Відео

I wonder if Bucky ever read about sacred geometry, he is drawing 3d versions of a number from that space. Scientists might like numbers (in their work), but no one else does. Mr V needs to find a way to make it not, or they will never transfer knowledge / break down boundaries.

I wonder what he would have made of sacred geometry. Tried reading Synergetics a couple of times, but I find it too obtuse for now.

I experience synchronicities literally every day and I also am clinically diagnosed with OCD and the two have latched on and have ruined my fucking life. Egocentrism and paranoia DEFINITELY. I'm glad to see some one who says that synchronicities are dangerous. All these new agers who say Synchronicities are signs from the universe are saying something very dangerous.. because my synchronicities are deeply negative. I don't know how to overcome this

Oh my. I am afraid in a few years you will look at this video and be thoroughly embarrassed. Nevertheless, I suppose it will at least serve as a demonstration of how much you will have learned until then.

What was that outro video, did you make it? I want more

🍿

This is great. Your content and way of thinking is very similar to my own.

great series. very thought provoking! thank you.

I noticed that this video didn't make it into your Memes Playlist.

A protein could be a rule.

I have a love hate with continental philosophy, because on the one hand I find it very interesting and imaginative, but on the other I despise how unclear and allegorical writing it is. I feel that this happens with Feyerabend, in his search to create a new paradigm in epistemology (which he partially achieved), he wrote in a way so different from what we are used to reading in epistemology, that his ideas can easily be understood as if was making an apology for pseudoscience. But, it is simpler to say that Fayerabend concluded that the scientific method is not universal, and therefore is not objective, because all disciplines, in practice, have different methods.

succulent ideas!

Promo-SM

👍

If this guy read Kant he would have saved a lot of time

❤awesome listen

Whahahahahahaha memes are archetypes is by far the dumbest thing I've heard all year. Not the dumbest think Peterson has ever said, but it is in the top 10.

Can you please share a name the music that plays at the end of your video? Its a great piece

I follow my heart, intuition and gut feelings. I got all my other ones just not this one😅

I really enjoy your presentation. It is both engaging and succinct.

What mic are you using, I have a beautiful Logitech blue ball that I should use more often😅

Very good listening

synergetics was a favorite book of mine in the early 80's. I had both volumes. it really was a novel way of thinking. 40 years later i'm interested again at 63 y/o.

fascinating... it seems i had to respond with a few more thoughts than would fit a comment, so i guess i just left you a short, erm, twoandahalfdozen minutes voice message😅☯️

I understood about 20% of that… so I’m basically an expert on the topic.

Always interesting to hear two people I respect disagree for reasons I don't understand

jordan peterson is not a profound thinker, he's a pseudo-intellectual who sells himself as an actual intellectual to intellectually starved young men who feel disempowered by a society they all but completely love to perpetuate. Peterson is a waste of time and a waste of educational space

I think that JP is a little misunderstood here. Jungian archetypes are the most fundamental memes. Every meme is a mix of these archetypes. But I think in the end every concept is "bullshit" in the sense that while it might help to understand the word, it's always an abstraction and therefore oversimplification of reality.

Jordan has conservative dependency. He has been promoted by conservative propagandist. Jordan is tramped into using the archetypes conservatives have been indoctrinated to believe.

Never mix symbols with alcohol and benzos

You are too stuck up on definitions, Peterson uses words and lays connections in abstract ways. That does not mean what he's saying is "simply incorrect". If you define words in a narrow way that excludes Peterson's usage then that's a very easy and shallow way of disregarding his opinion. You also seem to be painting the interactions of Peterson and Dawkins in a rather hostile light. If you listen to their whole conversation it was actually very interesting and both were explaining their ideas productively and they were coming to agreements.

Alan watts talked about this almost fifty years ago. The flight between the two world views of the west. One world view sees you as a blind programmed dumb animal. The other sees you eating the menu, believing it to be the dinner. Both are equally ridiculous.

He isn't drunk on symbols. He has a problem with benzos.

tfw being drunk on symbols is a symbol...

he is genetically drunk with GREEEED$$$ and Grandios$$$$ity like all Socio Paths Hi jakcers

Fantastic video, sub!

saying Richard Dawking figured that out but didn't take to logical conclusion is like spiiting on his entire work. Peterson should choose words better. That is something he is talking about a lot, but does not take as a conclusion for himself

Add this to the list of things that Peterson talks about but doesn't understand

Jordan pointed out something interesting when he said "there are ideas that are so contagious that we have actually adapted to them biologically" I think what Jordan is simply trying to point out is that memes and genes and the environment aren't all separate things they all work on each other and respond to each other, and can create overarching structures. I think the difference is that Dawkins is a reductionist while Peterson believes in emergent properties. the sum can be greater than the parts. A great example is Dawkins rejection of the intention/purpose of memes. He is adamant that memes don't have an intention or purpose, while stating that we do say that gene's have a "purpose" for convention. He rejects intent but intent is a belief in and of itself. We cannot see into the mind of another so we watch behaviors like a detective an infer intention. similarly you can look at patterns in complex systems and ask by their behavior what do they want. What does the market "want". there are feedback loops and structures that are bigger than a guy selling and another buying. You might ask a question of what is the intention of an ant hill. You might be a reductionist and say an ant colony has no "intent" individual ants have algorithms of receiving chemical signals and releasing chemical signals. However it is the colony that computes complex problems, not a single ant, and if you do not look at the emergent properties of the colony you will not understand the ant or see what it is doing. If we are going to move into the spiritual route it is possible to look for patterns in the universe and ask what is its "intent", The universe decaying into entropy, living structures that fight against it and hold their shape. This will take you down a road a Dawkins type will call nonsense. However if you don't look at patterns and contend with emergent properties your understanding and analysis will be shallow. A reductionist can't understand the anthill. With only reductionism you miss understanding and lack prediction. In theory if you had enough computing power you could reduce everything to particles bouncing and extrapolate the rest, but even in theory that is impossible because. 1. quantum uncertainty 2. there might not even be enough computing power in the universe in theory. So we must deal with emergent properties however the more patterns you try to see the more risk seeing faces in the Rorschach blots that aren't there and I think this is what can happen to Jordan Peterson when he can make dubious connections.

Can't focus on anything but the button that was missed. 4:36

Memes are strategies for truth 🤯🤯 Nice way to pinpoint Peterson's flawed perspective on memes being "living ideas" while pointing out that Darwin's definition of behavior (strategies for obtaining what you want) is embedded in the definition of memes. Memes aren't living ideas ❌ Memes are human nature, a byproduct of our truth-seeking behavioral tendencies. Looking forward to the next video

First

Is Design Pattern a suitable word for program? And Algorithm a better word instead of Rules? Or is that taking it too far into computational.

It depends on how strong and persistent those synchronicities are. Once when they start to bleed out and become fluid like in your environment almost in an instant one after another, you are in trouble. If you are one of those peeps who underwent the mental gymnastics and deep inner search on your spiritual journey, you might not even have a clue that you ignited the spiritual spark pretty strong. While you doing this whole spiritual inner work and going trough the process and minding your own business you have no idea that the whole time you have been jabbing, poking, digging and slicing onto the veil of forgetfulness. Someone / somebody placed the veil of forgetfulness for a reason, its there so you keep on following the already " pre scripted life path that has been given to your avatar for your Spirit to experience". However when your spark is lit and you are poking on the veil and not having clue that you are totally headed in the direction that your spirit wants and not the pre scripted one, well " the big daddy of this Universe" takes that personally and goes on a witch hunt to crush your spiritual spark you ignited. In short words to make things clear and simple, this is my moto: "Put an end to the reincarnation loops, leave Samsara and peace be with you."

This got me pumped. This was well-structured, clear and concise. Great job. I look forward to where this analysis takes us. A thought came up watching this. What you are doing here is what we are all doing in our own ways. Making sense and creating. Building a career, a relationship, writing a poem, filming a video, maintaining our health, trying to become more wise, more kind. We are all creating the symphonies that our lives are. We are doing our best to make it beautiful, worthwhile and always trying doing our best to do the right thing. Carving the marble to reveal David - chipping away all of the parts that weren't his to reveal him in all its glory. I want to you give a word of advice: have high standards for yourself. Try to make these as good as you can. However, finishing a project, as flawed as you might think it is, is the most important part. Believe in your own judgement, take out what is not needed and focus on what's relevant. You're creating something great here, happy to be part of the journey. Take us into the deep.

3:45 😂👌

The selfish gene, the unspeakable memes could we be witnessing the evolution of man or are these just dreams?

Not what I asked for but what I unconsciously needed

👍 Question for everyone: what is Your opinion about Peterson?