Відео

he won it at milan

Those 3 are the only ones who won it playing in the Premier League. Shevchenko won it while he was in Italy.

Even that . Ronaldo is a dribbling monster at his peak hell he had 4.65 dribbles/ game in peak mid 2000's English bpl with 51% success rate

@@YODAA.303 Ronaldo was never a dribbling monster watu talking about

@@Trauma_Clown bruh

@@Trauma_Clown bro might actually be a clown

Definitely! You can't reach those levels without both talent and hard work

At those times a lot of sports were played by people who had side jobs because those sports were not profitable. It is similar to how people say Wilt Chamberlain isnt that good because he was playing basketball against farmers. That is a factor that is beyond an individual player's control but that doesnt change the fact that at that time that said player in whatever team sport they played was better than most of their opponents. If we go by the logic that players from the era before sports became very very lucrative then it means that every World Cup won before the 1992 or the 1988 World Cup is invalid, and the same can be said for most major sports that we watch today.

@crazychaba9816 Well , what i stated is true across the board . Let's take boxing, for example. Jack Johnson was the 1st black heavyweight champion in 1908. This man no ring generalship. He had low IQ in the ring . His defense was virtually nonexistent. But he dominated for about a decade. Do you truly believe this man would've been a champion in today's era ? Absolutely not. Nowadays, boxers have to have ring generalship, decent power, and decent defense. To even compete.

@@bigtex1238 My point is that you can not compare people from the past with current players of this generation. 1. Sport Science has improved a lot as such people are trained better so physcially todays athletes are better than most of the athletes from the past. 2. Access to information,nowadays people have access to quality information about training,nutrition,etc. So it is easier to train yourself and become a decent athlete. 3. Globalization, Nowadays there are a lot of tournaments,international friendlies between athletes of different countries as such sports are more competitive making todays atheletes generally better than past atheletes 4. Sports evolve as new tactics are created, IF you look at the way Magnus Carlsen and hikaru nakamura play and then compare it with the way Garry Kasparov,Bobby Fischer or Anatoly karpov used to play you will see that todays Grandmasters have learned a lot from past grandmasters. My point is that yes today's athletes are better,but if todays athletes were born way back in the past they would have been similar to Pele and Wilt Chamberlain and all the others,and if you took the past athletes and brought them to the present they would be as good or better than our current athletes. The past athletes and scientists and coahes/trainers did all the experimenting and the trial and error and what we see today is a finished product. BAsketball was invented in 1891. I just remembered, The ball that is used for football right now is so different from the past one that it is not even the same sport. You used to not be able to header the ball because it would cause injuries. Also todays balls are lighter and more accurate meaning that crosses are more accurate,you can score freekicks more easily and your shots are more likely to be on target. The same can be said for the football boots. In marathon running there are plenty of banend shoes because they give athletes a performance boost. Is it really fair to compare an athlete who played with wooden shoes or an athlete who ran a marathon with barefeet with today's athlete who can wear a shoe with a carbon fibre insole? www.sportskeeda.com/football/evolution-ball-used-football

Do you realize that most dribbling moves used today was created by Pele, even the Cryuff turn was made by Pele. Pele was a damn good footballer

people like to glorify the past. this is what they are thought. this is how they sell religions to them. Pele said he has scored 1k goals. there is not enough evidence for even half of it. truly the most overrated player of all time.

Quaresma isn't more talented than Ronaldo. 😂 Neymar and Messi are the only players above CR7 in talent.

id argue that ronaldos set is a talent itself cause that kind of mindset isnt something you get from working

XDDD wtf i like henry but that´s a bad joke

R9 scored 34 in laliga as a 20 year old something Messi and Ronaldo never achieved at that age or even come close. Then his knees exploded and was injured for almost 2 years and lost half of his potential that made him special. If he was injury free and continued on his trajectory there's no reason he wouldn't have scored 40+ league goals at the same age Messi and Ronaldo achieved them