- 31
- 161 077
Bill's Garage
United States
Приєднався 14 лют 2021
I've been a mechanic my entire life, and I play in my garage for fun. Cars. motorcycles, boats, trailers, lawn equipment, airplane parts, and more. There's no telling what I'll be working on at any given time, but there will always be a common theme - I do everything the hard way, and I will go out of my way to try and do it the way that everyone says can't be done because there's no fun in doing things the same way as everyone else.
Installing Mustang II aftermarket suspension parts on a Mustang II? Who does that??
In this video, I talk through my plan for installing upgraded aftermarket front suspension parts on my Mustang II. These parts will complement the rear suspension upgrades and chassis stiffening parts in order to help my car perform substantially better than stock.
Переглядів: 150
Відео
My Plan for Stiffening the Subframe & Upgrading the Rear Suspension on my Mustang II
Переглядів 162Місяць тому
The Mustang II is known for having a lot of body flex, so in this video I talk through my plan for stiffening up my '78. I'm also making some improvements to the rear suspension at the same time. I don't see the need to replace the rear suspension on this particular car because it will remain a street-driven car, and the leaf-spring suspension does just fine with some upgrades. The subframe con...
Fixing the Side Object Detection on my 6th Gen.Taurus
Переглядів 60Місяць тому
When I was getting ready to fix the SOD in my 2018 Taurus, I watched a ton of videos that overcomplicated this relatively easy task, and was apalled at what this industry charges for this kind of work. This is definitely one of those jobs where you could buy an expensive scan tool, do the job yourself, and still save a fortune.
What are my options for increasing the fuel capacity of my 1978 Mustang II?
Переглядів 3482 місяці тому
I'm trying to figure out the best solution for increasing the fuel capacity of my 1978 Mustang II from 16 gallons to 22. The easiest option looks to be cutting out the spare tire well and installing a fuel cell below the trunk, but I'm open to suggestions.
Want to switch your Mustang II from Ghia windows to Coupe windows? Here's what you need to know!
Переглядів 998 місяців тому
I can't stand the little opera windows on the Mustang II Ghia, so I'm removing mine and replacing them with the larger windows from a Coupe. I'm stripping the vinyl top off of the car because it's ugly and causes rust, but doing this exposes the plastic inserts that make up the difference between the smaller Ghia windows and the larger Coupe-sized window opening, so the smaller windows (and ins...
I'm Replacing My 1978 Mustang II Wiring Harness
Переглядів 1379 місяців тому
My wiring harness is pretty degraded, as can be expected of any car this old, but I have plans to install a lot of new electrical components such as fuel injection, LED lighting, electronic gauges, and a touch-screen monitor, so I purchased a new wiring harness in order to help avoid problems. There are a ton of options out there for just about any car on the road, but I chose one from Johnny L...
MSD Distributer Spring Problems
Переглядів 2069 місяців тому
I filmed these clips last year but forgot about them. I had encountered a problem with my MSD distributor when running my engine on the stand, and it turned out that the advance springs were worn out.
Why the heck would anyone build a Mustang II???
Переглядів 1,3 тис.10 місяців тому
In this video, I talk about why I chose to build a Mustang II, and I give my opinion on a lot of the things that you tend to hear about them, like that they're small, they're Pinto-based, they were unpopular, they were slow, everybody hates them, etc. Most of that is b.s., but it's a (mostly) free country, and everyone is entitled to their opinion, so I'm giving mine.
I cut open the oil filter from my SBF break-in run to inspect the element
Переглядів 50911 місяців тому
I cut open the oil filter that was installed on my engine when I did the break-in run to inspect the metal particles inside. I wanted to make sure there weren't too many particles, and that they weren't big enough to cause concern. This is a task that is regularly performed on aviation engines but is much less common on automotive engines.
I'm installing a hyd clutch in my Mustang II with a MalWood pedal and a Tilton throwout bearing
Переглядів 910Рік тому
I'm using a @MalwoodUSA under-dash hydraulic clutch pedal kit and a @TiltonEngineering 6000 series hydraulic release bearing to actuate the clutch in my 1978 Mustang II. This is a very oddball combination, with an early 5-bolt 289 being mated to a brand new Tremec TKX transmission and installing them in a Mustang II. Due to a variety of challenges, the hydraulic setup was the best solution for ...
Distributor Options for your SBF
Переглядів 1,2 тис.Рік тому
I get a lot of questions about SBF distributors, so I put together this video describing three different options - points, electronic, and dual sync fuel injection trigger. There's no universal answer as to which is best because all have pros and cons. The best answer for you depends entirely on your specific application.
1978 Mustang II Custom Dash Panel
Переглядів 616Рік тому
I wanted to upgrade the dash panel for my 1978 Mustang II, so I purchased a set of Autometer gauges and modified the factory panel. Not only does it look cooler now, but Autometer gauges are extremely reliable, and the Autometer harness makes wiring them up relatively easy. I can't wait to put it in the car! @AutoMeterTech www.autometer.com
I Built a DIY Engine Run Stand so that I could break in my SBF engine.
Переглядів 2,3 тис.Рік тому
There are a lot of good reasons to use an engine run stand to break in and tune your engine before you put it in your car. However, most are really expensive and quite large, so I decided to build my own. Most of the components that I used were lying around in my garage anyway, and I made it easy to disassemble so that it won't take up a bunch of room when not being used. My total cost was arou...
I Installed a Powermaster Mastertorque 9603 Starter on my SBF
Переглядів 2,8 тис.Рік тому
I've never had a problem running stock starters, but for this build I decided to try a @powermasterperformance Mastertorque 9603 starter. It's smaller, lighter, and has more torque than the stock starter, I just hope it turns out to be as reliable as the stock starter!
Installing a McLeod RST Street Twin Clutch Kit behind my SBF
Переглядів 1,5 тис.Рік тому
I've chosen to use a @McLeodRacingClutches P/N MCL-6913-07 RST Street Twin Clutch Kit to transmit power to my Tremec TKX transmission, and mounted it to an @CenterforceClutches 700225 billet steel 157-tooth flywheel. I recommend using an @RAMClutches billet steel alignment tool when installing a dual disc clutch; I used the 03-048, which has the same 1-1/8" 26-spline dimensions as my transmissi...
Aligning my SBF Quicktime Bellhousing for use with a Tremec TKX Transmission
Переглядів 3,6 тис.Рік тому
Aligning my SBF Quicktime Bellhousing for use with a Tremec TKX Transmission
Installing a CVF Racing Wraptor Serpentine Kit on my SBF
Переглядів 2 тис.Рік тому
Installing a CVF Racing Wraptor Serpentine Kit on my SBF
Measuring Piston to Valve Clearance on my SBF
Переглядів 3,7 тис.Рік тому
Measuring Piston to Valve Clearance on my SBF
Measuring for Correct Pushrod Length in my SBF
Переглядів 5 тис.Рік тому
Measuring for Correct Pushrod Length in my SBF
SBF Cylinder Head Options - 289/302 vs 351W vs AFR
Переглядів 17 тис.Рік тому
SBF Cylinder Head Options - 289/302 vs 351W vs AFR
Installing Piston Rings on my Mahle Pistons
Переглядів 475Рік тому
Installing Piston Rings on my Mahle Pistons
Should you install a main girdle on your SBF?
Переглядів 24 тис.Рік тому
Should you install a main girdle on your SBF?
But the internet says that you can't stroke a 289!
Переглядів 53 тис.Рік тому
But the internet says that you can't stroke a 289!
Great video. I like how you take the time to explain things in simple terms. Nice to see this process with an engine on the engine stand in order to get a great view of mounting. Thank you!
Yeah well played. Wanted to know what the big deal was. Makes sense now.
Thanks for watching!
Got mahle rings here, can’t tell which one is top vs bottom. Both same color. One has the dot 3/4 from end the other 1 1/4 from end . Which top or where does the direction of bevel need to orientate. Instructions in box so generic.
It's easy to tell them apart of you have coated top rings, but more challenging if the edges are all the same. The mark on the ring (whether a dot or the Mahle logo) usually goes up, so maybe try and position them like that to see where the bevel lies, then compare that to the pics in the instructions. Mahle's video on rings is here: ua-cam.com/video/QloJ3kjsAyY/v-deo.html
All ford guys should definitely use a girdle..😂
nice. 🤣
ERROR: At 2:25 he mentions the stock stroke is 1.87". it's 2.87"!
Yes, there are a bunch of comments that previously pointed this out. Thanks for watching.
I have a II and did the upper and lower control arm, QA coil over, 500# springs and 1" sway bar. The difference in ride is enormous. Sure the old stuff was worn out, but I also remember what it rode like when it wasn't 45 years old. It rides like butter and handles quite well. Doing this kit is well worth the effort. I need to do strut rod bushings and replace the inner tie rods, but will probably just put in a new rack. Thanks for explaining options with the rack. There is so much Mustang II stuff out there that much of it is not actually for a Mustang II. Is it not a strange echo of engineering to see "Mustang II" parts made better than new?
I'm glad to hear you're happy with your setup. I can't wait to sort out my garage situation so I can get back to work on mine. Thanks for watching!
I like the fuel safe cell but move license plate down to bumper and have the exposed filler cap like the 60's mustang. Or try a similar option using like a Buick Regal tank which mounts from under car and has a rear fill. I have though about this since I have owned a 75 and a 77 couple before. Looking forward to getting a fastback when I retire in a couple of years as a project.
Interesting - I like the idea of moving the plate down to the bumper and using an exposed filler cap like the 60's Mustangs, I'll have to play around and see how that would look. Thanks for the suggestion!
4 places 120 degrees from each if those are right its as good as it will get
Thanks for watching
you put out great content. Example the offset bushing.
Thank you so much!
221, 255,260,289 ,302 and Australian 5.6 HO engines have the same relative deck height . And yes from most engine builders view point stroking even a 302 W is nuts , to short a deck, bad rod angularly and so on , more over there is already a block built for a longer stroke that bolts anywhere " really" a 302 W will , the 351 W and you can stroke that by dropping in a 400 Ford crank , machine a very small amount off the crank snout and it bolts rite in , same bore spacing , same journal diameter. And you get a 408 ci Windsor with a .030 over bore . If stroking the 302W was a good idea don't you think Ford would have saved money in the late 1960s and done it ?? They looked into it and found 1 to short a deck 2 bad rod angularly and 3 that engine was designed to max out at 290 ci when designed and started at 221 ci . So the taller deck , larger main 351W was created . And if you can't find the 3/4 inch to fit a 351w in your 302w fitted car there is something wrong.
Noted - the thousands and thousands of people with 347 strokers are all dummies with motors that are going to blow up due to bad rod angles because you say a 351W will fit in their cars and they just just swap one in. You couldn't be more wrong, and you are exactly the type of person who prompted me to make this video. Lots of people tell me that I'm making too much of this and that no one seriously thinks you shouldn't stroke a 289, but I just refer those poeple to comments like yours.
@billsgarage you are a fool , just dribbling out age old reteric, do some real research , so you have trouble fitting a 351W in a car that came with a 302 W , 3/4 of an inch , wow , may be you should not be building cars hay . If you can't fabricate a fix for such a small difference there is something very wrong . And yes a 347 stroker 302 W is a dog of an engine , sideways rod angularly, a killer in the long term , so much bad engineering sold to unsuspecting people who watch dud engine builders who think they know better than Ford itself , again don't you think Ford would have done it back in 1968/9 , just gone the cheap way and throw a 3.5 inch stroke crank in a 302w save so much money , no look up the hours of testing of the era , they came to the conclusion, a taller bigger block was needed . Again the 289 was the end of the line , they pushed the engineering in using the 3 inch stroke crank , the only thing the 347 has going is today's metallurgy allows a bad idea to live long enough to look like it works ! Lmfao ,
Get your quench right. You will be good.
Definitely! Thanks for watching.
Did you say you spun 8000 rpm with those 289 heads? What kind of distributor setup were you running? *Nice video of your progression
Yup - but I got a lot of valve float and broke some springs even with ARP studs and stud girdles installed! I used an MSD Pro-Billet distributor with that setup.
@ I had a 289 in the early 80’s that wouldn’t spin over 7200 rpm. Now that I look back I wonder why? Head flow, intake flow, valve springs, dual point distributor, running out of fuel.....I guess I can cross off head flow. I needed to spin 7500 rpm to get them 5.43 gears across the finish line without falling off. My 62 Ranchero ran 11.80’s
ALUM conductor of heat Also can dissapate under Conventional Operation.
Yes, aluminum heads definitely dissipate heat better. Thanks for watching.
Thousands of people have done this.
Read through the comments, and you'll see that there are a lot of people violently opposed to the idea. Thanks for watching.
Isnt a 302 just a stroked 289? If you go to 347 you have to clearance the block as far as I know.
Mathematically yes, but in reality no - Ford cast new blocks for the 302, they never produced a 302 with a 289 block. Yes, clearancing is necessary, and is shown in the video.
I have a question and need your opinion. I just had my 302 stroked to 347. I had the shop install the crank pistons and cam. The problem I am having is a significant oil leak that drips off the bell housing. I didn’t check the threaded plugs on the back of the engine before I attached the bell housing and trans. Do you think it could be an unsealed plug? I would hope it’s not the main seal! Thanks!
I wish I had better news, but there are only a few places oil could be coming from - the rear main seal, the threaded oil galley plugs, or the large cam plug. If you have access to a borescope, you might be able to snake it up in there to see what's going on, but at a minimum the transmission & bellhousing will need to come out in order to access the back side of the engine for repairs. I'd suggest finding the problem, documenting it with pics/video, then having a conversation with the shop. We live in a cynical world, but there are still some honest people out there, and if the shop did make a mistake they may be willing to work with you on making it right. Good luck!
@ that’s pretty much my conclusion too. I have my own lift and trans jack so the job is just nuts and bolts! I’ve had the Mustang since 1996, I refreshed the engine once before in 2004. Reused the rotating assembly, new bearings, honed it. New street cam, a friend gave me the manifold, bought an Edelbrock 500cfm…. It ran great until it didn’t.. started knocking and on disassembly I found a broken piston skirt. So as I said, new Eagle crank, sealed power pistons, had to sleeve two cylinders due to a crack. We drove it 2,200 mile on power tour last June, ran great! Thanks for your input!
If it's coming down the outside of the bell housing it's most likely the intake at the china wall
@ nope, the top back of the engine is dry. I built the engine last summer and was very meticulous about proper sealing, thread locker, gaskets etc.
@@paulpruitt2776 someone suggested using the UV dye in the oil to track down the leak, so I may try that! Thanks!
Thank you for your video just answered my question I don't need the extra expense I don't plan on turning my motor over 6,500 RPMs anyway
Great, thanks for watching!
Every resto mod cars run 347 ci and you can buy a 363 ci with an aluminum race block can make more with a lot of money
Thanks for watching
An got a good price tag on them too
Definitely! Thanks for watching!
Comments are great. Great channel, just subscribed.
Awesome, thank you!
Ben Alameida has a great tip for better oil flow on his channel. If you watch this video at the 5;31 mark, there is a cap directly over Bill's hand. Its an inverted v shape cast in the block, which passes oil from one side to the other. Ben says this cap impinges the oil flow and should be installed upside down. If you look at a drawing of oil passages this makes sense. Thank you Bill for this great info! I just watched you video on main girdles, very informative. Thank you.
Yup, I've seen that video. I've never tried it myself, but it definitely makes sense. Thanks for your comments, and thanks for watching!
Thanks, I Joy your channel, I ❤Mustang IIs , Probably because my frist car was a mustang II, I still have the king cobra parts.
Thanks for the kind words, and thanks for watching!!
I LOVE AND APPRECIATE YOUR VIDEO AND LOVE FOR THE GREAT 289 😊❤ I PREFER THE OLD 289S MYSELF AND NEVER MET ONE PERSON WHO HEARD OR FELT MINE RUN THAT DIDN'T HAVE A SMILE EAR TO EAR 💪😎👍🙏😇🇺🇸
Truly they have a sound like no other! Thanks for watching!
Great vid.. glad i found you.. going from 289 cast heads to aluminum i had a concern about the water passage on the aluminum heads.. you cleared it up. Thanks cheers !
Awesome, good luck with yours and thanks for watching!
That’s an awesome engine run stand… ❤ I have been having problems with Carter mechanical pumps putting out too much pressure. Two of them pegged my 15 psi gauges. I have been running Holley carbs. That high pressure pushes past the needle and seats. So I have been running electric fuel pumps.
I had a similar problem - I actually switched over to an electric pump. Glad to hear I'm not the only one. Thanks for watching!
Just the fact that there are "Kits" available should tell you the answer to that books question. If you didn't figure that out yet, you shouldn't touch your engine!
Right? But the kits primarily market themselves as being for 302s so people think the world will end if you use them in a 289. Thanks for watching!
You better., It's the only thing gonna hold that boat anchor together.
Nice. Don't let me keep you from your LS.
Great video, very clear and easy to follow.... thanks for taking the time to help others .
Thank you so much!
what about pre lode
If you measure the pushrods correctly like this, than you just need to install them and set the preload correctly for your cam/lifter combo.
I was an engine machinist for many years. I've installed a lot of these on SBF. The best way to do it is machining the caps for the steel girdle to fit flush. That is also the proper way to install front and rear straps on SBC. It actually makes the cap stronger by putting a flat piece of billet steel over the center of the cap. The steel is less likely to flex than the cast cap in the center, where all of the load is being concentrated. You should remove the spacers for a tight fit against the cap, provided that the caps have been machined (milled) properly and straight. You should also have the align hone done after the girdle is fitted. An SBF is generally good to the 500hp threshold and a girdle won't fix that but it won't hurt anything either. It does help with other issues.
Thanks for sharing your insight, and thanks for watching!
Did you use a dial indicator plate to do this?
No, I used a magnetic base, which you can see in some parts of the video if you look closely. Tremec does the same in their tech videos.
Your video was really good, probably the best I've seen here yet. I just found the biggest positive and negative locations and divided by two. I didn't check it all the way around until after installing the .014 pins. That got me to about 0.003. However, I often wonder what the tolerance for the diameter of the hole is because you can never seem to get exactly right. Hell, what is the tolerance of the dial indicator for that matter? Mine is Chinese, but it did zero out at the 360° rotation. Or even my error considering parallax with a relatively fixed eye position while the gauge is in different positions as the crank turns. I guess I can beat the horse to death with my OCD, but all good points. Anyway, I did like your explanation about OEM trannys not being very finicky because they are for mass production.
Thanks for your comments! I also wonder about the overall accuracy because there are so many variables, but I just try to get ot to the manufacturer's tolerance as best I can and go with it.
This is good to know. I have a 64 289 five bolt I’d like to build up on a few years.
Awesome, good luck with it!
this is the first mention of a girdle or a install Ive ever seen. unless this is a full on dragster then the caps are going no where. however the girdle does looks sewxy on there, maybe you can put a bonnet on the intake.
Maybe you have one I can borrow?
So is it safe to say that the flat side of the connecting rod will face the front side ( marked by a dot or arrow) of the piston??
The flat sides of the connecting rods face each other and the chamfered side faces the crank.
I have seen girdles and new caps made to fit one another. Yup, line bore and hone must be done but it is your engine, do whatever you like.
Thanks for watching
One that you missed was drilling an approximate 1/16" hole in a front galley plug to add lube oil to the timing chain and gears. Also, many if not all late 5.0/302 engines (i.e. '95 up) have tapped front galley holes.
I don't ever drill that hole, I've never seen a timing chain gear wear in any appreciable way regardless of how the engine gets punished. I'd rather have all of the oil go to the lifters. Thanks for watching!
I was waiting for: power/torque curve between 302 VS 351............. Or, 0 to 60 times......... 1/4 miles times to Judge money VS performance gains...................... ; p
Yeah, that's not really my kind of content, I'm just a guy playing around in his garage. There are a ton of dyno videos out there if your curious about what kind of power you can potentially make with each of these heads.
@@billsgarage Did you notice a change when you went from the 302 head to the 351 head? 302 vs 351 vs AFR, is just bate and switch? See, my Hi-po 1965 289 has 280/290 ford motorsport cam, from 1984. Still runs fine. But, we always want more. : ) To be or not to be?................. heads or stroker kit? Bang per buck.
Very good info thanks
Thanks for watching!
My experience, 347 hydraulic roller cam , castiron high ports. And EFI. It went 11.20’s on motor , on 175 went 10.00’s. Made about 15 track passes , lost oil pressure , tore it down only thing visible it actually broke the girdle over by the oil pump. Finished tearing it down , pulled crank out and #3 main crumbled off into the block. It still had cap walk , have built several Shp afternarket block sbf’s , if you making some big power you will still have cap walk. Seen it many times. Only thing I seen my girdle did was save my rotating assembly from being destroyed. Just my opinion.
Yes, if you're going to make big power, you definitely need to look at upgrading to an aftermarket block. A girdle can't eliminate cap walk (nothing can), all it can do is minimize the effect in a stout street/strip application. If you're going racing, you need a better solution. Thanks for your comments!
Very well explained ! I always wonder how long those measurements stay the roughly the same. If you have an engine that puts out 650 'lbs of torque coupled to the bell housing, you would imagine that something would twist a bit in time. Am I off my rockers or kind of on the right track ?
Yes, I wonder the same. I think it almost certainly changes over time, especially with regular abuse. Thanks for watching!
Haha.... 347 stroker range anxiety is kind of funny. This chassis was designed with the 2.3 L 4 that got 23 city and 33 highway. A 347 stroker with a giant cam and heads is pretty much the opposite of what they were thinking. The reason the car sold the way it did was it was a superior option to a sub-compact and got similar mileage. I'm in the same position. I think I'm not getting 10 miles to the gallon. Also, my gas gauge isn't working.
The stock fuel system that I showed was designed for the 302 in 1978, which was rated at 16 city, 21 highway. A mild 347 with fuel injection should be able to get similar numbers, but the total fuel capacity is just too low. My Taurus has an 19-gallon tank, which is about right. It's not anxiety when you're correcting for shortcomings in the design.
Like the pro safe rear fill tank with the pull down license plate idea.
Someone also suggested a Cougar fuel tank with a similar arrangement, but I'm definitely leaning towards a fuel cell.
the 78 Mustang ll I am building my son I cut out the rear spare tire well and surrounding floor, fabricated a square frame with 2"x2" square mild steel tube to fit between the rear frame rails, welded that in and bought a 1967/68 Mercury Cougar gas tank to fit in that opening, also used a 2 1/2" hole saw to cut out for the fill tube to go behind a 67/68 cougar pull down license plate holder and fill neck tube, hole in driver rear quarter is deleted, cougar tank is 16 gallons, mustang ll tank is 13 gallons
you can even upgrade to a 69/70 cougar gas tank with 22 gallons
Chassis connectors
Interesting - this would give me 16 gallons without having to use the aux tank in the wheel well, and I like the idea of the pull-down license plate holder. Thanks for letting me know what worked for you!
Even better!
Working on it - got a set from Stumpy's Fabworks.
I'll tell you like i did another guy they make spacers for those oil pumps on ford 289 and 302 , when you need to use them!!!
Yes, I've seen them, but I've never seen a longer oil pump driveshaft offered. When you space the pump out from the block, you lose the corresponding amount of driveshaft engagement with the pump, weakening the system. You also need to change the geometry of your oil pump pickup, which is a lot of work when compared to a little bit of time with a grinder.
You can purchase aftermarket main caps also , im not a for guy , but if I'm going to build a 347 stroker or bigger cubic inch engines im going to buy and aftermarket bolck , Dart, Blueprint, Speedmaster something that has billet four bolt splayed caps in the center three caps ,
I can't see paying $4,500 for a block when I'm running horsepower numbers that are well within the capability of the stock block to handle. I'm not building a race car, I'm building a fun toy, no need to complicate things with unnecessarily expensive and one-off race car parts.
Great Explanation Thanks!
Glad to help, thanks for watching!
Harrop makes a supercharger kit for the 302 -351that will increase the power to over 700 HP. Not cheap though. 😙
That's a lot of HP to try and put through a stock block!
@@billsgarage True. I think the supercharger kit is for aftermarket blocks. These kits are 7K and up to about 12K each. I have been looking at this kit for my 427 W. But there are some fitment issues when installed in a T bucket. There just is not much space as these are front entrance belt driven superchargers. May have to design a special air inlet that does not look too odd. Plus I need to find a place for the supercharger liquid cooling radiator. Have not figured that out so far.
I own a 74 mustang 2 September 73 build date love it better looking than anything made today
Awesome - I love the longer nose on the '74s. It's only about 3" longer than the '75 - '78s but makes a big difference.
Thank you for this video!!!!!
You're welcome, thanks for watching!