Відео

I mean I just watched it today and honestly don't see the complaints is the movie great no is it good yes and all of the people complain it should have been her father is the main character so we watch a movie where the guy dies not defeat the main villain. She isn't perfect most of her impressive feats is when she's on horseback and if you can't understand why a Rohirrim would be good on horseback then I don't think you're a fan of Lord of the rings. Ps there's like heaps of warrior women in tokens universe is not unusual for women so learn had to fight to protect themselves

Maybe you took a nap for most of the movie which is completely understandable .... both unnamed for a reason female protagonists were on god mode

What about the scene where Mufasa was talking to Simba about the kings from the past doesn’t Mufasa being an orphan contradict that

Stupid movies anyway. Lions don’t live in jungles.

You have no idea how secretly silent elephants can be. Their feet are like sponges that absorb shock so they’re practically silent.

My main issue with the monkey is that it was wearing a modern dress

Its shit

This movie is so overhated

ngl a lot of movie reviews shit on the movie because it focuses on hera and saying that she’s a mary sue and i honestly don’t understand how 1. it’s an issue that she’s a main character and 2. how she would be considered a “mary sue”

Yeah but how are they supposed to fill the movie with boss girl moments if helm was the protagonist

Haven't seen helm since shadow of war and yet still as badass.

Spoiler "Punches his way through things, and that's how he solves them" That's also how he started a war... But he *was* wise enough to realize that and seek redemption.

The movie was almost good. Really good bones, terrible budget. It felt so small. Tiny armies make it feel like a silly larp. Poor job setting up the main character as a fighter (they do make her seem smart, but thats not how they resolve things) Too many references to the books. Several things felt really contrived, and it didn't trust the audience to follow some important plot points.so they had to spell it ut out too much The brother getting left behind is silly because they are only followed by 4 guys. The complaint about the bridge is too nitpicky. In a better film, you probably wouldn't have noticed something like that cause you would be invested enough not to notice. those kind if issues happen all the time, but you rarely notice them on a first viewing if you like the film

Nope, she’s a Mary sure who girl bossed her way through the movie

It is stated. He says, “I think I can go now. I just… needed to help someone. I think I did…”

Uuh did we watch the same film? Cause this film was well received by audiences and TLK fans on everywhere else I see like Reddit and TikTok.

Finally, a sensible outlook on Hera as a character. Lots of people just write her off as a Mary Sue girlboss, which she isn't.

Watch acolytes horror video too ❤

Some dude said that Helms Deep was a multi layered wall.

I want to see the movie

This kind of complaint is always struck me strange. The same deus ex machina or wherever the heck you wanna call it character issue is ever present in male characters, but it only gets complained about when it’s a woman.

I mean, he did imprison a bunch of dwarves for no reason other than they wondered into a forest he didn't want them to in the book, so it's not like they completely made the cruel thing up

Jared??

Frankly it has to do with his beginning motivation his parents were trying to make Gotham better

Wayne is rich and all his power/businesses/ houses are in Gotham. Fox, Gordan, Alfred, Harvey, Rachel, Selina, pretty much everyone lives there. Someone told me, a villain and a hero have the same come up, something bad happened to them. The villain says, the world hurt me so I’m going to hurt it back. The hero says the world hurt me and I’m not going to let anyone feel the same.

Well said, yep. It's a unique angle that i feel we won't get to see in another Batman movie for a while.

Glad 2, a metaphor for Hollywood.

Absolute rubbish....

Terrible movie. Terrible performance by Denzel. Most disappointing

Hear me out, just saying. Rome fell for multiple reasons. One of them is the constant cycle of fixing and evetually falling of the empire. One emperor would take power after a previous emperor fumbled the bag. This emperor would lead rome into an era pf prosperity and wealth, either through politics or conquest. This emperor would eventually die and his sucesor would take rain. This sucesor and the ones that vome after would get progresivly worst until one fumbles the bag, sending the empire back to first step of the loop. Repeat the process until Rome falls. Maximus did his thing, but at the best, what he did is create a very short loop. With Marcus Aurelius being the good leader, comodus being the one that fumbles the bag, and however comes after porb fixing things.

Maximus spent his life fighting wars for Rome so it made sense when he beat other gladiators in combat. Lucius spent his life in luxury and then in hiding, so it was lazy writing that made him a good fighter. The movie was also just really slow for long stretches of time and it felt like much of that screentine was wasted on unnecessary dialogue. Althoug it wasn't great, I can at least appreciate how little it effects my enjoyment of the original.

Like pacific rim

I watched 6 min and turned it off ,, I went and seen the original in the theater it was epic mm the actors were incredible ,, kids who have no clue making these movies today

But in real life history is that what happened? That is the real question.

That’s the point…. You missed the whole point

I don't want to even see the sequel because that was the best movie ever and perfect I don't even want to see the sequel but anyway thank you

Not really, considering evil never changes...n is constant. Terrible review

Actually Mr Bond was based on multiple characters that Mr Fleming met during his time at the Naval Intelligence Division . One of them was the Dutch Prince Bernhard, who was a true womanizer and liked his Martini’s shaken, not stirred.

I looked away from my phone and I thought Ben Shapiro was talking about Batman

Your assessment of this wonderful film is erroneous and pointless.

What I see with people talking about batman these days is the same as it was when I was at school and people thought it was cool to hate oasis. 15 years on oasis are selling out everywhere and Robbie Pats is trying to be a sleek Baleman ... just appreciate the moment, it's easier to stay true.

Arkham Scarecrow is the best imo

Colin Farrell and Matt reeves just did for the penguin what Nolan and ledger did for the joker.

ADAM WEST !!!!!!!!! all others are psudo

Batman won't kill he'll just leave you at 1hp 😂

i disagree with bane

You’re right. Batman’s brand of justice wasn’t harsh enough. And he wasn’t even trying to wear his regulation hockey pants.

Just finished the movie and was like wtf did i just watch and now i want to watch it again knowing this thanks bro🤣🤘🏼

Kieth. Amazing.

This is a completely wrong analysis of what’s going on here