Відео

no fold functions are able to implement produce because they apply to a list while produce doesn't accept a list but rather produces one

What's that spacy music in the background? Sounds nice.

Hi can I add barcode to inventory items?

On the names: If you have a concrete value like a specific tile, it should have a descriptive name, even in Haskell. But the more abstract a function is, e. g. like mapList, the less descriptive names can be and long names just become a distraction, e. g. `x xs` instead of `firstElement remainingElements`.

I have to remind myself: Each time I use (if/then/else), check if I should rather use pattern matching or a guard. Also interesting to follow your thought process on handleEvent. I "cheated" and used Maybe and `orElse` to compose the different potentially event handling use cases (win, move player, move box, change direction, or else keep existing state if any other key was pressed).

Great videos, fun to watch and to follow. I'm still a beginner in Haskell and feel like I will always be. But it teaches me so much about structure and style that I can use in other languages as well. I came up with a very similar solution as the example solution, mainly for symmetry reasons. But after I had implemented another maze I've got two different initial states! Switching between them in your solution would require to change two references to initialState. With a resetableInteractionOf, it's just one place. Also, if you'd ever implement a level selection, you could just pass the selected level. Considering, as an alternative, changing the event handler signature to receive an initial state just for this purpose seems bad style to me: The function would be doing too much.

"Look, Haskell, you have a problem." 😂

Dude, this resource as a whole is amazing, thank you for putting the time in to do this.

A good video. I have chosen to purchase the PS1 version. Thank you

I'm 23 years old and decided to give Wizardry a try Really enjoying it so far! Floor 3 nearly wiped me when I made the mistake of digging too deep into the secret doors without casting Dumapic I also encountered two murphy's ghosts when I found him, so it definitely is still possible in the new version

Found you through Reddit and loving it so far. Just the right (2x) speed for me, considering I've only been at Haskell for 20 or 30 hours of reading, listening, and experimenting. Yes, very much the API should be be a bit more explicit. As for the `rectangle` API doc, yes, it could be better. At a minimum, they need to specify the order to be absolutely clear that it's width _then_ height.

I remember using a program that was called something like "visual 6502" or something like that, that was similar in concept to the program in the video, it was amazing, as it similarly animated the registers and memory access as it ran an assembly program. You wouldn't happen to know what it was called or have video of such a thing other than the one you show here? It was an amazing program and I'd love to relive that part of my childhood.

Thanks for this- new to my Apple ][+ and this taught me a great deal!! For others on a plus: boot the dos 3.3 master, switch to integer basic with INT, then you can CALL-151, and then F666G to get the mini assembler ! prompt! Thanks for the tip on Merlin too- older versions work on the + in 40 col mode. The manual is a must!

Really cool videos -- it's nice to see people working to explain haskell (at least outside school, etc.). It'd be fun to see how one could program in haskell style in traditionally "blue collar" language's like Java (which now supports -- basic! -- algebraic types via sealed interfaces, switch expressions and records).

Thank you so much!

Круто! Спасибо за работу, привет из 2024

Started watching this video when it went live on my dad's birthday. Brought back memories of watching him play 3 in Three at the Mac IIci on his desk in the living room. The puzzles were way too hard for me back then, so I only solved a tiny handful of them. Thanks for posting it!

Awesome gaming! 🥳

Love it! 💕

16:58 great rake on mistakes and learning. Love that you are 'learning in public'. Instantly earned a sub.

buddy, what website or software are you using for diagraming? I would be grateful if you tell me.

Hmm, to me "purely functional" has a very clear-cut meaning, while just "functional" can mean a lot of different things (and especially to different people).

In Haskell all functions are implicitly curried. This means that the following to type signatures are the same: ``` moveFromTo :: Coord -> Coord -> Coord -> Coord moveFromTo :: Coord -> Coord -> (Coord -> Coord) ```

I got the game last night got lost and found 2 Murphys ghost and they ended my 1st party

Thanks for doing this!

The remake plays well on Linux through steam. You just have to turn it on in the compatibility tab.

Watching you play The Fool's Errand, it was really rewarding to see the puzzles come together most of the time, where it feels like there is a sense of accopmlishment for putting the peices together and making everything work out in the end. Not that this is lesser than that, but the arbitrary puzzles get stale very fast, (The lifts) and stay that way. Which is to say, I echo your sentiments for this one, and while it looks and sounds ahead of it's time for 1989, at least to me. The question, "Is it fun." Is seeming like a resounding "Not really."

Apollo voiceovers in the audio stream at 25:50?

Confirming: when you switch it to Japanese it uses different kanji / words for Inspect that are much more clear. That issue was bothering me as well!

Too bad you are not doing this game anymore. I wish I could encourage you to come back to it, but you do you.

If you ask me, it is the best wizardry game out there.

I loved Goblin Slayer season1. Such a pity that absurd retarded reviewbombing and utterly unjust backlash it received. I thought it was BRILLIANT how the author made goblins, and dungeon delving in general, dangerous again, like in old games like Wizardry or classic D&D. Thanks for the great Easter egg!

Hey there again. I was looking again at your old vids on Wizardry 1 remake during Early Access (I really enjoy your vids on Wizardry and Javadry, which I came to know thanks to you!) and suddenly found this vid with the sad news and the great homage. Incredible, how time passes by… it never ceases to amaze me when people that made such a mark on the industry, and inspired a whole genre perhaps without even knowing, suddenly pass away. Thanks for sharing, your vids are much appreciated, I really enjoy your voice, knowledge and anecdotes of hardcore Wizardry playing, and how you showed all the features of the remake comparing them with the original and everything. I’d enjoy a Full Wizardry playthrough from you. Cheers and all best!

You probably already noticed, but the bottom of your screen seems to barely fall off of the video, so if you're writing on the bottom line on your screen, it's not visible in the video. Good baby steps through the "mapping of things" though, very nice :)

I use plain text accounting in conjunction with version control systems.

I recently picked up the PS1 version of the game. I am a big console gamer so that is the version I am playing through. The combat is fun, exploration is great, and the soundtrack is top notch.

I think you have the MOST and LEAST significant bits backwards. I believe you are treating address[6] as an array of 6 bits, reading them left to right. This WOULD imply that the most significant bit (the leftmost bit) is address[0]. This is not correct in the syntax, and the most significant bit is actually address[5]. To demonstrate this, in the web-version, when I do `Not(in=address[0], out=notZero)` and set the address to `1 0 0 0 0 0`, it outputs `notZero=1`. And when I set the address to `0 0 0 0 0 1`, it outputs `notZero=0`. The tests still pass in your code, but if you switch the least and most significant bits in all of your examples, the tests also still pass.

Hi from Europe, Spain, Pete! This may be a weird comment, but I think there is something about Wizardry that's very "Alien", from 1979. I think it's the dark mysterious (and sometimes even scary) atmosphere present on all the wizardry main games (even 7 or 8). I wonder if the movie itself inspired the developers. Thanks for the video btw, there is something very chilling about the way you present your content!

A very nice tribute. Really enjoy all your wizardry coverage.

Excellent. While PTA meets my needs and I use it exclusively, the video makes good points in a non-argumentative manner. PTA for instance certainly doesn't scale to large businesses. But for my uses--- to keep the books for small non-profits with minimal accounts receivable, as well as relatively uncomplicated personal finance--- it's just great. Ledger integrates with Emacs and it's all a breeze. The video is also correct about this being a terrific learning tool for double-entry accounting. As a side note, I was happy to see that the alternative shown, GnuCash, is free open-source software.

That is sad. It was written in Pascal and had many elements of D&D. Wizardry was the game that got me into the game industry. May he rest in peace.

it was a great time for games and influenced a lot of future games

Thank you for this tribute. Not a game I played or even heard of, but those old games are some of my favorite memories from my childhood.

Excited for lvl 4!

thanks for nand2tetris videos

I have played eye of beholder on some icl machine once and the wizardry 7 and 8 didn't complete them but dam hours months and was great

Lol now that's funny I always thought about errors on my laser 128 when booting up wrong bios shows brk and address and my brother scratching his head while I'm like that break is assembly and the number is resigery which I found a book online that showed all the resigery designation, though I'm new to assembly I been using CA65 compiler with visual studios to make a Super Nintendo game lol but I'm getting more used to some of the code but yet to code on other systems

Is losing all your gold part of the story or a bug?

My friends apple2e game came preloaded with BilboBaggins variant. 🤐

Interesting. Have been on Quicken since the 1990's and my database goes back to 1993. But why do we do it, why do we play with personal finances and developing different alternative systems? Let's be honest: extrinsic versus intrinsic motivation. We play because we enjoy it, not because it is necessarily better. But so what, play is the best form of learning, right! Enjoy 🙂