Abdu Murray
Abdu Murray
  • 304
  • 326 638
J. Warner Wallace on True Crime and What It Reveals About the Meaning of Life | Ep 66
J. Warner Wallace talks to us about the many lessons learned from his life as a homicide detective.
#AbduMurray #JWarnerWallace #truecrime #ColdCaseChristianity #Apologetics #Bible #Christianity
J. Warner Wallace is a Dateline featured cold-case homicide detective and a best-selling author and national speaker in the field of apologetics. He also serves as a Senior Fellow at the Colson Center for Christian Worldview and an adjunct professor at several universities, including Talbot School of Theology, Gateway Seminary, and Southern Evangelical Seminary. His newest book is The Truth in True Crime: What Investigating Death Teaches Us About the Meaning of Life (Zondervan, 2024).
Previous discussions with J Warner Wallace:
ua-cam.com/video/rmii2yvhI1s/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/c61siLn4NDY/v-deo.html
Facebook abdumurray
Instagram abdumurray12
Twitter abdumurray
TikTok www.tiktok.com/@abdumurray
Keep in touch with Abdu and be notified when he is in a town near you by signing up for his monthly newsletter at embracethetruth.org/sign-up/.
Embrace the Truth is a donor-supported ministry that seeks to answer PEOPLE, not questions. Consider partnering with us in this important mission by visiting embracethetruth.org/donations/.
Переглядів: 180

Відео

What If You Were Conceived in Rape? One of the Hardest Questions I've Been Asked
Переглядів 26121 годину тому
Today I try to offer hope and insight for anyone wrestling with difficult questions about suffering and existence. Watch the full Q&A session here! bit.ly/47kQZc7 . . . #Apologetics #Christianity #Philosophy #Truth #Hope #YouMatter #Rape #Pregnancy #Existence #Value
This Might Change Your Perspective on Slavery in the Bible
Переглядів 44214 днів тому
The big challenges of the day are about race and gender. And the biggest challenge oftentimes is that the Bible condones slavery. I hope this helps you to be better equipped next time you're asked about slavery in the Bible. 🎧 Want to learn more? Watch the full talk now! Follow the link: bit.ly/3Mm7CdW . . . #Apologetics #Christianity #Philosophy #Truth #Bible #Slavery #History #Humanity
Maximal Data & The Gospels with Dr. Lydia McGrew | Ep 65
Переглядів 64014 днів тому
One approach to testing the reliability, or lack thereof, of the Gospel accounts of the Resurrection is the "minimal facts" approach by which we look at only those facts that are undisputed among even the most critical scholars. But are there good reasons to move beyond the "minimal facts" to "maximal data"? #AbduMurray #LydiaMcGrew #BartEhrman #NewTestament #Apologetics #Bible #Christianity Wa...
Is a Same-sex Monogamous Relationship that is Sexless Still Sinful?
Переглядів 36121 день тому
What about a same-sex monogamous relationship where there is no sexual activity? Thanks, Nix, for your question. 🎧 Watch the full Q&A in the following link! bit.ly/47kQZc7 . . . #Apologetics #Christianity #Philosophy #Truth #LGBT #Relationship #Moral #Ethics
What did the Pope Say?!?
Переглядів 90421 день тому
Recently Pope Francis remarked that all religions are paths to God. But is that biblically accurate? Is such a statement respectful of all religions or does it fail to take them seriously? Abdu explores the Pope's remarks with clarity.
Faith and Politics: Finding Your Way Without Losing Your Mind w/ John Stonestreet | Ep 64
Переглядів 464Місяць тому
Faith and Politics: Finding Your Way Without Losing Your Mind w/ John Stonestreet | Ep 64
The Unexpected Relevance of Jesus in the 21st Century
Переглядів 260Місяць тому
The Unexpected Relevance of Jesus in the 21st Century
How to Survive the Upcoming Presidential Debate
Переглядів 194Місяць тому
How to Survive the Upcoming Presidential Debate
Is the Gospel of John theological FICTION? With Dr. Lydia McGrew | Ep 63
Переглядів 579Місяць тому
Is the Gospel of John theological FICTION? With Dr. Lydia McGrew | Ep 63
How to Truly Engage in Conversations About Faith
Переглядів 145Місяць тому
How to Truly Engage in Conversations About Faith
The MASSIVE Failure of Origin of Life Science w/ Dr. James Tour | Ep 62
Переглядів 3,5 тис.2 місяці тому
The MASSIVE Failure of Origin of Life Science w/ Dr. James Tour | Ep 62
Atheism, Science vs. Christianity, and Other Books You NEED To Read | Ep 61
Переглядів 4782 місяці тому
Atheism, Science vs. Christianity, and Other Books You NEED To Read | Ep 61
What is the Epic of Gilgamesh?
Переглядів 3992 місяці тому
What is the Epic of Gilgamesh?
What the Trump Assassination Attempt Reveals About the US | Ep 60
Переглядів 1 тис.2 місяці тому
What the Trump Assassination Attempt Reveals About the US | Ep 60
What is the first thing you think of when the Bible mentions the word slave?
Переглядів 2543 місяці тому
What is the first thing you think of when the Bible mentions the word slave?
Abdu appears on the Neil Boron Show to talk about his testimony, apologetics, and Evangelism
Переглядів 3203 місяці тому
Abdu appears on the Neil Boron Show to talk about his testimony, apologetics, and Evangelism
The Result of a Post-truth Culture.
Переглядів 3254 місяці тому
The Result of a Post-truth Culture.
How does the Christian faith really influence the idea of freedom?
Переглядів 2014 місяці тому
How does the Christian faith really influence the idea of freedom?
Machines remake us in their image
Переглядів 1965 місяців тому
Machines remake us in their image
Astonishing: Richard Dawkins SHOCKINGLY Claims to Be a Christian! Sort of ...
Переглядів 9475 місяців тому
Astonishing: Richard Dawkins SHOCKINGLY Claims to Be a Christian! Sort of ...
We are in a digital Garden of Eden
Переглядів 2945 місяців тому
We are in a digital Garden of Eden
Is it contradictory to say that an all-loving God exists in a world of suffering?
Переглядів 4206 місяців тому
Is it contradictory to say that an all-loving God exists in a world of suffering?
A lawyer exposes the weakness of the Scotland Hate Crime Law
Переглядів 3746 місяців тому
A lawyer exposes the weakness of the Scotland Hate Crime Law
Does Social Contract Theory get rid of God?
Переглядів 2856 місяців тому
Does Social Contract Theory get rid of God?
Easter and the Christ is King Controversy
Переглядів 3286 місяців тому
Easter and the Christ is King Controversy
Is the Church Being Influenced by the World?
Переглядів 2936 місяців тому
Is the Church Being Influenced by the World?
Jesus Does Not Compromise His Message
Переглядів 2327 місяців тому
Jesus Does Not Compromise His Message
Is Religion Dangerous? LIVE Q&A at MIT | Ep 59
Переглядів 1,4 тис.7 місяців тому
Is Religion Dangerous? LIVE Q&A at MIT | Ep 59
What Is The Point of Marriage?
Переглядів 2128 місяців тому
What Is The Point of Marriage?

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @traildude7538
    @traildude7538 17 хвилин тому

    Hey -- if you're inside a spaceship you'll hear its engines or whatever!

  • @traildude7538
    @traildude7538 24 хвилини тому

    Dr. Tyson is making the same mistake that the young-earth crowd make, that the Bible is meant to be something like a friend's grandfather's journal of events he observed instead of the ancient literature it is. It's based on the faulty assumption that it isn't necessary to actual learn about something before making pronouncements on the topic. Ross is making the error of assuming that Genesis 1 is speaking in scientific terms: there is nothing about a planet in Genesis 1. His claims are just science fiction that pretty much does do what Tyson claims, changing the interpretation to fit science. So Ross is thinking contrary to his opening principle; the first step is to figure out what kind of literature the text represents -- and it isn't history. Given that Ross fails to do that, he doesn't qualify as an expert witness. Indeed he's making the same mistake as fundamentalists do when they accuse evolution of being a religion, taking words and writings to mean what they would mean by them. By his measure, the books of Tom Clancy or John Grisham have to qualify as meant to be taken literally.

  • @Daniel7evens
    @Daniel7evens 3 години тому

    Iron sharpens iron… 🦋

  • @itstodorokiskittes2745
    @itstodorokiskittes2745 12 годин тому

    This Christian’s BS had no limits on lying about the creation of this world and the universe. Science tests and proves while the religion is OH OK everything was done in 6 days. What a BS.

  • @ji8044
    @ji8044 22 години тому

    You made your most recent video private after I had written a very scholarly and respectful comment to it, attacking no one. What are you afraid of?

  • @planes3333
    @planes3333 День тому

    This man obviously does not know the bible.

  • @planes3333
    @planes3333 День тому

    No there is only about two books named after women in the bible, Esther and Ruth.

    • @ji8044
      @ji8044 5 годин тому

      There is also Judith, depending on which canon and translation you are using.

  • @igutoskie
    @igutoskie День тому

    Getting so tired of the Simp Christianity that’s destroyed the west. Yes, women are in the Bible, but what you should be treated teaching is the strength of men in the family the role of the man in the family that’s gone by the wayside to this wimpy garbage preaching guarantee this not speaking out against abortion. I guarantee you this isn’t speaking out against divorce and fatherless homes. That’s the message. You should be pushing right now Mark Driscoll, Jeff Durbin there’s a lot of good preachers that actually teach what needs to be taught right now this is feminist, garbage inside of Christianity and it needs to stop.

  • @timricketts.
    @timricketts. День тому

    The Bible also declares the Father, the Holy Spirit and the Word in the first 3 verses of Genesis. "1 John 5:7 For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one." "Genesis 1:1 In the beginning God (Father) created the heaven and the earth. 1:2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God (Holy Ghost) moved upon the face of the waters. 1:3 And God said (the Word), Let there be light: and there was light."

  • @Bronsluv
    @Bronsluv День тому

    This is bullshit.

  • @MiguelSanchez-ce2qq
    @MiguelSanchez-ce2qq День тому

    Identity politics in the Gospel?

  • @hdueiannsns
    @hdueiannsns День тому

    not gonna worship her you weird "jesus" followers

    • @hdueiannsns
      @hdueiannsns День тому

      follow only jesus folks.

    • @hdueiannsns
      @hdueiannsns День тому

      please, wwoman never follow this man, it is miapoken

    • @Quackzine
      @Quackzine День тому

      Where did he say to 'worship' Ruth? Maybe try LISTENING again

  • @michaelmartinez4981
    @michaelmartinez4981 День тому

    Actually, even if he isn't correct about some of the names of books that doesn't matter the point he's making is that women were prominent enough by Yahweh to be used in some of the greatest instances

    • @ji8044
      @ji8044 5 годин тому

      Actually the Both of Ruth never mentions Yahweh. It's the only one in the OT which doesn't.

  • @tristin6995
    @tristin6995 День тому

    Bruh the gospels are infamously known for NOT including women, its like the only argument Muslims really have over Christians, some books in the Quran are identical to the bible with the exception the Quran mentions 350 more women then the Christian Bible, infact multiple Female names were turned into Male names through Translation during the Medieval Times

  • @LauraBeeDannon
    @LauraBeeDannon День тому

    Be Catholic

  • @GeraldineHall-pm7xz
    @GeraldineHall-pm7xz День тому

    He is wrong very wrong. Ruth is a Jew

  • @Cracklejackel66
    @Cracklejackel66 2 дні тому

    I don’t know if ALL the books of the Bible are named after women

    • @michaelmartinez4981
      @michaelmartinez4981 День тому

      He never said all the books. He said many of the books are after women and it isn't a coincidence that some of jesus's first disciples were women and the places they met when Paul's ministry was prominent were women's houses

    • @planes3333
      @planes3333 День тому

      No there is only about two books named after women in the bible, Esther and Ruth.

  • @Jesuswinsbirdofmichigan
    @Jesuswinsbirdofmichigan 2 дні тому

    ⁉️#11_StopInterupting_🚫

  • @bnjm8868
    @bnjm8868 2 дні тому

    Paul in in the 4th chapter of Hebrews revealed some 4,000 years after the beginning of the seventh day that that oeriod of time was still ongoing and that Christians habe opportunity to enter or rest within it from sin. That includes Christians today, some 6,000 years later. So each day was thiusands of years long.

  • @bnjm8868
    @bnjm8868 2 дні тому

    Actually is Revelation chapter 6 the stars indicate the falling stars as meteors that fall daily from the sky. Which at that time will be visible through the darkened sky.

  • @andy4ward.slavaukraini.364
    @andy4ward.slavaukraini.364 2 дні тому

    Amazing, 'stars falling' could mean angels, demons, or meteorites falling. Great interpretation (delusion). Another 'scientific example from the bible, on how the earth is made in 6 days 😂

  • @deanschulze3129
    @deanschulze3129 2 дні тому

    Neil Tyson believes that we are living in a simulation. Imaging the leap of faith it takes to believe something like that.

  • @logic_rules
    @logic_rules 3 дні тому

    Delusional people gathered in the comments section. Proof that religion is a brain dlsease.

  • @LindenAstle
    @LindenAstle 4 дні тому

    Well , why don't you have Neil on your program to debate this bronze / iron age god believing christian apologist ! We need a coherent enlightened discussion on these issues and not just one nonsensical viewpoint !

  • @BehroozCompani-fk2sx
    @BehroozCompani-fk2sx 4 дні тому

    These guys are trying so hard to explain their bible nonsense. You can read a cook book and interpret it better as how the universe was created.

  • @ji8044
    @ji8044 4 дні тому

    You're wrong again. Ruth, Bathsheba, Tamar and Rahab are included in the Matthew genealogy of Jesus only as the consort or wives of Israelites. According to Israelite law, only the ethnicity of the father counted, which is why for instance when the Israelites conquered other peoples, they killed the men but kept the women. It's also why even thought Herod the Great married Mariamne I, descendant of Alexander Jannaeus, no royal lineage was conferred on Herod in the eyes of the Judeans by doing so. Her royal ancestry didn't count. There are no women listed in the Luke genealogy of Jesus. You should stop making these videos, because you know virtually nothing about the Old Testament.

    • @sniperfox8806
      @sniperfox8806 4 дні тому

      Yeah he went into detail on that dude, you can go ahead and watch the video to see for yourself before holding judgements

    • @ji8044
      @ji8044 4 дні тому

      @@sniperfox8806 He's completely wrong in his details. He's never read any other genealogies obviously, certainly not even Luke. Now here's the funny part. If Joseph was not the father of Jesus, then neither Matthew's nor Luke's genealogy matters as at all. Jesus would have had no blood relationship to the House of David. It's another way you know that everyone within the lifetime of Jesus, including his family and his disciples believed Jesus was born human.

    • @sniperfox8806
      @sniperfox8806 4 дні тому

      @@ji8044 Jesus has relation to the line of David through Mary, not Joseph, you can go ahead and read the Bible in full and find that out for yourself. Jesus was born of the virgin Mary as God made in human form, Joseph was called to act as the human father and marry Mary to spare her from being stoned due to the societal laws at the time.

    • @ji8044
      @ji8044 4 дні тому

      @@sniperfox8806 That's false, there is no genealogy through Mary in the Bible and it wouldn't matter if there was since the Israelites did not recognize female lineage for royal succession. Also stoning was not the crime for unmarried pregnancy in Judea. You have no idea what you're talking about.

    • @sniperfox8806
      @sniperfox8806 3 дні тому

      @@ji8044 that's kinda the incredible thing about the Bible, Ruth and other exceptional women are in the genealogy of Jesus anyways in spite of the social norms at the time. And Mary was pregnant with Jesus before her and Joseph married, which is why he took responsibility for it, to prevent her being stoned so she could give birth

  • @chriskeen4886
    @chriskeen4886 5 днів тому

    No male or female. We are all one in Christ Jesus.

    • @ji8044
      @ji8044 4 дні тому

      Nope, nope, nope "Therefore I want the men everywhere to pray, lifting up holy hands without anger or disputing. 9 I also want the women to dress modestly, with decency and propriety, adorning themselves, not with elaborate hairstyles or gold or pearls or expensive clothes, 10 but with good deeds, appropriate for women who profess to worship God. 11 A woman[a] should learn in quietness and full submission. 12 I do not permit a woman to teach or to assume authority over a man;[b] she must be quiet." 1 Timothy 2:8-12

    • @Szpak-123
      @Szpak-123 День тому

      @@ji8044 I suggest Judges 4. Deborah.

    • @ji8044
      @ji8044 22 години тому

      @@Szpak-123 Unless you're Jewish, that has no bearing here.

  • @bethbacarella
    @bethbacarella 5 днів тому

    John and I have never heard this explained better. Thank you for taking the time with that young lady and also for posting this.

  • @paradigmbuster
    @paradigmbuster 5 днів тому

    The prophecy about stars falling from the sky referred to "shooting stars" or stars are symbolic to spiritual things in high places. Natural history according to scientist depend on philosophical naturalism. Science did not discover that philosophical naturalism gives us the answers to natural history, these are only affirmations. The spirit of God moving over the face of the waters is the "breath of God",or wind. No hovering. The darkness on the face of the deep was the sea floor, which it is today. There would be sun on the face of waters but not on the face of the deep. The 4th day is the day that the purpose and authorship of the selestial bodies was announced, not the day they were placed. The appearance of light the first day was the day that the water that covered the continents became shallow enough to light the surface of the earth as the new ocean basins were opening.

  • @georgeevanick40
    @georgeevanick40 6 днів тому

    There is a lot of highly valuable content in this episode. I will need to watch it again. Powerful insights. Thank you.

  • @Blueskyeday
    @Blueskyeday 6 днів тому

    pride. like a lot of award displays? sorry, jus sayin.

  • @Bugsy0333
    @Bugsy0333 7 днів тому

    Lies !

  • @johnnyrosenberg9522
    @johnnyrosenberg9522 8 днів тому

    Tyson mention one example. Do you guys have problems with examples? What a load of rubbish.

  • @sqlblindman
    @sqlblindman 9 днів тому

    Yeah, he's lying. Leviticus 25:44-46 explicitly describes chattel slavery. If you have to lie to protect your beliefs, it is time to get new beliefs.

  • @ji8044
    @ji8044 9 днів тому

    There is nothing sacred about sex or conception. People all over the Earth throughout human history have had sex and babies, without ever knowing anything about Jesus. In fact, in the OT sex usually leads to a very bad result and in the NT it doesn't exist at all except for Paul's admonition to go ahead and do it if you have to, but marry first. If this young lady found comfort in what you told her though, that's still a good thing.

    • @Blueskyeday
      @Blueskyeday 9 днів тому

      You have a right to your opinion.

    • @ji8044
      @ji8044 9 днів тому

      @@Blueskyeday Yes, we al have the right to our own theology, just not our own set of facts to paraphrase Daniel Moynihan.

    • @kirkdarling4120
      @kirkdarling4120 7 днів тому

      @@ji8044 What fact are you debating? "Sacred" is a matter of theology, not a matter of fact.

  • @ji8044
    @ji8044 10 днів тому

    HOW does it refute itself? That statement is a subjective opinion about the nature of truth. Therefore, to the extent it does anything; it PROVES itself.

    • @AbduMurrayOfficial
      @AbduMurrayOfficial 8 днів тому

      The statement "There is no objective truth" refutes itself because if it's true, it becomes an objective truth, contradicting its own premise. This creates a logical paradox. I hope that helps clarify the reasoning!

  • @f.r.etling6226
    @f.r.etling6226 12 днів тому

    Like any belief, postmodernism has a kernel of truth to it. It’s good to be aware of dogmatism on both ends and question “objectivity”. But there are times when the truth is simply the truth, and one side is simply wrong

  • @dpapaioannow
    @dpapaioannow 12 днів тому

    the description begining at about 32:17....could it be that he slightly lavitated for a little bit?before that burst of energy came from the inside out and in both directions at once?

  • @jbapples4611
    @jbapples4611 12 днів тому

    This is what lying looks like.

    • @ji8044
      @ji8044 11 днів тому

      Even though every informed person knows that is what he's doing; he's not going to make any changes or corrections.

  • @nickbrasing8786
    @nickbrasing8786 12 днів тому

    "The Bible says you can't own a person as property at all"? Where Abdul? You know very well this isn't true. It specifically says the opposite of that. That you can, so long as they aren't a fellow Israelite.

  • @ji8044
    @ji8044 12 днів тому

    This is completely false, as any person who is familiar with the Torah would know. Why say something so blatantly wrong and so easily disproven by opening up Deuteronomy?

  • @nb7524
    @nb7524 12 днів тому

    Thank you for defending our faith and for responding to this serious issue.

    • @henrypbel
      @henrypbel 10 днів тому

      As usual, anything goes in defending the faith, including blatantly lying and endorsing Slavery-Lite. Why tie yourself in knots trying to reconcile the bible's ("god's") routine and unambiguous endorsement of behavior that modern people consider hideously immoral? Once you allow yourself to entertain the possibility that the bible was authored not by god(s), but by MEN living 2000-4000 years ago, the bible's endless immoralities, contrivances, and contradictions are no longer mysterious. All of a sudden it's totally obvious why god 's top virtue and only requirement for salvation from eternal torture isn't, say, "love thy neighbor" (or any other trait that if followed would make the world a better place), but belief without evidence.

    • @Bugsy0333
      @Bugsy0333 7 днів тому

      You mean making excuses and not being truthful !

  • @labspeciman7402
    @labspeciman7402 13 днів тому

    The bible talks about beating your slaves and the rules on if they die. No one has to buy your book. The bible is clear on it. It also condones: Incest, Genocide and child sacrifice. If you have to have that explained to you then you are beyond hope.

  • @servantofgod7798
    @servantofgod7798 13 днів тому

    Great video

    • @AbduMurrayOfficial
      @AbduMurrayOfficial 12 днів тому

      Thank you!

    • @Bugsy0333
      @Bugsy0333 12 днів тому

      Why no response to people that don’t agree with you ?

    • @ji8044
      @ji8044 11 днів тому

      @@Bugsy0333 He knows what he is saying is false, but he's betting the people in his audience don't.

    • @Bugsy0333
      @Bugsy0333 11 днів тому

      @@ji8044 Yes and what a shame !

  • @timeshark8727
    @timeshark8727 14 днів тому

    Ah yes.. another talk where they pretend the bible doesn't say what it does by misrepresenting what slavery is/was, not only in the bible, but in history as well.

    • @419
      @419 14 днів тому

      The Lord has told me that no matter what I say to you, or how much evidence I provide you with, it will not result in you having faith in Jesus since you do not want to believe because you're hung up on some misconceptions you have about Christianity and have some religious trauma. The only thing I can do is tell you that what you think about Christianity is wrong, and pray that you realize just how loving and gracious our God is.

    • @timeshark8727
      @timeshark8727 14 днів тому

      @@419 Hahahaha. Did you get a recording or transcript of "The Lord" telling you this? Because, faith in Jesus wasn't even the topic of discussion. I'm not sure why you think that lying about God telling you something, then lying about me is going to convince me that the next things you say are true. You end by basically telling me that the bible doesn't say what the bible says... classic. I hope you one day wrench your head out of your rear end so that you stop spouting lies and nonsense.

    • @ji8044
      @ji8044 14 днів тому

      @@419 If you believe the OT is the word of God inspired and inerrant, then actually, everything the Lord said in the Old Testament is completely contradictory to what Murray says here.

    • @Bugsy0333
      @Bugsy0333 11 днів тому

      @@419 Leviticus 25:44-46 New International Version 44 “‘Your male and female slaves are to come from the nations around you; from them you may buy slaves. 45 You may also buy some of the temporary residents living among you and members of their clans born in your country, and they will become your property. 46 You can bequeath them to your children as inherited property and can make them slaves for life, but you must not rule over your fellow Israelites ruthlessly.

  • @ji8044
    @ji8044 14 днів тому

    The Bible doesn't preach any of those things. You consistently misstate every single aspect of slavery in the Old Testament. That is deliberate. All of the passaged deleted from the Slave Bible refer to indentured servitude between fellow Israelite males only. Christian slave owners referred to the slaves as the children of Ham, condemned to eternal servitude.

  • @salserokorsou
    @salserokorsou 14 днів тому

    Cut the dishonest crap. The Bible does condone slavery, owning of other human beings as property. There is no way to clean that up.

    • @419
      @419 14 днів тому

      Well if there is no God, why is that wrong? It's not. It's just your opinion vs someone else's, because there's no higher authority than human opinion to subject our morals to, so it all becomes a matter of opinion. And if they say it's right, it's merely your opinion that it's wrong. However when you read the context and understand the purpose for it in the Bible, you'll find that the reason for it does align with your God-given conscience. God didn't condone it, but he brought restrictions on it in order to end it completely over time. Does "love thy neighbour as thyself" condone it? I think not. But let's be real here, you don't want the Bible to be true, do you?

    • @salserokorsou
      @salserokorsou 14 днів тому

      @@419 if you can't be honest enough to admit the bible condones slavery, why even have a conversation with you about it?

    • @419
      @419 14 днів тому

      @@salserokorsou You need to re-read what I said because you're still stuck in your ignorance.

    • @salserokorsou
      @salserokorsou 14 днів тому

      @@419 you need to learn how to be honest. But I guess you won't cuz you are afraid of an imaginary god.

    • @419
      @419 14 днів тому

      @@salserokorsou You're the one wasting your temporary and precious time here on this Earth on something you believe to be imaginary. I'm spending a fragment of an eternity trying to correct you in the hope that you too will receive Christ's offer and receive an eternity. Nothing you do will get you into heaven. It is all about what Jesus did for you that gets you there.

  • @ji8044
    @ji8044 14 днів тому

    If I said "Abdu Murray are you an attorney?" and you said "I am", would you be answering a question or confirming that you were Yahweh? If you look at any concordance, the Hebrew "I am" of Yahweh, is not the Greek "I am" of John. They are entirely different concepts and John was not written in Hebrew.