- 17
- 30 428
Kelly Hollis
Приєднався 27 сер 2015
Відео
Law 1 - Defenses (Castle Doctrine/Stand Your Ground)
Переглядів 404 роки тому
Recorded with screencast-o-matic.com
Law 1 - Crimes Against Person (Sexual Assault)
Переглядів 1844 роки тому
Recorded with screencast-o-matic.com
Law 1 - Crimes Against Person: Manslaughter
Переглядів 1064 роки тому
Recorded with screencast-o-matic.com
Law 1 - Preliminary Crimes #2 Conspiracy
Переглядів 1524 роки тому
Recorded with screencast-o-matic.com
Do you tutor students in the IRAC method?
Awesome, short and sweet.
This was really helpful thank you so much
Thanks ❤
Thanks ❤
awesome !!!!
Thank you so much! This was very cool, simple, clear, and concise. It's not always like this in the real world, but this explanation is awesome.
Hello, How can I connect to you
I like the explanation but the timeline really plays with my OCD. "...are hanging out at TJHS 'AFTER SCHOOL' one 'MORNING', waiting for students to 'ARRIVE'..." Are we talking about night school or typical school hours during the day? If typical day school, I would have to call into question the reliability of the witness and their statement. Thus, I'd get the four teachers acquitted. Additionally, the use of the word "SHOULD" in the phrase, "...suggests that they should break into..." is not the same statement that they WILL. The former is an opinion with the latter being an affirmative statement for committing an action. I would therefore argue that the teachers did NOT agree to COMMIT a crime but only an opinion that one should occur. The actions of Mrs. Scears falls completely on her for a few reasons. First, the agreed opinion did not include Mrs. Scears' action of spraypainting the cameras. That is all of her own mind. Second, because of Mrs. Scears' misunderstanding of the English language and the difference between the meaning of the words "should" and "will", her independently planned actions should not be held against the other three teachers as they only expressed agreement of opinion. BTW, It is apparent that Mrs. Freeman is the English teacher and Mrs. Scears is the Art teacher.
Hi Professor can i please now how am i going to get your nots or register to be one of your online student.
Your lecture is very helpful for me Thanks❤
I have a question how can the judges reach a decision using different classifications of Law to enforce legal environment of business??? I really need the answer if you could help me:(
Very helpful thanks 💕
Thankyou mam very useful
Wow
Can i have your page...instagram
Thank you this timely video
Thank you my lovely online teacher.
Thank you so much.your channel gave me a clear understanding of what IRAC stand for and how to apply it.I wish you could continue posting because your method of teaching is so understandable and makes it easy for me to apply IRAC
HELLO THERE. I am currently doing a question on ILAC. can I please get your email to help me out with my questions please.
Thanks
Question: most of the videos on UA-cam about IRAC seem to agree on there being one main issue and that is the issue that you discuss (like a thesis statement). What about the cases that have multiple issues? I was told by my professor it should go like this, issue/rule, issue/rule, issue/rule….analysis, conclusion. Is IRAC meant for one main issue or all the issues in the case? Thanks.
This is meant for high school, and I usually only give them one issue at a time. For the bar exam, we usually look for a complete IRAC analysis of each issue before moving on to the next.
@@kellyhollis5514 Thanks!
This really is wonderful. I’ve been stuck on an assignment in regard to parties to a crime but this just got me cleared 😊
Wonderful! I’ve been stuck on an assignment on parties to a crime and this just got me cleared. Xx
Thnx Madam
Thank you ma'am ❤️
You do AR and MR separately and you also deal with each issue separately, IRAC for each issue ..
Nice Video
Thank you so much ❤
thnx for this mam