Law School Data
Law School Data
  • 7 973
  • 224 167
Fox News Network, LLC v. TVEyes, Inc. (2018) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
Fox News sued TVEyes for copyright infringement, claiming that TVEyes re-distributed Fox's audiovisual content without permission. TVEyes records and compiles television programming into a text-searchable database, allowing clients to search for and watch up to ten-minute video clips that mention terms of interest. The district court found that some functions of TVEyes's service constitute fair use, but others, such as downloading videos and freely e-mailing videos, were not considered fair use. The court held TVEyes liable for copyright infringement and issued a permanent injunction limiting aspects of TVEyes's service. The key facts relevant to the court's analysis were whether TVEyes's actions constituted fair use and whether TVEyes's Watch function was transformative.
Fox News Network, LLC v. TVEyes, Inc. (2018)
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
883 F.3d 169
Learn more about this case at www.lsd.law/briefs/view/fox-news-network-llc-v-tveyes-inc-23075382
---
Law School Data has over 50,000 case briefs and a one-of-a-kind brief tool to instantly brief millions of US cases with just the name or case cite.
Check out all of our case briefs: www.lsd.law/briefs
Briefs come with built in LSDefine and DeepDive, which allow you to read as quickly or as deeply as you want. Each brief has a built in legal dictionary and recursive summaries that go into more and more detail, until you eventually hit the original case text.
Subscribe for new videos every week: www.youtube.com/@LSData?sub_confirmation=1
Переглядів: 174

Відео

Freeland v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance (2011) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
Переглядів 65Рік тому
The Freelands loaned their minivan to their son, who got into a fatal accident resulting in the death of him and his wife, and injuries to their three children. The Freelands claimed that their insurance policy provided UM/UIM coverage up to $100,000, but the district court dismissed the case due to the amount being one penny short of the jurisdictional minimum. The dispute concerns whether the...
Freeman v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc. (2000) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
Переглядів 32Рік тому
Aimee Freeman is suing Hoffman-La Roche, Inc. for injuries caused by their drug Accutane. The case involves the legal principle of "unavoidably unsafe" drugs, which are drugs that cannot be made completely safe due to the current state of human knowledge. The court analyzed various theories of recovery, including failure to warn, breach of implied warranty, breach of express warranty, and misre...
Foss v. Circuit City Stores, Inc. (2007) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
Переглядів 44Рік тому
An applicant agreed to resolve any disputes with Circuit City through arbitration during the employment application process. The applicant objected to this agreement on the grounds of being underage and it being unfair. The court must now determine whether the issue of infancy should be decided by the court or the arbitrator, and whether the agreement to arbitrate is enforceable. The most relev...
Ford Motor Co. v. United States (2017) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
Переглядів 32Рік тому
Ford challenged the United States' decision to classify their imported Transit Connect vehicles. The court found that the vehicles were misclassified due to Ford's removal of the second row seat, which made it appear as if the vehicle was designed for transporting goods. The court had to determine if the intended purpose of transporting people outweighed the intended purpose of transporting goo...
Fortis Financial Services, LLC v. Fimat Futures USA, Inc. (2002) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video
Переглядів 16Рік тому
The case involves a dispute between a prime tenant and subtenant over a restoration obligation stated in the sublease contract. The subtenant argues that a provision in the contract relieves them of the obligation to restore the premises to their pre-lease condition. However, the court disagrees and examines the contract's language to determine the parties' intentions. The most relevant facts f...
Ford v. United States (1963) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
Переглядів 30Рік тому
In this case, the plaintiffs and Mrs. Genevieve G. Taylor are seeking to recover alleged overpayment of income taxes for the years 1955 and 1956. They are stockholders in the W. F. Taylor Company, Inc., which owned the Free State Plantation and other assets. The issue is around the calculation of the basis of the assets distributed to them when the corporation was liquidated. The plaintiffs wan...
Ford v. Wainwright (1986) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
Переглядів 163Рік тому
The case is about Alvin Bernard Ford, who was sentenced to death in 1974. He was later diagnosed with a mental illness called Paranoid Schizophrenia With Suicide Potential in 1982, which made it difficult for him to defend himself in court. His attorneys wanted a hearing to determine whether he was competent to be executed, but the state court denied it. They then filed for habeas corpus in fed...
Ford Motor Co. v. Zahn (1959) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
Переглядів 15Рік тому
The case is about a person who lost an eye due to a defective ashtray in a Ford car made by the defendant. The plaintiff was awarded $26,350 in damages. The defendant argued that the defect was not discoverable during their inspection process and that the risk of harm was minimal. The court had to determine if the defendant breached its duty of care and if the harm was foreseeable. The most rel...
Ford Motor Co. v. Leggat (1995) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
Переглядів 17Рік тому
The case is about a dispute between the car company Ford and a group of plaintiffs called the Whites. The Whites were suing Ford for damages related to their Bronco II cars. The court granted a writ of mandamus saying the trial court made a mistake by ordering Ford to give the Whites certain documents. Ford said these documents were protected by attorney-client privilege and work-product doctri...
Ford Motor Co. v. Lemieux Lumber Co. (1967) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
Переглядів 13Рік тому
The plaintiff bought a new Ford pick-up truck from N.A. Walker, who was an authorized dealer for Ford Motor Company. The plaintiff intended to use the truck for hauling equipment in muddy and rough terrains. However, the truck immediately started having problems, and despite attempts to repair it, no solution was found. The plaintiff sued for breach of both an implied warranty in law and an exp...
Foodcomm International v. Barry (2003) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
Переглядів 33Рік тому
This case is about two former employees of Foodcomm, Patrick Barry and Christopher Leacy, who secretly negotiated with Foodcomm's customer, Empire Beef, to create a competing company called Outback Imports. They did not inform Foodcomm of their plan and used its resources to communicate with Empire. As a result, Foodcomm lost 75% of its business with Empire. Foodcomm filed a complaint seeking a...
T.C. Sherwood v. Hiram Walker (1887) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
Переглядів 162Рік тому
Plaintiff Sherwood approached Defendant Walker, intending to buy cattle. Both parties believed the cows for sale were “probably” barren (no milk, no calves). The parties contracted for the sale of a cow (Rose 2nd of Aberlone) on this belief and priced her as only suitable for beef. Prior to delivery, Walker learned the cow was pregnant and refused sale when Sherwood tendered the money. Sherwood...
Florida Bar v. Rodriguez (2007) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
Переглядів 31Рік тому
The law firm Friedman, Rodriguez, Ferraro, and St. Louis represented clients in a lawsuit against DuPont while also entering into a secret engagement agreement with DuPont for financial gain. The law firm advised their clients to accept settlement offers from DuPont, which exceeded what the clients could have reasonably expected to recover at trial. The law firm engaged in professional miscondu...
Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin (2014) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
Переглядів 132Рік тому
Abigail Fisher sued the University of Texas for violating the Fourteenth Amendment with their race-conscious admissions program. She argued that she was not eligible for admission because of her race. The court had to determine if the university's use of race in admissions was constitutional, and if Fisher had standing to bring her claims. The court found that the university used a holistic rev...
Fisher v. United States (1946) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
Переглядів 125Рік тому
Fisher v. United States (1946) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
DF Activities Corp. v. Dorothea F. Brown (1988) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
Переглядів 33Рік тому
DF Activities Corp. v. Dorothea F. Brown (1988) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
First Pacific Bancorp, Inc. v. Helfer (2000) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
Переглядів 15Рік тому
First Pacific Bancorp, Inc. v. Helfer (2000) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
First Trust Co. v. Atlas Pipeline Corp. (1939) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
Переглядів 34Рік тому
First Trust Co. v. Atlas Pipeline Corp. (1939) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
First National Bank of Logansport v. Logan Mfg. Co. (1991) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summar
Переглядів 9Рік тому
First National Bank of Logansport v. Logan Mfg. Co. (1991) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summar
Feminist Majority Found. v. Hurley (2018) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
Переглядів 21Рік тому
Feminist Majority Found. v. Hurley (2018) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
First National Bank v. Methodist Home for Aged (1957) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
Переглядів 18Рік тому
First National Bank v. Methodist Home for Aged (1957) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Risjord (1981) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
Переглядів 27Рік тому
Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Risjord (1981) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
Ferguson v. Ferguson (1994) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
Переглядів 53Рік тому
Ferguson v. Ferguson (1994) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
Ferebee v. Chevron Chemical Co. (1984) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
Переглядів 36Рік тому
Ferebee v. Chevron Chemical Co. (1984) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
Ferguson v. McKiernan (2007) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
Переглядів 25Рік тому
Ferguson v. McKiernan (2007) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
Joan Sullivan v. Merval Porter, Jr. (2004) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
Переглядів 119Рік тому
Joan Sullivan v. Merval Porter, Jr. (2004) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
Felder v. Casey (1988) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
Переглядів 25Рік тому
Felder v. Casey (1988) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
Frontiero v. Richardson (1973) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
Переглядів 188Рік тому
Frontiero v. Richardson (1973) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
Corder v. Rogerson (1999) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
Переглядів 11Рік тому
Corder v. Rogerson (1999) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary