Відео

As with your other supercut, this is a great way to catch up on missed videos and also gain a consistent review of the series.

100% love & support!

Really enjoyed the Love Shack break in with the B-52s! 👍

This has been a great compilation. Most of them were made before I joined your channel. I keep pointing out that I've only recently got into horror and although I have expanded my experience of the horror genre, I haven't watched any of the Friday the 13th series yet. Because I love sci-fi and special effect features, I ended up watching a lot of stuff about horror but had little desire to watch the movies themselves. Even though I've seen a lot of special effects features and scene breakdowns, actually getting around to watching the movies is still fresh. It adds a whole new context to what I have seen before rather than just feeling that I've seen it all before. As I was typing this I almost said 'thinking' and although we do analyse movies afterwards, we watch them because we want to feel something.

I've never heard of this movie but it was probably more specific to the US in terms of airing. I can definitely see where you are coming. Cheesy and dated at times but it had ambition to tell an engaging and wholesome story. Hunt for the Red October is an awesome movie and I listened to the Audiobook of it about 3 years ago.

I rather liked Fly II. Eric Stoltz and Daphne Zuniga had great chemistry together (even if Stoltz is technically playing a five year old). And we realize that Seth had a VERY good reason to avoid Bartok Industries! Lee Richardson makes a VERY good bad guy - always did, really - and I will say that Bartok got what he deserved. I thought that Chris Walas did a very good job with his first directorial effort. Even if you can make the special effects guy into a director but you can't take the special effects guy OUT of the director! I remember the Behind the Scenes video on the blu ray release that Walas spent more time dissecting the special effects than he did on his direction! Still, he clearly learned his lessons well from David Cronenberg, and came out with a very good film. And the special effects - no freaking CGI! - were fantastic. I never saw it as gore for gore's sake - it DID have its place. Still, what they did to the doggie....

My assumption was always that this film took place a month or so later, not 9 months and that the son's growth rate started while in the womb so she couldn't have an abortion because it was already too late

Can't believe it has been 10 years. I saw Robocop 2 first and It's my favourite. I totally get why people love the original but for me, 2 I love the Drug angle especially when it was used as method of controlling RoboKain. I also liked the the character of Hob in that movie. Anyway, there were some decent aspects to this movie but it just didn't hit the mark. I don't think it was a total disaster, just low energy. I agree that it did have some great characters and did try to do something different and more modern with the context of the story.

This is so cool! 👍

I just watched this podcast and they talk a lot about Dark City ua-cam.com/video/qapuCmkuSJ8/v-deo.htmlsi=NzBb-tHbcUn3zugw Ty and That guy are fans of certain movies you might agree on

I was a science nerd in school … well, still a science nerd as an adult. This movie is forever stored in my geek vault of favorites:-).

Although not familiar with this movie I have seen a lot of older TV movies. While they could be hit or miss, I think most movies were trying to make something with purpose, to be enjoyed or to show the talent of the Actors, writers and production group. With streaming, some of the content is very hollow, simply to fill schedules and time. While the camera quality may not hold up, I think the acting and storytelling can.

Have you seen Tarzan The Fearless?

I think a first-time viewer might be wise to check it out at home first. Mainly, because one of the last times I went to see it at a movie theater, the audience was yelling out their responses so continually that I really couldn't hear the movie at all. By then I pretty much knew all the dialogue by heart (having watched it around 50 times lol) so I already knew what was going on, but a newbie might be totally lost.

This 70s cult classic has a killer soundtrack and I personally also loved the early 80s follow-up 'Shock Treatment', which was way ahead of its time with whole 2000s reality TV obsession era while influencing movies like The Truman Show :-)

I've missed some of the franchise, and really should re-watch them all... I know I liked the first two a LOT and I think part of why I stopped watching was probably because I doubted any could be that good again. Knowing me I'll give them all a watch around the time this newest one hits streaming.

Sigourney Weaver is fantastic as Warrant Officer Lt. Ellen L. Ripley. 😀👍👽

Alien definitely still holds up today. A dynamic mix of characters and an amazing creature, especially for 1979. Fantastic cinematography all around. Some of the style elements are rooted in when it was made, but I loved how textured and functional the environments are. Aliens was actually the first of the movies that I saw and again has fantastic cinematography. Hadley's Hope is understandably industrial so it had a different style to the first movie but still had that tactile and functional quality. The reason that both of the first movies are so beloved is partly due to how different they are but don't contract each other's content. I actually love Alien 3. I also thought it had a terrific sense of style. Even though the others had great casts, I enjoyed this group the best. A hostile environment for Ripley but she still forges alliances. (Spoilers) One thing that this movie was criticised for was killing off Hicks and Newt. Even though Michael Biehn was such a strong leading man, I think Ripley had to be the core of the franchise. The shot you showed with Ripley and the Alien inches from her face is iconic. Although there was a couple of shots that weren't great, I also liked the Alien 'Runner' design to add something new Aliens 4 was okay. It had some nice elements with Ripley 8 being a Hybrid and reconnecting with her humanity, The scene with Ripley 7 and the Newborn's death still haunt me. Predators 1 & 2 are some of my favourite movies of all time. 1 will always be iconic but I never understood why 2 got the hate it did. It has a fresh setting, different and original characters. It adds to the lore without breaking anything in the same way that Alien and Aliens coexist. AVP was a let-down. Sanaa Lathan was actually a competent lead but was surrounded by dull characters. The Predators were too bulky and immobile rather than agile. Bigger is not better when it came to their physicality or their weapons. I liked the concept of the Grid Alien, it made them more than just drones in a hive, it showed that they could have some sense of individuality. Requiem. It could have been improved by less of the whiny 90210 / Dawson's Creek nonsense. Prometheus. A good Sc-fi flick but should not have been part of the Alien universe. Although the first 3 added Aliens to the franchise, they began to diverge from what made the Alien's Alien. Covenant. They somehow made a bad movie with 2 Michael Fassbenders. I will probably go see Romulus but am slightly concerned about the younger average age of the cast. As I said before Aliens was the first of the franchise I ever saw. I'm a much bigger sci-fi fan than my older brother but it's thanks to him that I had access to movies like this, Dune, Psycho, Escape from New York and more that stirred my love of movies. Even though the Alien movies have strong horror elements I've always seen them as sci-fi first. I love special effects and both genres have a fantastic relationship with practical effects. I've always watched stuff about horror but have only recently begun to watch what I would call pure horror more recently

As I said before, I'm glad you're continuing with this series but I definitely see why you took a step back so that you could choose projects. The Elvira Collection was built for riffing so it's important to balance out movies with more relevance. While some of these movies may feel like they have little value, these movies may have been an early lifeline for individuals within the movie industry and skillsets to support the industry as a whole.

👍👍

Great recommendation! I especially like how you covered so many aspects of the film, other than just the storyline :o) Re-watched it just the other day and got a lot more out of it than the first time around.

Dark City is my absolute favorite film of all time. The Director’s cut, which omits the spoilers given in voiceovers at the beginning, letting us to learn what is happening during the course of the film, is better than the original theatrical release, IMHO.

I hope you got the Director's cut.

This was one weird movie, and I did have to watch it a couple of times to really understand what's happening. Watching it more recently, I found myself thinking of two comparisons. I don't want to give out any spoilers either, but I was reminded of Frederik Pohl's Tunnel Under the World (adapted a couple of times on the radio series X Minus One) and the 1997 Spanish film Abre Los Ojos (Open Your Eyes in English) starring Penelope Cruz -- which was utterly screwed up in the American adaptation Vanilla Sky with Tom Cruise. You'll pardon me, but I've never been that impressed with Tom Cruise, and I thought he was terrible and utterly unbelievable in the American version.

I also first saw this in theaters, and I've enjoyed it on every subsequent viewing.

I got this at the time on VHS. This was a nice film with some great acting and great character aspects, it took a couple of watches to appreciate it but because of its slow pacing, it didn't have that long-term rewatchability.

they put ryan reynolds in it just to sell tickets and killed him off in the first 10 mins. Its like using james franco in prometheus only for him to die in the opening sequence. hyped that he was in it only to kill him off coz of the budget

Just finished re-watching it (2nd time). Totally remembered the ending all wrong, but I won't go into details here (spoilers). Truly, this film deserved much more attention than it got, and if it had... for sure a sequel would be called for. Better than I remembered, which isn't always the case with 2nd viewings!

Even though I love Sci-fi, the trailer never gripped me enough to try and see it. It had a solid cast, looked great, intriguing monster and a nice setting. These people felt like astronauts in that just outside the walls was a harsh environment that could kill them just as easily as the alien.

The two brothers who want to race all the time crack me up. (Learned English from the wide world of sports lol

Even if certain elements weren't received in the way they hoped... they definitely need respect for being creative with the filmmaking process itself.

It was a fun movie. I liked it!

I haven't heard of this movie let alone seen it. From what you've shown and said, this looks to have some really nice cinematography, doesn't take itself too seriously but at the same time takes the actual filmmaking side seriously. Meta movies like this can be engaging because they do add something different to the mix. Sometimes it works for the viewer and sometimes it doesn't. Some CG can be done really well but when worlds are so based in reality rather than being dinosaurs or space ships, it needs to be used subtly and sparingly. I certainly have no issues giving older videos a second chance when they didn't find traction the first time. What might have been interesting or perhaps even useful for you would be to rewrite the review even if you don't actually redo it. See what has changed with your writing style.

I remember this iteration of TPOTO and liking it well enough, but the 1925 & Hammer versions are my favorite- this one was more Jack the Ripper meets The Phantom.

I haven't seen this movie. I'm in two minds as to whether they were genuinely trying to put an alternative spin on the story elements or if they were just using Robert Englund's name as a draw and the story was secondary. From what you've shown me it might even be a bit of both. The poster clearly capitalises on Englund but the movie has a good look to it. Maybe they tried something unique and it just didn't work.

pearl is still the best in the trilogy in my eyes and its not even close. Its such a good character study.

I haven't seen this movie so it's so hard to judge if this movie still has relevance. I don't mean that in a bad way, films are relevant because they are there to be enjoyed. What I mean is that is this a movie of it's time, can people relate to it now. I'm from the UK so I'm not sure how this was received at the time. Was it a distillation of Americana that people felt was a world away, even at the time.

Even though these movies are essentially made back to back, it's interesting to know which one to watch first. The movies will give different contexts to each other... but is context more invigorating than intrigue.

Sounds really good! I'll be checking out the rental prices!

I have really enjoyed Reginald the vampire show. It’s always gotten ridiculous amount of hate and I hope they get a season three

I really liked it, didnt expect how dark it got

I thought it was Maynard. But stayed because the content is on point.

Great video with a great subject. Although I am familiar with Pee-Wee Herman, I haven't seen this movie. This if from a time where the name of an Actor or Director had so much pull regardless of the plot or tone of the movie. I would happily watch Batman today and although very comic-booky, the camp was toned down. Despite the tone of the movie Jack Nicholson's Joker put chills down your spine. Beetlejuice is not one that I have gone back to re-watch but I remember feeling at the time it was more than an enjoyable movie but an actual movie and cultural experience. This is the movie that everyone asked you if you had seen it.

The very fact that a movie is a "Tim Burton Film" plays a large part in my decision to watch it.

I keep seeing this and everytime I do, I consider watching it. I get the feeling it will be something I would actually like, yet keep putting it off for some reason. Saw your video suggested to me and thought I'd see what you had to say. LoL Perhaps I'll finally stop delaying and finally dig some fangs into this show...ya know...see what the taste be like. HeH 😉

I never watched this show but there was something in the way you described deciding to watch it that reminded me of The series iZombie. I saw it advertised and watched it only so I could legitimately say how crap it was. I fell in love with the show. It has flaws but the characters were so fun and there were great stories.