbleed1464 yeah put a uspa polo in the washing machine and it already starts fading and tjhe matietial get brittle, really you get shT you pay for, i got 3 yea old RL polos that still look brand new

  • @MrJc9600
    @MrJc9600 12 років тому

    When uspa was made it wasnt a clothing company, it was a club, ralph lauren was the original polo. Uspa didnt come out with polo clothing until the 80s or 90s.

  • @waitandbleed1464
    @waitandbleed1464 12 років тому

    no people wear ralph lauren because its genuine quality material and is 1000000x classier than uspa....uspa would be presintable if it wasnt cheaply made

  • @MultiMoneyman222
    @MultiMoneyman222 12 років тому

    ayyy bitch you cant say uspa is ugly i like it i dont wear ralph polos ,my opinion i dont like them other people do.its just the way i am and at least i dont wear akes like u.nice vid,like if u agreee

  • @knas7692
    @knas7692 12 років тому

    You stupid fuck

  • @danieldvs100
    @danieldvs100 12 років тому

    Rofl Ctfu that bitch had two mans on it

  • @freemount2
    @freemount2 12 років тому

    this fight between 2 brands is just so useless, if you like ralph lauren wear it! If you like Uspa wear it? Whats the problem? It's like accusing Puma for copying the animals... really... My friend from school wears pure ralph lauren. He said that those people who have enough money and have enough self-confidence, they wont even bother whining about those who wear for exampel uspa. Coulnd't agree more..

  • @SASLEAD666
    @SASLEAD666 13 років тому

    @pdrizzleHR bum ass. uspa made in the 1880's

  • @ghack1234
    @ghack1234 13 років тому

    uspa is not fake it is its own brand just like addidas isn't fake because nike is better there just two different brands. i wear ralph lauren though

  • @CAVEMANsean
    @CAVEMANsean 13 років тому

    woooow everyone ones Ralph Lauren produced polo's and clothes about 20 years before USPA plus which one do people pay more for?