Film for Thought
Film for Thought
  • 15
  • 323 365

Відео

Iron Claw - Meaning, Themes and Ending Explained - Character Analysis Video Essay
Переглядів 1965 місяців тому
Iron Claw is one of my favourite films of 2023 and in this video I analyse the main characters and try to interpret the meaning of the story.
Carl Jung's Collective Unconscious in Dream Scenario Explained.
Переглядів 2,9 тис.6 місяців тому
In this video I analyse Dream Scenario and use Carl Jung's theory of the collective unconscious in order to make sense of everything that happened in the film. The theory of the collective unconscious is often misunderstood and in this video I have explained it how I understand it, if I myself have misunderstood anything or not explained it well enough please leave a comment down below.
American Fiction Explained - Themes and Character Analysis - Video Essay
Переглядів 7 тис.7 місяців тому
In this video I talk about the 2023 film American fiction and about the different topics surrounding the publishing industry highlighted in the film which can be seen as an analogy for today's entertainment industry in general.
Poor Things - Meaning, Themes and Characters Explained
Переглядів 6737 місяців тому
In this video I explore some of the potential meanings and themes we can interpret from the Poor Things film. I also analyse some of the main characters especially Bella Baxter. Please Leave a like if you enjoyed the video.
Infinity Pool - Meaning & Ending Explained
Переглядів 298Рік тому
In this video I compare Infinity Pool to the Original Sin story of Adam and Eve and the garden of Eden.
TAR - I'm for Truth No Matter Who Tells It - Film Explained + Character Analysis
Переглядів 839Рік тому
In this video I explain some of the main ideas of the film TAR and I also analyse Lydia Tar and her motives and behaviour.
Ending Explained & Character Analysis - Triangle of Sadness
Переглядів 80 тис.Рік тому
This is my analysis of the film triangle of sadness let me know what you think in the comments below.
Banshees of Inisherin - Meaning and Ending Explained
Переглядів 221 тис.Рік тому
In this video I share my interpretation of the Banshees of Inisherin film Leave a comment below and let me know what you think.
Palm Springs - Finding Meaning in the Suffering of Existence - What Palm Springs is About - Review
Переглядів 1,2 тис.2 роки тому
In this video I talk about one of my favourite films of 2020 and I analyse something of the themes and meanings of the film whilst mostly focusing on Nyles. Palm Springs Explained.
The Meaning Behind The House 2022 (Netflix) Explained - Analysis Review
Переглядів 1,2 тис.2 роки тому
In this video I explore the possible meanings behind the Netflix animation and answers such questions such as what does the house represent ? Who is Mr Van Schoonbeek ? and why did the cats survive the flood? Please like comment and subscribe
Titane - Meaning Behind the Madness Explained - Analysis Review
Переглядів 5002 роки тому
In this video I talk about one of my favourite films of 2021 and try to interpret the meaning behind this intense film. Ending Explained.
The Power of the Dog - Character Analysis - Characters, Symbols and Ending Explained
Переглядів 1,4 тис.2 роки тому
Hi and welcome to my channel, in this video I analyse Peter and Phil from the film Power of the Dog. Please leave a comment and let me know what you think.
Nightmare Alley - Symbols, Meanings and Ending Explained - Analysis Review -
Переглядів 2,6 тис.2 роки тому
Hi and welcome to my channel where I review films. In this video I take a look at the meanings and symbols in the film Nightmare Alley, let me know what you thought of my interpretations and if there is anything I missed out.
The Northman - Meaning, Symbols and Themes Explained - Film Analysis Review
Переглядів 1,6 тис.2 роки тому
Hi and welcome to my channel where I review films. In this video I take a look at the meanings and symbols in the film The Northman, let me know what you thought of my interpretations and if there is anything I missed out. Also apologies for miss pronouncing Amleth's name during some parts of the video. I also forgot to mention that Amleth was not being truthful when he said he needs to kill hi...

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @kobiiboksireficul
    @kobiiboksireficul 10 днів тому

    Its a War allegory

  • @GabeWilliams
    @GabeWilliams 18 днів тому

    If you’ve ever had a really brash falling out with a close friend, this movie really hit home in a lot of ways. Also, I really enjoyed your take on this. I’ve never heard that Jung quote before, I think I really needed that tbh.

  • @danolsonrightnow
    @danolsonrightnow 27 днів тому

    This… might be what you think, but just imagine how significant stories will be once you start to see what’s actually there…

  • @chungnos
    @chungnos Місяць тому

    That allegory on carl jungs depression and how the sister invites her and leaves unlike paderic was an excellent interperation

  • @shreddhead23
    @shreddhead23 Місяць тому

    😎🙏💯

  • @AWolfMan75
    @AWolfMan75 Місяць тому

    Interesting interpretation. However, were there actual lines from the text to suggest Colm did all this to try and cleverly manipulate Padraic into leaving the island for his own good? Because I don't remember seeing that in the film at all.

  • @roentgen571
    @roentgen571 2 місяці тому

    Excellent analysis of an excellent film. I kind of felt bad for how it was advertised in the USA--as a comedy, which probably led to a lot of people going to it and then telling their friends it wasn't as funny as the commercials made it out to be. That's not how it was meant to be seen, as your criticism shows. It's a deep film, with a lot of stuff to say.

  • @cbgaming08
    @cbgaming08 2 місяці тому

    1. Isolation and loneliness: The film explores the profound effects of isolation on a small Irish island, reflecting broader themes of human connection and loneliness. 2. The nature of friendship: It questions what constitutes a meaningful relationship and the impact of suddenly ending a long-standing friendship. 3. Civil war allegory: The conflict between the two main characters can be seen as a metaphor for the Irish Civil War, with its seemingly senseless division and self-destructive nature. 4. Existential crisis: Colm's sudden decision to end the friendship stems from a fear of being forgotten and a desire to create something lasting, reflecting on the human need for purpose and legacy. 5. Consequences of stubbornness: The film shows how pride and an unwillingness to compromise can lead to devastating outcomes. 6. The role of art in life: It explores the tension between the pursuit of art and maintaining human connections.

  • @nosickl
    @nosickl 2 місяці тому

    After I was done watching this movie, It felt like a waste of time because I failed to interpret the plot properly. That is why I am so gratefull for your review. Thank you for showing me a real point of view regarding the meaning of the film. This is far more statisfying than those who claim the relationship between the characters is an allegory for the war between the Irish.

  • @stevesmith4901
    @stevesmith4901 4 місяці тому

    But what about Dominic? What was his life and death about?

  • @Sierra-Whiskey22
    @Sierra-Whiskey22 4 місяці тому

    Their pets are represetations of themselves. Pádraic is the kind but dimwitted donkey, Colm is the intelligent and loyal border collie.

  • @elizabethfox751
    @elizabethfox751 4 місяці тому

    Promo-SM

  • @ingGS
    @ingGS 5 місяців тому

    The dialogue between Peter and Rose (his mother) when she says: “It is just another man”, leads me to believe Peter killed his biological father. In the book it is explained that his father was an alcoholic that abused Rose repeatedly.

  • @theascendunt9960
    @theascendunt9960 5 місяців тому

    This movie was one of the best movies I have seen that provokes your thoughts. Even though it's a romcom, it was hitting in all the right/wrong places in me with the existential questions it was presenting.

  • @wisdom9288
    @wisdom9288 5 місяців тому

    such a good explaination how did u learn it did u read the book?

  • @JJs_playground
    @JJs_playground 5 місяців тому

    Was Dimitri married to 2 women?

  • @angelabrooke5059
    @angelabrooke5059 5 місяців тому

    Do you understand what "irony " means ?

  • @SonOfUberTuber66
    @SonOfUberTuber66 5 місяців тому

    Good review. It was indeed one of the best films of 2023, underrated.

  • @JokerInk-CustomBuilds
    @JokerInk-CustomBuilds 5 місяців тому

    on a psychological level the movie was fine.... but after watching it I learned it was a comment about Cotholic/protestant history and that felt so pointless. It almost seems like a disconnected theme or at least a stretch to put that whole debacle onto it...

  • @KeyforChange
    @KeyforChange 6 місяців тому

    Get paid and compromise your integrity

    • @JayBelafonte
      @JayBelafonte 3 місяці тому

      You also perpetuate and promote negative stereotypes, which is the mission.

  • @KeyforChange
    @KeyforChange 6 місяців тому

    Depth work is a problem of our cultural and political times

  • @KeyforChange
    @KeyforChange 6 місяців тому

    Low level entertainment... the zeitgeist of our time. Great analysis.

  • @jeronimorubim
    @jeronimorubim 6 місяців тому

    Good points, especially diving deeper on the issue the stereotypical dramatization of black people

  • @C4ProductionsSD
    @C4ProductionsSD 6 місяців тому

    One thing that I thought the film got wrong is that it's actually quite hard to produce something extremely popular, perhaps much more difficult than to appeal strongly to a few.

    • @leafyishereisdumbnameakath4259
      @leafyishereisdumbnameakath4259 6 місяців тому

      Can you explain how the book shows this?

    • @C4ProductionsSD
      @C4ProductionsSD 6 місяців тому

      @@leafyishereisdumbnameakath4259 haven’t read it but I supposed that the film is based on the book and if it is the case both are wrong. Pareto distribution makes it very hard for artists to get into the spotlight.

    • @leafyishereisdumbnameakath4259
      @leafyishereisdumbnameakath4259 6 місяців тому

      @@C4ProductionsSD what's pareto

  • @bodalix18
    @bodalix18 6 місяців тому

    Wonderful interpretation. I wish I had a counter but maybe after a rewatch.

  • @gyaza23
    @gyaza23 6 місяців тому

    brilliant analysis.

  • @WyantWin
    @WyantWin 6 місяців тому

    The Russian lady barfing and shiting was so real and gross

  • @velcro-is-a-rip-off
    @velcro-is-a-rip-off 6 місяців тому

    Gross. Very incel driven perspective. Hopefully you've grown up.

  • @Riles51
    @Riles51 6 місяців тому

    donkey also showcases they no longer solely rely on Abigail to provide, so when she comes back she’ll be less powerful

  • @EarlofSedgewick
    @EarlofSedgewick 6 місяців тому

    I disagree a little bit about characterising Sintaro Golden's defense of her book as hypocritical. You left out that she explains her book is heavily researched, with some dialogue being directly lifted from recorded tapes of actual conversations. This represents a fundamental, if subtle, difference in the nature of her book from the "Stagg R. Leigh" fabrication. Monk even admits that he hasn't read the entirety of her book during this scene, and is therefore judging the marketing of it rather than the book itself. This conversation parallels the one he has with his brother throughout the film. In both, Monk is confronted with the accusatory idea that he is sneering at people because they don't share his values/standards, that there is a right and a wrong way to behave. This belief in the existence of a measurable, qualitative standard between people based on their behaviour, their speech, their lives, is precisely what kept his father alienated from meaningful relationships, and is what shrinks Monk's relationships throughout the film. Her defense of her book is really the only point where the two major plots cross over and inform one another, which is why I am writing such a long response. By the actual ending, Monk has accepted himself, his brother, and the world, despite disagreeing with its ugly nonsense. The two drive away together out of the drab, dull canvases of the movie studios walls into the comparatively green and vibrant city park beyond, something that isn't quite wild, but isnt an entirely manufactured reality either. And yet, the studios still loom large in the foreground, obscuring what is actually happening in the world. It's an invitation/challenge for people to connect with their own families and worlds outside of entertainment, and to ignore the intrusions of manufactured stories. What do you guys think?

    • @C4ProductionsSD
      @C4ProductionsSD 6 місяців тому

      I believe that his conversation with Sinatra, where she implied that the notion of potential suggests inadequacy, prompted him to realize his own self-absorbed attitude and snobbery. Rather than grasping market demands or people's desires, he has been preoccupied with fulfilling his own intellectual artistic vision. That’s why he felt guilt and try to reconnect with his ex-girlfriend. Ultimately artists are here to provide value for others and not by intellectualizing and self-flagellating. Greatness is determined by service.

    • @Harsh12351
      @Harsh12351 5 місяців тому

      Yet her last argument is trash. Potential does NOT mean you're good enough. Potential means the ability to be better which is the best example of the human experience. For example let's say I am really good at my job but there is something unfurling in my life. I don't know what. But I am really good at it. Now people can realise the missing thing, but not many people have the ability to project themselves out of their body and have out of the body experience. This is where other people come in. Because people have the hardest time knowing their potential, they might be able to see it in others. And this is what has changed lives for the many. Be it a coach recognising a football player or an agent recognising a handsome but poor guy working at 7/11. The Potential is about change. Similarly yes Black people are doing well. Yes all the problems in the movie are a reality. But it's also a fact many black people have succumbed to victim mentality and the violence of culture also consumes the black lives the most. Black people could be winning nobel prizes, being top CEOs etc and in larger number etc. ETC. THIS IS WHAT THE POTENTIAL MONK IS TALKING ABOUT. It's just that he hasn't found a way to voice this.

    • @C4ProductionsSD
      @C4ProductionsSD 5 місяців тому

      @@Harsh12351 Given the fact that by nature not everybody can have a high end career or do something exceptional. (For example part of the population doesn’t have enough IQ to get a job) one have to acknowledge that and be tolerant and kind towards the majority of people who aren’t born to be special in the first place.

    • @EarlofSedgewick
      @EarlofSedgewick 5 місяців тому

      @@Harsh12351 just quickly, it's weird that I mostly get notified by UA-cam when there is a conflicting comment. I don't get notified nearly as often when there is assent or appreciation. Anyone else notice that? I agree that there is a difference between potential and actual, and it isn't crazy or awful to notice it. But with potential comes judgement: did you meet your potential, or did you fail to live up to it? Who sets that delta, that gap between actual and potential - who judges success? I think a good mentor will strive to teach their mentees how to take charge of that judgement for themselves. Monk wasn't doing that at all in his life, and neither was his father. Without that reaching out, there's no connection; without connection, there is no trust. Without trust, how can a person follow the judgements of another? I think Monk, as many youngest siblings do, competed with his older siblings and wanted to supersede them at some level, so he pleased his parents. But he never took ownership of himself, of who he was. I think he was the least free person in the story because he had this rigid notion of "do these things -> get reward" driving most of his interactions. When Santoro's book was successful, it didn't fit - that's bad art! But what he missed (and never investigated) was its truthfulness for others outside himself. It is a pattern he repeated with his girlfriend, his sister and his brother (seemingly the whole world). I identified with this because I was like Monk, and still am in a lot of ways. I joined the army and became a Captain by 24, and was out by 29. I failed because I didn't know myself, and I was judging myself and my peers against some imaginary rubric of perfection I had conjured up as possible. My potential. If I had understood my actual, instead of only my potential, I wouldn't have burnt myself out trying to be perfect. I probably would have found a sustainable role within the organisation. There's a grave at Beny-sur-mer in France that reads "He has done what he could." I think that has always been a paradox. It can only ever be ascribed to you with accuracy once you are dead, and at that point it doesn't matter what else you might have done, you have now done all you could. I think this movie has a nice, subtle way of painting the nuances and difficulties of this quandary, and the different reactions to this scene is at the heart of exploring it.

    • @Harsh12351
      @Harsh12351 5 місяців тому

      @@C4ProductionsSD is Picasso remembered for his service? Greatness is determined by impact. Sheer astonishment at the no of or scale of accomplishments. Service to the public may or not be part of that.

  • @kevinfisher9096
    @kevinfisher9096 6 місяців тому

    Great analysis I couldn't agree more

  • @goobyaluob
    @goobyaluob 6 місяців тому

    I absolutely agree with the analogies to the Irish Civil War, but I also loved how you commented on the selflessness of Colm’s decision to push Paidrac away. It seems insane, but his self mutilation in the face of his desire to play music shows that this decision to cut ties with Padraic is not for Colm’s benefit, but for Padraic’s. He cares for Padraic and there may be some jealousy about Padraic’s youth, but him not wanting Padraic to end up like him totally fits with Colm’s actions throughout the film, and it’s unfortunate that one of the consequences of his choices (Jenny’s death) is what pushes Padraic over the edge and causes them to become enemies. By the end, Colm seems to want to go back to being friends, seemingly giving up on saving his friend from becoming like the rest of the island, recognizing that he has joined them in bitterness, but it is too late to change how Padraic feels. Truly tragic, and Dominic’s suicide is just the cherry on top. Incredible film.

  • @raycar9827
    @raycar9827 6 місяців тому

    The success of the book wasn't due to white guilt it's to reinforce stereotypes and racism.

  • @Magic-mushrooms113
    @Magic-mushrooms113 6 місяців тому

    Freud thought there was no need for Jung’s idea of a collective unconscious , that the unconscious is collective anyhow, “a general possession of mankind”. But Jung’s archetypes should not become stereotypes that separates people into categories that is attached to someone’s worth. I don’t like this at all. Using the archetypes to study film or literature is fine. But why is America fixated on this stereotype of the loser? There are just people with different ways of being in the world.

    • @ryanseddon4800
      @ryanseddon4800 6 місяців тому

      You have nailed the problem to the board for all to see.

  • @GreenMan42O
    @GreenMan42O 6 місяців тому

    We are all equal under the similar circumstances

  • @twinciris_358
    @twinciris_358 6 місяців тому

    Great review and thoughts!

  • @JohnFlynn-p3i
    @JohnFlynn-p3i 7 місяців тому

    It’s definitely Civil War. The policeman represents British Rule. In the War of Independence the Irish fought side by side but after independence they split and fought each other over whether to fight on for a full united ireland or accept loosing the 6 counties of Northern Ireland (pro treaty and anti treaty sides). The self mutilation represents the harm they did to themselves and Ireland or possibly the fingers represent the 6 counties lost to the UK at the end. In the end pro treaty forces won and defeated anti treaty forces. They shelled the four courts in Dublin while anti treaty forces where within burning it which obviously represents burning the house. In the end the civil war ended resulting in life going back to normal with friend and families hating each other and not talking yet having to live with each other in the same places all over Ireland. His sister I would assume represents those who left for America for a new life leaving the strife behind.

  • @FromTheHood2TheWoods
    @FromTheHood2TheWoods 7 місяців тому

    Great breakdown. Thank you

  • @MAC-gb6im
    @MAC-gb6im 7 місяців тому

    I think you are spot on. I didn't know what to make of it other than the film I like Bruges** I'm gonna watch another explanation video now but I really do like your explanation pal

  • @heroofthyme4237
    @heroofthyme4237 7 місяців тому

    We know at the end it was actually Yaya that rejected wealthy men when presented to her. Unlike Carl, who would rather manipulate someone for his own survival

  • @meri_tatiana
    @meri_tatiana 7 місяців тому

    Mmm this take was no bueno

  • @carlissaneumann8133
    @carlissaneumann8133 7 місяців тому

    Thank you for this interpretation, I was really confused during this whole movie and I did not understand what it was trying to say. This made it make more sense and gave me a lot more to think about.

  • @glennlafaye8895
    @glennlafaye8895 7 місяців тому

    Pádraic represented the depression of Colm and of Padraic's sister. Padraic WAS depression in the film. When he kept speaking to Colm, Colm would cut his fingers off. When Padraic's sister left, in order to be with Padraic she would have to return to the town. She had left her depression behind.

  • @Reversion1970
    @Reversion1970 8 місяців тому

    Thanks for posting this. At first I thought what you said Colm's attitude towards Padraic being due to Colm wanting Padraic to make something of himself and leave the island, a bit of a stretch. I mean.. possibly, but where is the evidence. But yes there are a couple indications this might be the case ie; the few cryptic and almost unspoken interactions between Colm and Siobhan is evidence of that. Good take!

  • @matthewmurphy2624
    @matthewmurphy2624 8 місяців тому

    I think the most enthralling scene in the movie was that in which siobhan was peering into the lake, while the old woman - representing suicide, edged her on. We can only assume had it not been for dominic, that would have been the end of siobhans life. In a way, dominic saved her life by professing his feelings towards her showing that its not always lonely, but she had other plans and didnt feel the same for him which crushed him and destroyed any hope he had of ever finding love. The phrase "well there goes that dream" is symbolic as it was the only thing that he cared about and it was taken away from him in an instant. While seemingly looking up to siobhan and her pursuit of her dreams, he tried to follow in her footsteps and push on with his own ambitions, but ultimately it was her, his love that caused his death. By attempting to achieve happiness with someone he loved, he was pushed away and led him to commit suicide, all while it was the same interaction that caused siobhan not to end her life and journey to the mainland and follow her dreams. Siobhan will probably never hear of dominics death, showing how he sacraficed his memory/legacy to give someone else an opportunity at happiness.

    • @ethernaut.3175
      @ethernaut.3175 6 місяців тому

      We see that the old lady was calling onto Siobhan, but maybe it was Dominic who was being called. He took the call, confessed his feelings, was defeated, and suicided.

    • @gismosfinalform2031
      @gismosfinalform2031 4 місяці тому

      ​@@ethernaut.3175 Yes, this is how I interpreted the scene as well. Dominic appears from right behind her, in the same direction where the old lady was gesturing

  • @jessicahannigan2858
    @jessicahannigan2858 8 місяців тому

    Yer man can't even pronounce the names in the film nevermind interpret the meaning!

  • @hallaja8338
    @hallaja8338 8 місяців тому

    Oh my you are clueless on SO MANY POINTS 🤦

  • @rob162100
    @rob162100 8 місяців тому

    It's about the civil war

  • @TokyoBlue587
    @TokyoBlue587 9 місяців тому

    I would rather have watched a movie about the Irish Civil War, than a long slow depressing film that’s an allegory of that war. The cinematography and acting were great but I honestly hated the story.

  • @Mlogan11
    @Mlogan11 9 місяців тому

    At the end, I don't think the alcohol was tainted yet. The plan is to get them started, then taint it later after they were on the job, not before so they will go all in and be a real geek. One thing has me thinking. His father wound up changing his life from being drunk and became a teetotaler and religious. Stan rejected that life and his fathers attempt at redemption and found himself going down his fathers original dark path. His end came when he thought he could play Lilith, but she played him instead.