Відео

@@realtmony Thank you! I have a thing for moody and darker looks too. I just love the density and richness you see when creating a darker look. ☺️

Thank you, Miranda!

Thank you for your lovely comment. I'm so glad you found this useful! 😊

That's a great question and the answer is quite simple - what feels right to you for the image you're working with? Are you looking to have a softer texture - if so, softening the details would be the way to go. Are you looking to enhance the detail in areas of high contrast (high frequencies) - then sharpening those would be your answer. It's all subjective and it is up to you and your client to decide how you want the texture of the image to look. Hope this helps!

You're so kind, I appreciate it, Alex!

@@theindiefilmdude Here is the link to the breakdown of this Halation technique: ua-cam.com/video/DzeUY9IidFs/v-deo.htmlsi=4e_UQnvQRsCYlafF

@@Havetsvarg Here is the video where I break down this Halation technique: ua-cam.com/video/DzeUY9IidFs/v-deo.htmlsi=4e_UQnvQRsCYlafF

Hey Gabo, thank you for your kind comment. This applies to DWG as well. However, I can't get it to work in ACES at this stage.

Thank you Marieta!! ACES has the flaw of loosing detail in that frequency, like neon lights. It has been improved but still…

That's so kind, thank you!

Of course. I've simply used a film grain overlay in Quicktime and blended it over the footage in 'Multiply' mode using a Layer mixer. Hope this clarifies this step.

Thank you very much!

@@madelproduction Thank you! Yeah, there are some great DCTLs that can significantly improve your speed.

@@IridescentColor Thank you once again for sharing them with me! ☺️

Hey Jeremy, density and luminance are referring to the same thing - how bright or dark a hue is.

Just to chime in there real quick, the functionality in version 2 is slightly different from version 1, so some things you might see on my channel might be slightly outdated compared to the newest version. If we want to be super precise, "density" differs from "luminance" in that the effect of a density adjustment is greater the more saturated a colour is, whereas luminance is irrespective of saturation and also means slightly different things depending on the colour model. That's why density adjustments are usually cleaner because they don't exacerbate chroma noise in low sat areas or muddy up skin tones. Since there isn't really a way to adjust luminance without affecting saturation in a tetrahedral framework, I replaced the slider with a density control instead. Hope that makes sense! :)

@ thanks for the follow up!! that was exactly what was I looking for! Thank you guys!

@@IridescentColor how long have you been studying colour science for? You're well versed. I'm about to buy 3 of your DCTLs btw, solid work

Thank you, Douglas! Of course, there are multiple ways to do things and I'd never want people to think using external tools is the only way to grade. 😊

Thanks! The video you're referring to looks great, indeed. I'm curious to know how did you get to the conclusion about how it's graded? I couldn't see a look breakdown on the channel, unfortunately.

@@marietafarfarova I asked him, so I know :)

@@1mmola108 Ah, got you! Nice one. It’s a beautiful look. 👌

That's so kind, thank you!

Yeah, as mentioned in the video, I have noticed it takes of bit of time for Look DNA to load. But then it works perfectly. I haven't had any performance issues with the rest of the DCTLs.

Haha that's so kind, thank you very much! ☺

Thank you so much!

I'm so glad to hear that, thank you!

Is there where you learned this technique from? I picked it up from a course with TAC Resolve or Colour Training, I'm not entirely sure. But I've been using it since then and loved the results! ☺

@@marietafarfarova it's a standard technique nowadays