Відео

If you are talking about the main belt with the dents, probably not.

You're welcome!

I am sorry for the delayed answer. It is an open rear differential.

Shitty t5

Sorry for the late reaction, (due to technical problems). For the moment, playing every day, almost, there is no sign of deterioration.

The advantages of the t3 vs t5, (for the off road), are: #1 Syncro vs Haldex. The Syncro transfers to the rear axle the 100% of the power where mostly needed, especially for a loaded bus: www.vwsyncro.eu/p/blog-page_25.html #2 Two lockers, (t3), vs edl for the front and only one locker for the rear, (t5). #3 The Syncro humb phenomenon, (100% 4wd engagement), vs Haldex hydraulic pressure, (70% engagement or less and if): www.vwsyncro.eu/p/blog-page_5.html #4 Gelande gear for vertical walking on walls, for the t3, t5 has nothing. For on/off road: #5 Stellar passive safety, t3 has the fuel tank right in the middle, t5 has a coastal fuel tank, (between others): www.vwsyncro.eu/p/blog-page_18.html #6 Stellar active safety, t3 has an huge unique high speed front spoiler, (between others): www.vwsyncro.eu/p/blog-page_2.html The Syncro Heresy

Sorry for my late reaction. No I haven't.

The Haldex, especially for a bus, is much inferior to the Syncro: #1 Syncro vs Haldex. The Syncro transfers to the rear axle the 100% of the power where mostly needed, especially for a loaded bus: www.vwsyncro.eu/p/blog-page_25.html #2 Two lockers, (t3), vs edl for the front and only one locker for the rear, (t5). #3 The Syncro humb phenomenon, (100% 4wd engagement), vs Haldex hydraulic pressure, (70% engagement or less and if): www.vwsyncro.eu/p/blog-page_5.html #4 Gelande gear for vertical walking on walls, for the t3, t5 has nothing.

Admitting a Russian idea for 5cm lifting front and rear.

No sir!

No, The t3 was designed as an offroad vehicle and also used on the road, the t5 was designed as an on road vehicle and also used off road, The t5 will win on road every time, the t3 will win off road every time, very different designs, both great vehicles but 1 is at home in the mud and the other at home on the road, but thats not to say you put some mud tires on the t5 it will still be a capable machine, just not as capable as the t3

Please do not forget tha the Porsche b32 is a t3(2wd) and not a t5. The Syncro t3, (and to a lesser extend the 2wd), has an amazing behavior on road, partially due to a secret weapon: the unique, huge, frontal spoiler, which is a high speed stabilizator: www.vwsyncro.eu/p/blog-page_3.html As you can see into the above link, b32 considered stabler than a Porsche 911, (and they couldn't understand the why!).

Thank so much for your kind words!

Yes, you can use any photo you like. Is there anything I can do to help you? Please, let me know. The Syncro Heresy

Please forgive me for my delayed answer. I saw it by chance since there was no notification by youtube. Here are some elements about him: www.vwsyncro.eu/p/blog-page_76.html I do not know anything about the Ferrari you ask. I will be glad to help trying to find answers if you need them. The Syncro Heresy

Tires used by the Syncros are not the same, but, still, they are passing without exceptions. The Syncro Heresy

Thank you! The Syncro Heresy

Now at 300.000 km: ua-cam.com/video/9HG-eYXqiBY/v-deo.html No repairs, still. Never opened engine. The Syncro Heresy

Thank you very much. The Syncro Heresy.

'Ενας κινητήρας PG μπορεί να φτάσει, (και να ξεπεράσει), τα 500.000 km. χωρίς επισκευές. Οι λοιποί 1.8l, (VW), μπορούν να έχουν το επιχείρημα. Τhe Syncro Heresy

Thank you very much. The Quattro is a VAG system but absolutely different from the Syncro, (first model applied: VW Iltis), and it is applied to Audi VW and Porsche models. The Syncro is a VAG system, (Ferguson patent, first front engine model applied Golf II, first rear model applied Vanagon/Transporter/Caravelle t25), and is applied to VW, Audi and Porsche models. The rear engine cars take a Syncro system with another architecture vs the front engine cars, but very similar. The t4, (Eurovan, Transporter, Caravelle), Syncro, is equivalent to the Passat b35i Syncro, in terms of transmission, but it has, as an optional, a rear locker which is missing for the Passat. A comparison between the two systems, (Syncro for front engine cars), can be found here: www.vwsyncro.eu/p/blog-page_91.html The Syncro Heresy

You can use any tyre or tyre combination. The fact is that the dual lockers, the gelande gear, the main axle, (which in a van or a truck is the rear, where, mainly, is loaded), in a 100% continuous, (and not intermittent), direct, drive, connected through gears and not softly through a hydraulic clutch, cannot be defeated. The above conditions exist, simultaneously, in a t3 Syncro and do not in a t5 Haldex, (with the exception of the rear locker). By using the same tyres the difference, in the favor of the t3, is maximized. This is the why the t3 is so unique and cannot be replicated even by it's creator, the VW. More about this subject you can find here: www.vwsyncro.eu/p/vs-t5-4motion-haldex.html The Syncro Heresy

@@HellenicVanagonTheSyncroHeresy Thanks Hellenic. Ill do some more reading. There would be a market for something like this again. I have a Landrover Defender TD5 110 that is our work car and our tourer that we sleep in. Often driving along a beach in soft sand near midnight on a Friday night after work to find a place to camp. Wish the T6 was ok in soft sand.

You are welcome. The Syncro Heresy

Thank you very much for your comment. As for the yellow teflon tape, it's thickness is a desirable factor for some applications and you are right. For the specific application though, the belt has to be very thin, since the torque of the motor is low, as well as, the rollers do not accept any thicker belt than the original. On the other hand, the key here is to make a multi layer teflon belt, but very flexible, thin and, simultaneously, zero compliance, (for sound quality reasons), in order to have the opportunity to lock the layers. Without a successful locking whatever you do is dismantled as a matter of seconds. There may be better methods of course, but, up to now, I haven't seen any.