Відео

@@graegoles8382 I have not yet, tbh I've been covered up with work and other non car projects.. but it's still on the list to circle around to

Thanks for the headsup ​@@linuxman51, if you ever get arpumd to it it would be immensely helpful.

indeed. they didn't mess me up when I moved the hive to its final location so there is that

I don't think so, it was like 5 and 5, I used this kit: www.5speeds.com/cart/index.php?route=product/product&path=75_84&product_id=179

balancing? lol. ua-cam.com/video/MrAQbNJx9BU/v-deo.htmlsi=9X92w9xJM9VXOVyh it happily spun up to 8500 quite a few times and is no worse for the wear... but currently residing on an engine stand after the car itself was retired.

🤣

Covid was made in a lab my guy. Let me guess you took the fake vaccine too

This a shared behavior among all parents. A truly fascinating species.

Bracken cave in / near San Antonio, TX. adjacent to Natural Bridge caverns

Ok

at 200 the trans will be fine. once you start moving past 250 you'll definitely want a better than oem trans cooler setup and you'll want to be careful in overdrive, and pretty much once you get past 300whp it becomes a service item whose frequency depends on how you drive.

it fits a 240, so there is that

@@linuxman51 so does a stock turbo manifold - lots of room under the manifold not being used, runner #3 could have went under for better 8v plug clearance - but I'm just an armchair quarterback atm

need to eh? all these teaser videos and no substance

I do not have gaskets in there, so that would move it out some.

tapped on the injectors, checked for spark, put a jump pack on it to get the cranking rpms up, and discovered the ignitor had gotten knocked loose. plugged that in and it fired right up.

Nice! She purrs like a kitten

cam and longtubes

@Kenny Howard Thanks. I'm hoping to get A Decent number with mine. But I don't know what the normal cammed 5.3 numbers are

there's a short version of the video for that.

this may help: www.5speeds.com/cart/index.php?route=product/product&product_id=101&search=doug+nash but in his videos he talks about using rtv or similar to seal the pans from the factory. I haven't filled this one yet (still working on this swap, getting down to crunch time) but hopefully it doesn't leak 😀

@@linuxman51 just be careful when you torque down the pan bolts. Those threads are so soft and strip out easily. In the case you do, you can use a longer bolt and catch the threads up in the case. I striped out 3 bolts.

that's subject to debate, probably not at the very low boost level this test was run at. I would like to verify (or deny) that, but I don't have any straight chunks of 3in piping laying around to do the test with.

I search eBay intercooler because, without having taken it out and thoroughly inspected it, I think I have a leak. I’m running a Borg Warner S475 and a fresh motor. It won’t build boost until about 4500 rpm.

we talked about it

it's fairly basic as far as engine mods go.. some lightish port work and chamber work, what is thought to be an early ipd cam (but who knows), b230f bottom end and a small t04e turbo

I thought we had a video for that test, here's the thread with all the pictures and what not. forums.turbobricks.com/showthread.php?t=358795&highlight=intercooler+test I'll dig around and see if I have any video, I think it might have been one of those I thought sam was doing it and he thought I was doing it kind of things, so no one did it

k24 from a v70r

I think it'll actually go up a bit as the tune comes around. I did not spend any time adjusting ignition timing for the ipd cam for the purposes of this test, so I imagine it'll pick up some more (how much? who knows, will do a video for that a little later). occasionally I hear what sounds like excessive lash on one, and I've got an oil leak in the top end to track down, so I'll go back in now that I'm not soaked and sweaty and check some things out and tidy it up a bit.

no, the Garrett core benefits (possibly/probably greatly) from different end tanks that are more conducive to even distribution across the core. I have some ideas that I'm working on, I'll post a video when I get to the testing phase

@@linuxman51 looking forward to the results.

certainly. also pre and post intercooler air temperature readings would be nice too.

@@linuxman51 so where is the wastegate source from, pre or post intercooler?

@@mihailpetrovici5044 it's mentioned in the video (I thought), compressor cover, so pre-intercooler.

@@linuxman51 didn't get it, thanks. So probably the intercooler is less eficient and that increase in 1-2 psi of pressure stacked before the intercooler opens the wastegate earlier

@@mihailpetrovici5044 that's what I was thinking as well

If it'd been a more planned out test instead of the ad-hoc experiment-leads-to-test that it was, there are a couple of things I'd like to have done differenly... I would like pre and post intercooler map sensor readings, pre and post intercooler air temp readings (that aren't greatly skewed by the heatsoaking going on with the intake manifold), and like I said in the video, initially I didn't think about the end-tank design, however in an attempt to a) reconcile a false assertion and b) solve the issue both for my own edification and ultimately the customer's horse power goals. I have some ideas, I may see if I've got enough scrap stuff laying around to modify the other ebay intercooler (not the one used in the test, the one that was included as a talking point) re-shape how air enters and leaves it. the air going through is not just using the bottom 1/3rd, the top of the core was warm as well, but if one considers how air might flow through, I wouldn't expect significant airflow to go through the rest until the bottom 1/3 is essentially choked off. the resulting turbulence I imagine is what is creating a lot of this pressure drop

@@linuxman51 if you put an aluminum can in 1" of hot water the top will eventually get warm as the heat spreads through the can. The whole IC being warm is not necessarily an indication of the air flowing through the core. I would imagine you could maintain a steady engine load (airflow) and see a similar result

@@JohnDoe-mx1sq no doubt, for this though I didn't really leave them on the car for a ton of radiant heat to get spread around. regardless, from an airflow perspective these end tanks do leave a lot to be desired.

the garrett core is just shy of 5 inches thick, the other two are roughly 3 inches thick, even though the one with smaller inlets looks narrower. I hacked it up for a quick(ish) and dirty(ish) end tank modification to see if my thought process is in the right place.