Відео

@@HringingyIll have to do that, thanks 👍

Thats probably because of the XenoThreat event going on right now. XenoThreat always hits the servers insanely hard and causes the game to simply tank in performance.

Not sure what u mean. Looks fine to me, what was the bug?

In the cockpit you could not see through the paint.

@@jonmarsh8669 Oh no thats fine, guess they fixed it 🤷‍♂️

That first one isn’t even an alien week paint.

@@FRETW1ZARD Yep I know, I put in the description how I think its better than any of the alien week paints.

It depends on what area you are in. 65 FPS sounds about right for space combat/ PVE bounties. If ur only getting 65 FPS in quantum travel, then something is either seriously wrong with your PC or there is a limiter on FPS.

@@wallacengineering8096 I was in Area18, FPS was varying between 40 to 65 fps.

@@ptessier73 Ya, thats about normal for Area 18. Watch the video and note the huge changes in FPS as you go from one area to another. Its simply how the game is, cities will not get good FPS until the game is fully optimized.

I tried 2560x1080 In-Game Resolution and it looks pretty bad, so I would rather only go one step than two. Im still seeing a rather large uplift in frames and yet it looks as good as Native Resolution, so this is just the way I prefer it. You Also have to keep in Mind that this is Star Citizen and it doesn't run the same way other games do. When you see GPU Utilization drop in large cities, its because the game is not optimized and its becoming CPU-Bound.

I only thought to try Driver-Level Upscaling because its also how AMD users got Frame Generation working. Once I saw the artifacting using the game settings I just kind of had an idea. Previously I was okay with just pure raster performance at native resolution because the game actually ran okay with the 7800X-3D and 7900-XTX.

For the Ryzen 7800X-3D I did some all-core OC. Nothing extreme, but can now run at 4925 MHz All-Core or 5050 MHz single core. For the 7900-XTX I did mild OC in Adrenaline because Star Citizen hates AMD OC and crashes to desktop with more aggressive OC.

Well of course I play other games and Star Citizen is a lot of fun, especially with friends. Read the video description, this game is still an Alpha build and unoptimized and I put in a lot of information as to how to make the game run as good as it possibly can.

@@wallacengineering8096 I seen your description.The game still runs like ass no matter how you wanna look at it.

@@getsmoked6219 Agreed, I am just saying there is a reason for why it runs like ass.

Sounds about right they are very good trucks.

LG UltraGear actually. Alienware only has Nvidia G-Sync

@@wallacengineering8096 the DWF is freesync and gsync compatible! I've used it with both Nvidia and AMD cards

That's why you read the description. I included FPS numbers for major areas. I just didn't record visiting those areas because the recording was about testing a real playing scenario which is out there accepting missions and doing the work. The only time you go to spaceports and cities is for repairs or it's a swap ships or something so those at BS numbers are less important because you're not doing anything that requires smooth gameplay.

Laptop Parts are low power and designed to run off the battery for long periods of time. Because of this, laptop parts are significantly slower than their desktop counterparts. The Ryzen 5900HX is probably only as powerful as a Desktop 5700X. The RTX 3070 is probably only as powerful as a desktop RTX 3060. You can't really fit a massive full-sized 200-400 watt GPU inside of a laptop chassis, nor could any battery handle such huge power draw. And so that is the sacrifice that laptops make. Laptops also run differently depending on whether or not the charger is plugged in. To save on battery life, laptops are programmed to automatically reduce power draw by slowing down the CPU and GPU when the laptop is unplugged. So, make sure you are plugged in while gaming to get maximum performance. Star Citizen will never run perfectly, cities still run poorly even for me - Lorville often dives BELOW 40 FPS, so make sure your expectations are reasonable. The good news is your 32GB of System RAM and SSD Storage are pretty much Ideal for the game. Standard 16GB RAM systems struggle because the unoptimized Alpha State game will easily completely saturate all 16GB of RAM and you end up with frequent crashing. Spinning Hard Disk Storage won't even run the game at all. Assets will load in so slowly when attempting to read from HDDs that in game your character will glitch and clip into the environment and die over and over. If your laptop has a 1440p screen, scale the game down. Specs like yours are unfortunately not quite good enough to play a game as unoptimized as Star Citizen at high resolution, so scale the game back to 1920x1080. I had to do the same thing with my old Ryzen 3700X + Radeon RX 5700-XT system - I played at 2560x1080 despite the 3440x1440p Monitor. However, make sure graphical settings are left quite high. Star Citizen is still a CPU-bound game, and so "High" and "Very High" Settings can take some load off the CPU and distribute it to the GPU. The one exception is Volumetric Clouds. Turn those completely OFF for a massive jump in performance on planets. Look up how to get more FPS in Star Citizen here on UA-cam. There are several more advanced tweaks that can help you even more. So in summary - Lower Resolution, but High Settings and turning OFF Volumetric Clouds is how you get the most performance out of Star Citizen, along with more advanced system tweaks that you can research.

@wallacengineering8096 I think I'll just wait till the games becomes playable. I get 80ish fps on cyberpunk raytraced so it shouldn't be a rig problem

@@ginomenicucci6888 It is honestly playable, especially in Space. Its mainly the cities that run poorly. And wait for this game to be Optimized? Lol, realistically ur talking another 10+ years, not even joking. If you wait for some next-gen hardware like RTX 5000 or 6000 and Ryzen 8000 or 9000, even laptop parts will soon be able to brute-force the game to pretty high performance. But you would need top-tier hardware to keep up with most Desktop Builds, like a Ryzen 8950HX + RTX 5080-Mobile or 5090-Mobile sort of system which I imagine is incredibly expensive. For now we just accept the low performance in cities and just play the game regardless. You can't expect perfect performance from an un-optomized Alpha game.

​@@wallacengineering8096playable with top specs 😂

Yeah you should get similar performance at the same resolution because this is a classic game that is GPU bound definitely not CPU. You only start to see a difference in performance if you go with a lower resolution like 1080p and aim for extremely high frame rates in which case a stronger CPU will show a massive difference

@@wallacengineering8096 Okay thanks mate (:

There are both in this video. The thumbnail pic was literally taken with the 4 of us lined up in our 4 Ares fighters. 2 Of them used Ions while the two others that included myself used Infernos.

It should ya, the 5800X-3D is quite a strong CPU, just be aware there is currently an issue with 7900-XTX GPUs in Star Citizen. Ever since a recent patch, clock speeds can spike way too high while performing certain actions in game and case the game to crash to desktop, also crashing the Adrenaline Driver. The way you fix this issue is by manually setting a clock speed limit within the AMD Adrenaline Driver Software. Check out the information I found on Reddit: www.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/s/9QZRS7phpi

@@wallacengineering8096 Hello. I just download this game this week and got the problem you mention above. My games always crash (Driver timeout crash). Im using rx6900xt par with Ryzen 5600 (Bottleneck my gpu). Can you tell me what I need to do in adrenaline software? Im not good at tuning pc hardware. Does undervolt without tuning my gpu clock help?

@@cptforce4541 You need to simply limit the maximum clock speed in Adrenaline software. Pull up the software, go to Performance Tab, then Tuning Sub-Tab, then enable Core control and Advanced Control. Set your maximum frequency around 2300 MHz. If that doesn't work, try something a bit lower until it does work.

@@wallacengineering8096 Thank You. Will try it now.

@@wallacengineering8096 Update. Been playing for 5 hours non stop. No crash. Again thank you 👍👍

It is actually surprising because in the past the game wouldn't run well even with top tier specs because CPUs were not good enough no matter how much money you spent. In other words, it has taken 10 years for computer hardware to brute force its way to good performance in this game.

Well ya of course Player-Owned ones will be difficult, I would expect as much.

​@@wallacengineering8096btw since you are using the ares. Is the nerf as bad as people tend to make it out to be? Or do you think their reaction is exagerated?

@@evobsm2328 The Nerf is over now. If you look at the date of this video, I uploaded it when the Ares first came out more than a year ago. Right after launch, both Ares variants were nerfed into the ground by adding insane weapon spread that meant in the Inferno, you couldn't do any damage to a small ship at 500 meter range, 99% of rounds would just spread all around the target instead of go at them. The nerf was horrible and lasted about a year, nobody really wanted to use an Ares during that time. However, finally, with 3.20 CIG finally admitted their mistake and buffed both Ares variants with a huge reduction in weapon spread along with pip lock tweaks.

@@wallacengineering8096 ah ok, i dont really look too closely at patch notes and dont own these. I did hear a lot about it. But yeah i didnt really look at the date of the video my bad.

@@evobsm2328 No worries man, nobody expects anyone to know everything.

Yep, the game is CPU bound, GPU never loads to 100%

Its an AI version of the Idris, so they have only 60% of the shield and hull HP stats that a normal player owned one would, coupled with the laggy, absolutely terrible aim the AI have due to no server meshing, Yeah, a proper crewed Idris is going to be very difficult if using guns alone. The REAL cap killers are going to be missile boats, Polaris or the Retaliator slinging torps are a much bigger threat than the smaller guns ships.

Windows 11 Professional 64-Bit

Its a minigun, of course you will miss some shots... lol. But ya ive been meaning to try out lag pip.

@@wallacengineering8096 Not a minigun that size my dude, its more a ballistic repeater than a minigun anyways.

@@Blackburn6969 Um, not even close lol, it fires at like 1,200 RPM or so, that is certainly not a repeater, its just a minigun with a slower fire rate, its still definitely a Minigun and I only missed like 100-200 rounds out of the entire capacity, trying to be perfect with a minigun is just dumb, never gonna happen, especially now that it has spread. Who said that perfection was necessary? Lol its a video game

Well, if you get a modern CPU, you should be able to play the game fairly smoothly. This game is definitely more CPU bound than GPU at the moment.

Its not really about the top speed because all light fighters are similar - its the acceleration. The 350R is simply insane...

No, I don't play VR, it makes me sick.

Yest very worth 4k 120hz 1440p 240hz and 1080 360hz best combo for gaming

@@Ghostlynotme445 yeah i'll be playing at 1080p

It depends on if you really wanna spend the cash and your target resolution. This card is massive overkill for 1080p. Nobody needs this kind of power for 1080p. Remember that Linus Tech Tips showed that even professional E-Sports gamers who literally get paid to game - show no improvement whatsoever from 144FPS to 240 FPS. This card will easily do more than 240 FPS at 1080p in most games, so you are just throwing away power and money at that point. Its an extremely powerful option for 2560x1440p at absolutely maxed-out settings, or higher. All you need for a completely smooth and responsive experience is about 90 FPS average and yet this card will deliver about 160 FPS in most games at 2560x1440p with completely maxed out settings. So even for 2560x1440p Ultra, its a bit overkill. What this card is actually designed for - is resolutions HIGHER than 2560x1440p. Its even slightly overkill for my 3440x1440p resolution. If I turn off the ray tracing, my average FPS in this game jumps to over 120, usually bouncing around 130-140 even at the same Ultra-Everything settings. Its just that Ray-Tracing is so incredibly taxing on the performance. I actually wanted the lower-tier RX 7900-XT (Not the XTX) but a man bought this Red Devil card and then decided he wanted a Sapphire Nitro instead so I kept my mouth shut about how stupid he was being and saved $300 versus buying in store, I ended up paying even less than the 7900-XT I wanted at the time, and I am able to use the warranty as well. In reality, the RX 7900-XTX is a TRUE 3840x2160p (4K) gaming card. It is capable of 90 FPS at 4K Ultra in most games or just shy of 120 FPS at high settings. So if you want to get an RX 7900-XTX, I highly recommend you get either a 3440x1440p or a 3840x2160p monitor - so you can actually use all of the power this card has to offer - rather than letting it go to waste.

@@wallacengineering8096 thanks for the heads up, initially I’ll stick with the 1080p monitor and then i’ll upgrade to a 1440p. But even with the 1080p monitor i think that it will give 200+ plus fps at most games in ultra, so it should a nice experience

@@patrickzelenoy3872 Yes it certainly will, definitely run Ultra-Everything at 1080p and do not be shy about any Ray Tracing either. Just run every single feature at completely maxed-out and ull still be flying at 1080p. When you pick up the 1440p monitor, go for a high refresh-rate good one with 165Hz+ and options like HDR and an IPS panel to maximize the power the card has to offer. Check out this article by Tom's Hardware to get an idea of what cards can do at what resolutions. Each chart is an average of 10 very modern, very demanding games at each resolution. Click on the image and you can cycle through charts showing information at different resolutions: www.tomshardware.com/reviews/gpu-hierarchy,4388.html

Its true, if I turn the RT off it goes to more like 120-150 FPS depending on the area but Ive never felt like huge FPS numbers are all that beneficial either. Linus showed that even professional E-Sports gamers show no improvement from 144 to 240 fps, the average gamer is completely satisfied with 90 FPS, and most enthusiasts are completely satisfied with 100 FPS. Even 75 FPS is pretty darn smooth and responsive, plus my monitor is 100Hz anyways. If I wanted rock-solid stable frames, I could just turn on a limiter. But its perfectly smooth with no stutters or weirdness, so why would I?

@@wallacengineering8096 Good solution would be 100 fps lock since U have 100Hz monitor.. Going up to 120fps then down to 80 or 90 will make it less smooth compared to locked fps, Also it's give your card a stretch headroom & cool temps My 7900xtx with 400w OC already keeping my case hot even with 4 fans setup.. but if i lock fps to 120, it's never go beyond 300w - 350w which make the case goes from hot to warm

They have been gone for quite some time

I get a bit of stuttering as well. Im pretty sure it is unavoidable in this game. Vulkan also crashes for me.

@@wallacengineering8096 Thank you!! Today I've removed the power splitter from the graphics card and I have put three separate cables from the power supply, it seems that something has improved. Tell your friend about it.

I just finished my upgrade to Ryzen 7800X-3D myself. SAM definitely improves performance a fair bit.

Nah unfortunately we found out with the 4S V2 trucks that there is a limit to how much weight you can put on a plastic chassis and how long the plastic chassis can be before it's not structurally sound anymore. Anyone who bought the Kraton 4S V2 Like I did knows just how easy It is to snap the damn chassis on the thing. It's way too weak for a truck that big and heavy and the M2C racing chassis brace is pretty much a necessity.

@@wallacengineering8096 I think Traxxas has engineered a vehicle that has size and the chassis survives the beating well. Anything is possible with a hell of an engineer. I don’t think the metal chassis should go away because it does have its benefits but it bends and is costly to replace.

@@drivenrc Thats why I run either the EXB chassis or the M2C Racing Chassis exclusively on Arrma 6S vehicles. The RTR edition 6061 aluminum factory chassis is indeed far too weak and prone to bending.

Well Spektrum Electronics are okay, just not great. Main issue really is the bearings. They use super cheap bearings that seize very early on, if you get better bearings they can last just fine, they just don't have the best power but when you consider they are free electronics included with the truck, you can't be too mad about it lol. I am of course referring to the motor bearings. If the motor bearings sieze then it can fry the motor with all the resistance and that resistance also stresses out the ESC which can burn it out as well. Basically, best to just avoid all that nonsense and just buy a couple nice high-end bearings if you want the stock electronics to last. The biggest thing behind the durability of the truck is preparation. I coated the truck in Muck-Off MO-94 and let it dry for 3-4 days before I ever drove it, took the time to tune the suspension before I ever drove it. Basically I completed the entire build before even the maiden run. Thats the key - to strengthen parts BEFORE you break them.

@@wallacengineering8096 yup had my Typhon 3s motor seize the 3rd time out. Had them warranty it out for the Arrma BLX. No problems since. Have a spare spektrum I put in my Outcast v4 and took out the Arrma motor to hold on to Incase the spektrum goes out.

@@tonysmith7989 Yep that sounds about right lol 😂

@@wallacengineering8096 really all Arrma bearings suck. Plus you spend so much on these things and alot of people have servos go out because the manufacturer is so cheap they won't put bearings in the servo saver/ bellcrank. The 1/10 comes with plastic bushings and the 1/8 with brass bushings. Only 1/5 come with the bearings. So on the smaller one you are getting rubbing on the brass or grinding the plastic over time. The bearings will help prolong the servo. Some don't know this as in the diagrams shows the number for the bearing so you assume they have them.

@@tonysmith7989 honestly the rtr servo is not bad…just not that powerful. UA-camr’s will have you thinking upgrades. When the manufacturer has the setup pretty much right. A stronger servo is cool, but not needed. The bearings are like cheapest things to buy. HH will replace the motor while in warranty…almost no questions asked. 👍🏾