- 44
- 458 189
J.L. Williams
Приєднався 6 чер 2006
Lenses and Perspective Explained in Silly Sketches
Why is a "normal lens" normal? What's so natural about "natural" perspective? To explain these slippery concepts to photography newcomers, I drew these silly sketches as part of a now-retired video about the Pixii Plus and Pixii Max cameras. In case non-Pixiians are interested in these subjects, I've snipped out the sketchy explanations and posted them as their own video. Enjoy!
Переглядів: 106
Відео
Pixii Max: Just the Facts
Переглядів 2,2 тис.4 місяці тому
The new Pixii Max M-mount digital rangefinder camera has been announced, but not yet seen in the wild. What will it be like? Armed with the factory spec sheets plus my own experience using using a Pixii extensively since November 2021, I'm here to make my guesses! NOTE: This is an edited-down version of my earlier video, “Pixii Max Early Look.” THAT video contained a fairly length explanation o...
Pixii Max Early Look
Переглядів 5 тис.4 місяці тому
A mysterious visitor is coming from France! Nobody has it, has seen it, or knows much about it... but that won't stop us about speculating about the new 36x24mm Pixii Max rangefinder camera! Plus probably more than you really wanted to know about why focal lengths don't matter, how 40 degrees defines natural perspective, how much four nickels weigh, and some silly drawings... NOTE: If you DON'T...
I Almost Quit Film! Until...
Переглядів 5557 місяців тому
I was struggling to find a good solution for digitizing my 35mm films, until I stumbled across this three-step process: (1) use a real film scanner; (2) scan negatives in positive mode; (3) use the Negative Lab Pro plug-in to convert them into positive images. Watch the video and you'll see it's easier than it sounds... NOTE: Scan times quoted may vary depending on your computer, USB connection...
Monochrome Mystique
Переглядів 90910 місяців тому
Christmas cheer was getting to me, so I clicked my Pixii Plus into black-and-white mode and headed out into the nighttime streets in search of the Monochrome Mystique. Come on along... If you'd prefer a normal review of the Pentax K3 III Monochrom, these friendly Canadians can fix you up: ua-cam.com/video/I4ZpLIUzjPw/v-deo.htmlsi=Z5w70jjyuzm0QNrU NOTE: I generated all the film-noir movie poster...
Let's chat about the new Pixii Plus digital rangefinder camera!
Переглядів 18 тис.11 місяців тому
CHAT MODE ON! I shot this segment interview-style so I could be the first on UA-cam with a look at this new evolution of the Pixii digital rangefinder camera from France. The Plus has a significantly improved rangefinder and viewfinder that also can be installed as an upgrade to existing Pixii models. Time to get serious about the Pixii? Watch and find out! Disclosure statement: This is my pers...
Two little meters - one Achilles' heel
Переглядів 15 тис.Рік тому
Want to add an exposure meter to a meterless classic camera, or make a quick fix to one with a dead meter? These third-party clip-on meters offer solid basic specs at two-digit prices. But are they any good? UPDATE TO THE ORIGINAL REVIEW: The TTArtisan meter made it to its second battery change, but at that point one sidewall of the beige plastic battery compartment broke off while I was removi...
Saving space with a super-thin lens!
Переглядів 2,3 тис.Рік тому
Brightin Star's new 28mm f/2.8 lens is so thin it makes an M-mount camera almost pocketable. I gave it a try in a cramped Amtrak roomette to see whether the compact build compromises handling. [8/4/2023] QUICK COMPATIBILITY UPDATE: The lens fits comfortably on the Pixii and I assume it also will fit on all the Leica M models listed on Funleader's product-info page [myfunleader.com/products/funl...
Pixii feature preview: Now with auto ISO!
Переглядів 1,6 тис.Рік тому
The Pixii software-defined digital rangefinder camera has a new feature now testing in its developer channel: Auto ISO! Here's a quick look at how to use it. (TIP: Anybody can be part of the developer channel as long as you don't mind the risk of a few extra glitches. Visit pixii.fr to learn how.) NOTE: In the effort to make a SHORT video, I may have left the incorrect impression that the auto-...
Generative Fill, But Not Dumb! #shorts
Переглядів 86Рік тому
By now all the big Photoshop channels have shown gee-whiz demos of Adobe's new "Generative Fill" feature... but they usually wind up making the photo crummier and more predictable. Here's a simple way to use it that's actually helpful: turn uncooperative people who don't want you to use their photos into "synthetic people" who won't complain!
Help Me (and AI) Pick a Budget Digital Rangefinder Camera*
Переглядів 542Рік тому
Using AI, because everything is about AI now, I compare results from two digital rangefinder cameras suitable for non-Leica budgets. *Chicanery is involved!
PREVIEW: New 64-bit Pixii A2572 rangefinder camera
Переглядів 20 тис.Рік тому
Pixii SaS, the French maker of the Pixii 26-megapixel digital rangefinder camera, has introduced a new model* with a 64-bit Cortex A55 processor. The new processor is much faster - but how does that translate into real-world photography performance? Watch and see! *Because the Pixii is a *software-defined* camera - all its functions are implemented as code, rather than relying on proprietary ch...
How bad, really, is the "Worst Lens of 2022"?
Переглядів 568Рік тому
Of all the mainstream photography channels on UA-cam, the only one I really enjoy is @dpreview . The hosts are personable, the tone is light-hearted without being goofy (usually), and the gear advice is pragmatic. So I felt a psychic wound when I found that my favorite photo-UA-camrs had chosen a lens that I had just bought with my own hard-earned money as "the worst lens of 2022" in their annu...
Hack It With Me: Lomography DigitaLIZA Max
Переглядів 2,2 тис.2 роки тому
Hack It With Me: Lomography DigitaLIZA Max
Review Part II - Does a Software Update Transform the New French Pixii Camera?
Переглядів 8 тис.2 роки тому
Review Part II - Does a Software Update Transform the New French Pixii Camera?
New 26mp Pixii Camera [2021] - First Detailed Review!
Переглядів 21 тис.2 роки тому
New 26mp Pixii Camera [2021] - First Detailed Review!
Weird Film Weekend: Lomography Fantome 8
Переглядів 2,4 тис.3 роки тому
Weird Film Weekend: Lomography Fantome 8
OOPS! I developed Portra 160 as black-and-white!
Переглядів 8824 роки тому
OOPS! I developed Portra 160 as black-and-white!
Bumbling My Way Through E6 with CineStill's Dynamic Chrome
Переглядів 6 тис.4 роки тому
Bumbling My Way Through E6 with CineStill's Dynamic Chrome
Load Your 35mm Film Camera the 1960s Way
Переглядів 5 тис.4 роки тому
Load Your 35mm Film Camera the 1960s Way
Chilling Tales of Old-Time Photography: The Ordeal of Exposure
Переглядів 7934 роки тому
Chilling Tales of Old-Time Photography: The Ordeal of Exposure
Ilford Ortho Plus: Ortho or Orth-no?
Переглядів 1,5 тис.4 роки тому
Ilford Ortho Plus: Ortho or Orth-no?
7Artisans 75mm f:1,25 - Return of the Biotar?
Переглядів 29 тис.4 роки тому
7Artisans 75mm f:1,25 - Return of the Biotar?
SFFP: Small-Footprint Film Processing
Переглядів 3605 років тому
SFFP: Small-Footprint Film Processing
I bust a gut when that lid went flying. Magnificent, perfect timing.
I loved it. You explained so that even I could understand it. I love the "backstories" of old and modern lenses. Somehow you combined them both in one great video. Bravo.
This is SO helpful. Thank you so much for taking the time to make this video. Much appreciated.
Thaks for the video, very informative
This is a very simple, elegant solution. Thank you for sharing!
Ive been using my dslr lol its not ideal. Gotta get one of these.
Good one. I am waiting for mine, September I am told and hoping.
KEKS meter is the best of the budget options imo, lit screen with auto brightness adjustment and continuous aperture/shutter priority readout, customizable exposure compensation and customization of max/min aperture/shutter and 1/3,1/2,full stop steps
I've heard a lot of good things about these; hope to give one a try!
Like the way the lens is reviewed and compared, particular against the vintage lens (Canon). Lens can be "as sharp as possible" or it can also be "having its own character". Love to have the choice of sharpness or dreamy feel.
They are just purely awesome...
Another excellent video. You are my Go To got Pixii related news.
4:52 I don't know about the Reflx but the TTArtisan actually takes a CR1632.
Update! I've just watched a bit more of the video and mine is a METER II which takes a CR1632 whereas the one here takes a CR2023. They seem to be otherwise identical but there might be internal differences.
How do you remove the red cap - I am about to the swat team to open it
Nah, that would be too extreme. Try a small industrial laser…
unrelated but that strap lug placement at 1:18 is ingenious! currently i have the Sony ZV1 and its pesky one strap lug is driving me nuts.
Got myself the AstrHori AH M1 some months back, and I can't complain. The battery life is pretty good, the visibility is excellent, the material feels premium, and the usability is as good as you'd expect it to be. Only small downside I found is that it can't be used for long exposures, since the longest it can display is 32s, which I found out the hard way. Another thing I'd like to see on these little devices is exposure compensation, which is useful when using filters. But for $50, it does the job perfectly.
Back in the film days, most amateur photographers would print their 35mm photos to a size of 8 x 10 inches. If the picture was really good, 11 x 14 inches and if they really liked that photo, they may have gone to a 16 x 20 enlargement. Most brand name lenses closed down to f8 with the camera on a tripod would produce an acceptably sharp image. I once tested a new lens for sharpness and started blowing up the image on my computer screen and thought it was not as sharp as I expected until I realised that if I had printed it, it would have measured 5 x 7.5 feet! That lens was super sharp for any use I had!
This no nonsense video presentation on black & white photography is a work of art! Congratulations!
I shoot film 100% for nostalgia reasons. I'm 76 and started with film when I was about 9 years old. I like the grain and "old look" because it's psychologically speaking an almost return to my childhood/teenage/early adult years. Film is fun picture taking. The latest digital cameras are vastly superior as for picture quality. Everyone knows that even if some won't admit it. I watch nearly every film camera video on UA-cam that was taken with a digital camera(s). Viva film!
Thanks, like others commented....you just saved me a lot of money.
You're welcome. I've actually gotten accustomed to its foibles enough that it's my first choice when I just need to process one roll, but I still think most learners are better off starting out with a conventional tank system...
Thank you! I just mounted a new Reflx meter to my M3 and there was no manual in the box.
I bought the original PrimeFilm XA years ago and overall it is a pleasant experience. I use VueScan to scan raw tiff files and I have my process of inverting. For 35mm a dedicated 35mm scanner is the way to go. Once you learn the process you can get better scans than the lab (not counting Imacon or drum scans).
I want one. I just care about photography and don't need all the blah blah blah. But weather sealing would be nice.
I don't disagree that it would be nice, but I can't think of a time when I've ever actually needed it for the kinds of photography I do with the Pixii. I shot a lot of photos in the rain when I was in Chicago last summer, but I just stood under hotel awnings, shot out open windows, etc. and was fine. Obviously an outdoor or wildlife photographer would want a more weather-sealed camera!
Hi, great video. Would you know the angle that the sensor "lens" cover? Would it be something equivalent to a 50mm lens? Thanks again!
The specs say it covers about 45 degrees, while a 50mm lens on a 35mm film camera covers about 40 degrees (horizontally) so a bit wider. Keep in mind that these specs aren't necessarily based on any actual measurements! With mine I try to get as close as reasonably possible; if it's not possible to get close, I'll meter off a substitute subject. An old trick that still works is to hold your hand in the same light as the subject, meter off the palm of your hand, and then open up one stop from the reading (this usually works regardless of your racial background because palms are pretty uniform, BTW.)
Thanks for sharing this video and information. I received the messages 👍 ❤🎉
Thankyou!
Wish I can afford one 😂😂😂
Somebody should start a vintage camera rental business, like the ones now offered for vintage cars! Then curious photographers could try out older cameras that interested them. I can't imagine myself buying, for example, a Nikon SP, but it would be fun to be able to rent one for a couple of weeks to see what it was like...
For those who would try a Lab-Box, but are deterred by its huge price, know that you may be able to buy a Lab-Box for as little as $40 in hand. They are currently (April 2024) being sold on AliExpress (Chinese mega-mail order) for about $32. These may not even be knockoffs. Ars Imago designed the Lab-Box and funded by a Kickstarter, wherein they received about seven times the amount they sought. You'd think that would be the end of the story, but in fact they screwed the project up so badly that it had to be totally redone, some parts several times. Mainly, they couldn't figure out how to actually reproduce the prototypes in retail quantities, so they turned the entire manufacturing aspect over to a Chinese company to produce. That company had to redesign some of the parts so they could be economically made. In the end, Ars Imago ran out of money (amazing) to fully fund the project, so they cut down the offer a bit to get it out the door, screwing over their Kickstarter investors in the process. It looks like their Chinese manufacturer, probably in violation of its contract with Ars Imago, is now making more lab-Box production and selling it though AliExpress at bargain-basement prices. Note that these units do not appear to be copies, but look to be the real thing in every detail, for 20% of the Ars Imago price.
Thanks this helped a lot
Hi, I would be very happy if you would make a video about the Epson R-D1 again. The last ones are already quite old and a lot has happened with the software. Please have a video on how to improve the 6 megapixels in 2024!
Thanks, I'll look into it! I'm not sure how significant the improvements are to the latest Topaz Gigapixel (other than ease of use)... have you heard of anything else that's worth trying?
ive got a plusteck without the auto pulling thru. its ok. ive used hasselblad scanners in the past. my take is film photography is too expensive these days and not worth it. black and white yes maybe as theres nothing like it, but still deving film yourself etc is all slow and tedious. still i have my film cameras and the pull still exists. cheers
Yes to all. Having started in photography back when film was all there was, I'm pretty much over the it's-so-magical hype; shooting film is just an occasional amusement for me, so I want to take as much of the drudgery as possible out of it. I put a motor on my Ars Imago Lab-Box so I can do something else while developing, and I got the auto-pull-through Plustek so I can do something else while scanning, and so far that seems pretty manageable. The cost, though: yikes! Maybe I should be working on a way to print money 😹
This is just another case of photographers being snobs about things. Thanks for Shining Light on it. We really do take ourselves too seriously.
Thank you!!
私、持ってる~。型番似てるかも~
[Translation: “I have it - the model number may be similar”] Yes, it was in production for a very long time, so there are many versions with similar model numbers but different lenses, viewfinders, shutters, and additional features. The very earliest ones date back to the era of the Second World War, and each of those probably has an interesting history… if only it could be traced!”
The haters : I dont’care. JL Williams : i love this guy !
A fair and objective review indeed, it's great! Particularly like historical development portion and the comparison with the lens that is of similar designs. Obviously a 'simple' non-ASPH and non APO design is difficult to compete against the more sophisticated designs, in term of sharpness and abb. controls. But from photographic point of view, it offers an extra option for 'vintage' performances. Best if can improve the center sharpness while the mid session and corners can stay the way it is now. That will be a great performer in the 'vintage' type lens product.
fantastic review
I really like the Voigtlander VC II. It's so simple classic like my trusty Nikon F2SA the way it meters over under led. I was interested in the Gossen Digisix. What's your comparison on it besides size? I lole it's layout as I use the Gossen PrifiSix And what digital meter is that on far right the looks like a Minolta display?
Thank you for taking the time to create these Videos. I recently bought a Pixii myself and I think you are very much part of the reason I took the plunge and ordered it.
This is a good, in-depth video regarding these two light meters. The surprising thing for me is how popular other shoe-mounted light meters are in comparison to the Reflx Lab one. I think the biggest difference comes down to marketing. I didn't know the Reflx Lab one existed until I was browsing their site after looking at their flash. It seems to be the right one for me, I don't want an extra 2 dials nor the (- o +) style metering of the TTartisan. The smaller size is a bonus too. I'll be using one on my Nikon F. Anyhow, thanks for this video, these are basically the only two shoe-mounted meters I was considering based on the combined factors of price, size, and convenience.
Just bought a camera from the 60’s, its even dated with 1964 and the past owners name. now i will be loading it like this 😂
Great update video! Do you know of anywhere I can view some action shots? Between your ballet shots and mattais' equestrian and moving train pics I'm almost sold, I'd like to see more action shots close up (doesn't need to be I person)... On their site they have pics of skateboarders, but I can't find those anywhere... Mahalo in advance
That’s Matthias’ intro song!
Anyone care to explain why you can't have flash photography with the electronic shutter in the Pixii? The Z9 doesn't have a mechanical shutter either but it still can shoot flash photography. I do admire the gumption it takes to enter a realm where the big players have very deep pockets and many of them have decades of experience in the world of cameras and optics. I'd be surprised if Pixii makes any money on these bodies given the cost of R&D and the economy of scale. I'm certainly not in the market for a rangefinder camera ( there's a reason they fell out of favour once the SLR was invented) but I can appreciate those who find the charm in them.
Great review. No fillers and all good information
I've just bought the reflx lab meter and it's working great. I have a Konica s2 (meter not working) and a Konica autoflex T3 (also meter not working) and with the reflx lab in my pocket, I can use both cameras as one will have b&w and the other colour.
I use the black TT Artisan meter on my black Nikkormat FT2. It looks like it was made for it and I find it works great. Great video, thank you.
Wow. Going to use an Arduino to enable motor reversal every 30 seconds, but this concept is awesome. I stopped using my Lab Box because of this, now you have re-energised me. Thank you.
You're welcome! It's your call, but I'd be a bit hesitant about reversing the rotation every 30 seconds as I think the Lab-Box is designed for one-way rotation: if you look at the 35mm reel ends in particular, you'll see they've got agitation "paddles" around the outside, and if you reverse the direction there's a risk of splashing chemicals back up into the loading compartment and cutter blade. (Ask me how I know this 🙀) On the other hand, it might be a really worthwhile improvement to use the Arduino to pause the motor occasionally at random intervals, to help break up flow patterns that otherwise might cause developing streaks -- as shown in the video, I give the tank a sideways shake occasionally to do this, but having completely hands-off operation would be nice! If you complete this build, be sure to post up and let us know how it works! One more point about agitation: If you're using partial fill (300ml) as I do, you're already doing a form of intermittent agitation. The point of intermittent agitation (regardless of the type of tank) is that while the film is static, the developer immediately adjacent to the film surface performs development and then becomes depleted by chemical action; when you agitate, fresh developer is brought into contact with the film, and this depletion/replenishment cycle helps provide a compensating effect. In the Lab-box, the time the film is at the top of the reel corresponds to the static part of the cycle -- the thin coating of developer clinging to the film becomes depleted, and then is replaced when the reel rotates the film back down into the developer. Since you're already getting intermittent agitation just by this cycle, there may not be any benefit in reversing the reel... other than reducing the risk of flow marks, which also could be done just by stopping the reel for a moment occasionally. Anyway, be sure to let us know how this works out!
@@jlwilliams wow. What a thorough reply. Thank you. Your points are all very valid and the random pausing is very interesting. I could also reverse the motor for only, say, 90 degrees and then brake it and head forward once more. I can also reverse the motor very slowly as I’ve discovered that using the arduino motor shield Rev 3 I can alter the pulse width modulation and hence the effective voltage and also the direction. If you google ‘Controlling a DC Motor with Motor Shield Rev3’ you’ll see the very essence of what I’m thinking. I bought the lab box on the kickstarter project, but I develop a lot of film and very soon realised that it was impractical for the same reasons as you. Today I was clearing out some cupboards and found it. It’s really cold and miserable in the UK in January so I saw a project, then found this UA-cam video and now I’m fully onboard. I probably still won’t use the lab box as my mainline development tank but I love the journey and so you’ve really got me started. As for posting the project here, yes I certainly will but in essence it’s your mechanical design but with the motor controlled by software as seen in the document referenced in the Google search above. Thank you again. Wonderful.
@@jlwilliamsI typed a long response to this but UA-cam seems to have deleted both that response and the other message (which I expected to be deleted) where I gave the link to the arduino pdf re motor control. I give up.
@@jlwilliams but it was an appreciative response.
Good review, but some points you made are either obvious or kind of overstated (cost for example: I got mine for 180 dollars. You're going to spend over 100 dollars assembling all the parts you're going to need in a traditional set-up anyway. Photography isn't a cheap hobby to begin with, so that was kind of a mute point to me). As far as complexity and needing dexterity to develop a roll of film, I just don't see what the problem is. It couldn't be easier! To me, fumbling around in a changing bag where you can't see anything is a study in frustration. The rinsing and drying process is something you'd have to do in a more traditional set-up anyway, and the Lab -Box only has 8 parts. Granted, it's one roll at a time but if that's a problem for someone they are probably a more professional photographer and should have a more professional set-up. This thing took away all the trepidation I had in regard to developing my own film and the money I have saved by not sending my film to a lab to be developed has more than paid off. Also, it's made an already pleasurable hobby all the more enjoyable as I can do the whole process myself.
Glad it worked out for you. I admit that once I got used to its quirks, I started using mine more and more, and now it's all I use unless I need to process more than one roll at a time. Still, I think it was legit to point out the drawbacks. And for first-timers who discover they just don't enjoy developing film, it's easier to walk away from a $35 investment (typical price for a two-roll Paterson starter tank) than a $180 investment!
Rolling shutter is the drawback.
Yup, if I get hired to photograph the Formula I season next year, it's not the camera I'm going to use for track action. On the other hand, for normal human-speed activities, I don't typically notice any issues. And since it doesn't shoot video, no worries about the "jello effect"!
Nice and useful comparison - thanks for your work. Lovely camera... i hope to obtain one, but i'm afraid that my Oly E-1, which is also kinda magic, will hate me for the competition. Lkd&Subd. All the best from a cabin in a swamp in a rainforest in New Zealand.