Відео

Yes, opinions vary. He is 4.0 rated by USTA and keeping over 60% wins every year at that level. Ofcourse, this match doesn’t reflect his skill as MEP nullified his serves and backhand slices, buildup nerves high on this short 1 set match.

Yes, if you are around us in Massachusetts. You are welcome to join. 😀

😂😂

It was a windy day. Also l believe MEP level increased in recent years much better

Yes, Ian from essential tennis shown that. But unless, it’s your natural game, it’s all about few moments that MEP wait for you to miss and keep testing your patience and confidence on coming on net.

Which one?

Which one?

"Kyrgios" dude

Yes,he has such a low toss, but hits on right areas, that reduce reaction time for opponents. It video, it looks easy serves. I seen many people struggle, We call him Kyrgios serve from dollertree.

Thanks for your generous comment. I user vcore 98 with solinco confidential strings (similar to solinco hyper-g) poly.

Ah, interesting. Thanks for that. I’m considering the VCore 100. So hard to decide n a new racket.

Do you like to see more of it? Stopped during winter in MA. Now, not publishing much

It’s friendly match play. Thanks for your support.

I thought to same. We had similar player who had several wins at 4.5 USTA level. But Ben beat him 6-2 comfortably. So I don’t take anyone’s word unless you have played against him. Did you ever played him?

feels crazy! especially when it's humid and glass filled with fog. But i have some ant-fog cleaners that i use during humid days, it helps a bit. Thanks for commenting.

🙏🙏

Glad you enjoyed it. 👍

MEP Boston USTA rating is 4.5. But I see him either losing quick or winning with dominant score. I believe it’s about whether opponent knows how to handle his playstyle, low slices.

Thanks for your feedback. Will take care in future videos.

4.0 is equivalent to UTR atleast 6.0 level. This player have over 60% win in UTR 6.0 level matches. But MEP style test our patience sometimes, it’s all about you are able to keep you level matters.

😂😂😂😁

Music is there only for quick highlights that comes in first minute. Rest all just the ball sound once match starts.. 👍👍

Yes, he is self thought player. Definitely serve mechanics needs some corrections.

Roberto.

I know. that why it’s 3.5; hopefully improving second serves & consistency to become 4.0 this year. 😁👍

@@tamiltennisdiary as a 2.5 your level is what i can only hope to be at lol

👍👍

Winner! It’s a shot that of painting the line.

I guess No. I see Roberto show hand signal as out on that point. 👍

Yes! Point start at 10:45. Interestingly he had exactly point play 3 times in this match and both player produced same shots and point ended in almost same way.

Yes, it is. Countless winners from both players. Thanks for commenting. 😊

Yes, he plays 4.5 leagues. They played league stage of tournament match. So players get chance to play different levels. Appreciate your comment.

May be that’s because Njogu giving good topspin height!

There was a serve that almost hit him; crazy serves. Thiem 2.0 served 135 KM serve just like a pro!

true! He returns most of the served back; no easy serve points for opponent.

Thanks Kevin. Yes, Ashok’s slices are nasty and throw me out of my comfort several times in this match.

Thanks Bill! Ashok is good in the way he plays. Also very comfortably neutralized my shots with his slices. Converting few of those crucial points in my way would have given me a W. But happy with my game. Hopefully, I will go further deep in next year’s tournament.

That’s useful. Will try to work on that. 👍

Thank you captain!

What do you mean by that? Do you think they are lower than 3.5 or higher?

IMO 3.5 seems fair. All 4 exhibit at times very strong shot making ability across all their strokes. All 4 also however would at times make wildly errant shots. That lack of consistency and reliability in their strokes is a good delineation between 3.5 and 4.0. Ratings are all relative to wins vs how good/bad your technique looks though, so obviously everything w/ a grain of salt. If I had to be critical toward anything regarding a 3.5 rating, a couple of the players had particularly slow second serves. Footwork and technique at the net at times was also very dodgy for all 4 if the ball wasn’t coming in straight and at chest level. All in all though, some shaky technique and some lack of consistency is expected at 3.5.

Looks like mid level 3.5 to me.