Rarity7 Coins & Currency
Rarity7 Coins & Currency
  • 3
  • 11 672
Rare Coin CAC Submission LIVE Reveal: The Sequel [October 2024]
We're back for more! I submitted another 41 coins to CAC, didn't check the results, opened the boxes live on camera, and got specific feedback from CAC on why the ones that didn't pass, didn't pass. This was originally recorded on October 4, 2024 and streamed on Instagram.
See all coins & currency we have for sale:
rarity7.com
Follow Noah on Instagram (so you can catch the next one live):
numismattack
Follow Rarity7 on Instagram:
rarity7coins
Email Noah directly, anytime:
noah@rarity7.com
==Links to Coins Featured in this Video==
1894/1894 Indian 1c PCGS MS65 - [Not our coin]
1869 Seated $1 NGC PR63 - rarity7.com/i/o7GI
1882 Trade $1 NGC PR63 - [Sold]
1889-CC Morgan Dollar PCGS AU53 - [Sold]
1912 $10 Indian PCGS MS64+ - rarity7.com/i/Nko4
1916 Mercury 10c PCGS MS64FB - rarity7.com/i/7NWU
1916 Mercury 10c PCGS MS65FB - [Sold]
1916-S Mercury 10c PCGS MS65FB - rarity7.com/i/FudE
1926-S Mercury 10c PCGS XF45 - rarity7.com/i/Mg3I
1921 SLQ PCGS XF40 - rarity7.com/i/PrzQ
1824 Capped Bust 50c PCGS AU50 - [Sold]
1876 Seated 50c PCGS MS63 - [Sold]
1913 Barber 50c PCGS AU55 - rarity7.com/i/oAiD
1875-CC Trade $1 PCGS XF45 - [Sold]
1875-CC Trade $1 Chopmarked PCGS MS61 [Not our coin]
1885-CC Morgan $1 PCGS VF25 - [Sold]
1926 Peace $1 PCGS MS64 - [NFS...yet.]
1927-D Peace $1 PCGS MS64 - [NFS...yet.]
1935 Peace $1 PCGS MS65 - rarity7.com/i/U7Nd
1934-D Oregon 50c PCGS MS65 - [Sold]
1915-S Pan Pac 50c NGC MS63 - [Sold]
1834 Classic Head 1/2c PCGS AU58 - [Sold]
1857 Flying Eagle 1c PCGS AU58 OGH - rarity7.com/i/fMKX
1857 Flying Eagle 1c NGC MS65 - rarity7.com/i/Pr6k
1877 Indian 1c PCGS F12 - rarity7.com/i/7keP
1877 Indian 1c PCGS XF40 OGH - [Sold]
1891 Indian 1c PCGS MS65+ RD - [Sold]
1900 Indian 1c PCGS MS64 RD - [Sold]
1905 Indian 1c PCGS MS66 RD - [Not our coin]
1909-S VDB Lincoln 1c PCGS XF45 - rarity7.com/i/ZWcg
1916-D Lincoln 1c PCGS MS65 BN - [Not our coin]
1862 3CS PCGS MS64 - [Sold]
1878 Shield 5c NGC PR65 - rarity7.com/i/u0Qo
1918 Buffalo 5c PCGS MS64 - [Sold]
1928 Buffalo 5c PCGS MS64 - [Sold]
1937 Buffalo 5c PCGS PR66 - rarity7.com/i/ymvu
1937-D 3 Legs Buffalo 5c PCGS AU50 OGH - [Sold]
1827 Capped Bust 10c PCGS VF20 - [Sold]
1837 Seated 10c No Stars PCGS XF45 - rarity7.com/i/drhT
1875-CC 20c PCGS F15 - rarity7.com/i/YXir
1932-S Washington 25c PCGS AU55 - rarity7.com/i/BGC6
1891 Seated 25c PCGS MS66+ - rarity7.com/i/m8Lp
==Chapters==
0:00 Introduction
2:16 1894/1894 Indian Cent PCGS MS65
3:50 1869 Seated $1 NGC PR63
7:01 1882 Trade $1 NGC PR63
8:10 1889-CC Morgan $1 PCGS AU53
10:21 1912 $10 Indian PCGS MS64+
13:14 1916 Mercury 10c PCGS MS64FB
14:37 1916 Mercury 10c PCGS MS65FB
16:03 1916-S Mercury 10c PCGS MS65FB
17:06 1926-S Mercury 10c PCGS XF45
18:17 1921 SLQ PCGS XF40
19:06 1824 Capped Bust 50c PCGS AU50
20:41 1876 Seated 50c PCGS MS63
22:33 1913 Barber 50c PCGS AU55
23:30 1875-CC Trade $1 PCGS XF45
24:30 1875-CC Trade $1 Chopmarked PCGS MS61
26:00 1885-CC Morgan $1 PCGS VF25
27:47 1926 Peace $1 PCGS MS64
31:00 1927-D Peace $1 PCGS MS64
32:33 1935 Peace $1 PCGS MS65
33:38 1934-D Oregon 50c PCGS MS65
34:49 1915-S Pan Pac 50c NGC MS63
35:57 1834 Classic Head 1/2c PCGS AU58
37:08 1857 Flying Eagle 1c PCGS AU58 OGH
38:55 1857 Flying Eagle 1c NGC MS65
40:07 1877 Indian 1c PCGS F12
41:27 1877 Indian 1c PCGS XF40 OGH
42:46 1891 Indian 1c PCGS MS65+ RD
43:59 1900 Indian 1c PCGS MS64 RD
44:39 1905 Indian 1c PCGS MS66 RD
45:30 1909-S VDB Lincoln 1c PCGS XF45
46:16 1916-D Lincoln 1c PCGS MS65 BN
47:14 1862 3CS PCGS MS64
48:30 1878 Shield 5c NGC PR65
49:32 1918 Buffalo 5c PCGS MS64
50:25 1928 Buffalo 5c PCGS MS64
51:26 1937 Buffalo 5c PCGS PR66
52:41 1937-D 3 Legs Buffalo 5c PCGS AU50 OGH
53:50 1827 Capped Bust 10c PCGS VF20
54:23 1837 Seated 10c No Stars PCGS XF45
55:39 1875-CC 20c PCGS F15
57:06 1932-S Washington 25c PCGS AU55
58:00 1891 Seated 25c PCGS MS66+
Переглядів: 3 399

Відео

$100,000 Rare Coin CAC Submission LIVE Reveal [July 2024]
Переглядів 7 тис.2 місяці тому
I submitted dozens of PCGS & NGC coins to CAC and didn't check the results beforehand (like some sort of animal!). It's just more fun to open that box and see the results & reactions live. This was originally recorded on July 26, 2024 and streamed on Instagram. See all coins & currency we have for sale: rarity7.com Follow Noah on Instagram: numismattack Follow Rarity7 on Instagram...
$80,000 Gold Nugget Stolen [FULL SECURITY FOOTAGE]
Переглядів 1,3 тис.6 місяців тому
On June 6, 2024, a gold nugget worth $80,000 was stolen from Bob Campbell aka All About Coins, a well-known and highly respected dealer exhibiting at the Long Beach Expo. My company, Rarity7, had a booth across the way from Bob's, and our security cameras caught the entire theft. Bob has offered a $10,000 reward to anyone who helps catch the thief. Do you recognize him or his accomplices? Ping ...

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @scottcol23
    @scottcol23 13 годин тому

    Just found your channel, I love these videos! Subscribed so I won't miss any new uploads . Greetings from New Orleans!

    • @Rarity7Coins
      @Rarity7Coins 4 години тому

      Awesome!! Thanks for the kind words -- greetings from the west coast! More to come soon...

  • @tylernathan7985
    @tylernathan7985 7 днів тому

    Underlying motive behind all these grading videos is to show the customers how much you have got over on someone that you can send a coin off for a shirt on of money and then make hundreds or thousands because dealers are Fuxking liars and ShItbirds

  • @insertnamehere5577
    @insertnamehere5577 8 днів тому

    Of all the grading companies it’s certainly true that cac is the more critical. With that, I think that previously cac’d 65 to pcgs 64 is an interesting outcome. If I had to guess, despite generally being very conservative in their grades--perhaps seeing it again had them agreeing with pcgs’s grade after another looky see. Sort of like seeing his notes indicating why your submissions didn’t cac sticker and when you reviewed a little closer. Then said “yeah, I can see now why it went that way”. I think the same applies to that specific coin. Which is kind of cool to see an acceptance of getting it slightly wrong versus just nonchalantly placing a gold bean on it “just because”.

    • @insertnamehere5577
      @insertnamehere5577 8 днів тому

      Also, thank youuuu for these videos. An absolute awesome educational ride to help decide what to send for beans and take just another minute or two to find that one thing that may save a submission lol

  • @insertnamehere5577
    @insertnamehere5577 8 днів тому

    The format in which you do this is crazy beneficial for any watchers. The ability to see the before and after, explaining why you submitted or gambled sending, and then seeing the results sets up a little more success for everyone. Thank you for this fantastically put together video.

    • @Rarity7Coins
      @Rarity7Coins 8 днів тому

      Thank you so much for the kind words!!

  • @Kenlydford
    @Kenlydford 13 днів тому

    Uh ohh, I have a 1882 pf gem from MMV. It does have a bit of the “electric blue” but it does have a semi cameo look.. Anyway, just found your channel 👍

  • @linneisenhower2571
    @linneisenhower2571 16 днів тому

    You have amazing photography - camera and lighting. Would you describe for us ?

  • @jeremysmith3522
    @jeremysmith3522 23 дні тому

    Great content! It is super educational for a newbie such as myself. 💥💥💥🥊

  • @jeremysmith3522
    @jeremysmith3522 23 дні тому

    That 67 Mercury Dime is fire ! 🔥 I love it. Those might just be my favorite coin ever.

  • @patrickwolf6879
    @patrickwolf6879 28 днів тому

    What is your instagram?

  • @NumismaticStacker-z8x
    @NumismaticStacker-z8x 29 днів тому

    Great coins! I just subbed! I do VAM'S on my channel. Wonderful numismatics here and lots of great feedback

  • @brucebuckeye
    @brucebuckeye Місяць тому

    I was expecting to see a comment like "Overgraded". Instead it was "scratch/cleaning/PVC" etc. But I should assume that these were sent in by you and your buds who definitely knows their stuff and were cherry picked already. Anyhow, like I said in my previous comment, it was refreshing and very insightful to know why something didn't make the mark. I wish this kind of feedback was standard.

  • @brucebuckeye
    @brucebuckeye Місяць тому

    Fascinating. I think that a simple explanation goes a long way to make us all smarter collectors. I wish that grading companies would provide info like this, as to why it made a grade, and not the next. Video was well done with care. Thanks so much!

  • @simonquigg2745
    @simonquigg2745 Місяць тому

    What do you use for your camera setup?

    • @Rarity7Coins
      @Rarity7Coins Місяць тому

      Two Panasonic Lumix GH5 MK2s (one for the main cam, one for CoinCam). Main cam uses a Leica 10-25mm F1.7 lens, CoinCam uses a Leica 9mm F1.7 lens. I chose the Panasonic basically because it's a great camera, handles 4K60p video easily, and is reasonably priced. Everything else in that price range that I looked at (Canon & Nikon in particular) had tradeoffs that made them not ideal for video OR were way more expensive.

  • @andrewnelson-wy7pl
    @andrewnelson-wy7pl Місяць тому

    Fantastic video other UA-camrs aren’t even close. I don’t think anyone provides nearly as much good content or commentary on slabbed coins.

    • @Rarity7Coins
      @Rarity7Coins Місяць тому

      Thank you so much for the support and kind words!

  • @RetroHabit82
    @RetroHabit82 Місяць тому

    My last CAC sub came back with one red sticker for PVC unfortunately

    • @Rarity7Coins
      @Rarity7Coins Місяць тому

      Depending on the coin / holder / value, you might want to consider a restoration. When you get a PVC sticker that sometimes (not always) means the coin is all there but for the PVC.

  • @MichaelC_22
    @MichaelC_22 Місяць тому

    Very informative and some big boy coins for sure. I wish I would have gotten notes from the 4 coins I submitted in which none stickered. I assume with no notes, he just thought they were either not choice for the grade or overgraded.

    • @Rarity7Coins
      @Rarity7Coins Місяць тому

      It’s one of two things - either he doesn’t agree with the grade (eg overgraded) or the coin has a problem (under CAC standards) - eg old cleaning, too big a scratch, repair, etc.

  • @Nicolaschefusfr
    @Nicolaschefusfr Місяць тому

    Very amazing content,it’s always nice to learn from the best. Thanks you for taking the time to create those videos.

    • @Rarity7Coins
      @Rarity7Coins Місяць тому

      My pleasure! Thanks for the kind words ❤❤

  • @barnesmultimedia2725
    @barnesmultimedia2725 Місяць тому

    You found the perfect way to do CAC reveals. Very educational and fun content.

    • @Rarity7Coins
      @Rarity7Coins Місяць тому

      Thanks for the kind words! ❤

  • @BlueRidgeSilverhound
    @BlueRidgeSilverhound Місяць тому

    Man, been looking forward to your next CAC sticker upload. It was nice to meet you at the Sacramento show. Thank you for your tutelage and all the best on your future submissions!

  • @Catbertcat
    @Catbertcat Місяць тому

    Noah - great that you are sharing this knowledge to all. This is good for the hobby and that JA is willing to participate with you. Big thanks and looking forward to seeing you at FUN.

  • @brentstraddle1462
    @brentstraddle1462 Місяць тому

    This is cool. Thank you for sharing!

  • @EricBynog-zd4rd
    @EricBynog-zd4rd Місяць тому

    Hood up it was in a NGC 65 holder but goes to pcgs comes back a 65+ thought ngc over grades coins

  • @EricBynog-zd4rd
    @EricBynog-zd4rd Місяць тому

    The one sided view on NGC is dumb the 65 was close and I find most NGC coins are fairly graded where I find issue with NGC is in old cleanings etc or grading coin that should maybe in detail holder but they give it AU grade

    • @Rarity7Coins
      @Rarity7Coins Місяць тому

      There's no one-sided view -- no grade is perfect or singular. That's the biggest thing to learn about grading: All coins have multiple grades at any time. Sometimes details grades are right, sometimes they're wrong, and sometimes they're both right and wrong :)

  • @EricBynog-zd4rd
    @EricBynog-zd4rd Місяць тому

    What is the big hang up with the OGH if a coin has PVC it will damage the coin in long run which is not very good for business as a coin person you should crack and restore but your lack of awareness is very alarming for your customers the fact you would rather keep a coin in a AU58 OGH holder versus cracking and restoring coin and preserving the coin for future over well I may lose a dollar because I bought the coin in a OGH is crazy makes me very nervous to ever buy a coin from you

    • @Rarity7Coins
      @Rarity7Coins Місяць тому

      "As a coin person you should crack and restore" - No, sorry I respectfully disagree. OGH holders are very collectible as a part of coin history and many folks enjoy seeing the coins in the original slabs they were encased in from 30+ years ago (same with rattlers). There are of course certain examples where a spot of "live" damage (Verdigris aka copper acetate) will start to spread, but in most cases it's just not something to worry too much about. Of course you are always entitled to do / restore / crack / whatever to the coins you own. But there's no universal rule in play here.

  • @EricBynog-zd4rd
    @EricBynog-zd4rd Місяць тому

    Noah now this is where I have a big issue with the gold Indian I can’t understand why a person would crack that coin in a 64 cac pcgs holder and send it back to pcgs but the real issue is you got John’s real opinion but was not happy with the results because it went backwards so my issue is in calling to get John rethink his opinion but if I am correct you sent it in saying it came out of 64 cac holder but John’s honest opinion was that coin was a 63+ not a 64 if that were my coin I would not want the sticker on there unless John thought it deserved it

    • @Rarity7Coins
      @Rarity7Coins Місяць тому

      There's no one "real" opinion -- it's really important to understand that all coins (and yes, I mean ALL coins) have multiple grades at any given time. One day you might say 65, another day you might think 64+, and another day you might think 65+. And a different person might think the same/different. So don't get hung up on one specific grading event. I don't blame any person for changing their opinion with different viewings - it's part of the process and how it happens. PCGS thought the $10 Indian was 64 at one point and 64+ at another point and I wouldn't be surprised if a grader might think 63+. Same with CAC -- 63+, 64, 64+ -- it's all on a continuum. Grading is a VERY inexact science/art - it's just all part of the process.

  • @RoshellSmith-b6t
    @RoshellSmith-b6t Місяць тому

    Hi i watch u from barbados all the time how can pcgs give u a straight great n cac says different they grade hard

    • @Rarity7Coins
      @Rarity7Coins Місяць тому

      CAC has tougher standards than PCGS or NGC on certain coins and that's a good thing for collectors. They want to sticker/holder only the best of the best. Doesn't mean that a non-CAC coin is bad -- just that the CAC coins are premium for the grade and the highest quality.

  • @bobstrom2967
    @bobstrom2967 Місяць тому

    What a wonderful learning opportunity. Thanks so much for sharing!

  • @shoeless1137
    @shoeless1137 Місяць тому

    Chiming in I have a proof 1878 quarter that has a green bean and has a lot of hairlines It is a 62CAM so maybe at the 62 level John is okay with hairlines but just figured I’d add my experience

  • @CoinCollecter-uh1uw
    @CoinCollecter-uh1uw Місяць тому

    So they put a green sticker on it as a 64 but then thought it was a 63+ XD

    • @Rarity7Coins
      @Rarity7Coins Місяць тому

      Grading is a continuum and all coins have multiple grades. I don't blame them or anyone else for having different opinions at different times. Until we're all grading with AI, humans have opinions that change and grading is more art than science. PCGS thought 64 and 64+, and CAC thought 63+ and 64 at different times. Perfectly within reason and part of the process.

    • @CoinCollecter-uh1uw
      @CoinCollecter-uh1uw Місяць тому

      @ I definitely agree it was just funny

  • @donaldpfeffer8231
    @donaldpfeffer8231 Місяць тому

    Proof 63 looks like pf65 awsome coin

  • @billmason533
    @billmason533 Місяць тому

    Great video. Spoke with you today at Baltimore show. Great type collection you picked up!

  • @CindyPlatts
    @CindyPlatts Місяць тому

    Love these videos very informative. It helps me to look more critically which will be of benefit in the future. Thanks

    • @Rarity7Coins
      @Rarity7Coins Місяць тому

      Great to hear! Thanks for watching and for the nice feedback.

  • @kevinhoock9742
    @kevinhoock9742 Місяць тому

    Enjoyed the video. What under au grade wasn't cleaned at some point in it's life...

  • @buildingAbiz
    @buildingAbiz Місяць тому

    This is quickly becoming my favorites coin videos to watch!!

  • @kevingalusha2210
    @kevingalusha2210 Місяць тому

    Entertaining as always!

  • @woodandsteel3040
    @woodandsteel3040 Місяць тому

    Great video! Helped me learn more about CAC then any video I've seen to date. Subscribed.

  • @KY_Coins_and_Collectible-wk7xx
    @KY_Coins_and_Collectible-wk7xx Місяць тому

    Thanks for this video brother it helps to see why they don’t CAC, very helpful. I’m subscribing for future content.

  • @sonnygunz9207
    @sonnygunz9207 Місяць тому

    This is some of the most interesting and useful CAC content on UA-cam. Thank you for taking the time to bring us along. Great job my friend.

  • @biggiethecat4896
    @biggiethecat4896 Місяць тому

    I don't get what you mean by all proofs have been cleaned. Otherwise, they would be 68s or 69s.

    • @Rarity7Coins
      @Rarity7Coins Місяць тому

      Excellent question - sorry for not explaining more in the video. First, with mint state coins, they all start out life as 65s-70s (depending on strike & luster) and as they get jostled around in mint bags or bank rolls or change drawers or even during/just after the minting process, they acquire hits, ticks, scrapes, and other marks that bring them down, and then once they reach circulation they can get down to 58 and below. With proof coins - since they were all struck with "perfect" dies and specially prepared for collectors, there are no mint bags or rolls or things like strike or luster variations to make the difference between a 62 and a 70 -- what makes the big difference for proofs is how they were handled by collectors. In the 1800s and 1900s, it was very common for proofs to be kept in velvet boxes or coin trays or otherwise on display, and as they gathered dust they would be regularly wiped off! (I know we shudder to think about it but that's how it was). As they got wiped, their mirrored fields would take on hairlines, haze, or other impairments like that, and that's how we get PR61s, 62s, 63s, etc. So really, all proofs in the lower 60s have been cleaned at one time or another, and when you see some PR61s or 62s you can really tell! I even handled a PR64 Morgan recently that had obvious horizontal hairlines that would put any MS coin in a Details holder. When I spoke to JA about this (and the PR63 Seated Dollar in particular), he clarified that CAC's standards for proofs are that "wipes" are ok (and part of the grading process), but that those should look more like gentle overall hairlines (like the PR63 Trade Dollar in the video). When you get more concentrated signs of real abrasive cleaning, like the field of the seated dollar, that's where he draws the line between a wipe (ok for CAC) and cleaning (not CAC).

    • @biggiethecat4896
      @biggiethecat4896 Місяць тому

      @Rarity7Coins thanks. That definitely helped me understand what you mean. I've only been collecting now for about 4 years. I found a 1878 8 tail feather morgan that looks proof like but I'm not sure about it. Could I send you some pics? Or is it too hard to tell from pictures? Either way thanks for the explanation.

    • @Rarity7Coins
      @Rarity7Coins Місяць тому

      @@biggiethecat4896 Absolutely -- noah@rarity7.com

    • @biggiethecat4896
      @biggiethecat4896 Місяць тому

      @@Rarity7Coins thanks. I'll send it on my lunch break

  • @jmcneer1
    @jmcneer1 Місяць тому

    Did he have feedback on the 1862 3C “burnt”?

    • @Rarity7Coins
      @Rarity7Coins Місяць тому

      Yes! I called him and spoke about a few of the coins. Essentially when you over-dip a coin it gets a literal chemical burn look to it (since dip is stripping a tiny layer of the metal off via chemical reaction). That's what happened on the 3CS reverse. Grade-wise it's all there but the reverse was just done a touch too long. If you're going to play with dip it's really important to be careful about the timing -- even a few seconds too long can do it.

  • @McSilverWolff
    @McSilverWolff Місяць тому

    Best coin grading video on the internet

  • @linneisenhower2571
    @linneisenhower2571 Місяць тому

    Very entertaining reveal. I’m astonished that JA gave you such valuable feedback. Many, many, many submitters have been requesting this sort of response from CAC with no success. He must be mellowing in his “old age”

    • @Rarity7Coins
      @Rarity7Coins Місяць тому

      Ha! He's been really great about this stuff lately, and I know I'm not alone or special. Lots of collectors get the yellow/red stickers too (upon request). It's just the big dealers who send 100s/1000s of coins at a time who nobody ain't got time for :)

  • @BullionBeast
    @BullionBeast Місяць тому

    I had a feeling that 89cc would be called cleaned of some sort. Lovely coin however.

    • @Rarity7Coins
      @Rarity7Coins Місяць тому

      Yeah I had a gut about it. It's got a nice original look and I really (still do) like the coin, but I had my fears.

    • @BullionBeast
      @BullionBeast Місяць тому

      @Rarity7Coins i don't know or think that it was in fact cleaned but I think it just has a similar look to that of an old cleaning on an AU coin so CAC just couldn't take the risk with a sticker. I think it's a great AU example. Original look.

  • @CertifiedPre33
    @CertifiedPre33 Місяць тому

    Appreciate the content... you're definitely going places in the numismatic community.. 😁 still watching vid as I'm commenting.. that 1869 proof seated dol. is stunning for a 63 no CAC. 🪙 life 🤪

  • @ltcol2005
    @ltcol2005 Місяць тому

    I bought the 1885 cc. your price was far below a lower graded vf 20 cac on a stacks bowers auction. excellent coin

    • @Rarity7Coins
      @Rarity7Coins Місяць тому

      Amazing Richard! You have good taste :) Thanks for the business.

  • @AcoushaCollectibles
    @AcoushaCollectibles Місяць тому

    Thank you for this content. I appreciate the commentary and the time you took to put this video together. You are quickly becoming the UA-cam guy.

    • @Rarity7Coins
      @Rarity7Coins Місяць тому

      You guys are the best. I appreciate the kind words but I’ve got a long way to go before I’m the UA-cam guy! You guys are the kings and an inspiration.

  • @donaldinnewmexico
    @donaldinnewmexico Місяць тому

    Hi Noah, I enjoyed this video. The coins are fantastic-just the type of coins I collect. I would like to see more videos like this. I subbed. Sub #255.

    • @Rarity7Coins
      @Rarity7Coins Місяць тому

      Amazing! Thanks so much Donald. More to come soon (I'm editing the next one as we speak...)

  • @donaldinnewmexico
    @donaldinnewmexico Місяць тому

    The green boxes were very distracting. Thanks for the video.

  • @maxcollectscoins
    @maxcollectscoins Місяць тому

    That scream at the end scared me- That 1892 proof with the sticker though is amazing!

  • @linneisenhower2571
    @linneisenhower2571 Місяць тому

    Great images. You have a very nice camera and light setup.