Відео

Guy is unbearable to talk to. He's definetly an IT guy. Feels yes somehow gotcha ALL THE TIME.

Monkey fallacy!!!!!!

Aantekeningen: - Een deductievorm 0) Stelling: x (1 of meerdere) is de voorwaarde voor y 0) y bestaat 0) x bestaat/heeft bestaan - Atheïsme is vooral een spiritueel probleem (thx maat) 0) Een atheïst wil zondigen 0) Een atheïst wil de creatie niet erkennen - Het probleem van transcendentelen 0) Ook wel categorieën genoemd 0) Immaterieel 0) De volgende concepten kunnen niet empirisch (wetenschappelijk) geverifieerd worden: - Tijd & Ruimte - Zelf - Woord/betekenis - Het verleden - Concept/Universele - Moraliteit/Ethiek 0) Bovengenoemde concepten veronderstellen menselijk handelen 0) Bovengenoemde fenomenen zijn zowel een voorwaarde voor kennis als verondersteld 0) Het ontkennen van transcendentelen leidt tot absurditeit - Hoe relateren de transcendetelen aan elkaar? 0) Zij zijn nauw verbonden: Zij kunnen niet zonder elkaar bestaan. 0) Er moet een God zijn die hen bijeenhoud: Zonder God zouden ze niet in verbintenis kunnen bestaan. - Er is een geest nodig die deze transcendentelen bij elkaar houd: De menselijke geest is niet krachtig genoeg. 0) Platonisme had dit bijna goed 0) De godshypothese vervult de voorwaarde voor het aannemen van transcendentelen.

This is the Jay Dyer I miss.

Christ is lord☦️

4:58 Jay-Jay-Jay-Jay!!!

Pray for peace , love and communion between the Eastern Orthodox Church. ❤

LOL Redeemed Zoomer's playing of that saccharine uplifting music when he's introducing points and figures HE admires does a lot to show his hand. He isn't holding good cards, but he wants you to FEEL like he is. I don't know if he really is "Redeemed" but he is definitely a Zoomer. XD

Amazing

🤮🤮🤮🤮

70% of Jakes "debate skillz" is just bravado. I think hes just mirroring a sassy black woman tbh 😂

Jake' The Snake 🐍 EXPOSED* 😤

Hitchens was probably the dumbest of the new atheists which is why he was the most effective

There’s so much I don’t know 🤷‍♂️

I just realized if you rearrange the letters in "no god but allah" it says "anal blood thug" alhamdulillah I am convert to islam ☪️🕋

Wonder how many uncreated foots that could fit in there. Sadly, it's not Soy Glower anymore, but now Jay50, this supplement is for perky nip cold shower enjoyers, gentically modified test infused babies, and roid natties who are on a cringestorne dosemaxxer grindset, to increase hypertrophy. use...(I miss his old dawkins impressions).

😭😭

Ginger atheists in Londonistan be like:

Jay tweaking lol

Damn can’t watch this one I can’t listen to that little hat goblin speak

🙏🙏🙏😢👆👆👆

Manly Jay, has no Bishop Authority.

You are partially a, Archimedes archetype; at best.

Infernalists like yourself are arrogant, resentful, sore losers. That’s just the honest truth.

where can i read hume's critique on empirism

Why won’t he just say what his worldview is?

The had to be a gap of thousands of years between man's creation tha's if he was created and the invention of writing and if humans did not have spoken word which later became language how could they be able to explain how everything came into being?!?!

Imaginary concepts are not reality, reality is a self contained system. Real phenomena requires observable qualities. In religious beliefs boundaries are absent,snakes can talk, people are able to come back from the dead, people can walk on water or turn water into wine.Let's be honest friends.. that's insanity.

All; Hadiths are for, justifying corruption.

Boost

Remembered this today and am very happy I could find it by searching “coffee shop bro fallacy” lol.

Jay totally wiped the floor here.

Boost alg

Let's come to knowledge that theres not such thing as coming to knowledge.

How does Dillahuntys logic not apply to Hitler?

In The Matrix, would Neo have been correct if he told the agents in the matrix that, "reality is reality, bruh"?

How does he know reality is reality and not just a delusion in his head or a computer simulation?

A Jay Dyer argument is more perfect than some other argument

BUMP BUMP BUMP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Jay: ***lists various heresies and acts of apostasy from various popes*** Nick: "This is a very flimsy standard..." Good Lord, that's an insane take.

Paul Williams is a Islamic Troll! 😜

Talmudic World Order Pure evil. Judaism wasn't first. Prophets weren't jews. Dyer worked with info wars (which along with Rogan, Alex Jones is represented/owned by the "misinfo (or disinfo publishing group) it has a literal horn logo. Rogans booking agent Matt something is also an open Satanist. Dyer is controlled. Paid. Consciously or not. He's been diverted off the path. The Israelites were white. They were taken into Assyrian captivity then escaped over the CAUCUS mountains (the same mountain Noah "pure in his generations" descended from) when Babylon invaded. Anglo Saxons are Sons of Saac. Isaac. Israelites went onto establish Europe and go to "all corners of the earth" Robert Sephyr is an expert in his field and unequivocally lays out the facts of who Israel really was. And it's not a shithole tyrannical synagogue of Satan established in 1943 by the Rothschild/Balfour dec that's for damn sure. This year I've figured out LOXISM is what' it is all about.

7:39- 7:56 I'm never not going to laugh at that with the "oops" at the end LOL. You just made him look so stupid.

The part that people who support Tag fail to understand is that while the argument technically is a logical argument it isn’t supported in its validity. For example Zeus is a necessary condition for lighting, lighting exists, therefore zeus exist. If the main subject of the premise can be changed to something outlandish like fairies and it makes as much sense, then the argument most likely isn’t valid.

so you gonna drop the reverbed dyerwave or what pal?

I really don't understand why Christian apologists regard these proofs of God as so convincing. There are countless examples of contradictions and absurdities in logic. Logic is a rational technology of the human mind and has lots of imperfections in it. So that people can come up with clever logical tricks showing the 'necessity of God' is completely unconvincing. The more profound objection, however, is your putting God in a subordinate position to logic. As of God can be proved, making him below, so to speak, the rational logic used to prove him. That is just absurd. I want to make it clear that I am not either objecting or disputing existence of God, merely that God can be proved.

One of the necessary conditions of cake other than its ingredients is also a baker.

Didnt answer the question. Reformed people agree with secondary causes. The question to Jay should have been framed differently. Something like the following: Jay agrees that the incarnation is something predestined. The incarnation depends on Mary saying "yes", according to orthodox this is a prime example of free will. Does that mean that Mary could have thwarted the plan of the incarnation? Or is a more realistic answer that God has predestined the chain of people from Adam to Mary, influencing people's choices, who to marry, who to give birth to, through all these generations in order to bring Christ through this lineage. I think God is heavily involved in our day to day actions and influences our environment so that we make certain choices, so that things are both predestined and we truly make free choices. In the end, God's will shall be done. An analogy would be a flap of a butterfly causing a Tornado by contributing and influencing the wind.

Homosexuals will never get it...

The wicked flee when no one pursues.