Відео

Get a LOT more information such as geography and how to sound like a grown up before you waste anyone else's time.

Χαίρε ! Thank you

Thanks man👍🏼

The problem with that list of words is that they're not arranged in frequency order.

Anyone seen an equivalent document for Latin learning?

Thank you for your insight.

Imagine a text where one in five words is unknown. How much of the text would you really understand? According to the extensive research that has in fact been done on this subject, you need to know about 98% of words in a text in order to understand it well enough to guess the meaning of the remaining 2% unknown words. Depending on the text, and depending on the level of comprehension aimed for, you need a working vocabulary of somewhere between 5,000 and 10,000 words (which will translate to ~95-98% coverage) to read and roughly understand without using a dictionary. If you only know 2,000 words, almost any text written for native speakers will be gibberish to you. Don't get me wrong: it is a good idea to study the 2,000 most common words, just so long as you understand how far it will really take you. Knowing four out of five words may make it easier to focus on that fifth unknown word, but since in most cases that word is crucial for comprehension, you really need more. In fact, in my view it's a good idea to learn using frequency lists until you're at about 4,000-5,000 words. After that though, an interesting empirical phenomenon called Zipf's law start kicking in, which means that almost any unknown word you'll encounter will be a rare one. At this point, frequency lists become both hard to produce and practically useless. With 95% comprehension, it is possible to (slowly) read authentic texts though, and from this point on the best strategy is to read, read, read as much as possible, without caring too much about explicit vocabulary study. Because now almost any unknown word is in fact a rare one, you need to read a lot (think several books) to even meet it once again, and so actually acquiring such words (which only happens when you repeatedly meet them in different contexts, about seven times for most people) becomes utterly dependent on a very large amount of reading. 💜🖤

Thank you what a great help! There are books around, like Jerry Toner's. Some of them are relatively cheap, but this list looks really useful and especially since you have organised them in manageable groups like this. A wonderful resource and so many of us are deeply indebted to (often) younger students who take time to put such lists together and make them available. Again, thank you.

I took a picture with this when I went to Manchester

Great thanks

The following is an extract from: Fragments (Pseudo-Peter) ch5.7 Written by Peter the Bishop of Alexandria It was written some time between 300-311AD whilst Christianity was still illegal and widely persecuted though not as a formal persecution as before. Over the following 2 years, Constantine would convert and legalise. Here is what St. Peter of Alexandria wrote: ‘…as John, the divine and evangelist, teaches us in the Gospel written by him, […] and the copy itself that was written by the hand of the evangelist, which, by the divine grace, has been preserved in the most holy church of Ephesus, and is there adored by the faithful…’ In 300 we have the original John and there is every reason to believe its preservation continued. All of our early John manuscripts (including the 4 complete NT manuscripts) match almost word perfectly (with the obvious exception of the beginning of John 8) to what we have today and it is hardly a stretch to date: P5 P6 P22 P28 P39 P45 P52 P66 P75 P80 P90 P95 P106 Códex Alexandrinus Códex Vaticanus Códex Sinaiticas All before the loss of the original Gospel according to John. The level of agreement and the fact these manuscripts are not all related shows the level of preservation and how well we can trust that, even if the wording is not exact, we have a fantastic reason (every reason in fact) to believe we possess the words and teachings of Jesus and the apostles as passed down by the NT writers.

HUGE RESOURCE! Thank you so much for sharing the PDF AND adding it in to Quizlet! Invaluable study tool.

I think Joseph already had sons and these were his brothers because of that relationship. I can't remember what book it is but it talks about how Joseph got picked to take care of Mary. If I remember right Joseph was a widow and already had sons.

gangsta

People have the original Scriptures in a Paleo Hebrew book. They have it in the museum. They don't want anybody to know about it.there is one guy that has it if u pay the right price

Thank you so much!

Switzerland postal union to international stamp treaties to arrogant jackasses pretending to understand starting to chap my ass . Play you understand the world and clueless about this country

What any of you feel.you the hope for the man of understanding ? False prophets if keep it up. Deaf when spoke plain now you can test this moment and don't know how to .play you make it up decide if passed it or play is no test debate educated guessers unknown lie exactly lies telling self to believe unknown to play known to the ALL and not even close

What arrogant educated guessers unknown to even self deceiving self and others injust self and others unknown pretend to be known deaf pretend to hear blind pretend to see what is a false prophet these days

Thanks! I want to translate them to spanish, by any chance do you have them on an Excel format? That would make the task o lot easier.

Please how can we compare and contrast speculative and analytic philosophy of history?

Thank you

Thank you

An awesome piece is up on Catholic Answers by Tim Staples titled Why Did John Write His Gospel.

I like Blacks book. It goes through the easiest concept first and graduates to harder concepts later on. So it's really easy to go through the book.

@JD Reiner McCane, of course, explained why he considered the Mishna reliable here: burial customs are among the slowest to change. This is classic Craig, misread your source and point out a problem that only exist in your misreading. Deuteronomy wasn't written in Jesus lifetime either, yet you can bet Craig would be all to happy to cite it when he discusses Jesus burial.

This is garbage blasphemy inspired by satan and written by possest human in attempt to confuse the correct books inspired by GOD JESUS!!!!

Wow. Thanks!

You are fucking amazing, thank you!

Very interesting… Thank you… I heard about Manuscripts found in construction of the Aswan Dam

this is great.

Rumor was Cerinthus wrote the Revelation.

Thanks for this analysis. I received a message from the departed to read this text.

A question I've had for a while is why does st Paul state he appeared to peter then to the twelve, then the 500 brethren, THEN JAMES AND TO ALL APOSTLES. Is James not the 12? And why is he included with the apostles as if he is the first apostle after the 12 or something. How does this make sense considering the 12 ARE the apostles then we have bishops then priest then deacons/deaconesses. Was there more than 12 apostles? According to gnostic christians it seems to be so. But why? this doesn't seem to be confirming Orthodoxy at all or any branch of it but Gnosticism. Theres a book ive been meaning to pick up called the office of the apostle in early Christianity to study this further but could i possibly get your thoughts on this brother?

It's always a time of learning from you. Thank you, my friend. Keep on doing what you are doing.

Promo'SM

Jeremy Duff's book "The Elements of the New Testament Greek" is also a good book for the beginners.

I also cannot find another video on it at all nice work friend!

Super cool! I have never heard of this gospel before! Very very recent find! Please go more into this text good brother! Great work love it!

Thanks for doing stuff on Possessionist Christology I find the topic very odd yet fascinating

The "th" in the name McGrath is silent. Ask any Irish person

Thw Christian single pillar: sola scriptura.

I love and much appreciate your work brother! Do you think that the gospels which put Christ's last words as "my God, my God, why have you forsaken me" could be sourced in gnostic Possessionist Christology? As in the Christ left Jesus on the cross because gnostics saw the holy spirit as Sophia if I'm remembering right. This could also be why Paul addresses in an epistle that we shouldn't damn Jesus and worship Christ if I'm also remembering right.

W video

Good and clear points.

Would a Galilean have had access to a family tomb in Jerusalem?

"They do things in pretty much the same way, as far as the formal structure of the church goes." What does this even mean? Because I see VAST differences between the Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox churches...

Great work!

very well researched, yeah some have said 90, some have said 125 some have said third century... curious if you can actually read greek. glad to see your interested in things like linguistics and new testament textual transmission...

This is great 👍🏻 thanks for your commentary