Відео

Totally irellevant comparison.Everyone knows the answer

Is basically comparing NA to turbocharged all the being equal. One has aero (F1), the other doesn’t (MotoGP).

And yet MotoGP is still more entertaining to watch…

No matter where I go, it seems like motorsport comment section, F1 involved in particular, are always turn hostile real quick. Meanwhile, I'm here enjoying MotoGP, F1, WEC, and FE (if I have nothing else to do) equally. Bagnaia vs Martin at Sepang was peak, then followed by chaotic Brazilian GP. While rooting everyone equally to be the best of themselves. Wish more people can enjoy the sport as is, of course you can root for one over another, but simply be civilized. If you guys wants war, may I introduce you to Football.

Not even close. Still tho, bike riders have much bigger balls.

MotoGP is the crazy thing about this all

I'm not a huge fan of bike races, but a lap on MotoGP looks physically INSANE!

2 wheels don't grip as well as 4 around corners. The bikes are faster in a straight line.

Answer = 2 wheels.

Wow ! F1 makes MotoGP look slow, but MotoGP is much more exciting to watch. Just goes to show that speed isn't that important for close and exciting motor racing.

F1 had a huge advantage because the track is full of turns. Moto GP bikes are faster in straight lines and slower in turns, for the F1 cars it's the opposite.

You didn’t have to do this comparison, just listen to what Rossi said after he drove Lewis Hamilton car’ he “everything is coming up so fast “ 😂

A square layout tyre can't lie

Such a huge gap. It shows that the faster you go doesn't guarantee a direct race

Seeing quite a lot of moto GP fans giving it the “yeah but moto gp this and moto gp that” Look it’s just a comparison, not a dick measuring competition, I watch and like both equally, kudos to them both, no one will have a neck and reactions like an f1 driver but no one will have balls and skill like a moto gp rider.

Going at 220mph on two wheels is a heck of a lot harder than doing the same on four wheels..Also overtaking on 2 wheels with just a 12 inch distance between drivers is phenomenal..Crashing in a four wheel is dangerous,but not half as dangerous as being fully exposed on two wheels..No F1 driver could cut it on motorcycles.

Slowed down by the weight of their balls.

24 sounds better looks better, much better game by far

Doesn't matter who is faster. MotoGP is far more exciting and thats what counts. F1 is just boring most of the time.

Motogp are not so fast in the corners.

MotoGp faster than Checo Perez

F1 is good but motogp is more interested to watch because lot of overtakes , crashes, last lap drama, only 45mins race and 20mins sprint even qualification also good to watch

Motogp is more tough then f1 because f1 has more safety things but Motogp if crash happen they easily can broke their bone so physically they have to focus in mtoogp

i think F1 in corner has high G force and Moto GP has 60° lean is insane

You could not pay me enough to drive in motogp , i respect the heck out them . They go as fast as f1 cars on the straights but they are totally exposed.

I wanna see a MotoGP versus an Indy car around an oval. Those bikes are insanely quick on a straight, but slow around corners due to lacking downforce.

What faa have done to the sport. Bring back atleast the v8😓

Is this a best lap vs best lap?

2014 2012 celeb is so trash

Aerodynamic down force and wing stability on the F1 car has the advantage

Max's sprint shootout pole lap is 2 tenths faster than charles' quali pole.

I’d like to see Moto gp vs GTD

It’s not even close at the top! 🤣 F1 light years ahead.

How damn old is that IndyCar, what an off comparison xD

Real sport is moto biker .f1 not body move

How Indycar and WEC were neck and neck through most of the lap is just cool to see. CANT BELIEVE THEY WERE WITHIN A TENTH OF EACH OTHER AT THE END!! Though if it were a full race WEC takes the cake.

So the difference is huge.

Cc nya aja beda min

whatever you want to say. at least in terms of top speed, MotoGP is faster. F1 is only 340Km/h while MotoGP can be 360-370Km/h. It's just a matter of comparing motorbikes and cars. It's not balanced

Just shows the oace and skill you need to be an f1 driver over other motorsport (not rally racing. Im also not discriminating other motorsports)

This goes to show just how fast F1 cars actually are around a circuit

Fun fact: In 2006 where the new engine regulations entered (from the v10s to the v8s) Toro Rosso had a V10 engine limited in REV this was because Toro Rosso didnt have enough time or money for a v8 if i remember.

By comparison, F1 cars around Austin lapped 28.98 seconds faster than MotoGP.

its pretty mad f1 23 is better by a mile

Mein erstes F1 Spiel war F1 2002. Das Spiel war meine Kindheit, ich selber bin 2002 geboren. 22 Jahre später besitze ich das Spiel immer noch und ich liebe es.

Alpine only have three games...none of these are alpine

Sempre meglio la MotoGP....tutta la vita...F1 e spettacolo nella stessa frase non ci possono stare 😂😂😂😂

7.8 sec gap but a spectalur guide VS a man pressing or not pressing a switch WOW

Imagine a Female Only MotoGP 💀💀💀

WSBK ist viel besser kann ich nur empfehlen