Відео

Its a neat machine but heavy, and you have all your weight even at the landings unlike with ICE powered. Thats the biggest drawdown about it.

there is extensive study about it here: endless-sphere.com/sphere/threads/definitive-tests-on-the-heating-and-cooling-of-hub-motors.48753/ and yes, ned to be careful washing this part with water!

haha dude... you even fly the IDENTICAL wing than me! subbed!

@@cloudpandarism2627 yup! I got it as a sample from the company that make it Godzilla fire insulation-Ningbo Booer New Materials

@@ridecrypto i found it. i am living in china and it should be easy to get. thanks mate. even i think this insulation wont protect the pilot. but if it gives him couple more seconds to get down its fine i guess.

Indeed it did and flight time increased from 45 to 53 minutes which is quite substantial.

plz show cell volt after repair on the app

It's quite the opposite actually, square wave controllers are much simpler and are less likely to break, the cons is that they're also way noisier and have less granular control, sine wave are quiet and very easy to control but they're also more complex, Thus, have more points of failure

​​@@liarusfrom my experience due to the simplicity they actually blow up more often than proper foc/sinewave controllers that use output current monitoring most squarewave junk only have input shunts/measure battery current only and just throw a lot of fets into it in the hope it doesnt blow up

Not sure on that, but three blade sound a bit more noisy, higher pitch on the sound.

With that battery and my setup, the best I can do is around 47min.

@@ridecrypto Is your battery equal to one of the 2 batteries of the SP140? 2.7 and 3.7 KWh Is your battery DIY?

@@neosugus The battery is stock one, 4kWh where it has 11 cells in parallel. New kits are delivered with 10 cells due to the use of cell holders that takes more space and encreases safety. Thats why the new packs are 3,7kWh. You can fit up to 4,7kWh in this pack with newer cells, like Samsung 50S.

@@ridecrypto I weigh 70Kg, and the trike and frame more or les 10Kg. Tola 80/90Kg on take off. What size and brand glider would you recomend me to get the longest flight time in a normal and easy cruise flight?

@@neosugus Not expert on wings so cannot say a lot. Trike seems very light so I bet the wing like mine may work(Spyder 3 26meter)

its in the description

You have to change pulleys more often than belt, belt is much stronger and eats them. I would say that intervals are same as a regular chain.

@@ridecrypto With neglect, I get 8000 miles from motor sprockets and 10,000 from chain. With care...occasional cleaning and relube, the chain lasts 12K and motor sprockets about 9000 miles. The motor sprocket teeth start hooking after a while and then eventually I need to replace the sprocket. I have yet to replace a wheel sprocket. All those teeth on them, they tend to last forever since the individual teeth are under far less load. *** So you are getting 8000 miles from your belts?

@@de-bodgery when it comes to surron, you already see wear on the swing arm sprocket after about 2-3000km. I would change this sprocket after about 6000km. Same would go for the motor belt pulley. But all depends on what type of terrain you do.

Еще в 2018 году endless-sphere.com/sphere/threads/stealth-bomber-goes-adaptto-at-12kw.62650/page-11#post-1392631

@@ridecrypto А я хочу купить электробайк, делема выбора или Rino evolution или Greip g12 или sur ron x. Многие советуют суррончик брать, он дешевле типа выносливей и батарея съёмная и запчасти не дефицит. Что посоветуешь?????

@@romanjablonskiy1733 Однозначно сур, тут вообще спору нет.

@@ridecrypto если честно то сколько сур х в пике выдает мощность?? И существенна разница в вольтаже 60 или 72. На форумах разное пишут что можна запутаться.

@@romanjablonskiy1733 Там контроллер выдает около 90А, батка в номинале 57.6В = выдает около 5184 ватт.

Vi är i Sthlm. Trode inte det fanns fler än mig med den just nu! Nu vet man iaf att det finns minst en till.

haha Сюда еще кто то заходит!

Why, I drive it with NUC at over 14kW, belt can take around 20.

around 55kg, you can pedal but they dod not have pedal assist back then.

I've heard a chain is better for jumps and offroad activities. And the belt is good for on the road. I'm still not sure, that's why I'm looking still.

@@carterjohnson453 had both Chain is better for off-roading but noisy better torque for wheelies too Belt is much quieter, less weight, less maintenance & hits higher top speed by a mile or two & may save a tiny bit more battery then chain. You can wheelie with a belt still but much less torque (whisky throttle)

Probably not backwards as that would be unsafe. I'm guessing upside down.

Fardriver

Sorry, not as of now.

Sorry for now, no.

snaps like breaks? or it just comes out? what makes it snap, small rocks getting caught between the belt and the sprocket?

So your buddy breaks a belt on every off road drive? Belts have a stronger breaking force than chains. Yeah B.S.

No as this belt setup is good up to about 18kW

@@ridecrypto Ah ok thank you you would say that the chain wear is greater than with belts

@@Cardesign-pg1yo These carbon belts are so damn strong that they actually outlast the pulleys - both front and the rear one. I would say that at least the belt will outlast the chain in clean conditions.

@@ridecrypto Thank you

I made it with stock case mate ridesurron.se/sidor/light-bee-extreme

It is not a problem, thats just how it sounds. Perhaps you can swap out the bearings for better ones and it will be better.